Lumbar artery perforator free flaps for breast reconstruction

Abstract

Despite its technical complexity, the lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flap remains a valuable asset in the realm of autologous breast reconstruction, providing an option for patients who may not be suitable candidates for abdominal flaps. The LAP flap offers dimensions and volume suitable for recreating a natural breast shape, including a sloping upper pole and optimal projection in the lower third. Harvesting LAP flaps can also lead to simultaneous improvement in body contour by lifting the buttocks and narrowing the waist, following the principles of aesthetic body lift procedures.

Keywords

Breast reconstruction / lumbar artery perforator flap / microsurgery

References

[1] Sgarzani R,Morselli PG,Lapalorcia LM.Patient satisfaction and quality of life in DIEAP flap versus implant breast reconstruction.Surg Res Pract2015;2015:405163 PMCID:PMC4663364

[2] Miseré RM,Claassens EL,Piatkowski AA.Breast-related and body-related quality of life following autologous breast reconstruction is superior to implant-based breast reconstruction - A long-term follow-up study.Breast2021;59:176-82 PMCID:PMC8287213

[3] Yueh JH,Adesiyun T.Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques.Plast Reconstr Surg2010;125:1585-95

[4] Levine SM,Disa JJ.Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients.Ann Plast Surg2012;69:380-2

[5] Matros E,Razdan SN.Cost-effectiveness analysis of implants versus autologous perforator flaps using the BREAST-Q.Plast Reconstr Surg2015;135:937-46

[6] Massey MF, Spiegel AJ, Levine JL, et al; Group for the Advancement of Breast Reconstruction. Perforator flaps: recent experience, current trends, and future directions based on 3974 microsurgical breast reconstructions.Plast Reconstr Surg2009;124:737-51

[7] Kato H,Takada T.The lumbar artery perforator based island flap: anatomical study and case reports.Br J Plast Surg1999;52:541-6

[8] Lui KW,Ahmad N.Three-dimensional angiography of the superior gluteal artery and lumbar artery perforator flap.Plast Reconstr Surg2009;123:79-86

[9] Bissell MB,Levine J.The lumbar artery perforator flap: 3-dimensional anatomical study and clinical applications.Ann Plast Surg2016;77:469-76

[10] Roche NA,Blondeel PN,Monstrey SJ.The use of pedicled perforator flaps for reconstruction of lumbosacral defects.Ann Plast Surg2000;45:7-14

[11] de Weerd L, Weum S. The butterfly design: coverage of a large sacral defect with two pedicled lumbar artery perforator flaps.Br J Plast Surg2002;55:251-3

[12] de Weerd L, Elvenes OP, Strandenes E, Weum S. Autologous breast reconstruction with a free lumbar artery perforator flap.Br J Plast Surg2003;56:180-3

[13] Greenspun DT.Discussion: lumbar flap versus the gold standard: comparison to the DIEP flap.Plast Reconstr Surg2020;145:715e-6e

[14] Augustin A,Morandi EM.Donor-site morbidity and quality of life after autologous breast reconstruction with PAP versus TMG flap.Curr Oncol2022;29:5682-97 PMCID:PMC9406532

[15] Pülzl P,Kleewein K.Donor-site morbidity of the transverse musculocutaneous gracilis flap in autologous breast reconstruction: short-term and long-term results.Plast Reconstr Surg2011;128:233e-42e

[16] Colwell AS.Contemporary lower body lift.Plast Reconstr Surg2023;151:1001-3

[17] Lockwood TE.Lower-body lift.Aesthet Surg J2001;21:355-70

[18] Sultan SM.Lumbar artery perforator flaps in autologous breast reconstruction.Clin Plast Surg2023;50:301-12

[19] Opsomer D,Depypere B,Blondeel P.Lumbar flap versus the gold standard: comparison to the DIEP flap.Plast Reconstr Surg2020;145:706e-14e

[20] Vonu PM,Sayadi L,Leyngold M.Lumbar artery perforator flaps: a systematic review of free tissue transfers and anatomical characteristics.Ann Plast Surg2022;89:465-71

[21] Peters KT,Lobo F.Early experience with the free lumbar artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2015;68:1112-9

[22] Hidaka T,Shimizu H,Tanaka K.Comparison of lumbar artery and superior gluteal artery perforator flaps for breast reconstruction: multislice CT-based anatomical study.Ann Plast Surg2022;89:e39-44

[23] Haddock NT.Lumbar artery perforator flap: initial experience with simultaneous bilateral flaps for breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open2020;8:e2800 PMCID:PMC7605872

[24] Kiil BJ,Pan WR.The lumbar artery perforators: a cadaveric and clinical anatomical study.Plast Reconstr Surg2009;123:1229-38

[25] Khansa I,Coriddi M.Timing of prophylactic hysterectomy-oophorectomy, mastectomy, and microsurgical breast reconstruction in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers.Microsurgery2014;34:271-6

[26] Ticha P.Patient-reported outcomes in bilateral prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction: a narrative review.Breast2024;73:103602 PMCID:PMC10709055

[27] Stillaert FBJL,Blondeel PN.The lumbar artery perforator flap in breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg2023;151:41-4

[28] Van Cleven S, Claes K, Vanlander A, Van Landuyt K, Berrevoet F. Incisional lumbar hernia after the use of a lumbar artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction.Acta Chir Belg2020;120:274-8