3D analysis at implant sites after soft tissue augmentation with two types of collagen matrices: a pilot study

Abstract

Soft tissue augmentation at the implant site is one of several techniques suggested in the case of soft and hard tissue deficiency after implant rehabilitation. The gold standard in this procedure is connective tissue graft (CTG), which is considered an autologous material with a high proliferative pattern. Today, several collagen matrices (VCMXs) are on the market as CTG substitutes and are recommended for this type of procedure. The aim of this case report is to compare the resorption process and the volume gain of two potential collagen matrices (VCMXA and VCMXB) of porcine origin for soft tissue augmentation around single implants. 3D analysis with dedicated software (GOM inspect® Braunschweig, Germany) was performed to understand the volumetric and surface changes on the vestibular aspect and the amount of resorbed biomaterial at 7 days from the surgery and at 3 months of follow up. Considering the limitation of the four included patients and the different surgical sites (13 and 17 for VCMXA and 26 and 25 for VCMXB), both VCMXs showed interesting results with respect to the baseline at 7 days (VCMXA gain, + 2.93 ± 1.65 mm; VCMXB, + 2.58 ± 1.11 mm); however, after 3 months of follow up, an important remodelling process was present in both treated sites (VCMXA, + 2.00 ± 0.99 mm; VCMXB, + 0.41 ± 0.73 mm). Soft tissue augmentation at the implant site resulted in a similar increase in volume for both the matrices. On the other hand, VCMXA seemed to preserve more volume at 3 months. Future randomised clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.

Keywords

Collagen-based matrix / dental implant / soft tissue augmentation / soft tissue volume / aesthetic outcome / keratinised tissue / peri-implant soft tissue

References

[1] Lekholm U,Henry P.Survival of the Brånemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10- year prospective multicenter study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants1999;14:639-45

[2] Romandini M,Lima C,Araoz A.Prevalence and risk/protective indicators of buccal soft tissue dehiscence around dental implants.J Clin Periodontol2021;48:455-63

[3] Prato GP, Cairo F, Tinti C, Cortellini P, Muzzi L, Mancini EA. Prevention of alveolar ridge deformities and reconstruction of lost anatomy: a review of surgical approaches.Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent2004;24:434-45

[4] Avila-Ortiz G,Romero-Bustillos M,Zimmerman MB.Efficacy of alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled trial.J Dent Res2020;99:402-9

[5] Cairo F,Nieri M.Soft tissue management at implant sites.J Clin Periodontol2008;35:163-7

[6] Akcalı A,Sun C,Nibali L.What is the effect of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone loss around dental implants?.Clin Oral Implants Res2017;28:1046-53

[7] Gobbato L,Sohrabi K,Karimbux N.The effect of keratinized mucosa width on peri-implant health: a systematic review.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants2013;28:1536-45

[8] Thoma DS,Jung RE.Critical soft-tissue dimensions with dental implants and treatment concepts.Periodontol 20002014;66:106-18

[9] Bassetti RG,Bassetti MA.Soft tissue augmentation around osseointegrated and uncovered dental implants: a systematic review.Clin Oral Investig2017;21:53-70

[10] Benninger B,Carter W.Clinical measurements of hard palate and implications for subepithelial connective tissue grafts with suggestions for palatal nomenclature.J Oral Maxillofac Surg2012;70:149-53

[11] Burkhardt R,Lang NP.Research Group on Oral Soft Tissue Biology & Wound HealingSelf-reported pain perception of patients after mucosal graft harvesting in the palatal area.J Clin Periodontol2015;42:281-7

[12] Thoma DS,Hilbe M,Hüsler J.Randomized controlled clinical study evaluating effectiveness and safety of a volume-stable collagen matrix compared to autogenous connective tissue grafts for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites.J Clin Periodontol2016;43:874-85

[13] Zeltner M,Hämmerle CH,Thoma DS.Randomized controlled clinical study comparing a volume-stable collagen matrix to autogenous connective tissue grafts for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites: linear volumetric soft tissue changes up to 3 months.J Clin Periodontol2017;44:446-53

[14] Huber S,Hämmerle CHF,Thoma DS.Non-interventional 1-year follow-up study of peri-implant soft tissues following previous soft tissue augmentation and crown insertion in single-tooth gaps.J Clin Periodontol2018;45:504-12

[15] Smidt A,Sharon E.A nouveau collagen scaffold to simplify lateral augmentation of deficient ridges between natural teeth.Quintessence Int2019;50:576-82

[16] Scheyer ET.Evaluation of premature membrane exposure and early healing in guided bone regeneration of peri-implant dehiscence and fenestration defects with a slowly resorbing porcine collagen ribose cross-linked membrane: A consecutive case series.Clin Adv Periodontics2015;5:165-70

[17] Riley DS,Kienle GS.CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document.J Clin Epidemiol2017;89:218-35

[18] John G,Schwarz F.Effects of taurolidine and chlorhexidine on SaOS-2 cells and human gingival fibroblasts grown on implant surfaces.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants2014;29:728-34

[19] Müller HD,Moritz A,Gruber R.Cytotoxicity and antimicrobial activity of oral rinses in vitro.Biomed Res Int2017;2017:4019723 PMCID:PMC5376431

[20] Tavelli L,Avila-Ortiz G,Giannobile WV.Peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification and its impact on peri-implant health: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.J Periodontol2021;92:21-44

[21] Thoma DS,Zwahlen M,Jung RE.A systematic review assessing soft tissue augmentation techniques.Clin Oral Implants Res2009;20 Suppl 4:146-65

[22] Pizzo M, Modica F, Bethaz N, Priotto P, Romagnoli R. The connective tissue graft: a comparative clinical evaluation of wound healing at the palatal donor site. A preliminary study.J Clin Periodontol2002;29:848-54

[23] Soileau KM.A histologic evaluation of various stages of palatal healing following subepithelial connective tissue grafting procedures: a comparison of eight cases.J Periodontol2006;77:1267-73

[24] Zuhr O,Hürzeler M.The addition of soft tissue replacement grafts in plastic periodontal and implant surgery: critical elements in design and execution.J Clin Periodontol2014;41 Suppl 15:S123-42

[25] Mathes SH,Uebersax L.A bioreactor test system to mimic the biological and mechanical environment of oral soft tissues and to evaluate substitutes for connective tissue grafts.Biotechnol Bioeng2010;107:1029-39

[26] Thoma DS,Cochran DL,Jung RE.Tissue integration of collagen-based matrices: an experimental study in mice.Clin Oral Implants Res2012;23:1333-9

[27] Tavelli L,Majzoub J,Mendonça G.Volumetric changes at implant sites: A systematic appraisal of traditional methods and optical scanning-based digital technologies.J Clin Periodontol2021;48:315-34