The MUSA robot and its applicability in lymphatic surgery

Abstract

The development of surgical treatment of lymphedema has been a challenging endeavor. Various surgical modalities have been proposed, but the results are often unsatisfactory. The lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) revolutionized by Koshima et al. with the introduction of super microsurgery has gained traction in the treatment of lymphedema and has shown favorable results. However, super microsurgery requires excellent hand-eye coordination, meticulous tissue handling, dexterity, and operative flow, which are subject to multiple factors. Robot-assisted microsurgery (RAMS) has the potential to increase safety for clinicians and patients and create new possibilities in the field of super microsurgery. Therefore, plastic surgeons of the Maastricht University Medical Center (Maastricht, the Netherlands) teamed up with engineers from the Eindhoven University of Technology (Eindhoven, the Netherlands) and developed the first dedicated robotic platform for (super)microsurgery, the MUSA. The development of MUSA, from inception to the first clinical study in patients with lymphedema, has yielded promising results. This review aims to elucidate the development of the MUSA and its role in lymphatic surgery.

Keywords

Lymphatic surgery / super microsurgery / robotic-assisted surgery

References

[1] Park KE,Chandler L.Surgical management of lymphedema: a review of current literature.Gland Surg2020;9:503-11 PMCID:PMC7225501

[2] Rajan S.Recent advances in management of lymphedema.JSSTD2021;3:26-32

[3] Miller TA.Charles procedure for lymphedema: a warning.Am J Surg1980;139:290-2

[4] Olszewski WL.The treatment of lymphedema of the extremities with microsurgical lympho-venous anastomoses.Int Angiol1988;7:312-21

[5] Koshima I,Urushibara K.Paraumbilical perforator flap without deep inferior epigastric vessels.Plast Reconstr Surg1998;102:1052-7

[6] Koshima I,Tsutsui T,Itoh S.Minimal invasive lymphaticovenular anastomosis under local anesthesia for leg lymphedema: is it effective for stage III and IV?.Ann Plast Surg2004;53:261-6

[7] Mohos B,Steinbacher J,Tzou CJ.Long-term use of ultrasound for locating optimal LVA sites: a descriptive data analysis.J Reconstr Microsurg2022;38:238-44

[8] Cornelissen AJM,Graupner C.Near-infrared fluorescence image-guidance in plastic surgery: a systematic review.Eur J Plast Surg2018;41:269-78 PMCID:PMC5953995

[9] Nugent E,Perez-Abadia G.Factors influencing microsurgical skill acquisition during a dedicated training course.Microsurgery2012;32:649-56

[10] Lakhiani C,Janhofer DE.Ergonomics in microsurgery.J Surg Oncol2018;118:840-4

[11] Klodmann J,Hellings-kuß A.An introduction to robotically assisted surgical systems: current developments and focus areas of research.Curr Robot Rep2021;2:321-32

[12] Takacs A,Rudas IJ.Origins of surgical robotics: from space to the operating room.Acta Polytechnica Hungarica2016;13:13-30

[13] Fosch-villaronga E,Drukarch H.The role of humans in surgery automation: exploring the influence of automation on human-robot interaction and responsibility in surgery innovation.Int J of Soc Robotics2023;15:563-80

[14] Das H,Boswell C,Rodriguez G. Robot assisted microsurgery development at JPL. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/2014/18940 [Last accessed on 13 Jun 2023]

[15] Katz RD,Taylor JA.Robotics in microsurgery: use of a surgical robot to perform a free flap in a pig.Microsurgery2005;25:566-9

[16] Katz RD,Rosson GD,Singh NK.Robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery: use of a telemanipulator slave robot to perform microvascular anastomoses.J Reconstr Microsurg2006;22:53-7

[17] Taleb C,Liverneaux PA.Telemicrosurgery: a feasibility study in a rat model.Chir Main2008;27:104-8

[18] Tan YPA,Wong JKF.Current limitations of surgical robotics in reconstructive plastic microsurgery.Front Surg2018;5:22 PMCID:PMC5931136

[19] Selber JC.Transoral robotic reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects: a case series.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery2010;126:1978-87

[20] van der Hulst R,Bouvy N.Microvascular anastomosis: is there a role for robotic surgery?.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2007;60:101-2

[21] van Mulken TJM,Qiu SS.Robotic (super) microsurgery: feasibility of a new master-slave platform in an in vivo animal model and future directions.J Surg Oncol2018;118:826-31 PMCID:PMC6221079

[22] van Mulken TJM,Schols RM.Preclinical experience using a new robotic system created for microsurgery.Plast Reconstr Surg2018;142:1367-76

[23] Chan W,Ramakrishnan V.Structured assessment of microsurgery skills in the clinical setting.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2010;63:1329-34

[24] van Mulken TJM,Scharmga AMJ.First-in-human robotic supermicrosurgery using a dedicated microsurgical robot for treating breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized pilot trial.Nat Commun2020;11:757 PMCID:PMC7012819

[25] Narushima M,Ogata F,Mihara M.Indocyanine green lymphography findings in limb lymphedema.J Reconstr Microsurg2016;32:72-9

[26] van Mulken TJM,Qiu SS.One-year outcomes of the first human trial on robot-assisted lymphaticovenous anastomosis for breast cancer-related lymphedema.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery2022;149:151-61

[27] Yamamoto T.Upper extremity lymphedema index: a simple method for severity evaluation of upper extremity lymphedema.Ann Plast Surg2013;70:47-9

[28] Temple CLF.A new, validated instrument to evaluate competency in microsurgery: the university of Western Ontario microsurgical skills acquisition/assessment instrument [outcomes article].Plast Reconstr Surg2011;127:215-22

[29] Devoogdt N,Geraerts I,Christiaens MR.Lymphoedema functioning, disability and health questionnaire (Lymph-ICF): reliability and validity.Phys Ther2011;91:944-57

[30] Gudeloglu A,Parekattil SJ.Robotic-assisted microsurgery for an elective microsurgical practice.Semin Plast Surg2014;28:11-9 PMCID:PMC3946016

[31] Riskin DJ,Gertner M.Innovation in surgery: a historical perspective.Ann Surg2006;244:686-93 PMCID:PMC1856601