Comparing microsurgical breast reconstruction outcomes following postoperative monitoring techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 2529 patients

Jose A. Foppiani , Lauren Valentine , Angelica Hernandez Alvarez , Allan Weidman , Stephen Stearns , Lacey Foster , Karthika Devi , Khaled Albakri , Samuel J. Lin

Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 53

PDF
Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) :53 DOI: 10.20517/2347-9264.2022.137
Meta-Analysis

Comparing microsurgical breast reconstruction outcomes following postoperative monitoring techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 2529 patients

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Aims: This paper aims to assess the existing evidence regarding oximetry and thermography by comparing postoperative rates of complications following microsurgical breast reconstruction.

Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane was completed. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of all included studies was then performed.

Results: Fourteen studies were included with a total population of 2,529 female patients who underwent microvascular breast reconstruction, ultimately totaling 3,289 flaps. The mean age for the cohorts included in this study ranged from 48.9 to 57 years of age. A total of 15 complete flap losses were reported. Furthermore, this meta-analysis of proportion showed that total flap loss experienced was 0% (95%CI 0%-100%) for patients monitored with thermography compared to 0% (95%CI 0%-1%) for those monitored with oximetry. Partial flap loss occurred at a frequency of 1% [95%CI 0%-73%] for patients monitored with thermography compared to 1% (95%CI 0%-2%) for those monitored with oximetry. Furthermore, the results of this study showed that thermography prompted a return to the operating room (OR) in 1% (95%CI 0%-73%) of the patients compared to 5% (95%CI 3%-9%) for oximetry. Lastly, the overall complication rate was 12% (95%CI 1%-54%) for patients monitored with thermography compared to 10% (95%CI 4%-21%) for those monitored with oximetry.

Conclusion: Ultimately, this meta-analysis concludes that while oximetry monitoring currently has strong evidence for improving flap outcomes, trends in the current data indicate that further studies may demonstrate that thermography may be comparable to oximetry in achieving similar patient outcomes.

Keywords

Microsurgical breast reconstruction / oximetry / thermography / flap monitoring / flap take back / flap outcomes

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jose A. Foppiani, Lauren Valentine, Angelica Hernandez Alvarez, Allan Weidman, Stephen Stearns, Lacey Foster, Karthika Devi, Khaled Albakri, Samuel J. Lin. Comparing microsurgical breast reconstruction outcomes following postoperative monitoring techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 2529 patients. Plastic and Aesthetic Research, 2023, 10(1): 53 DOI:10.20517/2347-9264.2022.137

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Mehrara BJ,Arcilla E,Shaw WW.Complications after microvascular breast reconstruction: experience with 1195 flaps.Plast Reconstr Surg2006;118:1100-9

[2]

Nahabedian MY,Galdino G.Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome.Plast Reconstr Surg2002;110:466-75; discussion 476-7

[3]

Chevray PM.Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.Plast Reconstr Surg2004;114:1077-83; discussion 1084-5

[4]

Ulusal BG,Wei FC,Song D.Breast reconstruction using the entire transverse abdominal adipocutaneous flap based on unilateral superficial or deep inferior epigastric vessels.Plast Reconstr Surg2006;117:1395-403; discussion 1404-6

[5]

Baltodano PA,Rezak K.Early discontinuation of breast free flap monitoring: a strategy driven by national data.Plast Reconstr Surg2020;146:258e-64e

[6]

McLaughlin M,Cohen-Shohet R.Safety of coupled arterial anastomosis in autologous breast reconstruction.J Reconstr Microsurg2021;37:132-5.

[7]

Selber JC,Liu J.The survival curve: factors impacting the outcome of free flap take-backs.Plast Reconstr Surg2012;130:105-13

[8]

Mirzabeigi MN,Kovach SJ,Serletti JM.Free flap take-back following postoperative microvascular compromise: predicting salvage versus failure.Plast Reconstr Surg2012;130:579-89

[9]

Han M,Zhu B.Risk factors for and cost implications of free flap take-backs: a single institution review.Laryngoscope2021;131:E1821-9.

[10]

Odorico SK,J Nicksic P.Surgical and demographic predictors of free flap salvage after takeback: a systematic review.Microsurgery2023;43:78-88. PMCID:PMC10084419

[11]

Disa JJ,Hidalgo DA.Efficacy of conventional monitoring techniques in free tissue transfer: an 11-year experience in 750 consecutive cases.Plast Reconstr Surg1999;104:97-101

[12]

Kwasnicki RM,Banhidy N.Quantifying the limitations of clinical and technology-based flap monitoring strategies using a systematic thematic analysis.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open2021;9:e3663 PMCID:PMC8274739

[13]

Keller A.A new diagnostic algorithm for early prediction of vascular compromise in 208 microsurgical flaps using tissue oxygen saturation measurements.Ann Plast Surg2009;62:538-43

[14]

Nassar AH,Manstein S.Comparison of various modalities utilized for preoperative planning in microsurgical reconstructive surgery.J Reconstr Microsurg2022;38:170-80

[15]

Harris JD,Manring MM,Flanigan DC.How to write a systematic review.Am J Sports Med2014;42:2761-8

[16]

Babineau J.Product review: covidence (systematic review software).J Can Health Libr Assoc2014;35:68-71

[17]

Nyaga VN,Aerts M.Metaprop: a stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data.Arch Public Health2014;72:39 PMCID:PMC4373114

[18]

Freeman MD,Sanati-Mehrizy P,Taub PJ.Nonaesthetic applications for botulinum toxin in plastic surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg2020;146:157-70.

[19]

Thiessen FEF,Tondu T.Dynamic infrared thermography (DIRT) in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a clinical study with a standardized measurement setup.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2020;252:166-73.

[20]

Saxena A,Raman V.Infrared (IR) thermography-based quantitative parameters to predict the risk of post-operative cancerous breast resection flap necrosis.Infrared Phys Techn2019;103:103063

[21]

Phillips CJ,Kuckelman J.Mobile smartphone thermal imaging characterization and identification of microvascular flow insufficiencies in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator free flaps.J Surg Res2021;261:394-9.

[22]

Lindelauf AAMA,Schols RM,Weerwind PW.Exploring personalized postoperative non-invasive tissue oximetry in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.Eur J Plast Surg2022;45:267-75

[23]

Johnson BM,Egan KG.Comparing tissue oximetry to doppler monitoring in 1367 consecutive breast free flaps.Microsurgery2023;43:57-62.

[24]

Pelletier A,Agarwal S,Song D.Cost analysis of near-infrared spectroscopy tissue oximetry for monitoring autologous free tissue breast reconstruction.J Reconstr Microsurg2011;27:487-94

[25]

Ricci JA,Ho OA,Tobias AM.Evaluating the use of tissue oximetry to decrease intensive unit monitoring for free flap breast reconstruction.Ann Plast Surg2017;79:42-6

[26]

Ozturk CN,Ledinh W.Variables affecting postoperative tissue perfusion monitoring in free flap breast reconstruction.Microsurgery2015;35:123-8.

[27]

Saad N,Karamanos E.Tissue oximetry readings accurately predict late complications in patients undergoing free flap breast reconstruction: exploring the optimal cut point value.J Reconstr Microsurg2020;36:534-40

[28]

Salgarello M,Rossi M,Barone-Adesi L.Postoperative monitoring of free DIEP flap in breast reconstruction with near-infrared spectroscopy: variables affecting the regional oxygen saturation.J Reconstr Microsurg2018;34:383-8.

[29]

Carruthers KH,Yoshida S.Inpatient flap monitoring after deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction: how long is long enough?.J Reconstr Microsurg2019;35:682-7

[30]

Tran PC,Lester ME,Socas J.The false positive rate of transcutaneous tissue oximetry alarms in microvascular breast reconstruction rises after 24 hours.J Reconstr Microsurg2021;37:453-557

[31]

Kumbasar DE,Dawood O,Blackburn A.Monitoring breast reconstruction flaps using near-infrared spectroscopy tissue oximetry.Plast Surg Nurs2021;41:108-11

[32]

Koolen PGL,Ho OA.Does increased experience with tissue oximetry monitoring in microsurgical breast reconstruction lead to decreased flap loss? The learning effect.Plast Reconstr Surg2016;137:1093-101.

[33]

Shammas RL,Sergesketter AR.A comparison of surgical complications in patients undergoing delayed versus staged tissue-expander and free-flap breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg2021;148:501-9.

[34]

Hamdi M,Webster MH.Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in breast reconstruction: experience with the first 50 flaps.Plast Reconstr Surg1999;103:86-95

[35]

Olsen MA,Fox IK,Wallace AE.Comparison of wound complications after immediate, delayed, and secondary breast reconstruction procedures.JAMA Surg2017;152:e172338 PMCID:PMC5831445

[36]

Bennett KG,Kim HM,Pusic AL.Comparison of 2-year complication rates among common techniques for postmastectomy breast reconstruction.JAMA Surg2018;153:901-8 PMCID:PMC6233788

[37]

Moderhak M,Jankau J.Active dynamic thermography method for TRAM flap blood perfusion mapping in breast reconstruction.Quant Infr Therm J2017;14:234-49

[38]

Hardwicke JT,Skillman JM.Detection of perforators using smartphone thermal imaging.Plast Reconstr Surg2016;137:39-41

[39]

Halani SH,Li X.Flap monitoring using transcutaneous oxygen or carbon dioxide measurements.J Hand Microsurg2022;14:10-8 PMCID:PMC8898164

[40]

Schoenbrunner A,DeSanto M.Cost-effectiveness of vioptix versus clinical examination for flap monitoring of autologous free tissue breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg2021;148:185e-9e

[41]

Berlin NL,Matros E,Momoh AO.The costs of breast reconstruction and implications for episode-based bundled payment models.Plast Reconstr Surg2020;146:721e-30e PMCID:PMC8503817

PDF

143

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/