The use of generative artificial intelligence in surgical education: a narrative review
Lavina Rao , Eric Yang , Savannah Dissanayake , Roberto Cuomo , Ishith Seth , Warren M. Rozen
Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 57
The use of generative artificial intelligence in surgical education: a narrative review
The introduction of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized healthcare and education. These AI systems, trained on vast datasets using advanced machine learning (ML) techniques and large language models (LLMs), can generate text, images, and videos, offering new avenues for enhancing surgical education. Their ability to produce interactive learning resources, procedural guidance, and feedback post-virtual simulations makes them valuable in educating surgical trainees. However, technical challenges such as data quality issues, inaccuracies, and uncertainties around model interpretability remain barriers to widespread adoption. This review explores the integration of generative AI into surgical training, assessing its potential to enhance learning and teaching methodologies. While generative AI has demonstrated promise for improving surgical education, its integration must be approached cautiously, ensuring AI input is balanced with traditional supervision and mentorship from experienced surgeons. Given that generative AI models are not yet suitable as standalone tools, a blended learning approach that integrates AI capabilities with conventional educational strategies should be adopted. The review also addresses limitations and challenges, emphasizing the need for more robust research on different AI models and their applications across various surgical subspecialties. The lack of standardized frameworks and tools to assess the quality of AI outputs in surgical education necessitates rigorous oversight to ensure accuracy and reliability in training settings. By evaluating the current state of generative AI in surgical education, this narrative review highlights the potential for future innovation and research, encouraging ongoing exploration of AI in enhancing surgical education and training.
Artificial Intelligence / AI / education / training
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
Boghdady M, Alijani A. Feedback in surgical education.Surgeon2017;15:98-103 |
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
Nah F, Zheng R, Cai J, Siau K, Chen L. Generative AI and ChatGPT: applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration.J Inf Technol Case Appl Res2023;25:277-304 |
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
Eschenbach WJ. Transparency and the black box problem: why we do not trust AI.Philos Technol2021;34:1607-22 |
| [33] |
Lee Y, Tessier L, Brar K, et al; ASMBS Artificial Intelligence and Digital Surgery Taskforce. Performance of artificial intelligence in bariatric surgery: comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4, Bing, and Bard in the American society for metabolic and bariatric surgery textbook of bariatric surgery questions. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2024;20:609-13. |
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
Artificial Analysis. Comparison of models: quality, performance & price analysis. Available from: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models. [Last accessed on 14 Nov 2024]. |
| [44] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |