PDF
Abstract
Aim: We analyzed the use of tubularized tunneled bladder mucosa graft (TBMG) and its application as a salvage procedure or as primary surgery for long urethroplasty in children and adolescents. Specific attention was given to a new method to harvest a long bladder mucosa graft through a minimal detrusotomy.
Methods: We analyzed the files of 10 patients who underwent TBMG urethroplasty at median age of 105 months (range 20-195 months). The indications were perineal hypospadias cripple in two, masculinizing genitoplasty for ovotesticular Ovotesticular Disorder of Sex Development (DSD) in two, perineal hypospadias in four, duplicated urethra in one, and complications of circumcision in one. Staged reconstruction was performed in all patients. The first stage was removal of all fibrous tissues and efficient treatment of curvature and skin coverage. After a minimal delay of one year, a free bladder mucosa graft was harvested through a minimal detrusotomy and tubularized. Tunneling of the graft was proceeded from the perineal urethrostomy to the glans.
Results: The graft was successfully harvested through the minimal detrusotomy approach for variable lengths of urethroplasty; the median length was 10.5 cm (range 8-16 cm). The median follow up was 61.7 months (range 18-160 months). TBMG was the last surgery with no redo in five cases (50%). Long stricture occurred in one case of primary perineal hypospadias and needed a redo staged surgery. Two patients performed self-dilatation for distal stenosis.
Conclusion: The tunneled bladder mucosa tube graft technique represents a good alternative for a long urethroplasty in patients with a paucity of healthy skin. The minimal detrusotomy technique for graft retrieval may reduce graft harvesting morbidity.
Keywords
Hypospadias
/
bladder mucosa graft
/
hypospadias cripples
/
urethra reconstruction
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Alaa El-Ghoneimi, Amane-Allah Lachkar, Pauline Lopez, Annabel Paye-Jaouen, Matthieu Peycelon.
Tunneled tubularized bladder mucosal graft for long urethral reconstruction: is it a reliable option in selected complex cases in children and adolescents?.
Plastic and Aesthetic Research, 2022, 9(1): 39 DOI:10.20517/2347-9264.2021.101
| [1] |
Verla W,Hoebeke P.Urethroplasty for Failed hypospadias repair related strictures in adults: a retrospective analysis with long-term follow-up.Urology2020;143:248-54
|
| [2] |
Badawy H,Moussa A.Staged repair of redo and crippled hypospadias: analysis of outcomes and complications.J Pediatr Urol2019;15:151.e1-151.e10
|
| [3] |
Turkyilmaz Z,Atan A.Redo hypospadias repair: comparison of three different methods.Urol Int2020;104:391-5
|
| [4] |
Mundy AR.Failed hypospadias repair presenting in adults.Eur Urol2006;49:774-6
|
| [5] |
Memmelaar J.Use of bladder mucosa in a one-stage repair of hypospadias.Journal of Urology1947;58:68-73
|
| [6] |
Ransley P,Oesch IL,Hoover D.The use of bladder mucosa and combined bladder mucosa/preputial skin grafts for urethral reconstruction.J Urol1987;138:1096-8
|
| [7] |
Zhao M,Tang Y.Two-stage repair with buccal mucosa for severe and complicated hypospadias in adults.Int J Urol2011;18:155-61
|
| [8] |
Kim SW,Han SW.Buccal Mucosa Tube graft for failed hypospadias repair: worth it or not?.Urology2020;146:196-200
|
| [9] |
Djordjevic ML,Bizic M,Vukadinovic V.“Hanging” of the buccal mucosal graft for urethral stricture repair after failed hypospadias.J Urol2011;185:2479-82
|
| [10] |
Barbagli G,Djinovic R,Lazzeri M.Retrospective descriptive analysis of 1,176 patients with failed hypospadias repair.J Urol2010;183:207-11
|
| [11] |
Weiss DA,Frazier JR.Back to the future: The Cecil-Culp technique for salvage penile reconstructive procedures.J Pediatr Urol2018;14:328.e1-7
|
| [12] |
Fine R,Zelkovic P.Tunneled buccal mucosa tube grafts for repair of proximal hypospadias.J Urol2015;193:1813-7
|
| [13] |
Wood DN,Andrich DE,Mundy AR.The morbidity of buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty and the effect of nonclosure of the graft harvest site on postoperative pain.J Urol2004;172:580-3
|
| [14] |
Valla JS,Dodat H.Single-stage correction of posterior hypospadias (178 cases). Comparison of three techniques: free skin graft, free bladder mucosal graft, transverse pedicle preputial graft.Eur J Pediatr Surg1991;1:287-90
|
| [15] |
Mouttalib S,Abbo O,Galinier P.Free tubularised vesical mucosa graft for congenital stenosis of the urethra in children.Prog Urol2015;25:109-14
|
| [16] |
Lanciotti M,Elia A.Proximal hypospadias repair with bladder mucosal graft: Our 10 years experience.J Pediatr Urol2017;13:294.e1-6
|
| [17] |
Castagnetti M.Surgical management of primary severe hypospadias in children: systematic 20-year review.J Urol2010;184:1469-74
|
| [18] |
Blanc T,Siddiqui M,Paye-Jaouen A.Double-face preputial island flap revisited: is it a reliable one-stage repair for severe hypospadias?.World J Urol2021;39:1613-24
|
| [19] |
Duckett JW,Ewalt D.Buccal mucosal urethral replacement.J Urol1995;153:1660-3
|
| [20] |
Weingärtner K,Hendren WH.Nephrogenic adenoma after urethral reconstruction using bladder mucosa: report of 6 cases and review of the literature.J Urol1997;158:1175-7
|