The relationship between contact lens ultraviolet light transmittance and myopia progression: a large-scale retrospective cohort study

Hiroyuki Okada , Masao Yoshida , Masaki Takeuchi , Eiichi Okada , Nobuhisa Mizuki

Precision Clinical Medicine ›› 2024, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) : pbae022

PDF (968KB)
Precision Clinical Medicine ›› 2024, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) :pbae022 DOI: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbae022
Research Article
research-article

The relationship between contact lens ultraviolet light transmittance and myopia progression: a large-scale retrospective cohort study

Author information +
History +
PDF (968KB)

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of myopia is increasing dramatically around the world, and many studies have suggested the possibility that ultraviolet (UV) light is effective to prevent the onset and progression of myopia. However, UV is a risk factor for diseases that cause refractive errors such as cataract and pterygium. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between UV exposure and myopia progression.

Methods: The dataset consisted of a total of 337 396 eyes of patients in the 12-to-29-year age range, who were prescribed soft contact lenses (SCL) for refractive error at Okada Eye Clinic in Japan between 2002 and 2011. They were tracked over a five-year period and did not change the type of SCL. In this retrospective cohort study based on medical records, we divided patients into two groups, one prescribed SCL with UV protection (UV-SCL), and another prescribed SCL without UV protection (UV + SCL).

Results: Change in refractive power over five years was measured and results compared. It was −0.413 diopter (D) in the UV-SCL group and −0.462 D in the UV + SCL group. Thus, the progression of myopia was slower in the UV-SCL group. The results were also analyzed separately by gender and degree of myopia at the time of initial prescription, which all showed significant differences (P< 0.001).

Conclusion: Results suggest that UV exposure may advance myopia. Further research is needed to investigate the underlying mechanisms that could explain this.

Keywords

ultraviolet / myopia / progression / cohort study / contact lens

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hiroyuki Okada, Masao Yoshida, Masaki Takeuchi, Eiichi Okada, Nobuhisa Mizuki. The relationship between contact lens ultraviolet light transmittance and myopia progression: a large-scale retrospective cohort study. Precision Clinical Medicine, 2024, 7(4): pbae022 DOI:10.1093/pcmedi/pbae022

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgements

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. We sincerely thank all the study participants and the medical staff involved in the diagnoses and data collection. Refractive power data was provided by Okada Eye Clinic.

Author contributions

H.O., M.T., E.O., and N.M. : Conceptualization; E.O. and H.O.: Funding Acquisition; H.O. : Writing-Original Draft; H.O., M.Y., and E.O.: Visualization, and Data Curation; H.O., M.Y., M.T., E.O., and N.M. : Writing-Review & Editing. All authors have given final approval for the submission and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data is available at PCMEDI Journal online.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Ethics approval

This study followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by Yokohama City University Ethics Committee (2023-022). The Ethics Committee waived the need for informed consent due to the retrospective, observational, and anonymous nature of this study, according to the Ethical Guideline for Clinical Research issued by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan.

Data availability

Data used in this study was obtained from the refractive power of soft contact lenses database, which is managed by Okada Eye Clinic. The society allows members to use the data for scientific research but does not allow anyone to share original data publicly.

References

[1]

Stone RA, Tobias JW, Wei W et al. Diurnal retinal and choroidal gene expression patterns support a role for circadian biology in myopia pathogenesis. Sci Rep 2024;14:533. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50684-2.

[2]

Sankaridurg P, Tahhan N, Kandel H et al. IMI impact of myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2021;62:2. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.62.5.2.

[3]

Saw SM, Gazzard G, Shih-Yen EC et al. Myopia and associated pathological complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005;25:38191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00298.x.

[4]

Koh V, Yang A, Saw SM et al. Differences in prevalence of refractive errors in young Asian males in Singapore between 1996-1997 and 2009-2010. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2014;21:247-55. https://doi.org/10.3109/09286586.2014.928824.

[5]

Vitale S, Sperduto RD, Ferris FL 3rd. Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971-1972 and 19992004. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:1632-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.303.

[6]

Williams KM, Verhoeven VJ, Cumberland P et al. Prevalence of refractive error in Europe: the European Eye Epidemiology (E(3)) Consortium. Eur J Epidemiol 2015;30:305-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-015-0010-0.

[7]

Saw SM. A synopsis of the prevalence rates and environmental risk factors for myopia. Clin Exp Optom 2003;86:289-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.2003.tb03124.x.

[8]

Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology 2016;123:1036-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006.

[9]

Morgan I, Rose K. How genetic is school myopia? Prog Retin Eye Res 2005;24:1-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.06.004.

[10]

Tay MT, Au Eong KG, Ng CY et al. Myopia and educational attainment in 421,116 young Singaporean males. Ann Acad Med Singap 1992;21:785-91.

[11]

You Y, Fu J, Xu M et al. Prevalence of refractive error among Chinese preschool children: the Changsha children eye study. Front Public Health 2022;10:1019816. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.20 22.1019816.

[12]

French AN, Ashby RS, Morgan IG et al. Time outdoors and the prevention of myopia. Exp Eye Res 2013;114:58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2013.04.018.

[13]

French AN, Morgan IG, Mitchell P et al. Risk factors for incident myopia in Australian schoolchildren: the Sydney adoles-cent vascular and eye study. Ophthalmology 2013;120:2100-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.035.

[14]

Guggenheim JA, Northstone K, McMahon G et al. Time outdoors and physical activity as predictors of incident myopia in childhood: a prospective cohort study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:2856-65. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-9091.

[15]

He M, Xiang F, Zeng Y et al. Effect of time spent outdoors at school on the development of myopia among children in China: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015;314:1142-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10803.

[16]

Rose KA, Morgan IG, Ip J et al. Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence of myopia in children. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1279-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.12.019.

[17]

Ip JM, Saw SM, Rose KA et al. Role of near work in myopia: findings in a sample of Australian school children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:2903-10. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-0804.

[18]

Ashby R, Ohlendorf A, Schaeffel F. The effect of ambient illuminance on the development of deprivation myopia in chicks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:5348-54. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-3419.

[19]

Ashby RS, Schaeffel F. The effect of bright light on lens compensation in chicks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:5247-53. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-4689.

[20]

Torii H, Kurihara T, Seko Y et al. Violet light exposure can be a preventive strategy against myopia progression. EBioMedicine 2017;15;210-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.12.007.

[21]

Wang M, Schaeffel F, Jiang B et al. Effects of light of different spectral composition on refractive development and retinal dopamine in chicks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2018;59;4413-24. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-23880.

[22]

Krutmann J, Béhar-Cohen F, Baillet G et al. Towards standardization of UV eye protection: what can be learned from photodermatology? Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2014;30:128-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12089.

[23]

Ivanov IV, Mappes T, Schaupp P et al. Ultraviolet radiation oxidative stress affects eye health. J Biophotonics 2018;11:e201700377. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201700377.

[24]

Takeuchi M, Akira Meguro A, Yoshida M et al. Longitudinal analysis of five-year refractive changes in a large Japanese population. Sci Rep 2022;12:2879. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06898-X.

[25]

Wolffsohn JS, Dhallu S, Aujla M et al. International multi-centre study of potential benefits of ultraviolet radiation protection using contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2022;45:101593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2022.101593.

[26]

Mori K, Torii H, Hara Y et al. Effect of violet light-transmitting eyeglasses on axial elongation in myopic children: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med 2021;10:5462. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225462.

[27]

Foulds WS, Barathi VA, Luu CD. Progressive myopia or hyperopia can be induced in chicks and reversed by manipulation of the chromaticity of ambient light. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54:8004-12. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-12476.

[28]

Strickland R, Landis EG, Pardue MT. Short-wavelength (violet) light protects mice from myopia through cone signaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2020;61:13. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.2.13.

[29]

Zou L, Zhu X, Liu R et al. Effect of altered retinal cones/opsins on refractive development under monochromatic lights in guinea pigs. J Ophthalmol 2018;2018:9197631. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9197631.

[30]

Jiang X, Pardue MT, Mori K et al. Violet light suppresses lensinduced myopia via neuropsin (OPN5) in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2021;118:e2018840118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2018840118.

[31]

Jiang L, Zhang S, Schaeffel F et al. Interactions of chromatic and lens-induced defocus during visual control of eye growth in guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus). Vision Res 2014: 94:24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.10.020.

[32]

Qian YF, Liu R, Dai JH et al. Transfer from blue light or green light to white light partially reverses changes in ocular refraction and anatomy of developing guinea pigs. J Vis 2013;13:16. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.11.16.

[33]

Liu R, Qian YF, He JC et al. Effects of different monochromatic lights on refractive development and eye growth in guinea pigs. Exp Eye Res 2011;92:447-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2011.03.003.

[34]

Long Q, Chen D, Chu R. Illumination with monochromatic long-wavelength light promotes myopic shift and ocular elongation in newborn pigmented guinea pigs. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2009;28:176-80. https://doi.org/10.3109/15569520903178364.

[35]

Kröger RH, Fernald RD. Regulation of eye growth in the African cichlid fish haplochromis burtoni Vision Res 1994;34:1807-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(94)90305-0.

[36]

Hung LF, Arumugam B, She Z et al. Narrow-band, longwavelength lighting promotes hyperopia and retards visioninduced myopia in infant rhesus monkeys. Exp Eye Res 2018: 176:147-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2018.07.004.

[37]

Gawne TJ, Siegwart JT, Jr, Ward AH et al. The wavelength composition and temporal modulation of ambient lighting strongly affect refractive development in young tree shrews. Exp Eye Res 2017: 155:75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2016.12.004.

[38]

Gawne TJ, Ward AH, Norton TT. Long-wavelength (red) light produces hyperopia in juvenile and adolescent tree shrews. Vision Res 2017: 140:55-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2017.07.011.

[39]

Liu R, Hu M, He JC et al. The effects of monochromatic illumination on early eye development in rhesus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:1901-9. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-12276.

[40]

Xiong S, Sankaridurg P, Naduvilath T et al. Time spent in outdoor activities in relation to myopia prevention and control: a metaanalysis and systematic review. Acta ophthalmol 2017;95:551-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13403.

[41]

Parssinen O, Lassila E, Kauppinen M. Associations of children's close reading distance and time spent indoors with myopia, based on parental questionnarie. Children(Basel) 2022;9:632. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9050632.

[42]

Alvarez-Peregrina C, Sanchez-Tena MA, Martinez-Perez C et al. The relationship between screen and outdoor time rates of myopia in spanish children. Front Public Health 2020;8:560378. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.560378.

[43]

Rose KA, Morgan IG, Smith W et al. Myopia, lifestyle, and schooling in students of Chinese ethnicity in Singapore and Sydney. Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:527-30. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.126.4.527.

[44]

Ye B, Liu K, Cao S et al. Discrimination of indoor versus outdoor environmental state with machine learning algorithms in myopia observational studies. J Transl Med 2019;17:314. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-2057-2.

[45]

Li T, Zhou X, Zhu J et al. Effect of cycloplegia on the measurement of refractive error in Chinese children. Clin Exp Optom 2019;102:160-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12829.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (968KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/