The forehead flap: a valuable option in resource depleted environment

Abstract

Aim: Reconstruction of orofacial soft tissue defect is often challenging and this is more difficult in resource challenged environment. This retrospective study highlights our experience with the use of forehead flap to overcome some of the challenges of orofacial reconstruction in a resource depleted environment.

Methods: A 23-year retrospective analysis of all patients who had orofacial defect reconstruction using forehead flap in our department was undertaken. Information was sourced from patient’s case notes and operating theatre records. Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and Microsoft Excel 2007 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA).

Results: A total of 43 patients were managed within the period reviewed and consisted of 31 (72.1%) males and 12 (27.9%) females. Trauma 24 (55.8%) accounted for most defect and the lip was the commonest site of defect. Complete forehead flap was used in 31 (72.1%) of cases and when timing of defect repair is considered, delayed reconstruction was the preferred method. Postoperative complications was observed in 8 (18.6%) patients and consisted of failed flap in 2 (25.0%) patients, tumor recurrence in reconstructed site in 2 (25.0%) patients and tumor occurrence in forehead flap donor site in 1 (12.5%) patient.

Conclusion: The forehead flap remains a reliable option in orofacial soft tissue defect reconstruction. It is easy to raise and can provide coverage for wide defects as far as the paramandibular and submandibular regions. Moreover, it does not require patient repositioning.

Keywords

Orofacial / soft tissue defect / forehead flap / delayed reconstruction

References

[1] Ellis E III.Assessment of patients with facial fractures..Emerg Med Clin North Am2000;18:411-48

[2] Aziz SR,Borah G.A current therapy: complications associated with rigid internal fixation of facial fractures..Compend Contin Educ Dent2005;26:565-71

[3] De Sousa A.Psychological issues in acquired facial trauma..Indian J Plast Surg2010;43:200-5 PMCID:PMC3010784

[4] Cawood JI.International academy for oral and facial rehabilitation-consensus report..Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg2006;35:195-8

[5] Ng W.Reconstructive options in head and neck surgery..Hong Kong Med Diary2007;12:14-6

[6] Janis JE,Attinger CE.The New reconstructive ladder: modifications to the traditional model..Plast Reconstr Surg2011;127:S205-12

[7] Asamura S,Mori K,Wada M.The pectoralis major myocutaneous pedicled flap revisited..Surg Sci2013;4:380-4

[8] Chim H,Seselgyte R,Mardini S.Principles of head and neck reconstruction: an algorithm to guide flap selection..Semin Plast Surg2010;24:148-54 PMCID:PMC3324247

[9] Hunt JP.The supraclavicular artery flap for lateral skull and scalp defects: effective and efficient alternative to free tissue transfer..J Neurol Surg Rep2014;75:e5-10 PMCID:PMC4110155

[10] Rinaldo A,Wei WI,Ferlito A.Microvascular free flaps: a major advance in head and neck reconstruction..Acta Otolaryngol2002;122:779-84

[11] Baliarsing AS,Gupta A,Garg S.Flap selection in head and neck cancer reconstruction..Int J Otorhinolaryngol Clin2013;5:63-76

[12] Colletti G,Tewfik K,Biglioli F.Autonomized flaps in secondary head and neck reconstructions..Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital2012;32:329-35 PMCID:PMC3546399

[13] Yavuzer R,Cavusoglu T,Ozmen S.A workhorse for nasal reconstruction: the forehead flap..Gazi Med J2001;12:107-11

[14] Kleintjes WG.The vascular anatomy of the forehead related to forehead flaps and its application in plastic and reconstructive surgery.Dissertation presented for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy, Faculty of Health Sciences at the University of Stellenbosch,2007;

[15] Burget GC.Preliminary review of pediatric nasal reconstruction with detailed report of one case..Plast Reconstr Surg2009;124:907-18

[16] Akinyoola AL,Dosumu O,Kassim OO.Microbial isolates in early swabs of open musculoskeletal injuries..Niger Postgrad Med J2006;13:176-81

[17] Kigera JWM.Antibiotic prescription patterns in the management of open fractures at Mulago Hospital in Kampala..East Cent African J Surg2012;17:47-50

[18] Bhatt Y,Nakade D.Reconstruction of nasal defects our three years experience..Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2006;58:51-6

[19] Rao J.Surgical excision with forehead flap as single modality treatment for basal cell cancer of central face: single institutional experience of 50 cases..J Skin Cancer2014;2014:320792 PMCID:PMC3927749

[20] Shaikh MI,Khatoon S.Forehead flap for reconstruction of maxillofacial region defects..JLUMHS2014;13:61-6

[21] Somoano B,Gladstone HB.Accelerated takedown of the paramedian forehead flap at 1 week: indications, technique, and improving patient quality of life..J Am Acad Dermatol2011;65:97-105

[22] Halim AS,Noor NM.Effects of ischemic preconditioning of different intraoperative ischemic times of vascularized bone graft rabbit models..Arch Plast Surg2013;40:687-96 PMCID:PMC3840174

[23] Richards L,Stile F,Zhang F.Effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on the tubed pedicle flap survival in a rat model..Ann Plast Surg2003;50:51-6

[24] Furnas DW,Achauer BM,Black KS.A pair of five-day flaps: early division of distant pedicles after serial cross-clamping and observation with oximetry and fluorometry..Ann Plast Surg1985;15:262-7

[25] Cheng MH,Wei FC,Lee HY.Combined ischemic preconditioning and laser doppler measurement for early division of pedicled groin flap..J Trauma1999;47:89-95

[26] Liu DZ,Zenn MR.The application of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in plastic surgery..J Reconstr Microsurg2011;27:355-64

[27] White JB.Two-stage nasolabial flaps for facial reconstruction: revisiting the Three Week Rule for pedicle division..Laryngoscope2010;120:S109

[28] Vasu RC,Sabitha KS,Mahesh K.Pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC) flap donor site recurrence in a case of buccal mucosal cancer: a case report..Int J Health Sci Res2013;3:55-7

[29] Ashok BC,Ashok H.Secondaries at deltopectoral flap donor site..Indian J Cancer2002;39:149-50

[30] Robbins KT.Chest wall metastasis as a complication of myocutaneous flap reconstruction..J Otolaryngol1984;3:13-4