Utility of multi-detector row computed tomography angiography versus Doppler in localization of perforators of anterolateral thigh flaps

Chandan N. Jadhav , Surinder Singh Makkar , Gautam Biswas , Niranjan Khandelwal

Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2016, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 52 -8.

PDF
Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2016, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) :52 -8. DOI: 10.20517/2347-9264.2015.64
Original Article
Original Article

Utility of multi-detector row computed tomography angiography versus Doppler in localization of perforators of anterolateral thigh flaps

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Aim: Anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap is widely used in reconstruction of various defects. Preoperative imaging facilitates perforator mapping, overcoming intraoperative uncertainty. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of multi-detector row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) and a handheld Doppler in locating ALT perforators.

Methods: Twenty patients were randomized into two groups. Group 1 patients received MDCTA and Doppler studies whereas Group 2 received only a Doppler study. The number, location, course, and source of all cutaneous and sizable perforators were compared with intraoperative findings. Surgeons’ stress levels during flap harvest and flap harvest time were compared.

Results: MDCTA findings correlated well with intraoperative findings for perforator type and segmental distribution with 100% concordance. Doppler alone had a 52% rate of concordance. The sensitivity and specificity for MDCTA in demonstrating the presence of perforators were 85.71% and 97.22%, respectively; whereas for Doppler alone the sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 87.91%, respectively. In demonstrating perforator source, MDCTA showed a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 91.66%, with 100% accuracy. Sensitivity and specificity for sizable perforators were 90% each, with 88.88% accuracy. Doppler studies were unable to provide this information. Comparison of surgeon stress levels showed no differences between the two groups, although the time for flap harvest was significantly shorter in Group 1.

Conclusion: MDCTA compared to Doppler is more sensitive, specific, and accurate with respect to location, course, and source of perforators.

Keywords

Anterolateral thigh / multi-detector row computed tomography angiography / perforator

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chandan N. Jadhav, Surinder Singh Makkar, Gautam Biswas, Niranjan Khandelwal. Utility of multi-detector row computed tomography angiography versus Doppler in localization of perforators of anterolateral thigh flaps. Plastic and Aesthetic Research, 2016, 3(1): 52-8 DOI:10.20517/2347-9264.2015.64

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Rozen WM,Pan WR,McClure VK,Stella DL.Anatomical variations in the harvest of anterolateral thigh flap perforators: a cadaveric and clinical study..Microsurgery2009;29:16-23

[2]

Yu P.Efficacy of the handheld Doppler in preoperative identification of the cutaneous perforators in the anterolateral thigh flap..Plastic Reconstr Surg2006;118:928-33

[3]

Taylor GI,McCarten G.The Doppler probe for planning flaps: anatomical study and clinical applications..Br J Plast Surg1990;43:1-16

[4]

Rosson GD,Fishman EK.3D CT angiography of abdominal wall vascular perforators to plan DIEAP flaps..Microsurgery2007;27:641-6

[5]

Hamdi M,Van HE.Advances in autogenous breast reconstruction: the role of preoperative perforator mapping..Ann Plast Surg2007;58:18-26

[6]

Song YG,Song YL.The free thigh flap: a new free flap concept based on the septocutaneous artery..Br J Plast Surg1984;37:149-59

[7]

Koshima I,Utunomiya R.The anterolateral thigh flap; variations in its vascular pedicle..Br J Plast Surg1989;42:260-2

[8]

Koshima I,Tsutsui T,Itoh S.Minimal invasive lymphaticovenular anastomosis under local anesthesia for leg lymphedema: is it effective for stage III and IV?.Ann Plast Surg2004;53:261-6

[9]

Kim EK,Honget JP.The distribution of the perforators in the anterolateral thigh and the utility of multidetector row computed tomography angiography in preoperative planning..Ann Plast Surg2010;65:155-60

[10]

Kimata Y,Ebihara S,Harii K.Anatomic variations and technical problems of the anterolateral thigh flap: a report of 74 cases..Plast Reconstr Surg1998;102:1517-23

[11]

Wong CH,Fu B,Lin JY.Alternative vascular pedicle of the anterolateral thigh flap: the oblique branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery..Plast Reconstr Surg2009;123:571-7

[12]

Lin SJ,Yu P.Designing the anterolateral thigh flap without preoperative Doppler or imaging..J Reconstr Microsurg2010;26:67-72

[13]

Garvey PB,Madewell JE,Feng L.A prospective study of preoperative computed tomographic angiography for head and neck reconstruction with anterolateral thigh flaps..Plast Reconstr Surg2011;127:1505-14

[14]

Rozen WM,Ashton MW,Grinsell D,Taylor GI.Does the preoperative imaging of perforators with CT angiography improve operative outcomes in breast reconstruction?.Microsurgery2008;28:516-23

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

35

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/