Enhancing prime editing efficiency and flexibility with tethered and split pegRNAs

Ying Feng, Siyuan Liu, Qiqin Mo, Pengpeng Liu, Xiao Xiao, Hanhui Ma

PDF(1136 KB)
PDF(1136 KB)
Protein Cell ›› 2023, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (4) : 304-308. DOI: 10.1093/procel/pwac014
LETTER
LETTER

Enhancing prime editing efficiency and flexibility with tethered and split pegRNAs

Author information +
History +

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ying Feng, Siyuan Liu, Qiqin Mo, Pengpeng Liu, Xiao Xiao, Hanhui Ma. Enhancing prime editing efficiency and flexibility with tethered and split pegRNAs. Protein Cell, 2023, 14(4): 304‒308 https://doi.org/10.1093/procel/pwac014

References

[1]
Anzalone AV, Gao XD, Podracky CJ et al. Programmable deletion, replacement, integration and inversion of large DNA sequences with twin prime editing. Nat Biotechnol 2022;40:731–740.
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Anzalone AV, Randolph PB, Davis JR et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 2019;576:149–157.
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Bae S, Park J, Kim JS. Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases. Bioinformatics 2014;30:1473–1475.
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Chen PJ, Hussmann JA, Yan J et al. Enhanced prime editing systems by manipulating cellular determinants of editing outcomes. Cell 2021;184:5635–5652.e29.
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Choi J, Chen W, Suiter CC et al. Precise genomic deletions using paired prime editing. Nat Biotechnol 2022;40:218–226.
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Convery MA, Rowsell S, Stonehouse NJ et al. Crystal structure of an RNA aptamer-protein complex at 2.8 A resolution. Nat Struct Biol 1998;5:133–139.
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Kosicki M, Tomberg K, Bradley A. Repair of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPR-Cas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements. Nat Biotechnol 2018;36:765–771.
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Benson M et al. ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44:D862–D868.
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Lin Q, Zong Y, Xue C et al. Prime genome editing in rice and wheat. Nat Biotechnol 2020;38:582–585.
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Litke JL, Jaffrey SR. Highly efficient expression of circular RNA aptamers in cells using autocatalytic transcripts. Nat Biotechnol 2019;37:667–675.
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Liu Y, Yang G, Huang S et al. Enhancing prime editing by Csy4-mediated processing of pegRNA. Cell Res 2021;31:1134–1136.
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Ma H, Tu LC, Naseri A et al. CRISPR-Cas9 nuclear dynamics and target recognition in living cells. J Cell Biol 2016;214:529–537.
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Ma H, Tu LC, Naseri A et al. CRISPR-Sirius: RNA scaffolds for signal amplification in genome imaging. Nat Methods 2018;15:928–931.
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Nelson JW, Randolph PB, Shen SP et al. Engineered pegRNAs improve prime editing efficiency. Nat Biotechnol 2022;40:402–410.
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Stanton BZ, Chory EJ, Crabtree GR. Chemically induced proximity in biology and medicine. Science 2018;359:6380.
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Urbanek MO, Galka-Marciniak P, Olejniczak M et al. RNA imaging in living cells—methods and applications. RNA Biol 2014;11:1083–1095.
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Higher Education Press.
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1136 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/