Robotic approaches to breast reconstruction

Jacob B. Hammond , Katie G. Egan , Jesse C. Selber

Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 28

PDF
Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) :28 DOI: 10.20517/2347-9264.2024.27
Technical Note

Robotic approaches to breast reconstruction

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The purpose of this manuscript is to fully characterize modern approaches to robotic breast reconstruction. The authors review and describe preoperative planning, operative anatomy & techniques, and clinical outcomes regarding robotic breast reconstruction. In the modern era of robotic surgery, many of the beneficial outcomes in other surgical specialties also apply to breast reconstruction. When comparing outcomes between traditional and robotic latissimus flap reconstruction, a robotic approach is associated with a shorter hospital length of stay, lower postoperative opioid requirements, and higher patient satisfaction. For robotic DIEP flap reconstruction, outcomes from several studies also report favorable results with no flap losses, intraabdominal complications, or postoperative hernia/bulge. Although barriers exist regarding this technology, robotic latissimus and DIEP flap reconstruction can be safely learned and applied with thoughtful patient selection and preoperative planning. Robotic breast reconstruction facilitates a minimally invasive approach that decreases donor-site morbidity, length of stay, and opioid requirements, and even improves patient satisfaction.

Keywords

Robotic surgical procedures / breast reconstruction / microsurgery

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jacob B. Hammond, Katie G. Egan, Jesse C. Selber. Robotic approaches to breast reconstruction. Plastic and Aesthetic Research, 2024, 11(1): 28 DOI:10.20517/2347-9264.2024.27

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abbou CC,Salomon L.Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot.J Urol2001;165:1964-6

[2]

Muaddi H,Choi WJ.Clinical outcomes of robotic surgery compared to conventional surgical approaches (laparoscopic or open): a systematic overview of reviews.Ann Surg2021;273:467-73

[3]

Boyd B,Samson M,Stahl K.Robotic harvest of internal mammary vessels in breast reconstruction.J Reconstr Microsurg2006;22:261-6

[4]

Selber JC,Holsinger CF.Robotic harvest of the latissimus dorsi muscle: laboratory and clinical experience.J Reconstr Microsurg2012;28:457-64

[5]

Selber JC,Holsinger FC.Robotic latissimus dorsi muscle harvest: a case series.Plast Reconstr Surg2012;129:1305-12

[6]

Selber JC.The Robotic DIEP flap.Plast Reconstr Surg2020;145:340-3

[7]

Struk S,Leymarie N.Robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest: A feasibility study on cadaveric model.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2018;71:259-61

[8]

Elver AA,Egan KG.Characterizing outcomes of medial and lateral perforators in deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps.J Reconstr Microsurg2023;39:20-6

[9]

Shuck J,Liu J,Selber JC.Prospective pilot study of robotic-assisted harvest of the latissimus dorsi muscle: A 510(k) approval study with U.S. food and drug administration investigational device exemption.Plast Reconstr Surg2022;149:1287-95

[10]

Winocour S,Chu CK,Clemens MW.Comparing outcomes of robotically assisted latissimus dorsi harvest to the traditional open approach in breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg2020;146:1221-5

[11]

Bishop SN,Liu J.Robotic harvest of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction: a case series.Plast Reconstr Surg2022;149:1073-7

[12]

Gillespie BM,Boorman RJ,Stranne J.The impact of robotic-assisted surgery on team performance: a systematic mixed studies review.Hum Factors2021;63:1352-79

[13]

Egan KG.Modern innovations in breast surgery: robotic breast surgery and robotic breast reconstruction.Clin Plast Surg2023;50:357-66

[14]

Fan CJ,Weiss MJ.Minimally invasive versus open surgery in the Medicare population: a comparison of post-operative and economic outcomes.Surg Endosc2018;32:3874-80

[15]

Eo PS,Lee JS,Park HY.Robot-assisted latissimus dorsi flap harvest for partial breast reconstruction: comparison with endoscopic and conventional approaches.Aesthet Surg J2023;44:38-46

[16]

Lee MJ,Song SY.Clinical outcomes following robotic versus conventional DIEP flap in breast reconstruction: a retrospective matched study.Front Oncol2022;12:989231 PMCID:PMC9515388

[17]

Khan MTA,Baumgardner K.Literature review: robotic-assisted harvest of deep inferior epigastric flap for breast reconstruction.Ann Plast Surg2022;89:703-8

[18]

Piper M,Shakir S,Soriano I.Minimally invasive robotic-assisted harvest of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for autologous breast reconstruction.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2021;74:890-930

[19]

Selber JC.Can I make robotic surgery make sense in my practice?.Plast Reconstr Surg2017;139:781e-92e

[20]

Williams SB,Hu JC.Economics of robotic surgery: does it make sense and for whom?.Urol Clin North Am2014;41:591-6

PDF

98

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/