Efficient derivation of extended pluripotent stem cells from NOD-scid Il2rg−/− mice

Yaqin Du , Ting Wang , Jun Xu , Chaoran Zhao , Haibo Li , Yao Fu , Yaxing Xu , Liangfu Xie , Jingru Zhao , Weifeng Yang , Ming Yin , Jinhua Wen , Hongkui Deng

Protein Cell ›› 2019, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 31 -42.

PDF (4702KB)
Protein Cell ›› 2019, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 31 -42. DOI: 10.1007/s13238-018-0558-z
SHORT ARTICLE
SHORT ARTICLE

Efficient derivation of extended pluripotent stem cells from NOD-scid Il2rg−/− mice

Author information +
History +
PDF (4702KB)

Abstract

Recently we have established a new culture condition enabling the derivation of extended pluripotent stem (EPS) cells, which, compared to conventional pluripotent stem cells, possess superior developmental potential and germline competence. However, it remains unclear whether this condition permits derivation of EPS cells from mouse strains that are refractory or non-permissive to pluripotent cell establishment. Here, we show that EPS cells can be robustly generated from non-permissive NOD-scid Il2rg−/− mice through de novo derivation from blastocysts. Furthermore, these cells can also be efficiently generated by chemical reprogramming from embryonic NOD-scid Il2rg−/− fibroblasts. NOD-scid Il2rg−/− EPS cells can be expanded for more than 20 passages with genomic stability and can be genetically modified through gene targeting. Notably, these cells contribute to both embryonic and extraembryonic lineages in vivo. More importantly, they can produce chimeras and integrate into the E13.5 genital ridge. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of generating EPS cells from refractory mouse strains, which could potentially be a general strategy for deriving mouse pluripotent cells. The generation of NOD-scid Il2rg−/− EPS cell lines permits sophisticated genetic modification in NOD-scid Il2rg−/− mice, which may greatly advance the optimization of humanized mouse models for biomedical applications.

Keywords

extended pluripotent stem cell / NOD- scid Il2rg −/− mice / embryonic and extraembryonic lineages / chemical reprogramming

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yaqin Du, Ting Wang, Jun Xu, Chaoran Zhao, Haibo Li, Yao Fu, Yaxing Xu, Liangfu Xie, Jingru Zhao, Weifeng Yang, Ming Yin, Jinhua Wen, Hongkui Deng. Efficient derivation of extended pluripotent stem cells from NOD-scid Il2rg−/− mice. Protein Cell, 2019, 10(1): 31-42 DOI:10.1007/s13238-018-0558-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Anderson PD, Nelson VR, Tesar PJ, Nadeau JH (2009) Genetic factors on mouse chromosome 18 affecting susceptibility to testicular germ cell tumors and permissiveness to embryonic stem cell derivation. Cancer Res 69:9112–9117

[2]

Brambrink T, Foreman R, Welstead GG, Lengner CJ, Wernig M, Suh H, Jaenisch R (2008) Sequential expression of pluripotency markers during direct reprogramming of mouse somatic cells. Cell Stem Cell 2:151–159

[3]

Brook FA, Evans EP, Lord CJ, Lyons PA, Rainbow DB, Howlett SK, Wicker LS, Todd JA, Gardner RL (2003) The derivation of highly germline-competent embryonic stem cells containing NODderived genome. Diabetes 52:205–208

[4]

Brook FA, Gardner RL (1997) The origin and efficient derivation of embryonic stem cells in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:5709–5712

[5]

Bryja V, Bonilla S, Arenas E (2006a) Derivation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Protoc 1:2082–2087

[6]

Bryja V, Bonilla S, Cajanek L, Parish CL, Schwartz CM, Luo Y, Rao MS, Arenas E (2006b) An efficient method for the derivation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 24:844–849

[7]

Buehr M, Smith A (2003) Genesis of embryonic stem cells. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358:1397–1402discussion 1402

[8]

Choi J, Huebner AJ, Clement K, Walsh RM, Savol A, Lin K, Gu H, Di Stefano B, Brumbaugh J, Kim SY (2017) Prolonged Mek1/2 suppression impairs the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells. Nature 548:219–223

[9]

Evans MJ, Kaufman MH (1981) Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292:154–156

[10]

Hanna J, Markoulaki S, Mitalipova M, Cheng AW, Cassady JP, Staerk J, Carey BW, Lengner CJ, Foreman R, Love J (2009) Metastable pluripotent states in NOD-mouse-derived ESCs. Cell Stem Cell 4:513–524

[11]

Hou P, Li Y, Zhang X, Liu C, Guan J, Li H, Zhao T, Ye J, Yang W, Liu K (2013) Pluripotent stem cells induced from mouse somatic cells by small-molecule compounds. Science 341:651–654

[12]

Ito M, Hiramatsu H, Kobayashi K, Suzue K, Kawahata M, Hioki K, Ueyama Y, Koyanagi Y, Sugamura K, Tsuji K (2002) NOD/SCID/gamma(c)(null) mouse: an excellent recipient mouse model for engraftment of human cells. Blood 100:3175–3182

[13]

Ito R, Takahashi T, Katano I, Ito M (2012) Current advances in humanized mouse models. Cell Mol Immunol 9:208–214

[14]

Kawase E, Suemori H, Takahashi N, Okazaki K, Hashimoto K, Nakatsuji N (1994) Strain difference in establishment of mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell lines. Int J Dev Biol 38:385–390

[15]

Liu K, Fang R, Li H, Yang W, Miao Z, Wen J, Deng H (2015) Efficient derivation of embryonic stem cells from NOD-scid Il2rg−/− mice. Protein Cell 6:916–918

[16]

Lodge P, McWhir J, Gallagher E, Sang H (2005) Increased gp130 signaling in combination with inhibition of the MEK/ERK pathway facilitates embryonic stem cell isolation from normally refractory murine CBA blastocysts. Cloning Stem Cells 7:2–7

[17]

Martin GR (1981) Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:7634–7638

[18]

McWhir J, Schnieke AE, Ansell R, Wallace H, Colman A, Scott AR, Kind AJ (1996) Selective ablation of differentiated cells permits isolation of embryonic stem cell lines from murine embryos with a non-permissive genetic background. Nat Genet 14:223–226

[19]

Nagafuchi S, Katsuta H, Kogawa K, Akashi T, Kondo S, Sakai Y, Tsukiyama T, Kitamura D, Niho Y, Watanabe T (1999) Establishment of an embryonic stem (ES) cell line derived from a nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse: in vivo differentiation into lymphocytes and potential for germ line transmission. FEBS Lett 455:101–104

[20]

Nichols J, Jones K, Phillips JM, Newland SA, Roode M, Mansfield W, Smith A, Cooke A (2009) Validated germline-competent embryonic stem cell lines from nonobese diabetic mice. Nat Med 15:814–818

[21]

Okita K, Nakagawa M, Hyenjong H, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S (2008) Generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells without viral vectors. Science 322:949–953

[22]

Picelli S, Faridani OR, Bjorklund AK, Winberg G, Sagasser S, Sandberg R (2014) Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2. Nat Protoc 9:171–181

[23]

Shultz LD, Ishikawa F, Greiner DL (2007) Humanized mice in translational biomedical research. Nat Rev Immunol 7:118–130

[24]

Shultz LD, Lyons BL, Burzenski LM, Gott B, Chen X, Chaleff S, Kotb M, Gillies SD, King M, Mangada J (2005) Human lymphoid and myeloid cell development in NOD/LtSz-scid IL2R null mice engrafted with mobilized human hemopoietic stem cells. J Immunol 174:6477–6489

[25]

Stadtfeld M, Nagaya M, Utikal J, Weir G, Hochedlinger K (2008) Induced pluripotent stem cells generated without viral integration. Science 322:945–949

[26]

Takahashi K, Yamanaka S (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126:663–676

[27]

Umehara H, Kimura T, Ohtsuka S, Nakamura T, Kitajima K, Ikawa M, Okabe M, Niwa H, Nakano T (2007) Efficient derivation of embryonic stem cells by inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3. Stem Cells 25:2705–2711

[28]

Woltjen K, Michael IP, Mohseni P, Desai R, Mileikovsky M, Hamalainen R, Cowling R, Wang W, Liu P, Gertsenstein M (2009) piggyBac transposition reprograms fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 458:766–770

[29]

Yagi M, Kishigami S, Tanaka A, Semi K, Mizutani E, Wakayama S, Wakayama T, Yamamoto T, Yamada Y (2017) Derivation of ground-state female ES cells maintaining gamete-derived DNA methylation. Nature 548:224–227

[30]

Yang W, Wei W, Shi C, Zhu J, Ying W, Shen Y, Ye X, Fang L, Duo S, Che J (2009) Pluripotin combined with leukemia inhibitory factor greatly promotes the derivation of embryonic stem cell lines from refractory strains. Stem Cells 27:383–389

[31]

Yang Y, Liu B, Xu J, Wang J, Wu J, Shi C, Xu Y, Dong J, Wang C, Lai W (2017) Derivation of pluripotent stem cells with in vivo embryonic and extraembryonic potency. Cell 169(243–257):e225

[32]

Ye J, Ge J, Zhang X, Cheng L, Zhang Z, He S, Wang Y, Lin H, Yang W, Liu J (2016) Pluripotent stem cells induced from mouse neural stem cells and small intestinal epithelial cells by small molecule compounds. Cell Res 26:34–45

[33]

Ying QL, Nichols J, Chambers I, Smith A (2003) BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell self-renewal in collaboration with STAT3. Cell 115:281–292

[34]

Ying QL, Wray J, Nichols J, Batlle-Morera L, Doble B, Woodgett J, Cohen P, Smith A (2008) The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453:519–523

[35]

Yu H, Borsotti C, Schickel JN, Zhu S, Strowig T, Eynon EE, Frleta D, Gurer C, Murphy AJ, Yancopoulos GD (2017) A novel humanized mouse model with significant improvement of classswitched, antigen-specific antibody production. Blood 129:959–969

[36]

Zhao Y, Zhao T, Guan J, Zhang X, Fu Y, Ye J, Zhu J, Meng G, Ge J, Yang S (2015) A XEN-like state bridges somatic cells to pluripotency during chemical reprogramming. Cell 163:1678–1691

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2018

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (4702KB)

Supplementary files

PAC-0031-18188-DHK_suppl_1

747

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/