Innovations with the scapula and subscapular system for head and neck microvascular reconstruction
Farshad Chowdhury , Eitan Prisman , Carissa M. Thomas
Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 68
Innovations with the scapula and subscapular system for head and neck microvascular reconstruction
Microvascular free flap reconstruction based on the subscapular system is an established and versatile method of reconstructing complex head and neck defects. Since the first published description in the mid-1980s, advances have been made to the harvest technique, positioning, use of virtual surgical planning, and endosseous implants. Here, the most recent literature is reviewed for innovations related to the subscapular system. Microvascular head and neck surgeon preferences related to the subscapular system are surveyed and discussed. The concordance between virtual surgical plans using scapula cutting guides and pre-contoured plates with the postoperative result is assessed, and novel applications of the scapula free flap are presented. Subscapular system free flaps are an established and essential component of the reconstructive armamentarium for head and neck defects with minimal limitations and low donor site morbidity.
Scapula / subscapular system / microvascular reconstruction / virtual surgical planning
| [1] |
van Rooij JAF, Roubos J, Vrancken Peeters NJMC, Rijken BFM, Corten EML, Mureau MAM. Long-term patient-reported outcomes after reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancer: a systematic review.Head Neck2023;45:2469-77. |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
dos Santos LF. The vascular anatomy and dissection of the free scapular flap.Plast Reconstr Surg1984;73:599-604 |
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
Urken ML, Cheney ML, Blackwell KE, Harris JR, Hadlock TA, Futran N. Atlas of regional and free flaps for head and neck reconstruction: flap harvest and insetting. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. Available from: http://solution.lww.com/urkenatlas [Last accessed on 11 Dec 2023] |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
Frodel JL Jr, Funk GF, Capper DT, Fridrich KL, Blumer JR, Haller JR, Hoffman HT. Osseointegrated implants: a comparative study of bone thickness in four vascularized bone flaps.Plast Reconstr Surg1993;92:449-55; discussion 456-8 |
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |