Design and analysis of 10MW 1 + 1/2 supercritical carbon dioxide counter-rotating turbine
Longgang Wu , Chen Yang , Xin Wei , Jinguang Yang , Dayong Wang , Michele Ferlauto
Propulsion and Energy ›› 2026, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) : 7
In order to reduce the axial size of the supercritical carbon dioxide (SCO2) Brayton cycle system and enhance its power-weight ratio, this paper proposes a counter-rotating design approach for SCO2 turbines. The design process primarily involves 1D aerodynamic design based on theoretical analysis of velocity triangles and blade geometry modeling. A three-stage 10 MW SCO2 axial turbine is selected as a test case and redesigned as a 1 + 1/2-stage counter-rotating turbine (CRT) configuration. Compared with the three-stage turbine, the axial length of the CRT is reduced by 63.5%. Subsequently, the performance of the designed counter-rotating SCO2 turbine is validated through detailed numerical analysis utilizing the three-dimensional computational dynamics method, considering real gas effects of CO2 by employing a physical property database for property calculations. The computational fluid dynamics results demonstrate that under design conditions, the isentropic efficiency is 92.4%, which represents a 12.4 percentage points improvement over the design target and satisfactorily meets the design objectives. Further analysis on the flow field was conducted, and it was found that the turbine streamlines are uniform, the entropy increase is concentrated at the trailing edge of the blades, and the average absolute outlet flow angle is 0° approaching the axial direction. The behavior of the CRT under off-design conditions is also discussed.
Counter-rotating turbine / SCO2 turbine / Aerodynamic design / Numerical simulation
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
Ye X, Pan W, You Y (2017) Application of supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle in power generation fields. Power Energy 38(3):343–347 |
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
Stepanek J, Syblik J, Entler S (2022) Axial sCO2 high-performance turbines parametric design. Energy Convers Manag 274:116418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116418 |
| [5] |
Zhang H, Zhao H, Deng Q et al (2015) Aerothermodynamic design and numerical investigation of supercritical carbon dioxide turbine. No. ASME GT2015-42619 |
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
Wintucky WT, Stewart WL (1958) Analysis of two-stage counterrotating turbine efficiencies in terms of work and speed requirements. No. NACA-RM-E57L05 |
| [8] |
Louis JF (1985) Axial flow contra-rotating turbines. No. ASME 85-GT-218. https://doi.org/10.1115/85-GT-218 |
| [9] |
Bellocq P, Garmendia I, Legrand J et al (2016) Preliminary design and performance of counter rotating turbines for open rotors: Part II—0-D methodology and case study for a 160 PAX aircraft. No. ASME GT2016-57921 |
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
Cai R, Wu W, Fang G (1992) Basic analysis of counter-rotating turbines. Int J Turbo Jet Eng 9(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1515/TJJ.1992.9.1.1 |
| [12] |
Ji L, Zhong WT, Xu JZ (2001) Primary analysis and design of a vaneless counter-rotating turbine. J Eng Thermophys 22(2):167–170 |
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
Fang X, Liu S, Wang P (2005) Design and analysis of LP-vaneless contra-rotating turbine. J Propuls Technol 26(141):234–238. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1001-4055.2005.03.010 |
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
Kumaran R S, Alone D B, Nassar A et al (2021) Preliminary aerodynamic design of a S-CO2 axial turbine. No. ASME GTINDIA2021-76454 |
| [19] |
Yang Z, Huoxing L, Wei L et al (2011) Aerodynamics design of two-stage vane-less counter-rotating turbinec. J Therm Sci 20(5):406−412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-011-0488-z |
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
Dunham J, Came PM (1970) Improvements to the Ainley−Mathieson method of turbine performance prediction. J Eng Power 92(3):252–256. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3445349 |
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |