Shock wave enhanced turbulent mixing in a wide-speed-range strut-based scramjet combustor

Abstract

The efficient mixing of fuel and oxidizer in a scramjet combustor is a critical issue for achieving future wide-speed-range flight. A numerical study is conducted using Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations coupled with shear stress transport k-ω turbulence model to investigate the mixing characteristics of hydrogen and air in a wide-speed-range supersonic combustor. Validation case using the numerical simulations shows remarkable consistency with experimental observations, confirming the reliability and accuracy of the computational approach. The results indicate that during a wide-speed-range flight, the enhancement effect of shock waves on the growth of the mixing region thickness within the combustor persists. This is attributed to the baroclinic torque and volumetric expansion effects caused by the interaction of shock waves and the turbulent shear layer, which enhance vorticity. When the combustor entrance Mach number is relatively low, this enhancement effect is more pronounced. As the combustor entrance Mach number increases, the enhancement effect gradually decreases. The area of the fuel–air mixing region decreases significantly as the combustor entrance Mach number increases, with this reduction being more pronounced at a low equivalence ratio compared to a higher one. The mixing efficiency of the fuel–air decreases with increasing combustor entrance Mach number. At a low equivalence ratio, a higher combustor entrance Mach number delays the location of full mixing. At a higher equivalence ratio, increasing the combustor entrance Mach number may result in the fuel and air remaining incompletely mixed by the time they reach the combustor exit.

Keywords

Wide-speed-range scramjet / Strut-based combustor / Turbulent mixing / Shock wave / Equivalence ratio

References

[1] Chang J, Zhang J, Bao W et al (2018) Research progress on strut-equipped supersonic combustors for scramjet application. Prog Aerosp Sci 103:1–30.https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0060604

[2] Huang W, Du ZB, Yan L, Xia ZX. Supersonic mixing in airbreathing propulsion systems for hypersonic flights. Prog Aerosp Sci, 2019, 109: 100545.

[3] Liu Q, Baccarella D, Lee T. Review of combustion stabilization for hypersonic airbreathing propulsion. Prog Aerosp Sci, 2020, 119: 100636.

[4] Zhang L, Zhang R, Wang X, Jiang J. Design method of supercritical hydrocarbon fuel injection for a scramjet. Adv Aerodyn, 2022, 4(1): 31.

[5] Zhang Y, Le J, Tian Y. Study on atomization characteristics of a kerosene jet in a supersonic crossflow. Adv Aerodyn, 2024, 6(1): 4.

[6] Chakravarthy S, Randive P. Interplay of self-throttling and air throttling on combustion enhancement of the scramjet combustor. Acta Astronaut, 2022, 196: 334-346.

[7] Yan M, Tian Y, Ding Z, Zhang Y, Zhong F, Song W, Le J. A reliable combustion strategy for a throttling-assisted supersonic combustor with flight Mach 7. Aerosp Sci Technol, 2024, 155: 109660.

[8] Zhou Y, Cai Z, Li Q et al (2024) Mixing enhancement mechanism of liquid jet in supersonic crossflow with gas throttling. AIAA J, 63:3. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J064572

[9] Gruber MR, Carter CD, Montes DR, Haubelt LC, King PI, Hsu KY. Experimental studies of pylon-aided fuel injection into a supersonic crossflow. J Propul Power, 2008, 24(3): 460-470.

[10] Vergine F, Crisanti M, Maddalena L, Miller V, Gamba M. Supersonic combustion of pylon-injected hydrogen in high-enthalpy flow with imposed vortex dynamics. J Propul Power, 2015, 31(1): 89-103.

[11] Vishwakarma M, Vaidyanathan A. Experimental study of mixing enhancement using pylon in supersonic flow. Acta Astronaut, 2016, 118: 21-32.

[12] Sekar A, Vaidyanathan A. Mixing enhancement of ethylene secondary jet injected into supersonic cross-flow using curved pylon. Acta Astronaut, 2023, 210: 253-267.

[13] Huang W, Li SB, Yan L, Wang ZG. Performance evaluation and parametric analysis on cantilevered ramp injector in supersonic flows. Acta Astronaut, 2013, 84: 141-152.

[14] Chang EWK, Yang S, Park G, Choi H. Ethylene flame-holding in double ramp flows. Aerosp Sci Technol, 2018, 80: 413-423.

[15] Li LQ, Huang W, Yan L, Du ZB, Fang M. Numerical investigation and optimization on the micro-ramp vortex generator within scramjet combustors with the transverse hydrogen jet. Aerosp Sci Technol, 2019, 84: 570-584.

[16] Micka DJ, Driscoll JF. Combustion characteristics of a dual-mode scramjet combustor with cavity flameholder. Proc Combust Inst, 2009, 32(2): 2397-2404.

[17] Aguilera C, Yu KH. Effect of fin-guided fuel injection on dual-mode scramjet operation. J Propul Power, 2017, 33(4): 927-938.

[18] Feng Y, Luo S, Song J, Xia K, Xu D. Numerical investigation on the combustion characteristics of aluminum powder fuel in a supersonic cavity-based combustor. Appl Therm Eng, 2023, 221: 119842.

[19] Wang K, Cao W. Numerical investigation of mixing enhancement in a cavity-based supersonic combustor using the upstream wavy wall. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2025, 114: 18-30.

[20] Shi HQ, Wang D, Cui NF, Zhao CY, Lei JM, Zhu ZQ, Zhang YN, Tian ZY. Effect of pilot hydrogen on the mixing and combustion characteristics in kerosene-fueled scramjet. Appl Therm Eng, 2025, 258: 124670.

[21] Fureby C, Nordin-Bates K, Petterson K, Bresson A, Sabelnikov V. A computational study of supersonic combustion in strut injector and hypermixer flow fields. Proc Combust Inst, 2015, 35(2): 2127-2135.

[22] Li C, Chen X, Li Y, Musa O, Zhu L. Numerical investigation on the performance of scramjet combustor with a novel strut configuration. Appl Therm Eng, 2019, 159: 113894.

[23] Qiu H, Wang X, Wu H, Wan Z, Feng G, Zhang J, Bao W. Numerical simulation of shock wave influence on flame diffusion characteristics in supersonic multi-strut combustor. Appl Therm Eng, 2025, 265: 125542.

[24] Gao Y, Ge B, Liu B, Zhu S, Qin F, An J. Investigation on temperature field reconstruction for the forced ignition process of rocket-based combined cycle engine. Propulsion and Energy, 2025, 1(1): 11.

[25] Quan F, Chang J, Kong C, Lv C, Wu G. Research on mixing characteristics of scramjet combustor equipped with strut injector. Appl Therm Eng, 2024, 236: 121527.

[26] Zhang J, Chang J, Ma J, Zhang C, Bao W. Investigation of flame establishment and stabilization mechanism in a kerosene fueled supersonic combustor equipped with a thin strut. Aerosp Sci Technol, 2017, 70: 152-160.

[27] Qiu H, Zhang J, Gao J, Chang J, Bao W. Research on combustion performance optimization in scramjet combustor with strut/wall combined fuel injection scheme. Aerosp Sci Technol, 2021, 109: 106376.

[28] Hiejima T, Oda T. Shockwave effects on supersonic combustion using hypermixer struts. Phys Fluids, 2020, 32: 016104.

[29] Iwabayashi N, Matsushita K, Okada S, Hiejima T. Shock-induced supersonic combustion with a streamwise vortex. Phys Fluids, 2024, 36: 036117.

[30] Gerlinger P, Stoll P, Kindler M, Schneider F, Aigner M. Numerical investigation of mixing and combustion enhancement in supersonic combustors by strut induced streamwise vorticity. Aerosp Sci Technol, 2008, 12(2): 159-168.

[31] Liu X, Sheikholeslami M, Gerdroodbary MB, Poozesh A, Shafee A, Moradi R, Li Z. Numerical simulation of the hydrogen mixing in downstream of lobe strut at supersonic flow. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(46): 25438-25451.

[32] Oevermann M. Numerical investigation of turbulent hydrogen combustion in a scramjet using flamelet modeling. Aerosp Sci Technol, 2000, 4(7): 463-480.

[33] Génin F, Menon S. Simulation of turbulent mixing behind a strut injector in supersonic flow. AIAA J, 2010, 48(3): 526-539.

[34] Fureby C, Fedina E, Tegnér J. A computational study of supersonic combustion behind a wedge-shaped flameholder. Shock Waves, 2014, 24: 41-50.

[35] Huang S, Chen Q. Numerical evaluation of shock wave effects on turbulent mixing layers in a scramjet combustor. Case Stud Therm Eng, 2021, 25: 100893.

[36] Niu X, Chen Q. Shock waves affected turbulent mixing region development in a strut-based scramjet combustor. Acta Astronaut, 2024, 225: 107-119.

[37] Huang W. Investigation on the effect of strut configurations and locations on the combustion performance of a typical scramjet combustor. J Mech Sci Technol, 2015, 29: 5485-5496.

[38] Yarasai SS, Ravi D, Yoganand S, Rajagopal TKR. Numerical investigation on the performance and combustion characteristics of a cavity based scramjet combustor with novel strut injectors. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(14): 5681-5695.

[39] Li X, Pan Y, Liu C, Liu X. Investigation on the effect of the expansion angle in the strut-based supersonic combustor. Aerosp Sci Technol, 2023, 133: 108095.

[40] Zhang L, Sheng ZQ, Dan Y. Effects of sawtooth grooves on supersonic combustion. Aerosp Sci Technol, 2023, 136: 108223.

[41] Zhang L, Sheng ZQ, Dan Y, Lu LZ. Scramjet combustion with bumpy struts. Aerosp Sci Technol, 2023, 140: 108462.

[42] Qin F, Huang ZW, He GQ, Wang S, Wei XG, Liu B. Flame stabilization mechanism study in a hydrogen-fueled model supersonic combustor under different air inflow conditions. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(33): 21360-21370.

[43] Wang Y, Shi W, Wang X, Zhang J, Gao J, Tang J, Chang J, Bao W. Aerodynamic performance enhancement of a variable-geometry dual-mode combustor designed by the method of characteristics. Aerosp Sci Technol, 2021, 108: 106353.

[44] Zhang J, Lin L, Luan G, Bao W. Experimental research on the stability margin of a variable geometry scramjet combustor in wide flight conditions. Acta Astronaut, 2023, 202: 151-156.

[45] Qiu H, Zhang J, Feng G, Chang J, Bao W. Numerical investigation on performance of axisymmetric variable geometry scramjet combustor equipped with strut flame holder. Combust Sci Technol, 2023, 195(5): 1059-1083.

[46] Qin Q, Agarwal R, Zhang X. A novel method for flame stabilization in a strut-based scramjet combustor. Combust Flame, 2019, 210: 292-301.

[47] Zhang J, Wang Z, Liu C, Sun M, Wang H. Computational realization of turbulent combustion in a scramjet combustor stabilized by a lobed strut. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(10): 4073-4086.

[48] Suneetha L, Randive P, Pandey KM. Numerical investigation on implications of four strut injectors on combustion characteristics of a doubly-dual cavity-based scramjet combustor. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(56): 32128-32144.

[49] Choubey G, Solanki M, Patel O, Devarajan Y, Huang W. Effect of different strut design on the mixing performance of H₂ fueled two-strut based scramjet combustor. Fuel, 2023, 351: 128972.

[50] Zingg DW, Godin P. A perspective on turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. Int J Comput Fluid Dyn, 2009, 23(4): 327-335.

[51] Choubey G, Pandey KM. Effect of parametric variation of strut layout and position on the performance of a typical two-strut based scramjet combustor. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(15): 10485-10500.

[52] Kummitha OR, Pandey KM, Gupta R. CFD analysis of a scramjet combustor with cavity based flame holders. Acta Astronaut, 2018, 144: 244-253.

[53] Hou L, Niu D, Ren Z. Partially premixed flamelet modeling in a hydrogen-fueled supersonic combustor. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(17): 9497-9504.

[54] Nair PP, Suryan A, Nizetic S. Investigation of flow characteristics in supersonic combustion ramjet combustor toward improvement of combustion efficiency. Int J Energy Res, 2021, 45(1): 231-253.

[55] Waidmann W, Alff F, Böhm M, Clauss W, Oschwald M. Supersonic combustion of hydrogen/air in a scramjet combustion combustor. Space Technol, 1996, 15: 421-429.

[56] Li Z, Wang J, Li X. Application of hydrogen mechanisms in combustion simulation of DLR scramjet combustor and their effect on combustion performance. Fuel, 2023, 349: 128659.

[57] Dharavath M, Manna P, Chakraborty D. Thermochemical exploration of hydrogen combustion in generic scramjet combustor. Aerosp Sci Technol, 2013, 24(1): 264-274.

[58] Génin F, Menon S. Studies of shock/turbulent shear layer interaction using large-eddy simulation. Comput Fluids, 2010, 39(5): 800-819.

[59] Zha Z, Ye Z, Hong Z, Ye K. Effects of unsteady oblique shock wave on mixing efficiency of two-dimensional supersonic mixing layer. Acta Astronaut, 2021, 178: 60-71.

[60] Chen H, Tian Y, Guo M, Le J, Ji Y, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Zhang C. Flow field reconstruction and shock train leading edge position detection of scramjet isolation section based on a small amount of CFD data. Adv Aerodyn, 2022, 4(1): 28.

[61] Petha Sethuraman VR, Yang Y, Kim JG. Interaction of shock train with cavity shear layer in a scramjet isolator. Phys Fluids, 2023, 35: 036111.

[62] Huang W, Wu H, Yang YG, Yan L, Li SB. Recent advances in the shock wave/boundary layer interaction and its control in internal and external flows. Acta Astronaut, 2020, 174: 103-122.

[63] Shi F, Gao Z, Jiang C, Lee CH. Numerical investigation of shock-turbulent mixing layer interaction and shock-associated noise. Phys Fluids, 2021, 33: 025105.

[64] Marble FE, Hendricks GJ, Zukoski EE (1987) Progress toward shock enhancement of supersonic combustion processes. In: 23rd joint propulsion conference, AIAA, San Diego, 29 June–2 July 1987

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(91741102)

Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation(2024A1515010712)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)