Robotic-assisted microsurgery using the MUSA-robot: evaluation of the learning curve in three clinical pilot trials

Gijs Debeij , Yasmine Jonis , Eleftheria Karavolia , René van der Hulst , Shan-Shan Qiu , Tom van Mulken

Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 48

PDF
Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) :48 DOI: 10.20517/2347-9264.2024.51
Original Article

Robotic-assisted microsurgery using the MUSA-robot: evaluation of the learning curve in three clinical pilot trials

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Aim: Current microsurgical procedures are limited by the physiological tremor and dexterity of the surgeon. The MicroSurgical Assistant (MUSA, Microsure), the world’s first robotic platform for (super)microsurgery can aid in resolving issues encountered during microsurgery. This study presents an overview of the operating times and Structured Assessment of Microsurgery Skills (SAMS) scores to assess the duration and quality of microsurgical anastomoses for three microsurgical procedures currently performed using the MUSA.

Methods: This study integrates data from one ongoing randomized controlled trial focusing on robotic-assisted lymphaticovenous anastomosis, along with findings from two separate prospective pilot studies concerning digital nerve repair and free tissue transplantation. SAMS scores and time needed per anastomosis were used to evaluate the quality and learning curve of the MUSA-assisted procedures.

Results: Thirty-five robotic-assisted procedures were analyzed, including 18 lymphaticovenous anastomoses, 9 digital nerve repairs, and 8 free tissue transplantations. All procedures showed a trend of a decrease in the time needed to perform the procedure. Moreover, the mean overall SAMS scores for all three procedures were rated above ‘satisfactory’, with all procedures demonstrating a consistent trend of increasing SAMS scores over time.

Conclusion: The evaluation of anastomosis’ quality in the initial cohorts of patients undergoing robotic-assisted microsurgery using MUSA indicates satisfying outcomes across all three types of procedures. The reduction in anastomosis time and the improvement in SAMS scores imply an ongoing learning process among the operating surgeons. Subsequent reports are expected to provide information on reaching a plateau phase in procedural efficiency.

Keywords

Supermicrosurgery / robotic-assisted surgery / structured assessment of microsurgical skills / operating time

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Gijs Debeij, Yasmine Jonis, Eleftheria Karavolia, René van der Hulst, Shan-Shan Qiu, Tom van Mulken. Robotic-assisted microsurgery using the MUSA-robot: evaluation of the learning curve in three clinical pilot trials. Plastic and Aesthetic Research, 2024, 11(1): 48 DOI:10.20517/2347-9264.2024.51

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Nugent E,Perez-Abadia G.Factors influencing microsurgical skill acquisition during a dedicated training course.Microsurgery2012;32:649-56

[2]

Lakhiani C,Janhofer DE.Ergonomics in microsurgery.J Surg Oncol2018;118:840-4

[3]

Mattos LS,Peretti G,Guastini L.Microsurgery robots: addressing the needs of high-precision surgical interventions.Swiss Med Wkly2016;146:w14375

[4]

Klodmann J,Hellings-kuß A.An introduction to robotically assisted surgical systems: current developments and focus areas of research.Curr Robot Rep2021;2:321-32

[5]

van Mulken TJM,Schols RM.Preclinical experience using a new robotic system created for microsurgery.Plast Reconstr Surg2018;142:1367-76

[6]

van Mulken TJM,Qiu SS.Robotic (super) microsurgery: feasibility of a new master-slave platform in an in vivo animal model and future directions.J Surg Oncol2018;118:826-31 PMCID:PMC6221079

[7]

Chan W,Ramakrishnan V.Structured assessment of microsurgery skills in the clinical setting.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2010;63:1329-34

[8]

van Mulken TJM,Qiu SS.One-year outcomes of the first human trial on robot-assisted lymphaticovenous anastomosis for breast cancer-related lymphedema.Plast Reconstr Surg2022;149:151-61

[9]

Lalonde DH.Conceptual origins, current practice, and views of wide awake hand surgery.J Hand Surg Eur Vol2017;42:886-95

[10]

Barbon C,Uyulmaz S,Lindenblatt N.Exploring the learning curve of a new robotic microsurgical system for microsurgery.JPRAS Open2022;34:126-33 PMCID:PMC9593278

[11]

Alrasheed T,Hanasono MM,Selber JC.Robotic microsurgery: validating an assessment tool and plotting the learning curve.Plast Reconstr Surg2014;134:794-803

[12]

Katz RD,Rosson GD,Singh NK.Robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery: use of a telemanipulator slave robot to perform microvascular anastomoses.J Reconstr Microsurg2006;22:53-7

[13]

Pernar LIM,Tavakkoli A,Brooks DC.An appraisal of the learning curve in robotic general surgery.Surg Endosc2017;31:4583-96

[14]

Serdar CC,Yücel D.Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies.Biochem Med (Zagreb)2021;31:010502 PMCID:PMC7745163

[15]

Tan YPA,Wong JKF.Current limitations of surgical robotics in reconstructive plastic microsurgery.Front Surg2018;5:22 PMCID:PMC5931136

PDF

171

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/