A systematic review on embodiment and breast reconstruction: a patient-centered framework for evolving breast outcome measures

Madeline G. Chin , Sahand C. Eftekari , Steven P. Moura , D’ Andrea T. Donnelly , Ellen C. Shaffrey , Lucas Sears , Aaron M. Dingle

Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 52

PDF
Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) :52 DOI: 10.20517/2347-9264.2023.44
Systematic Review

A systematic review on embodiment and breast reconstruction: a patient-centered framework for evolving breast outcome measures

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Embodiment describes the sense of one’s own body, encompassing dimensions of being, having, and using a body. Regarding breast reconstruction, embodiment can be understood as how effectively the reconstructed breast replaces the patient’s missing breast. While there has been increasing attention in recent decades on understanding and measuring embodiment in the prosthetic limb, there is limited literature applying embodiment to the context of breast reconstruction. We posit that the literature on prosthetic embodiment can be applied to evolving discussions on breast reconstruction outcomes and patient satisfaction. As breast reconstruction techniques continue to evolve, such as advances in nerve coaptation and reinnervation of the breasts, the concept of embodiment may help broaden the scope of how patient outcomes can be more holistically evaluated. This systematic review examines existing literature on embodiment after breast reconstruction, summarizes embodiment and its subcomponents, and discusses how embodiment can be a helpful framework for the future of breast reconstruction outcome measures.

Keywords

Embodiment / breast reconstruction / prosthetic embodiment

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Madeline G. Chin, Sahand C. Eftekari, Steven P. Moura, D’ Andrea T. Donnelly, Ellen C. Shaffrey, Lucas Sears, Aaron M. Dingle. A systematic review on embodiment and breast reconstruction: a patient-centered framework for evolving breast outcome measures. Plastic and Aesthetic Research, 2023, 10(1): 52 DOI:10.20517/2347-9264.2023.44

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Jonczyk MM,Graham R.Surgical trends in breast cancer: a rise in novel operative treatment options over a 12 year analysis.Breast Cancer Res Treat2019;173:267-74 PMCID:PMC6486837

[2]

Panchal H.Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg2017;140:7S-13S PMCID:PMC5722225

[3]

Davies CF,Avery K,Potter S.Patient-reported outcome measures for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: a systematic review of development and measurement properties.Ann Surg Oncol2021;28:386-404 PMCID:PMC7752876

[4]

Homsy A,Montandon D,Modarressi A.Breast reconstruction: a century of controversies and progress.Ann Plast Surg2018;80:457-63.

[5]

Hanson SE,Roubaud MS.Long-term quality of life in patients with breast cancer after breast conservation vs mastectomy and reconstruction.JAMA Surg2022;157:e220631 PMCID:PMC9008558

[6]

Rosenberg SM,Gelber S.Association of breast cancer surgery with quality of life and psychosocial well-being in young breast cancer survivors.JAMA Surg2020;155:1035-42 PMCID:PMC7495332

[7]

Santosa KB,Kim HM,Wilkins EG.Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction.JAMA Surg2018;153:891-9. PMCID:PMC6233781

[8]

Nelson JA,Polanco T.Long-term patient-reported outcomes following postmastectomy breast reconstruction: an 8-year examination of 3268 patients.Ann Surg2019;270:473-83

[9]

Sadok N,Eltahir Y,van Veen MM.Quality of life 9 to 13 years after autologous or alloplastic breast reconstruction: which breast remains best?.Plast Reconstr Surg2023;151:467-76

[10]

Toyserkani NM,Tabatabaeifar S,Sørensen JA.Autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Breast-Q patient-reported outcomes.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2020;73:278-85

[11]

Pusic AL,Scott AM,Cordeiro PG.Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q.Plast Reconstr Surg2009;124:345-53

[12]

Tsangaris E,Kaur MN.Development and psychometric validation of the BREAST-Q sensation module for women undergoing post-mastectomy breast reconstruction.Ann Surg Oncol2021;28:7842-53

[13]

Segil JL,Graczyk EL.Measuring embodiment: a review of methods for prosthetic devices.Front Neurorobot2022;16:902162 PMCID:PMC9797051

[14]

Zbinden J,Ortiz-Catalan M.Prosthetic embodiment: systematic review on definitions, measures, and experimental paradigms.J Neuroeng Rehabil2022;19:37. PMCID:PMC8962549

[15]

Bekrater-Bodmann R.Perceptual correlates of successful body-prosthesis interaction in lower limb amputees: psychometric characterisation and development of the prosthesis embodiment scale.Sci Rep2020;10:14203 PMCID:PMC7450092

[16]

Page MJ,Bossuyt PM.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.BMJ2021;372:n71 PMCID:PMC8005924

[17]

Hopwood P.New challenges in psycho-oncology: an embodied approach to body image.Psychooncology2019;28:211-8

[18]

Hansen ST.'At least there is something in my bra': a qualitative study of women's experiences with oncoplastic breast surgery.J Adv Nurs2022;78:3304-19 PMCID:PMC9544860

[19]

Chuang LY,Yin SY.Staring at my body: the experience of body reconstruction in breast cancer long-term survivors.Cancer Nurs2018;41:E56-61.

[20]

Cheng T,Platt J.Restoring wholeness: women’s embodied experiences in considering post-mastectomy delayed breast reconstruction.Cogent Social Sciences2018;4:1479478

[21]

Holmberg C.No one sees the fear: becoming diseased before becoming ill--being diagnosed with breast cancer.Cancer Nurs2014;37:175-83

[22]

Eftekari SC,Moura SP.A framework for understanding prosthetic embodiment for the plastic surgeon.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2023;84:469-86.

[23]

Baicchi A,Sandford JL.Sensory perceptions in language, embodiment and epistemology. Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics. Springer Cham; 2018.

[24]

Braun N,Spychala N.The Senses of agency and ownership: a review.Front Psychol2018;9:535 PMCID:PMC5911504

[25]

Slatman J.Multiple dimensions of embodiment in medical practices.Med Health Care Philos2014;17:549-57

[26]

Longo MR,Kammers MPM,Haggard P.What is embodiment? A psychometric approach.Cognition2008;107:978-98

[27]

Bekrater-Bodmann R.Factors associated with prosthesis embodiment and its importance for prosthetic satisfaction in lower limb amputees.Front Neurorobot2020;14:604376 PMCID:PMC7843383

[28]

Longo MR. Types of body representation. Available from: https://www.bbk.ac.uk/psychology/bodylab/docs/longo-2016-foundembodcogn.pdf [Last accessed on 30 Aug 2023]

[29]

Gallagher S. Body image and body schema in a deafferented subject. J Mind Behav 1995;16:369-89. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43853796 [Last accessed on 30 Aug 2023]

[30]

Gouzien A,Touillet A.Reachability and the sense of embodiment in amputees using prostheses.Sci Rep2017;7:4999 PMCID:PMC5503947

[31]

Di Pino G,Spaccasassi C.Sensory- and action-oriented embodiment of neurally-interfaced robotic hand prostheses.Front Neurosci2020;14:389 PMCID:PMC7232597

[32]

Fritsch A,Bekrater-Bodmann R.Prosthesis embodiment and attenuation of prosthetic touch in upper limb amputees-a proof-of-concept study.Conscious Cogn2021;88:103073

[33]

Rognini G,Raspopovic S.Multisensory bionic limb to achieve prosthesis embodiment and reduce distorted phantom limb perceptions.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2019;90:833-6 PMCID:PMC6791810

[34]

Brooks SG,Cimino SR,Mayo AL.Sexuality and sexual health in adults with limb loss: a systematic review.Sex Disabil2021;39:3-31.

[35]

Weissler JM,Carney MJ,Wu LC.Sifting through the evidence: a comprehensive review and analysis of neurotization in breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg2018;141:550-65

[36]

Shiah E,Comer CD.Neurotization in innervated breast reconstruction: a systematic review of techniques and outcomes.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2022;75:2890-913

[37]

Chou J,Kaufman Goldberg T.Is nerve coaptation associated with improved sensation after microvascular breast reconstruction? A systematic review.Microsurgery2023;43:522-8

[38]

Lindau ST.Using bionics to restore sensation to reconstructed breasts.Front Neurorobot2020;14:24 PMCID:PMC7227383

[39]

Slatman J,Meershoek A.Responding to scars after breast surgery.Qual Health Res2016;26:1614-26

[40]

Boer M, van der Hulst R, Slatman J. The surprise of a breast reconstruction: a longitudinal phenomenological study to women’s expectations about reconstructive surgery.Hum Stud2015;38:409-30

[41]

Piot-Ziegler C,Raffoul W.Mastectomy, body deconstruction, and impact on identity: a qualitative study.Br J Health Psychol2010;15:479-510.

[42]

Loaring JM,Shaw R.Renegotiating sexual intimacy in the context of altered embodiment: the experiences of women with breast cancer and their male partners following mastectomy and reconstruction.Health Psychol2015;34:426-36.

[43]

Montezuma T,Vaz MMDOLL.Changes in postural control in mastectomized women.JCT2014;05:493-9

[44]

Ahn SY,Song Y,Jung JY.Dynamic body posture after unilateral mastectomy: a pilot study.Gland Surg2020;9:1235-43 PMCID:PMC7667051

[45]

Mangone M,Agostini F.Changes in spine alignment and postural balance after breast cancer surgery: a rehabilitative point of view.Biores Open Access2019;8:121-8 PMCID:PMC6664823

[46]

Koralewska A,Łukowski R.Influence of the external breast prosthesis on the postural control of women who underwent mastectomy: cross-sectional study.Front Oncol2022;12:920211 PMCID:PMC9465318

[47]

Ciesla S.The effect of immediate breast reconstruction with Becker-25 prosthesis on the preservation of proper body posture in patients after mastectomy.Eur J Surg Oncol2010;36:625-31

[48]

Jeong JH,Chang SY.The effect of immediate breast reconstruction on thoracic spine alignment after unilateral mastectomy.Clin Breast Cancer2018;18:214-9

[49]

Atanes Mendes Peres AC, Dias de Oliveira Latorre MD, Yugo Maesaka J, Filassi JR, Chada Baracat E, Alves Gonçalves Ferreira E. Body posture after mastectomy: comparison between immediate breast reconstruction versus mastectomy alone.Physiother Res Int2017;22:e1642

[50]

Oh JS,Jin US.The effect of delayed breast reconstruction after unilateral mastectomy on spine alignment.Gland Surg2021;10:2368-77 PMCID:PMC8411092

[51]

Quixadá AP,Osypiuk K.Qigong training positively impacts both posture and mood in breast cancer survivors with persistent post-surgical pain: support for an embodied cognition paradigm.Front Psychol2022;13:800727 PMCID:PMC8900705

[52]

Esplen MJ.Online interventions to address body image distress in cancer.Curr Opin Support Palliat Care2020;14:74-9

[53]

Adams E,Armes J.The experiences, needs and concerns of younger women with breast cancer: a meta-ethnography.Psychooncology2011;20:851-61.

[54]

Thomas-MacLean R.Beyond dichotomies of health and illness: life after breast cancer.Nurs Inq2005;12:200-9

[55]

Jong V. Unveiling beauty: insight into being tattooed postmastectomy.Nurs Forum2022;57:536-44 PMCID:PMC9546492

[56]

Parton CM,Perz J.Women’s construction of embodiment and the abject sexual body after cancer.Qual Health Res2016;26:490-503

[57]

Trachtenberg L,Toner B.Gender socialization as a predictor of psychosocial well-being in young women with breast cancer.Curr Oncol2022;29:8121-32 PMCID:PMC9689583

[58]

Lende DH.Embodiment and breast cancer among African American women.Qual Health Res2009;19:216-28

[59]

Greco C.The poly implant prothèse breast prostheses scandal: embodied risk and social suffering.Soc Sci Med2015;147:150-7

[60]

Graham R,Priest H.Constructions of decision making for risk-reducing mastectomy.Qual Health Res2018;28:1595-609

[61]

Liu LQ,Mehigan S.BREAST-Q measurement of the patient perspective in oncoplastic breast surgery: a systematic review.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open2018;6:e1904 PMCID:PMC6143323

[62]

Cano SJ,Scott AM,Pusic AL.The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples.Plast Reconstr Surg2012;129:293-302.

[63]

Pusic AL,Snell L.Measuring and managing patient expectations for breast reconstruction: impact on quality of life and patient satisfaction.Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res2012;12:149-58 PMCID:PMC4182909

[64]

Klassen AF,Fuzesi S.Development and validation of the BREAST-Q breast-conserving therapy module.Ann Surg Oncol2020;27:2238-47. PMCID:PMC8174155

[65]

Tsangaris E,Kaur MN.development and psychometric validation of the breast-q animation deformity scale for women undergoing an implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy.Ann Surg Oncol2021;28:5183-93.

[66]

Kaur MN,Bordeleau L.Re-examining content validity of the BREAST-Q more than a decade later to determine relevance and comprehensiveness.J Patient Rep Outcomes2023;7:37 PMCID:PMC10079800

[67]

Abbas F,Simman R.Functional and psychosocial outcomes following innervated breast reconstruction: a systematic review.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open2022;10:e4559 PMCID:PMC9521786

[68]

Shauver MJ.A guide to qualitative research in plastic surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg2010;126:1089-97 PMCID:PMC4389680

[69]

Snell L,Klassen A.Clarifying the expectations of patients undergoing implant breast reconstruction: a qualitative study.Plast Reconstr Surg2010;126:1825-30 PMCID:PMC4519227

[70]

Fu R,Chen M.A qualitative study of breast reconstruction decision-making among asian immigrant women living in the united states.Plast Reconstr Surg2017;139:360e-8e

[71]

Baker JL,Wenziger CM."Going Flat" after mastectomy: patient-reported outcomes by online survey.Ann Surg Oncol2021;28:2493-505.

PDF

122

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/