Morphometry of subcutaneous fat lobules of the abdomen and its implication in obesity

Abstract

Aim: The subcutaneous fat in the lower abdomen (LA) is more resistant to resorption when compared to the upper abdomen (UA). Males and females have variability in fat deposition and resorption in the abdominal region. Hence, there could be a difference in morphology of fat cells of these regions. The present study aims to identify the differences in morphology of subcutaneous fat lobules of upper and LA.

Methods: Subcutaneous fat samples were collected from upper and LA of 40 cadavers (33 males and 7 females). The shape, the arrangement and the color of superficial and deep subcutaneous fat lobules were observed. The height and width were recorded for larger fat lobules.

Results: There was a difference in the color, shape, size and arrangement of the fat lobules between the two locations. Height (P = 0.042) and width (P = 0.008) of deep subcutaneous fat of LA were significantly larger than the UA in males while the height of superficial fat (P = 0.016) was significantly larger in LA than the UA in females. Height of the deep fat of UA (P = 0.018) and width of deep fat of the LA (P = 0.020) were significantly larger in females than males.

Conclusion: There was a significant difference in the morphology of the superficial and deep subcutaneous fat based on location and gender of the patient.

Keywords

Abdomen / morphometry / obesity / resorption / subcutaneous fat

References

[1] Illouz YG.History and current concepts of lipoplasty..Clin Plast Surg1996;4:721-30

[2] Fodor PB.Reflections on lipoplasty: history and personal experience..Aesthet Surg J2009;3:226-31

[3] Matarasso A.Traditional abdominoplasty..Clin Plast Surg2010;3:415-37

[4] Despre's JP.Abdominal obesity: the most prevalent cause of the metabolic syndrome and related cardiometabolic risk..Eur Heart J Suppl2006;8:B4-12

[5] Yusuf S,Ounpuu S,Avezum A,McQueen M,Pais P,Lisheng L.INTERHEART Study Investigators. Effect of Potentially modifiable risk factors associated with Myocardial Infarction in 52 countries..Lancet2004;364:937-52

[6] Gorter PM,van der Graaf Y,Rabelink TJ,SMART Study Group..Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in patients with coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease or abdominal aortic aneurysm..Atherosclerosis2004;173:363-9

[7] Sönmez K,Akcay A,Duran NE,Degertekin M.Which method should be used to determine the obesity, in patients with coronary artery disease? (Body mass index, waist circumference or waist-hip ratio)..Int J Obes2003;27:341-6

[8] Klein S,Young VL,Kilo C,Mohammed BS.Absence of an effect of liposuction on insulin action and risk factors for coronary heart disease..N Engl J Med2004;350:2549-57

[9] Vague J.Sexual differentiation. A determinant factor of the forms of obesity 1947..Obes Res1996;4:201-3

[10] Bahman T.Suction lipectomy and body sculpturing. Maryland Heights.1986;Saint LouisMosby Year Company19-20

[11] Yves I.Body Sculpturing by lipoplasty1989;EdinburghChurchill Livingstone29-32, 51

[12] Lee Y,Bang C.Dual-plane lipoplasty for the superficial and deep layers..Plast Reconstr Surg1999;104:1877-84

[13] El-Mrakby HH.Bimodal distribution of the blood supply to lower abdominal fat: histological study of the microcirculation of the lower abdominal wall..Ann Plast Surg2003;50:165-70

[14] Ahluwalia HS,Quinn TH.Anatomy of the Anterior Abdominal Wall..Operative Techniques in General Surgery2004;6:147-55

[15] Harvey RA..Lippincott's Illustrated Reviews: Biochemistry. 5th ed.2011;PhiladelphiaLippincott William and Wilkins350

[16] He Q,Kolter DP.A comparison of abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue pattern in obese and lean HIV-infected woman..J Nutr2005;135:53-7

[17] Freedland ES.Role of a critical visceral adipose tissue threshold (CVATT) in metabolic syndrome: implications for controlling dietary carbohydrates: a review..Nutr Metab (Lond)2004;1:12 PMCID:PMC535537