Degree of joint risk factor control and premature mortality in hypertensive participants

Jian Zhou , Minghao Kou , Rui Tang , Xuan Wang , Hao Ma , Xiang Li , Yoriko Heianza , Lu Qi

Precision Clinical Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2) : pbaf006

PDF (1009KB)
Precision Clinical Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2) :pbaf006 DOI: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbaf006
Research Article
research-article

Degree of joint risk factor control and premature mortality in hypertensive participants

Author information +
History +
PDF (1009KB)

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether the excess premature mortality risk related to hypertension could be reduced or eliminated through joint risk factor control.

Methods: A total of 70 898 hypertensive participants and 224 069 matched non-hypertensive participants without cancer or cardiovascular disease (CVD) at baseline were included and followed from 2006 to 2022. The degree of joint risk factor control was evaluated based on the major cardiovascular risk factors, including blood pressure, body mass index, waist circumference, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, glycated haemoglobin, albuminuria, smoking, and physical activity. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the relationship between degree of risk factor control and premature mortality.

Results: Each additional risk factor control was associated with a 15%, 12%, 24%, and 11% lower risk of premature all-cause mortality, premature cancer mortality, premature CVD mortality, and premature other mortality, respectively. Optimal risk factor control (≥6 risk factors) was associated with a 55% [hazard ratio (HR): 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40-0.51], 50% (HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.41-0.60), 67% (HR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.26-0.42), and 50% (HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.40-0.62) lower risk of premature all-cause mortality, premature cancer mortality, premature CVD mortality, and premature other mortality, respectively. Hypertensive participants with 3, 2, 4, and 2 or more controlled risk factors showed no excess risk of premature all-cause mortality, premature cancer mortality, premature CVD mortality, and premature other mortality, respectively, compared to matched non-hypertensive participants.

Conclusions: In this cohort study of UK Biobank participants, degree of joint risk factor control shows gradient inverse association with risk of premature mortality in hypertensive participants; optimal risk factor control may eliminate hypertension-related excess risk of premature mortality.

Keywords

hypertensive participants / risk factor control / premature mortality / UK Biobank

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jian Zhou, Minghao Kou, Rui Tang, Xuan Wang, Hao Ma, Xiang Li, Yoriko Heianza, Lu Qi. Degree of joint risk factor control and premature mortality in hypertensive participants. Precision Clinical Medicine, 2025, 8(2): pbaf006 DOI:10.1093/pcmedi/pbaf006

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (Grant Nos. HL071981, HL034594, HL126024), the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (Grant Nos. DK115679, DK091718, DK100383, DK078616), and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (Grant Nos. 2P20GM109036-06A1, Sub-Project ID 7233). The study funders/sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk) under Application Number 29256.

Author contributions

Jian Zhou (Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing), Minghao Kou (Writing - review & editing), Rui Tang (Writing - review & editing), Xuan Wang (Writing - review & editing), Hao Ma (Writing - review & editing), Xiang Li (Writing - review & editing), Yoriko Heianza (Writing - review & editing), and Lu Qi (Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing - review & editing).

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at PCMEDI Journal online.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Ethics and consent to participate

The UK Biobank study was approved by the National Health and Social Care Information Management Board and the North West Multicentre Research Ethics Committee (No. 11/NW/0382) and the Institutional Review Board of Tulane University (No. 2018-1872).

Data availability

This study was conducted using the UK Biobank Resource, approved project number 29256. The UK Biobank will make the source data available to all bona fide researchers for all types of health-related research that is in the public interest, without preferential or exclusive access for any persons. All researchers will be subject to the same application process and approval criteria as specified by UK Biobank. For more details on the access procedure, see the UK Biobank website: https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk.

References

[1]

NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 populationrepresentative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet 2021;398:957-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01330-1.

[2]

Mills KT, Bundy JD, Kelly TN et al. Global Disparities of hypertension prevalence and control: A systematic analysis of population-based studies from 90 countries. Circulation 2016;134:441-50. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018912.

[3]

Unger T, Borghi C, Charchar F et al. 2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines. Hypertension 2020;75:1334-57. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15026.

[4]

World Health Organization (WHO). Hypertension. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hypertension. (16 March 2023, date last accessed).

[5]

Kou M, Wang X, Ma H et al. Degree of joint risk factor control and incident heart failure in hypertensive patients. JACC Heart Fail 2023;11:678-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2023.01.006.

[6]

Yang WY, Melgarejo JD, Thijs L et al. Association of office and ambulatory blood pressure with mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. JAMA 2019;322:409-20. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.9811.

[7]

Carter BD, Abnet CC, Feskanich D et al. Smoking and mortalitybeyond established causes. N Engl J Med 2015;372:631-40. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1407211.

[8]

Liu Y, Coresh J, Eustace JA et al. Association between cholesterol level and mortality in dialysis patients: role of inflammation and malnutrition. JAMA 2004;291:451-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.4.451.

[9]

Matsushita K, van der Velde M, Astor BC et al. Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis. Lancet 2010;375:2073-81.

[10]

Bhaskaran K, Dos-Santos-Silva I, Leon DA et al. Association of BMI with overall and cause-specific mortality: a populationbased cohort study of 3.6 million adults in the UK. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018;6:944-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30288-2.

[11]

Lv Y, Zhang Y, Li X et al. Body mass index, waist circumference, and mortality in subjects older than 80 years: a mendelian randomization study. EUR HEART J 2024;45:2145-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae206.

[12]

Khaw KT, Wareham N, Luben R et al. Glycated haemoglobin, diabetes, and mortality in men in Norfolk cohort of european prospective investigation of cancer and nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk). BMJ 2001;322:15-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7277.15.

[13]

Lear SA, Hu W, Rangarajan S et al. The effect of physical activity on mortality and cardiovascular disease in 130000 people from 17 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: the PURE study. Lancet 2017;390:2643-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31634-3.

[14]

Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzen S et al. Range of risk factor levels: control, mortality, and cardiovascular outcomes in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Circulation 2017;135:1522-31. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025961.

[15]

Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzen S et al. Risk factors, mortality, and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2018;379:633-44. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1800256.

[16]

Sudlow C, Gallacher J, Allen N et al. UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLOS MED 2015;12:e1001779. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779.

[17]

Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. EUR HEART J 2018;39:3021-104. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.

[18]

World Health Organization. Waist Circumference and Waist-hip Ratio: Report of a Who Expert Consultation. Geneva, 2011. Available: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/44583.

[19]

Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM et al. The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. JAMA 2018;320:2020-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.14854.

[20]

Johnson NB, Hayes LD, Brown K et al. CDC National Health Report: leading causes of morbidity and mortality and associated behavioral risk and protective factors—United States, 2005-2013. MMWR Suppl 2014;63:3-27.

[21]

Li ZH, Gao X, Chung VC et al. Associations of regular glucosamine use with all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a large prospective cohort study. ANN RHEUM DIS 2020;79:829-36. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217176.

[22]

Wang M, Zhou T, Song Y et al. Joint exposure to various ambient air pollutants and incident heart failure: a prospective analysis in UK Biobank. EUR HEART J 2021;42:1582-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1031.

[23]

Wang M, Zhou T, Song Q et al. Ambient air pollution, healthy diet and vegetable intakes, and mortality: a prospective UK Biobank study. INTJ EPIDEMIOL 2022;51:1243-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyac022.

[24]

Oparil S, Acelajado MC, Bakris GL et al. Hypertension. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2018;4:18014. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2018.14.

[25]

Gaede P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving HH et al. Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:580-91. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0706245.

[26]

Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N et al. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2003;348:383-93. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa021778.

[27]

Bilous R, Chaturvedi N, Sjolie AK et al. Effect of candesartan on microalbuminuria and albumin excretion rate in diabetes: three randomized trials. ANN INTERN MED 2009;151:11-20, W3-W4. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-1-200907070-00120.

[28]

Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D et al. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2001;345:861-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa011161.

[29]

Zannad F, Rossignol P. Cardiorenal syndrome revisited. Circulation 2018;138:929-44. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028814.

[30]

Rangaswami J, Bhalla V, Blair J et al. Cardiorenal Syndrome: classification, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment strategies: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2019;139:e840-78. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.00000000 00000664.

[31]

Xu G, Liu B, Sun Y et al. Prevalence of diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetes among US adults in 2016 and 2017: population based study. BMJ 2018;362:k1497. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k1497.

[32]

QuickStats: prevalence of high total cholesterol* among adults aged >/=20 years,(dagger) by age group and sex-National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2015-2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020; 69:690.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1009KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/