Autologous augmentation of contralateral native breast in conjunction with unilateral abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction: case series and literature review

Abstract

In autologous breast reconstruction, the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is the most commonly used. For patients undergoing unilateral breast reconstruction who desire augmentation of the contralateral breast but wish to avoid using implants, augmentation of the contralateral breast using DIEP flaps is a reliable option. Preoperative evaluation requires assessing the patient’s desired outcome and the amount of abdominal tissue available. CT angiography (CTA) helps facilitate the evaluation of abdominal perforator anatomy and the estimation of flap volumes for simultaneous reconstruction and contralateral augmentation. Flap design takes into consideration the perforators needed for a large flap for the primary reconstruction and the length of the pedicle needed to access contralateral recipient vessels for a smaller flap for augmentation. One set of recipient vessels [internal mammary artery (IMA)/internal mammary vein (IMV)] are used with antegrade anastomoses performed for primary reconstruction flaps and retrograde anastomoses for flaps used in augmentation. Augmentation flaps can be completely buried or include a skin paddle for monitoring. Subsequent secondary procedures are often needed to achieve the desired final breast shape and symmetry. Overall, patients who have undergone unilateral autologous breast reconstruction with simultaneous contralateral autologous augmentation report high levels of satisfaction postoperatively.

Keywords

Breast reconstruction / autologous augmentation / DIEP

References

[1] American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2023 ASPS procedural statistics release. Available from: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/news/statistics/2023/plastic-surgery-statistics-report-2023.pdf. [Last accessed on 25 Dec 2024].

[2] Chang EI.Latest advancements in autologous breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg2021;147:111e-22

[3] Wes AM,Nelson JA.Do prior abdominal surgeries increase complications in abdominally based breast reconstructions?.Ann Plast Surg2015;75:526-33

[4] Hespe GE,Stein EB,Kung TA.Contralateral autologous augmentation in DIEP flap reconstruction: employing CT angiography & volumetric analysis for preoperative planning.Plast Reconstr Surg2024;Online ahead of print:

[5] Kamali P,Becherer BE.Medial row perforators are associated with higher rates of fat necrosis in bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg2017;140:19-24

[6] Satake T,Kou S,Ishikawa T.Contralateral unaffected breast augmentation using zone IV as a SIEA flap during unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2019;72:1537-47

[7] Deramo P,Boutros SG.Use of single-recipient vessels for cross-chest abdominal flap-based breast augmentation as an outpatient.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open2020;8:e2978 PMCID:PMC7413810

[8] Huang JJ,Wu CW,Valerio IL.Simultaneous scarless contralateral breast augmentation during unilateral breast reconstruction using bilateral differentially split DIEP flaps.Plast Reconstr Surg2011;128:593e-604

[9] McKean AR,Harris P,James S.Audit of venous thromboembolism in DIEP free flap breast reconstruction.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2017;70:970-2

[10] Gupta R,Gupta R.Simultaneous contralateral autologous breast augmentation during unilateral breast reconstruction utilizing deep inferior epigastric flaps.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open2022;10:e4498 PMCID:PMC9473798

[11] Hembd A,Zhu H.Optimizing perforator selection: a multivariable analysis of predictors for fat necrosis and abdominal morbidity in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg2018;142:583-92