Turning failure into form: autologous solution to salvage a severely compromised breast following partial mastectomy and radiation - a case report

Paula Holzer , Nikolaus Thierfelder , Irene Mesas , Christine S. Hagen , Elisabeth M. Haas , Nicholas Moellhoff , Riccardo E. Giunta , Felix H. Vollbach

Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1) : 25

PDF
Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1) :25 DOI: 10.20517/2347-9264.2026.50
Case Report
Turning failure into form: autologous solution to salvage a severely compromised breast following partial mastectomy and radiation - a case report
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The objective of this report was to present the successful management of a severely compromised breast following multiple implant failures, wound-healing complications, and infections. A 40-year-old female patient presented to our center with a severely compromised breast after treatment for breast cancer. Clinical examination revealed marked volume deficiency of the left breast, resulting in pronounced breast asymmetry compared with the right breast, following multiple infections and prior interventions. Our therapeutic approach was to reconstruct the breast using an muscle-sparing type II transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-2 TRAM) flap followed by refinement with lipofilling. The reconstructed breast showed a stable and aesthetically satisfactory outcome, objectively documented during the 25-month follow-up using VECTRA 3D imaging and patient-reported outcome measures. This case demonstrates the potential of autologous tissue for breast reconstruction and may aid preoperative decision-making in complex reconstructive scenarios.

Keywords

Autologous breast reconstruction / free tissue transfer / lipofilling / salvage surgery / case report

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Paula Holzer, Nikolaus Thierfelder, Irene Mesas, Christine S. Hagen, Elisabeth M. Haas, Nicholas Moellhoff, Riccardo E. Giunta, Felix H. Vollbach. Turning failure into form: autologous solution to salvage a severely compromised breast following partial mastectomy and radiation - a case report. Plastic and Aesthetic Research, 2026, 13 (1) : 25 DOI:10.20517/2347-9264.2026.50

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Robert Koch Institute. Breast cancer incidence 2023. Available from https://www.gbe.rki.de/DE/Startseite/startseite_node.html. [accessed 10 August 2026]

[2]

National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in oncology: breast cancer 2026. Available from https://www.nccn.org/. [accessed 10 August 2026]

[3]

Thiessen FEF,Tjalma WAA,Tondu T. Breast reconstruction after breast conservation therapy for breast cancer Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018 230 233 8

[4]

Bigdeli AK,Tee JW,Vollbach FH.et al. “Microsurgical breast reconstruction - a salvage option for failed implant-based breast reconstruction” Breast 2025 82 104480 PMC12056383

[5]

Sinnott CJ,Pronovost MT,Persing SM,Wu R,Young AO. The impact of premastectomy versus postmastectomy radiation therapy on outcomes in prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction Ann Plast Surg 2021 87 S21 7

[6]

de Boniface J,Coudé Adam H,Frisell A.et al. Long-term outcomes of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without radiotherapy: a population-based study Br J Surg 2022 109 1107 15 PMC10364787

[7]

Takeishi M,Fujimoto M,Ishida K,Makino Y. Muscle sparing-2 transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: a comparison with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap Microsurgery 2008 28 650 5

[8]

Pujol P,Remontet L,Lapôtre-Ledoux B,Rogel A,Lafay L,Molinié F. Increasing incidence of breast cancer in young women over time Breast 2025 83 104555 PMC12351116

[9]

Kim J,Park C,Jeon BJ.et al. Complication profiles of immediate implant-based versus deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction following nipple/skin-sparing mastectomy in patients with prior breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy Ann Surg Oncol 2026 33 3056 65

[10]

Bucher F,Vogt PM. The failed breast implant in postmastectomy reconstruction: a systematic literature review of complications of implant-based breast reconstruction Ann Plast Surg 2022 88 695 703

[11]

Frey JD,Salibian AA,Choi M,Karp NS. The importance of tissue perfusion in reconstructive breast surgery Plast Reconstr Surg 2019 144 21S 9

[12]

Lee KT,Mun GH. Prosthetic breast reconstruction in previously irradiated breasts: a meta-analysis J Surg Oncol 2015 112 468 75

[13]

Ho AY,Hu ZI,Mehrara BJ,Wilkins EG. Radiotherapy in the setting of breast reconstruction: types, techniques, and timing Lancet Oncol 2017 18 e742 53

[14]

Black GG,Chen Y,Qin N,Wang ML,Huang H,Otterburn DM. An evolving landscape: return of breast sensation after mastectomy varies by anatomic region and reconstructive method Ann Plast Surg 2024 92 S91 5

[15]

Munhoz AM,Sturtz G,Montag E.et al. Clinical outcome of abdominal wall after DIEP flap harvesting and immediate application of abdominoplasty techniques Plast Reconstr Surg 2005 116 1881 93

[16]

Tsuruta Y,Yano T,Kuramoto Y.et al. Breast shape evaluation after free flap breast reconstruction after more than 10 years follow-up using 3-dimensional imaging device Ann Plast Surg 2022 88 555 9

[17]

Rocco N,Catanuto GF,Accardo G.et al. Implants versus autologous tissue flaps for breast reconstruction following mastectomy Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024 10 CD013821 PMC11526434

[18]

Kanchwala SK,Glatt BS,Conant EF,Bucky LP. Autologous fat grafting to the reconstructed breast: the management of acquired contour deformities Plast Reconstr Surg 2009 124 409 18

PDF

1

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉