Photometric analysis of absorbable barbed suture for periareolar closure in mastopexy

Abstract

Aim: The primary author previously described his technique for periareolar closure in mastopexy using a pinwheel interlocking purse string with absorbable barbed suture and now reports the results of a retrospective photometric analysis comparing this technique with the same closure using Gortex® suture. This study is designed to compare the degree of areolar widening and safety profile of using absorbable barbed sutures for periareolar closure versus permanent smooth suture.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients whose periareolar closures were performed using an interlocking purse-string technique over a 10-year period. Only patients undergoing circumvertical mastopexy were included. All had photometric evaluation and follow-up performed within 6-24 months.

Results: In total, 20 patients (40 areolas), which were closed with absorbable barbed suture, were analyzed photometrically. In this suture group, areola size increased a mean of 4.9% from baseline, and no complications (0%) were observed. This compared favorably with previously reported complication rates using permanent sutures and with a series of cases presented herein in which permanent smooth suture was used for purse string closure. The degree to which absorbable barbed suture controls areolar spread was shown to be significantly better than those where permanent smooth purse string techniques were employed.

Conclusion: Circumvertical mastopexy closures using absorbable barbed suture was shown to be safe and effective and compared favorably to older techniques using permanent smooth suture for similar closures. This paper lends support to the safety of using absorbable barbed suture in circumareolar closures to limit areolar spread.

Keywords

Mastopexy / periareolar / absorbable barbed suture / Quill^TM suture / purse-string / circumvertical / permanent expanded polytetrafluoroethylene suture / GORE-TEX^® suture / breast lift

References

[1] American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2013 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. Available from: www.plasticsurgery.org. [Last Accessed on 24 June 2014].

[2] Benelli L.A new periareolar mammoplasty: the "round block" technique..Aesthet Plast Surg1990;14:93-100

[3] Lejour M.Vertical mammoplasty and liposuction of the breast..Plast Reconstr Surg1994;94:100-14

[4] Hall-Findlay EJ.A simplified vertical reduction mammoplasty: shortening of the learning curve..Plast Reconstr Surg1999;104:748-59

[5] Hammond DC,Kim J.The interlocking Gore-Tex suture for control of areolar diameter and shape..Plast Reconstr Surg2007;119:804-9

[6] Franco J,Kelly M.Periareolar augmentation mastopexy with interlocking Gore-Tex suture, retrospective review of 50 consecutive patients..Arch Plast Surg2014;41:728-33 PMCID:PMC4228217

[7] Rosen AD.Periareolar closure with barbed sutures..Aesthet Surg J2016;36:372-5 PMCID:PMC5127456

[8] Ruff G.Technique and uses for absorbable barbed sutures..Aesthet Surg J2006;26:620-8

[9] Paul MD, Budd M. Evaluating the Quill self-retaining system. Available from: http://www.plasticsurgerypractice.com/2009/03/evaluating-the-quill-self-retaining-system/. [Published 24 March 2009; Last Accessed on 08 September 2016].

[10] Rosen AD.Use of absorbable running barbed suture and progressive tension technique in abdominoplasty: a novel approach..Plast Reconstr Surg2010;125:1024-7

[11] Rosen A.Repair of the midline fascial defect in abdominoplasty with long-acting barbed and smooth absorbable sutures..Aesthet Surg J2011;31:668-73

[12] Swanson E.A retrospective photometric study of 82 published reports of mastopexy and breast reduction..Plast Reconstr Surg2011;128:1282-301

[13] Quill™ self-retaining system (SRS) comprised of Monoderm™ (PGA-PCL) synthetic absorbable surgical suture material. Instructions for use. Angiotech, Reading, PA

[14] Quill™ self-retaining system (SRS) comprised of dyed PDO (polydioxanone) synthetic absorbable surgical suture material. Instructions for use. Angiotech, Reading, PA

[15] Van Breukelen GJ.ANOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies..J Clin Epidemiol2006;59:920-5

[16] Shiffman MA.Shiffman MA.Mastopexy complications.Body Contouring.2010;BerlinSpringer145-7

[17] Hidalgo DA.Mastopexy..Plast Reconstr Surg2013;134:e642-56

[18] Stevens WG,Freeman ME,Hirsch EM.Mastopexy revisited: a review of 150 consecutive cases for complication and revision rates..Aesthet Surg J2007;27:150-4

[19] Stevens WG,Stoker DA,Cohen R,Hirsch EM.A review of 100 consecutive secondary augmentation/mastopexies..Aesthet Surg J2007;27:485-92

[20] Spear SL.Augmentation/mastopexy: "surgeon, beware"..Plast Reconstr Surg2006;118:S133-4

[21] Spear SL,Clemens MW.Augmentation/mastopexy: a 3-year review of a single surgeon's practice..Plast Reconstr Surg2006;118:S136-47