Computer assessment of the composition of a generic wound by image processing

Rohit Nayak , Pramod Kumar , Ramesh R. Galigekere

Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2015, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) : 261 -5.

PDF
Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2015, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) :261 -5. DOI: 10.4103/2347-9264.165444
Original Article
Original Article

Computer assessment of the composition of a generic wound by image processing

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Aim: This paper addresses the assessment of the composition of a general wound, in terms of all identifiable categories of tissue and pigmentation in an attempt to improve accuracy in assessing and monitoring wound health.

Methods: A knowledgebase of clusters was built into the hue, saturation and intensity (HSI) color space and then used for assessing wound composition. Based on the observation that the clusters are fairly distinct, two different algorithms: i.e., Mahalanobis distance (MD) based and the rotated coordinate system (RCS) method, were used for classification. These methods exploit the shape, spread and orientation of each cluster.

Results: The clusters in the HSI color space, built from about 9,000 (calibrated) pixels from 48 images of various wound beds, showed 8 fairly distinct regions. The inter-cluster distances were consistent with the visual appearance. The efficacy of the MD and RCS based methods, in 120 experiments taken from a set of 15 test images (in terms of average percent-match), was found to be 91.55 and 93.71, respectively.

Conclusion: Our investigations establish 8 categories of tissue and pigmentation in wound beds. These findings help to determine the stage of wound healing more accurately and comprehensively than typically permitted through use of the 4-color model reported in the literature for addressing specific wound types.

Keywords

Wound composition / color-image processing / HSI model / classification / Mahalanobis distance / rotated coordinate system method

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Rohit Nayak, Pramod Kumar, Ramesh R. Galigekere. Computer assessment of the composition of a generic wound by image processing. Plastic and Aesthetic Research, 2015, 2(1): 261-5 DOI:10.4103/2347-9264.165444

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Arnqvist J,Vincent J.Semiautomatic classification of secondary healing ulcers in multispectral images. Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Pattern Recognition; 1988 Nov 14-17;.1988;Rome. NYIEEE459-61

[2]

Herbin M,Venot A,Dubertret ML,Strauch G.Assessment of healing kinetics through true color image processing..IEEE Trans Med Imaging1993;12:39-43

[3]

Berris WP, Sangwine SJ. Automatic quantitative analysis of healing skin wounds using colour digital image processing. World Wide Wounds, 1997; Available from: http://www.worldwidewounds.com/1997/july/Berris/Berris.html [Last Accessed on 2015 Apr 12].

[4]

Mekkes JR.Image processing in the study of wound healing..Clin Dermatol1995;13:401-7

[5]

Jones BF.An instrument to measure the dimensions of skin wounds..IEEE Trans Biomed Eng1995;42:464-70

[6]

Hansen GL,Kokate JY,Iaizzo PA.Wound status evaluation using color image processing..IEEE Trans Med Imaging1997;16:78-86

[7]

Berris WP.A Colour Histogram Clustering Technique for Tissue Analysisof HealingSkin Wounds. Proceedingsof the 6th International Conference on Image Processing and its Applications, 1997 July 14-17. Vol. 2..1997;Dublin, New YorkIET693-7

[8]

Hoppe A,Melhuish J,Harding KG.Computer assisted assessment of wound appearance using digital imaging. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 2001 Oct 25-28.2001;Istanbul, Turkey2595-7

[9]

Oduncu H,Clark M,Harding KG.Analysis of skin wound images using digital color image processing: a preliminary communication..Int J Low Extrem Wounds2004;3:151-6

[10]

Varedas FJ,Morente L.A hybrid learning approach to tissue recognition in wound images..Int J Intell Comput Cybernetics2009;2:327-47

[11]

Wannous H,Lucas Y.Robust tissue classification for reproducible wound assessment in telemedicine environments..J Electron Imag2010;19:023002-1-9

[12]

Dorileo EAG,Rangayyan RM."Segmentation and Analysis of the Tissue Composition of Dermatological Ulcers". Proceedings of the Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering; 2013 May 5-8;.2013;Regina, SK. NYIEEE1-4

[13]

Pereira SM,Rangayyan RM.Classification of dermatological ulcers based on tissue composition and color texture features. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies; 2011 Oct 26-29;.2011;Barcelona, Spain. NYACMArticle 68.

[14]

Nayak R,Galigekere RR.Towards a comprehensive assessment of wound composition by color image processing. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Image Processing; 2009 Nov 7-10;.2009;Cairo, Egypt. NYIEEE4185-8

[15]

Veredas F,Morente L.Binary classification on wound images with neural networks and bayesian classifiers..IEEE Trans Med Imaging2010;29:410-27

[16]

Mukherjee R,Das DK,Mitra A.Automated tissue classification framework for reproducible chronic wound assessment..Biomed Res Int2014;2014:851582

[17]

Kolesnik M.How robust is svm wound segmentation?.Proceedings of the 7Th Nordic Symposium on Signal Processing, 2006 June, 7-9. Rejkjavik,2006;New YorkIEEE50-3

[18]

Gonzalez RC.Digital Image Processing. 3rd ed.2007;DelhiPrentice Hall

[19]

Dubois SR.An autoregressive model approach to two-dimensional shape classification..IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell1986;8:55-66

[20]

Herbin M,Devaux JY.Color quantitation through image processing in dermatology..IEEE Trans Med Imaging1990;9:262-9

[21]

Raykov T.An Introduction to Applied Multivariate Analysis.2008;New YorkRoutledge Taylor & Francis Group

[22]

Duda RO,Stork DG.Pattern Classification, 2nd ed.2001;HobokenWiley

[23]

Gashaw A,Singh H.Genetic divergence in selected durum wheat genotypes of Ethiopian plasm..Afr Crop Sci J2007;15:67-72

[24]

Hertzog C.On pooling covariance matrices for multivariate analysis..Educational and Psychological Measurement1986;46:349-52

PDF

35

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/