Making the most of computed tomography imaging in preoperative assessment and planning of abdomen-based flap breast reconstruction

Abstract

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) offers substantial benefits for reconstructive surgeons in preoperative planning for abdomen-based flap procedures in breast reconstruction. The abdominal perforator-based autologous breast reconstruction has become the gold standard due to its superior cosmetic outcomes and high patient satisfaction. Meticulous preoperative planning is crucial for the success of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. In this context, CTA, recognized as the gold standard for perforator mapping, provides crucial insights into patient anatomy, optimizing flap design and elevation. This study aims to go beyond the role of CTA for perforator mapping and summarize the wealth of information that can be obtained from preoperative imaging tools for abdomen-based flaps in breast reconstruction. Such information not only aids in assessing the risk of postoperative complications but also supports the design of various flaps beyond DIEP. Furthermore, we will introduce the latest methods for utilizing this information to assist during preoperative planning and intraoperative decision making.

Keywords

Microsurgery / abdominal-based breast reconstruction / preoperative planning / computed tomography angiography

References

[1] Teunis T,Kon M.CT-angiography prior to DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Microsurgery2013;33:496-502

[2] Smit JM,Liss AG.Preoperative CT angiography reduces surgery time in perforator flap reconstruction.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2009;62:1112-7

[3] Rosenberg IH.Sarcopenia: origins and clinical relevance.J Nutr1997;127:990S-1

[4] Broyles JM,Phillips BT.The effect of sarcopenia on perioperative complications in abdominally based free-flap breast reconstruction.J Surg Oncol2020;122:1240-6

[5] Jain NS,Luvisa BK.Sarcopenia best predicts complications in free flap breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open2023;11:e5125 PMCID:PMC10353710

[6] Shafiee A,Rafiei MA.Frailty among patients undergoing breast reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2023;84:556-66

[7] Kim S,Jeon BJ,Mun GH.Association of preoperative sarcopenia with adverse outcomes of breast reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap.Ann Surg Oncol2022;29:3800-8

[8] Espinosa-de-Los-Monteros A,Alvarez-Tostado-Rivera A,Llanes S.Postoperative abdominal bulge and hernia rates in patients undergoing abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Plast Surg2021;86:476-84

[9] Tokumoto H,Kubota Y.Relationship between preoperative abdominal wall strength and bulging at the abdominal free flap donor site for breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg2022;149:279e-86

[10] Kappos EA,Butler K,Hofer SOP.Preoperative computed tomographic angiogram measurement of abdominal muscles is a valuable risk assessment for bulge formation after microsurgical abdominal free flap breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg2017;140:170-7

[11] Park JW,Jeon BJ,Mun GH.Assessment of the risk of bulge/hernia formation after abdomen-based microsurgical breast reconstruction with the aid of preoperative computed tomographic angiography-derived morphometric measurements.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2020;73:1665-74

[12] Walgenbach KJ.“Marriage” abdominoplasty: body contouring with limited scars combining mini-abdominoplasty and liposuction.Clin Plast Surg2004;31:571-81

[13] Stalder MW,Allen RJ.Aesthetic refinement of the abdominal donor site after autologous breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg2015;136:455-61

[14] Stewart KJ,Coghlan B,Jones BM.Complications of 278 consecutive abdominoplasties.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2006;59:1152-5

[15] Kim J,Mun GH.Risk factors for step-off deformity of the donor site following abdominal flap-based breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg2025;155:16e-25

[16] Azzi AJ,Viezel-Mathieu A,Gilardino M.A review of objective measurement of flap volume in reconstructive surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open2018;6:e1752 PMCID:PMC5999430

[17] Kim JH,Mun GH.Optimizing intraflap anastomosis of conjoined bilateral DIEP flap for breast reconstruction: planning, execution, and outcomes in 201 patients.Plast Reconstr Surg2025;155:608-16

[18] Lee KT.Volumetric planning using computed tomographic angiography improves clinical outcomes in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg2016;137:771e-80

[19] Woo KJ,Lee KT.A novel method to estimate the weight of the DIEP flap in breast reconstruction: DIEP-W, a simple calculation formula using paraumbilical flap thickness.J Reconstr Microsurg2016;32:520-7

[20] Cook JA,Momeni A.Predictors of internal mammary vessel diameter: a computed tomographic angiography-assisted anatomic analysis.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2016;69:1340-8

[21] Kim H,Pyon JK,Oh KS.Preoperative computed tomographic angiography of both donor and recipient sites for microsurgical breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg2012;130:11e-20

[22] Seth AK,Caterson SA,Erdmann-Sager J.Left internal mammary vein size and its impact on microsurgical breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open2022;10:e4704 PMCID:PMC9788973

[23] Kim H,Pyon JK.Rib-sparing and internal mammary artery-preserving microsurgical breast reconstruction with the free DIEP flap.Plast Reconstr Surg2013;131:327e-34

[24] Kim EJ,Mun GH.Muscle-splitting approach to thoracoacromial vein for superdrainage in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction.Microsurgery2019;39:228-33

[25] Lee KT.Benefits of superdrainage using SIEV in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Microsurgery2017;37:75-83

[26] Rozen WM,Le Roux CM,Ashton MW.The venous anatomy of the anterior abdominal wall: an anatomical and clinical study.Plast Reconstr Surg2009;124:848-53

[27] Bhullar H,Rozen WM,Hunter-Smith DJ.Demonstration of superficial venous dominance in the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap.ANZ J Surg2020;90:907-8

[28] Lie KH,Ashton MW.Hydrogen peroxide priming of the venous architecture: a new technique that reveals the underlying anatomical basis for venous complications of DIEP, TRAM, and other abdominal flaps.Plast Reconstr Surg2014;133:790e-804

[29] Schaverien MV,Neil-Dwyer J.Relationship between venous congestion and intraflap venous anatomy in DIEP flaps using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.Plast Reconstr Surg2010;126:385-92

[30] Kim SY.Comments on “predicting venous congestion before DIEP breast reconstruction by identifying atypical venous connections on preoperative CTA imaging”.Microsurgery2019;39:571-2

[31] Sadik KW,Cohen A.Predictive value of SIEV caliber and superficial venous dominance in free DIEP flaps.J Reconstr Microsurg2013;29:57-61

[32] Kim SY,Mun GH.The influence of a pfannenstiel scar on venous anatomy of the lower abdominal wall and implications for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg2017;139:540-8

[33] Henry FP,Wood SH.Predicting and planning for SIEA flap utilisation in breast reconstruction: an algorithm combining pre-operative computed tomography analysis and intra-operative angiosome assessment.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2017;70:795-800

[34] Piorkowski JR,Nickerson P.Preoperative computed tomography angiogram to predict patients with favorable anatomy for superficial inferior epigastric artery flap breast reconstruction.Ann Plast Surg2011;66:534-6

[35] Rozen WM,Grinsell D.The variability of the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) and its angiosome: a clinical anatomical study.Microsurgery2010;30:386-91

[36] Zhang X,Yang Y.Predicting the feasibility of utilizing SIEA flap for breast reconstruction with preoperative BMI and computed tomography angiography (CTA) Data.Aesthetic Plast Surg2021;45:100-7

[37] Chang EI,Smith ML.Combining autologous breast reconstruction and vascularized lymph node transfer.Semin Plast Surg2018;32:36-41 PMCID:PMC5891653

[38] Forte AJ,Boczar D.Lymph node transfer combined with deep inferior epigastric perforators and transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous procedures: a systematic review.Gland Surg2020;9:521-7 PMCID:PMC7225473

[39] Winters H,Hummelink S,Ulrich DJO.DIEP flap breast reconstruction combined with vascularized lymph node transfer for patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema.Eur J Surg Oncol2022;48:1718-22

[40] Zhang H,Mu L.The distribution of lymph nodes and their nutrient vessels in the groin region: an anatomic study for design of the lymph node flap.Microsurgery2014;34:558-61

[41] Demiri E,Kyriazidis I,Tsimponis A.Predesigned chimeric deep inferior epigastric perforator and inguinal lymph node flap for combined breast and lymphedema reconstruction: a comprehensive algorithmic approach.JPRAS Open2024;40:1-18 PMCID:PMC10879689

[42] Kim SY,Mun GH.Computed tomographic angiography-based planning of bipedicled DIEP flaps with intraflap crossover anastomosis: an anatomical and clinical study.Plast Reconstr Surg2016;138:409e-18

[43] Koolen PG,Lin SJ,Greenspun DT.Bipedicle-conjoined perforator flaps in breast reconstruction.J Surg Res2015;197:256-64

[44] Kim J,Mun GH.Short fasciotomy-deep inferior epigastric perforator flap harvest for breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg2023;152:972e-84

[45] Selber JC.The robotic DIEP flap.Plast Reconstr Surg2020;145:340-3

[46] Kurlander DE,Shuck JW,Selber JC.Robotic DIEP patient selection: analysis of CT angiography.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open2021;9:e3970 PMCID:PMC8769113

[47] Hummelink S,Hoogeveen Y,Ulrich DJ.Preliminary results using a newly developed projection method to visualize vascular anatomy prior to DIEP flap breast reconstruction.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2015;68:390-4

[48] Pereira N,Parada L.Augmented reality microsurgical planning with a smartphone (ARM-PS): a dissection route map in your pocket.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2019;72:759-62

[49] Sullivan J,Varagur K.From augmented to virtual reality in plastic surgery: blazing the trail to a new frontier.J Reconstr Microsurg2024;40:398-406

[50] Seth I,Jakobsen A.Improving visualization of intramuscular perforator course: augmented reality headsets for DIEP flap breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open2023;11:e5282 PMCID:PMC10513288

[51] Necker FN,Shaheen MS.The reconstructive metaverse - collaboration in real-time shared mixed reality environments for microsurgical reconstruction.Surg Innov2024;31:563-6 PMCID:PMC11411343

[52] Ghasroddashti A,Martou G.Utility of 3D-printed vascular modeling in microsurgical breast reconstruction: a systematic review.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2024;96:95-104

[53] Jablonka EM,Mittermiller PA,Momeni A.3-DIEPrinting: 3D-printed models to assist the intramuscular dissection in abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open2019;7:e2222 PMCID:PMC6554155

[54] Mayer HF,Viñas JF.Three-dimensional printing in breast reconstruction: current and promising applications.J Clin Med2024;13:3278 PMCID:PMC11172985

[55] Zhu KJ,Zhu L,Mundy L.From printer to patient: a scoping review and new classification of ready-to-use three-dimensional printed constructs in autologous breast reconstruction.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2025;102:93-103

[56] Chae MP,Spychal RT.3D volumetric analysis for planning breast reconstructive surgery.Breast Cancer Res Treat2014;146:457-60

[57] Tomita K,Hata Y,Hosokawa K.DIEP flap breast reconstruction using 3-dimensional surface imaging and a printed mold.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open2015;3:e316 PMCID:PMC4387138

[58] Chae MP,Patel NG,Ramakrishnan V.Enhancing breast projection in autologous reconstruction using the St Andrew’s coning technique and 3D volumetric analysis.Gland Surg2017;6:706-14 PMCID:PMC5750311

[59] Hummelink S,Maal TJJ.Applications and limitations of using patient-specific 3D printed molds in autologous breast reconstruction.Eur J Plast Surg2018;41:571-6 PMCID:PMC6153881