Future of autologous breast reconstruction: a review of novel technological innovations

Abstract

The evolution of autologous breast reconstruction is marked by significant technological advancements aimed at enhancing surgical outcomes. This review explores the current limitations and inherent challenges in standard practices of autologous breast reconstruction and highlights the potential benefits of the latest technological innovations. It addresses key aspects that stand to gain from improvements in surgical training and perioperative patient care, with a particular focus on preoperative planning, intraoperative techniques, and postoperative monitoring. The transformative potential of these technologies is poised to significantly improve patient outcomes, optimize surgical efficiency, and advance surgical education.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence / AI / technology / breast reconstruction / plastic surgery / surgical education / 3D printing

References

[1] Nolan E,Visvader JE.Deciphering breast cancer: from biology to the clinic.Cell2023;186:1708-28

[2] Nardin S,Varughese FM.Breast cancer survivorship, quality of life, and late toxicities.Front Oncol2020;10:864 PMCID:PMC7308500

[3] Al-Ghazal SK,Blamey RW.Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction.Eur J Cancer2000;36:1938-43

[4] Yueh JH,Adesiyun T.Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques.Plast Reconstr Surg2010;125:1585-95

[5] Yun JH,Orman AG.Breast reconstruction and radiation therapy.Cancer Control2018;25:1073274818795489 PMCID:PMC6108018

[6] Pien I,Cheung MC.Evolving trends in autologous breast reconstruction: is the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap taking over?.Ann Plast Surg2016;76:489-93

[7] Wade RG,Sassoon EM,Ali RS.Complications in DIEP flap breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: a prospective cohort study comparing unilateral versus bilateral reconstructions.Ann Surg Oncol2017;24:1465-74

[8] Knoedler S,Knoedler L.The significance of timing in breast reconstruction after mastectomy: an ACS-NSQIP analysis.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2024;89:40-50

[9] DeFazio MV,Ahmad FI.Application of three-dimensional printed vascular modeling as a perioperative guide to perforator mapping and pedicle dissection during abdominal flap harvest for breast reconstruction.J Reconstr Microsurg2020;36:325-38

[10] Ogunleye AA,Inchauste SM.The utility of three-dimensional models in complex microsurgical reconstruction.Arch Plast Surg2020;47:428-34 PMCID:PMC7520243

[11] Chae MP,Chung RD,Rozen WM.3D-printed, patient-specific DIEP flap templates for preoperative planning in breast reconstruction: a prospective case series.Gland Surg2021;10:2192-9 PMCID:PMC8340344

[12] Seth I,Jakobsen A.Improving visualization of intramuscular perforator course: augmented reality headsets for DIEP flap breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open2023;11:e5282 PMCID:PMC10513288

[13] Cevik J,Rozen WM.Transforming breast reconstruction: the pioneering role of artificial intelligence in preoperative planning.Gland Surg2023;12:1271-5 PMCID:PMC10570966

[14] Jacobson NM,Treat A,Mathes D.Hybrid modeling techniques for 3D printed deep inferior epigastric perforator flap models.3D Print Med2023;9:26 PMCID:PMC10498601

[15] Mehta S,Karunanithy N.3D printing provides unrivalled bespoke teaching tools for autologous free flap breast reconstruction.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2016;69:578-80

[16] Cholok DJ,Leuze CW,Daniel BL.Spatial fidelity of microvascular perforating vessels as perceived by augmented reality virtual projections.Plast Reconstr Surg2024;153:524-34

[17] Hummelink S,Schultze Kool LJ.A new and innovative method of preoperatively planning and projecting vascular anatomy in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial.Plast Reconstr Surg2019;143:1151e-8e

[18] Mavioso C,Oliveira HP.Automatic detection of perforators for microsurgical reconstruction.Breast2020;50:19-24 PMCID:PMC7375543

[19] O'Neill AC,Roy M,Hofer SOP.Development and evaluation of a machine learning prediction model for flap failure in microvascular breast reconstruction.Ann Surg Oncol2020;27:3466-75

[20] Khan MTA,Baumgardner K.Literature review: robotic-assisted harvest of deep inferior epigastric flap for breast reconstruction.Ann Plast Surg2022;89:703-8

[21] Innocenti M,Menichini G.First-in-human free flap tissue reconstruction using a dedicated microsurgical robotic platform.Plast Reconstr Surg2023;151:1078-82

[22] Ghandourah HSH,Wolfs JAGN,van Mulken TJM.Robotic microsurgery in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a literature review.Surg Innov2023;30:607-14 PMCID:PMC10515453

[23] Bhullar H,Rozen WM.Fat necrosis after DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a review of perfusion-related causes.Aesthetic Plast Surg2020;44:1454-61

[24] Pruimboom T,Qiu SS.Optimizing indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in reconstructive flap surgery: a systematic review and ex vivo experiments.Surg Innov2020;27:103-19

[25] Pruimboom T,Felli E.Perioperative hyperspectral imaging to assess mastectomy skin flap and DIEP flap perfusion in immediate autologous breast reconstruction: a pilot study.Diagnostics2022;12:184 PMCID:PMC8774932

[26] Proulx ST,Derzsi S.Quantitative imaging of lymphatic function with liposomal indocyanine green.Cancer Res2010;70:7053-62 PMCID:PMC3398157

[27] Prabhu AS,Hope W.Robotic inguinal vs transabdominal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: the RIVAL randomized clinical trial.JAMA Surg2020;155:380-7 PMCID:PMC7081145

[28] Brassetti A,Tedesco F.Robotic surgery in urology: history from PROBOT^® to HUGO^TM.Sensors2023;23:7104 PMCID:PMC10458477

[29] Aitzetmüller MM,Dermietzel AF,Kückelhaus M.Robotic-assisted microsurgery and its future in plastic surgery.J Clin Med2022;11:3378 PMCID:PMC9225011

[30] Roy N,Ibelli TJ.The expanding utility of robotic-assisted flap harvest in autologous breast reconstruction: a systematic review.J Clin Med2023;12:4951 PMCID:PMC10419897

[31] Daar DA,Vranis NM.Robotic deep inferior epigastric perforator flap harvest in breast reconstruction.Microsurgery2022;42:319-25

[32] Wittesaele W.Implementing the robotic deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in daily practice: a series of 10 cases.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2022;75:2577-83

[33] Besmens IS,Giovanoli P,Lindenblatt N.Robotic microsurgery in extremity reconstruction - experience with a novel robotic system.Surg Innov2024;31:42-7 PMCID:PMC11046139

[34] Wolfs JA,van Mulken TJ. Robotic microvascular and free flap surgery: overview of current robotic applications and introduction of a dedicated robot for microsurgery. In: Nikkhah, D., Rawlins, J., Pafitanis, G. (eds) Core Techniques in Flap Reconstructive Microsurgery. Springer, Cham; 2023.p.77-86.

[35] Barbon C,Uyulmaz S,Lindenblatt N.Exploring the learning curve of a new robotic microsurgical system for microsurgery.JPRAS Open2022;34:126-33 PMCID:PMC9593278

[36] van Mulken TJM,Jonis Y.First-in-human integrated use of a dedicated microsurgical robot with a 4K 3D exoscope: the future of microsurgery.Life2023;13:692 PMCID:PMC10057826

[37] Abdelrahman H,Peralta R.Application of indocyanine green in surgery: a review of current evidence and implementation in trauma patients.World J Gastrointest Surg2023;15:757-75 PMCID:PMC10277941

[38] Burnier P,Bosc R,Meningaud JP.Indocyanine green applications in plastic surgery: a review of the literature.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2017;70:814-27

[39] Bigdeli AK,Schmidt VJ.Indocyanine green fluorescence for free-flap perfusion imaging revisited: advanced decision making by virtual perfusion reality in visionsense fusion imaging angiography.Surg Innov2016;23:249-60

[40] Wu Y,Wang Z.First clinical applications for the NIR-II imaging with ICG in microsurgery.Front Bioeng Biotechnol2022;10:1042546 PMCID:PMC9623121

[41] Van Den Hoven P,Van Capelle L.Quantification of near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green in free flap breast reconstruction.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2022;75:1820-5

[42] Moyer HR.Predicting mastectomy skin flap necrosis with indocyanine green angiography: the gray area defined.Plast Reconstr Surg2012;129:1043-8

[43] Phillips BT,Conkling N.Intraoperative perfusion techniques can accurately predict mastectomy skin flap necrosis in breast reconstruction: results of a prospective trial.Plast Reconstr Surg2012;129:778e-88e

[44] Cahill RA,Khan MF.Artificial intelligence indocyanine green (ICG) perfusion for colorectal cancer intra-operative tissue classification.Br J Surg2021;108:5-9

[45] Poplack SP,Ferrara KW.Optical breast imaging: a review of physical principles, technologies, and clinical applications.J Breast Imaging2023;5:520-37 PMCID:PMC10655724

[46] Oppermann C,Yikilmaz H,Eriksen T.Continuous organ perfusion monitoring using indocyanine green in a piglet model.Surg Endosc2023;37:1601-10

[47] Karim S,Farooq U,Laghari AA.Hyperspectral imaging: a review and trends towards medical imaging.Curr Med Imaging2022;19:417-27

[48] Studier-Fischer A,Sellner J.Spectral organ fingerprints for machine learning-based intraoperative tissue classification with hyperspectral imaging in a porcine model.Sci Rep2022;12:11028 PMCID:PMC9247052

[49] Thiem DGE,Goetze E,Al-Nawas B.Hyperspectral analysis for perioperative perfusion monitoring-a clinical feasibility study on free and pedicled flaps.Clin Oral Investig2021;25:933-45 PMCID:PMC7878271

[50] Knoedler S,Huelsboemer L.Postoperative free flap monitoring in reconstructive surgery-man or machine?.Front Surg2023;10:1130566 PMCID:PMC9992807

[51] Hummelink SLM,Wentink EC.Development and evaluation of a remote patient monitoring system in autologous breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open2022;10:e4008 PMCID:PMC8849395

[52] Khavanin N,Kraenzlin F,Sacks JM.The intra.Ox near-infrared spectrometer measures variations in flap oxygenation that correlate to flap necrosis in a preclinical rodent model.Plast Reconstr Surg2021;147:1097-104

[53] Largo RD,Garvey PB.Outcome analysis of free flap salvage in outpatients presenting with microvascular compromise.Plast Reconstr Surg2018;141:20e-7e

[54] Xie R,Liu Q,Liu M.A wireless infrared thermometry device for postoperative flap monitoring: proof of concept in patients.Surg Innov2023;30:636-9

[55] Oda H,Kaizawa Y.A novel technology for free flap monitoring: pilot study of a wireless, biodegradable sensor.J Reconstr Microsurg2020;36:182-90

[56] Halani SH,Li X.Flap monitoring using transcutaneous oxygen or carbon dioxide measurements.J Hand Microsurg2022;14:10-8 PMCID:PMC8898164

[57] Guye ML,Chemam S,Suria S.Remote peripheral tissue oxygenation does not predict postoperative free flap complications in complex head and neck cancer surgery: a prospective cohort study.Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med2017;36:27-31

[58] Marks H,Roussakis E.A paintable phosphorescent bandage for postoperative tissue oxygen assessment in DIEP flap reconstruction.Sci Adv2020;6:eabd1061

[59] Khanna AK,Weller RS.Postoperative ward monitoring - why and what now?.Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol2019;33:229-45

[60] Papavasiliou T,Khajuria A,Chan JCY.3D printed chest wall: a tool for advanced microsurgical training simulating depth and limited view.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open2021;9:e3817 PMCID:PMC8440024

[61] Leung R.Building your future holographic mentor: can we use mixed reality holograms for visual spatial motor skills acquisition in surgical education?.Surg Innov2024;31:82-91 PMCID:PMC10773164

[62] Favier V,Caravaca Mora O.Geometric and mechanical evaluation of 3D-printing materials for skull base anatomical education and endoscopic surgery simulation - a first step to create reliable customized simulators..PLoS One2017;12:e0189486 PMCID:PMC5734742

[63] Lichtenstein JT,Lemound J.3D-printed simulation device for orbital surgery.J Surg Educ2017;74:2-8

[64] Lobb DC,Dart D.The use of patient-specific three-dimensional printed surgical models enhances plastic surgery resident education in craniofacial surgery.J Craniofac Surg2019;30:339-41

[65] Smith DM,Cutting CB.Applications of virtual reality in aesthetic surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg2005;116:898-904; discussion 905-6

[66] Smith DM,Carter CR,McCarthy JG.A virtual reality atlas of craniofacial anatomy.Plast Reconstr Surg2007;120:1641-6

[67] Tolsdorff B,Höhne KH.Virtual reality: a new paranasal sinus surgery simulator.Laryngoscope2010;120:420-6

[68] de Runz A, Boccara D, Bertheuil N, Claudot F, Brix M, Simon E. Three-dimensional imaging, an important factor of decision in breast augmentation.Ann Chir Plast Esthet2018;63:134-9

[69] Lee GK,Fuertes V,Nazerali R.What is your reality? Virtual, augmented, and mixed reality in plastic surgery training, education, and practice.Plast Reconstr Surg2021;147:505-11