INTRODUCTION
Arthritis is a disease characterized by damage of joints, which leads to chronic debilitating pain and stiffness. Two of the most common forms, osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, combine to affect more than 28 million Americans; they exact a significant toll on our society, both in terms of financial cost and disease morbidity. Osteoarthritis (OA), which is the most common form of arthritis, is characterized by the progressive loss of articular hyaline cartilage (leading to narrowing of the joint space) along with underlying bony changes surrounding the joint (i.e., osteophytes, sclerosis and subchondral cysts). Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune condition that can be described as a chronic inflammatory polyarthritis with progressive erosion of tissues within and surrounding the joint. The destruction of articular cartilage is a feature of both OA and RA, and is thought to involve the proteolytic degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM) components. The
a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS) family of secreted zinc metalloproteinases includes many members that are known to bind and degrade extracellular matrix components. First identified in 1997, the ADAMTS family has since grown to 19 members, and has been implicated in diseases ranging from coagulation disorders to malignancy (
Levy et al., 2001;
Barreda et al., 2004;
Porter et al., 2005;
Llamazares et al., 2007;
Roy et al., 2008;
Apte, 2009). The important roles of ADAMTSs in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis have been well established (
Clark and Parker, 2003;
Jones and Riley, 2005;
Murphy and Lee, 2005;
Burrage et al., 2006;
Fosang et al., 2008;
Murphy and Nagase, 2008;
Rowan et al., 2008;
Liu, 2009). However, despite significant advances in knowledge regarding the structure and function of ADAMTS metalloproteinases, the exact mechanistic involvement of these molecules in the pathogenesis of arthritis has yet to become fully elucidated. In this review, we summarize what is currently known about various members of the ADAMTS family of metalloproteinases as they relate to the joint destructive processes of arthritis.
ADAMTSs—STRUCTURE BASED ON FUNCTION
ADAMTSs, which can occur in multiple isoforms due to alternative splicing, are translated initially as inactive preproenzymes, whose structure includes a signal peptide, a pro-domain, a catalytic domain, a disintegrin-like domain, a central thrombospondin type I-like (TS) repeat, a cysteine-rich domain, a spacer region, and a variable number of C-terminal TS repeats (
Kuno et al., 2000;
Tang, 2001;
Apte, 2004) (Fig. 1). Although the ADAMTS catalytic domain shares structural similarity with that of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), MMPs do not share the other structural features of the ADAMTS family. The C-terminal TS repeats, the number of which may vary from 14 (ADAMTS-20) (
Llamazares et al., 2003;
Somerville et al., 2003) to none (ADAMTS-4) (
Tortorella et al., 1999), seem to be important for the ability of many ADAMTS members to bind components of ECM (
Kuno et al., 2000;
Tortorella et al., 2000a;
Hashimoto et al., 2004). ADAMTS-4, which contains no C-terminal TS repeats, is able to bind to ECM components via its C-terminal spacer region (which associates with the C-terminal domain of fibronectin) (
Hashimoto et al., 2004) (Fig. 1). The ADAMTSs undergo N-terminal processing, with removal of the signal sequence followed by removal of the pro-domain, which involves a furin cleavage site (with the exception of ADAMTS-10 and -12) (
Bergeron et al., 2000). Interestingly, ADAMTS-13 can be active with the pro-domain still attached (
Majerus et al., 2003;
Somerville et al., 2004). The ADAMTSs also undergo C-terminal processing, which involves cleavage within the spacer region (
Rodriguez-Manzaneque et al., 2000;
Flannery et al., 2002;
Gao et al., 2002;
Luque et al., 2003;
Majerus et al., 2003;
Gao et al., 2004). Such processing is important for both substrate specificity and localization of the enzymes (
Porter et al., 2005).
ADAMTS proteins are divided into four divisions, based on structural and functional similarities (
Thompson et al., 1994;
Llamazares et al., 2003;
Nicholson et al., 2005). These divisions can be further broken down into subgroups. One sub-group consists of ADAMTS-1, -4, -5, -8, and -15, while another includes ADAMTS-9 and -20. Both sub-groups combine to form a larger division. Another division consists of ADAMTS-2, -3, and -14. ADAMTS-13 forms its own division. The remaining ADAMTS members form their own division, which is divided into structurally-related pairs: ADAMTS-17 and -19, ADAMTS-16 and -18, ADAMTS-7 and -12, and ADAMTS-6 and-10.
ADAMTSs—NOT JUST ARTHRITIS
Members of the ADAMTS family have been implicated in a wide range of diseases (Table 1). ADAMTS-13 plays a role in the development of the coagulation disorder, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (
Levy et al., 2001;
Hovinga et al., 2004;
Moake, 2004;
Shenkman, 2006). Patients with Ehler-Danlos syndrome type 7C, a genetic disorder of collagen synthesis, have mutations in the ADAMTS-2 gene (
Colige et al., 1999,
2004). These mutations have also been associated with bovine dermatopraxis, an inherited disorder characterized by severe skin fragility (
Colige et al., 1999). ADAMTS-1 exhibits angioinhibitory properties and is crucial for the development and function of the urogenital system (
Shindo et al., 2000;
Nakamura et al., 2007;
Basile et al., 2008). ADAMTS-1 may also contribute to atherosclerosis by cleaving versican (
Jonsson-Rylander et al., 2005). Mutations in ADAMTS-1 have been associated with an increased risk of coronary artery disease (
Sabatine et al., 2008). Other ADAMTSs, including ADAMTS-4, -7, and -8, have also been implicated in the formation of atherosclerotic plaque and atherothrombotic disease (
Wagsater et al., 2008;
Moriguchi-Goto et al., 2009).
AGGRECANASES
The proteoglycan aggrecan forms a major component of cartilage and plays a key role in protecting collagen from degradation (
Pratta et al., 2003b). By interacting with hyaluronan and link proteins, aggrecan forms large aggregated complexes which fill the ECM collagen mesh-work. The aggrecan molecule contains multiple glycosaminoglycan (GAG) side chains, which allow it to swell against the type II collagen scaffold in the presence of water. This is what gives articular cartilage the ability to resist compressive forces during joint loading (
Roughley, 2001).
Aggrecan degradation is one of the key events underlying the pathogenesis of arthritis (
Caterson et al., 2000;
Sandy, 2003;
Bondeson et al., 2008). ADAMTS-1, -4, -5, 8, and -15 belong to a subgroup of ADAMTSs whose members can cleave aggrecan. ADAMTS-9, -16, and -18 can also cleave aggrecan
in vitro, although they do not belong to the subgroup (
Somerville et al., 2003;
Fosang et al., 2008). However, the expression and/or aggrecanase degrading activity of ADAMTS-1, -8, -9, -15, -16, and -18 are quite low, leaving ADAMTS-4 and -5 as the two major functional aggrecanases (
Fosang and Little, 2008;
Tortorella and Malfait, 2008). ADAMTS-4, which is the best characterized aggrecanase, is able to bind to the ECM protein fibronectin, via its C-terminal spacer domain (
Hashimoto et al., 2004) (Fig. 1). C-terminal proteolytic processing of full-length ADAMTS-4 (74 kDa) breaks the attachment of the enzyme from ECM fibronectin, resulting in the release of processed isoforms (60 kDa and 50 kDa) (
Flannery et al., 2002;
Gao et al., 2002;
Hashimoto et al., 2004;
Kashiwagi et al., 2004). Furthermore, the 74 kDa full-length ADAMTS-4 cleaves aggrecan at Glu
1480-Gly
1481, while the processed isoforms cleave at Glu
373-Ala
374 (
Gao et al., 2002;
Kashiwagi et al., 2004). The aggrecanase activity of ADAMTS-4 depends specifically on its binding to the GAG chains of aggrecan, as evidenced by the presence of GAG binding sites in the C-terminal cysteine-rich and/or spacer domains of ADAMTS-4 (
Flannery et al., 2002). Interestingly, the interaction of fibronectin with ADAMTS-4 seems to inhibit its aggrecanase activity (
Hashimoto et al., 2004). This suggests that fibronectin may compete with aggrecan for ADAMTS-4 binding, since both molecules seem to associate with the C-terminal spacer region of ADAMTS-4 (
Flannery et al., 2002;
Hashimoto et al., 2004). However, the GAG side chains of aggrecan can also bind to ADAMTS-4 via its TS repeat and such binding is critical for aggrecanase activity (
Tortorella et al., 2000b;
Kashiwagi et al., 2004).
Cleavage of aggrecan by ADAMTS-4 and -5 occurs at the Glu
373-Ala
374 bond, as well as at four other sites.
In vitro studies have demonstrated that cleavage at these four sites is actually more efficient than cleavage at the Glu
373-Ala
374 bond (
Sugimoto et al., 1999;
Tortorella et al., 2000b). However, cleavage at the Glu
373-Ala
374 bond is likely more important in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis since a loss of integrity at this bond results in the loss of an entire aggrecan molecule, which is highly detrimental to cartilage integrity and function (
Little et al., 2007). Indeed, cleavage of aggrecan at the Glu
373-Ala
374 bond is reported as a reliable marker for arthritis activity (
Westling et al., 2002;
Gendron et al., 2007) and fragments generated from this specific cleavage (characterized by the specific N-terminus ARGSVIL epitope) have been identified in the synovial fluid of patients with OA (
Sandy et al., 1992). Additionally, genetically modified mice with a Glu
373-Ala
374 bond that is resistant to cleavage, are characterized by diminished aggrecan loss and cartilage erosion in models of OA and inflammatory arthritis (
Little et al., 2007). Interestingly, in ADAMTS-5 knockout mice, aggrecanolysis still occurs at sites other than the Glu
373-Ala
374 site, suggesting that ADAMTS-4 or some other aggrecanase may be responsible (
East et al., 2007). Thus, different aggrecanases may have differential preferences for separate regions of aggrecan.
Aggrecan fragments generated by ADAMTS-4 and -5-mediated cleavage have been found in bovine articular cartilage explants treated with interleukin (IL)-1 and TNF-α (
Tortorella et al., 2001). Treatment with either IL-1 or retinoic acid can also induce the release of such fragments. These fragments are actually present in normal articular cartilage and appear to accumulate with age (
Lark et al., 1997;
Yasumoto et al., 2003). Damaged cartilage also exhibits high levels of these fragments, as does cartilage that has been exposed to ADAMTS-4 or -5 (
Lark et al., 1997;
Sandy and Verscharen, 2001;
Chockalingam et al., 2004).
Although ADAMTS-4 has been shown to effectively cleave aggrecan
in vitro, ADAMTS-4 null mice are not protected from aggrecan loss. The same is true for ADAMTS-1 null mice. However, ADAMTS-5 knockout mice are protected from synovitis and joint destruction and thus ADAMTS-5 is now thought to be the primary mediator of cartilage destruction in arthritis, at least in mice (
Glasson et al., 2005;
Stanton et al., 2005). This is supported by the observation that IL-1α strongly stimulates the expression of ADAMTS-5, but not ADAMTS-4 in mice (
Stanton et al., 2005).
Although ADAMTS-5 (and not ADAMTS-4) may play a major role in the development of arthritis in murine models, studies involving human tissue seem to suggest the opposite—that ADAMTS-4, (and not ADAMTS-5) is the major molecular player in human arthritis. For example, genetic variation in human ADAMTS-5 does not seem to affect OA susceptibility (
Rodriguez-Lopez et al., 2008). Furthermore, treatment with oncostatin M and either IL-1β or TNF-α in human chondrocytes or cartilage explants, leads to a marked induction of ADAMTS-4 with a lesser upregulation of ADAMTS-5 (
Song et al., 2007). This process seems to be mediated by Ras signaling (
Ahmad et al., 2009). Additionally, some data demonstrate that only ADAMTS-4 levels are increased in OA cartilage (
Malfait et al., 2002;
Roach et al., 2005;
Naito et al., 2007). However, treatment of explanted human tissue with IL-1α suggests that both ADAMTS-4 and -5 are important in human disease (
Song et al., 2007). Both ADAMTS-4 and -5 are highly expressed in human OA cartilage and both molecules seem to contribute to aggrecan loss in both normal and OA cartilage (
Bau et al., 2002;
Plaas et al., 2007;
Song et al., 2007). Thus, while ADAMTS-5 (and not ADAMTS-4) is important in mice, it is ADAMTS-4 or perhaps both ADAMTS-4 and -5 that play a key role in human arthritis.
ADAMTS-4 is also induced by a variety of other endogenously occurring molecules, which are of great interest, since they could represent novel targets for the development of therapeutics. These molecules include IL-1, TNF-α, oncostatin M (OSM) and TGF-β, which have all been shown to upregulate ADAMTS-4 expression in cultured cartilage explants (
Tortorella et al., 2001;
Bau et al., 2002;
Yamanishi et al., 2002;
Pratta et al., 2003a). Interestingly, ADAMTS-5 expression is not induced by these factors. In a human chondrocyte line, the combination of IL-1α and OSM upregulated ADAMTS-4, while ADAMTS-5 was upregulated by IL-1α only. This suggests that ADAMTS-4 and ADAMTS-5 may be differentially regulated by extracellular signaling. When taken in combination, these data seem to suggest that ADAMTS-5 is constitutively expressed while ADAMTS-4 is inducible (
Vankemmelbeke et al., 2001;
Bondeson et al., 2006;
Fosang et al., 2008). In line with this reasoning, ADAMTS-4 expression in human synoviocytes is significantly inhibited by the clinically-available TNF-α-blocker eternercept as well as by anti-IL-1β blocking antibodies, while ADAMTS-5 is not affected (
Bondeson et al., 2006).
The activities of ADAMTS-4 and -5 are also likely modulated by other endogenous factors. PACE-4, which is secreted by human OA chondrocytes, is a proprotein convertase that activates ADAMTS-4 and -5 (
Malfait et al., 2008). PACE-4 is not produced by healthy articular cartilage.
Another endogenous factor that may modulate ADAMTS-5 activity is syndecan-4, which belongs to the syndecan family of transmembrane heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Syndecans are known to interact with a variety of ECM molecules, growth factors, and cytokines (
Tkachenko et al., 2005). It is thought that syndecan-4 activates ADAMTS-5 through direct protein-protein interactions as well as by regulating the synthesis of MMP-3 via modulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling (
Echtermeyer et al., 2009). Syndecan-4 knockout mice exhibit decreased MMP-3 expression and blocking MMP-3 activity has been shown to reduce aggrecanase activity, although the molecular mechanism by which MMP-3 inhibits ADAMTS-5 remains unknown. Of note, syndecan-4 knockout mice are protected from cartilage damage in a surgically induced model of osteoarthritis, highlighting the potential clinical relevance of both syndecan-4 and ADAMTS-5 to the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis.
In addition to osteoarthritis, the cleavage of aggrecanase by ADAMTS-4 and/or-5 may also play a role in the pathogenesis of Lyme arthritis, which is a manifestation of Lyme disease. Human chondrocytes infected with
Borrelia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease, show highly induced levels of ADAMTS-4, but not ADAMTS-5 (
Behera et al., 2006). Active ADAMTS-4 levels are also increased in synovial fluid taken from patients with active Lyme arthritis. This suggests that the cleavage of aggrecan may be a precipitating factor in the pathogenesis of arthritis as it occurs in multiple different settings.
ADAMTS-4 and -5 can have other functions as well. Both ADAMTS-4 and -5 are known to cleave human biglycan (
Rees et al., 2000;
Malemud, 2006;
Gendron et al., 2007). Biglycan interacts with type VI collagen and plays a role in establishing the type VI collagen network (
Wiberg et al., 2001,
2002). Biglycan degradation products are present in the ECM of articular cartilage from OA and RA patients (
Melching et al., 2006). However, it is still unclear whether this observation carries any functional significance.
Aggrecanase Inhibitors
With an advancing understanding of how aggrecanases mediate arthritis pathogenesis, recent attention has been turned to the conception of therapeutic strategies against disease progression. The goal of identifying and developing clinically effective inhibitors of ADAMTS-4 and -5 seems promising, especially since suppression of ADAMTS-4 and -5 expression using siRNA leads to decreased aggrecan catabolism (
Song et al., 2007) and deletion of these two genes provides significant protection against OA in animal models (
Glasson et al., 2005;
Ilic et al., 2007;
Majumdar et al., 2007). One example is the intra-articular injection of hyaluronan (HA), which is already in widespread clinical use and has been suggested to have a disease-modifying effect in OA. Until recently, the mechanism of HA efficacy was unknown but a recent study revealed that HA suppresses aggrecan degradation by downregulating IL-1α-induced ADAMTS-4 expression by modulating CD44 and ICAM1 signaling pathways in osteoarthritic chondrocytes (
Yatabe et al., 2009). Thus, HA is an example of how the inhibition of the aggrecanases may represent a clinically successful strategy in the treatment of OA.
A number of compounds are being investigated for their potential to inhibit the aggrecanases. A synthetic compound known as calcium pentosan polysulfate (CaPPS) has been shown to interact with the spacer domain of ADAMTS-4 and the cysteine-rich domain of ADAMTS-5 (
Takizawa et al., 2008;
Troeberg et al., 2008). CaPPS also increases the cartilage levels of TIMP-3, which is the only TIMP (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases) capable of inhibiting ADAMTS-4 and -5. Furthermore, CaPPS increases the affinity of TIMP-3 by more than 100-fold (
Troeberg et al., 2008). Nobiletin is a citrus polymethoxy flavone that can inhibit IL-1β-mediated ADAMTS-4 and -5 expression (
Imada et al., 2008). It is also effective in suppressing ADAMTS-4 and -5 expression and aggrecan degradation in a collagen-induced arthritis mouse model. N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids have been shown to downregulate the mRNA of ADAMTS-4 (
Curtis et al., 2002). Additionally, the C-terminal portion of fibronectin has also been reported to inhibit ADAMTS-4 (
Kramerova et al., 2000;
Hashimoto et al., 2004). Thus, the development of clinically effective inhibitors of ADAMTS-4 and -5 remains an area of active research. Also, although some compounds seem to inhibit one aggrecanase over another, it seems that inhibition of both ADAMTS-4 and -5 will be necessary to achieve an optimal therapeutic effect (
Bursavich et al., 2007a,
b).
Some drugs that are already in clinical use have been evaluated for their possible anti-aggrecanase effects. Glucosamine is a dietary supplement with controversial effects on pain and joint function in OA (
Clegg et al., 2006;
Herrero-Beaumont et al., 2007;
Reginster, 2007;
Vlad et al., 2007). As such, it is not currently recognized as a disease modifying agent by regulatory agencies (
Zhang et al., 2007). Nonetheless, experiments involving rat chondrosarcoma cells and bovine cartilage explants have demonstrated that glucosamine can inhibit aggrecanase activity
in vitro (
Sandy et al., 1998). It has also been demonstrated that glucosamine can inhibit IL-1-induced ADAMTS-4 and -5 expression in chondrocytes (
Chan et al., 2006). Another compound, diacerhein, is effective in treating hip OA (
Rintelen et al., 2006). Diacerhein has been shown to inhibit IL-1-induced ADAMTS-4 expression in bovine cartilage explants, by modulating NF-κB, AP-1, and JNK signaling.
Endogenous inhibitors of ADAMTS-4 and -5 have also been studied. Although TIMPs are broadly effective inhibitors of the MMP family (
Baker et al., 2002), ADAMTS-4 and ADAMTS -5 are inhibited by only TIMP-3, but not TIMP-1, -2,-4, or any other TIMP (
Arner et al., 1999;
Kashiwagi et al., 2001;
Hashimoto et al., 2003;
Wayne et al., 2007). TIMP-3 knockout mice exhibit increased aggrecan loss with mild cartilage degradation (
Mahmoodi et al., 2005;
Sahebjam et al., 2007).
Like the TIMP-3, the heparan-binding growth factor fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2) is another potential endogenous aggrecanase inhibitor. FGF-2 is bound to the ECM and released following mechanical injury. FGF-2 knockout mice exhibit accelerated OA, both spontaneously and following surgical induction. Additionally, surgically induced OA in FGF-2 knockout mice is suppressed by the administration of recombinant FGF-2. FGF-2 knockout mice also exhibit increased expression of ADAMTS-5 mRNA (
Chia et al., 2009). This confirms previous studies involving primary human chondrocytes demonstrating that FGF-2 prevents aggrecan degradation and inhibits IL-1α-induced ADAMTS-4 and -5 expression, suggesting that FGF-2 may protect against OA by suppressing these two ADAMTSs (
Sawaji et al., 2008).
Another endogenous inhibitor of ADAMTS-4 and -5 is α2-Macroglobulin (α2M), which is a general endoprotease inhibitor that is found in serum and joint fluid and is active against most endoproteases (
Hadler et al., 1981;
Chu et al., 1994). Each α2M molecule contains a stretch of amino acids, known as the “bait region”. When a protease cleaves the bait region, α2M undergoes a conformational change, trapping the protease inside, and sequestering it from interaction with other substrates. Both ADAMTS-4 and -5 are able to cleave the bait region of α2M and are thus inhibited by α2M (
Tortorella et al., 2004). However, attempts to identify α2M in the synovial fluid of OA patients have proven unsuccessful.
ADAMTS-7 AND -12
ADAMTS-7 and ADAMTS-12 are two recently discovered members of the ADAMTS family, and form their own subgroup with unique properties. There is emerging evidence to suggest that both ADAMTS-7 and ADAMTS-12 may play key roles in the pathogenesis of arthritis (
Liu, 2009). One study has found that ADAMTS-7 is significantly upregulated in arthritic cartilage and synovium (
Liu et al., 2006a). And while ADAMTS-7 and 12 are both significantly upregulated in the cartilage of RA patients, only ADAMTS-12 is significantly upregulated in OA patients (
Liu et al., 2006a,
b).
As is in the case of ADAMTS-4 and -5, inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and IL-1β have been shown to induce the expression of a number of MMPs (
Bevitt et al., 2003;
Voros et al., 2003;
Cross et al., 2006). Real-time PCR analysis of cultured human cartilage explants show that both TNF and IL-1β strongly induce ADAMTS-7 and -12 expression (
Luan et al., 2008). Interestingly, cytokine-based induction of ADAMTS-12 does not occur in human fetal fibroblasts (
Cal et al., 2001). This suggests that ADAMTS induction mediated by inflammatory cytokines may not occur in all tissue types.
COMP
Since arthritis is characterized by the proteolytic degradation of extracellular matrix proteins, much attention has been turned to identifying the mechanisms underlying the degradation of specific ECM components, such as aggrecan and collagen II. The 524 kDa disulfide-bonded multi-domain glycoprotein, cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP), is a component of cartilage ECM (
Hedbom et al., 1992). Human COMP gene mutations have been linked to the development of autosomal-dominant forms of short-limb dwarfism, such as pseudoachondroplasia and multiple epiphyseal dysplasia (
Briggs et al., 1995;
Hecht et al., 1995;
Cohn et al., 1996;
Briggs et al., 1998). The function of COMP is not entirely understood, although it appears to mediate chondrocyte attachment via an integrin receptor (
DiCesare et al., 1994;
Chen et al., 2005). COMP may also function to stabilize cartilage ECM via specific interactions with matrix components such as collagen type II and IX, aggrecan, and fibronectin (
Mansson et al., 1995;
Rosenberg et al., 1998;
Di Cesare et al., 2002;
Chan et al., 2007).
The degradation of COMP may play a key role in the pathogenesis of arthritis. COMP fragments have been detected in the cartilage, synovial fluid, and serum of patients with post-traumatic knee injuries, primary osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis (
Saxne and Heinegard, 1992;
Neidhart et al., 1997). Several recent studies have also suggested that the level of COMP in joint fluid and/or serum may be useful as a marker in assessing disease severity in a clinical setting (
Mansson et al., 1995;
Neidhart, 1996;
Lohmander et al., 1999;
Kraus et al., 2002;
Misumi et al., 2002). Thus, the identification of enzymes responsible for the degradation of COMP is of potential significance—both to elucidate the biological mechanisms underlying the disease process, as well as to develop novel approaches in diagnosis and therapy.
Several MMPs can digest COMP
in vitro, including MMP-1, -3, -9, -13, -19, and -20 (
Ganu et al., 1998;
Stracke et al., 2000). Interestingly, ADAMTS-4 has also been reported to cleave COMP
in vitro (
Dickinson et al., 2003). However, the exact role of MMPs in COMP degradation has yet to be confirmed by
in vivo animal studies.
The ability of ADAMTS-7 and -12 to bind COMP was first established in our lab. We used a yeast-two-hybrid functional genomic screen to identify both ADAMTS-7 and -12 as COMP-binding metalloproteinases, a result that was later confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation studies demonstrating that this interaction occurs
in vivo (
Liu et al., 2006a,
b). Using ADAMTS-7 and -12 deletion mutants, we then discovered that four C-terminal thrombospondin type-1 repeats are conserved in both enzymes and are required for COMP cleavage, an event that requires binding to the EGF-like domain of COMP. These findings are unsurprising since C-terminal domains of metalloproteinases are often important for determining substrate specificity (
Martel-Pelletier et al., 2001).
Bone, cartilage, synovium, tendon and ligament all contain COMP (
Hedbom et al., 1992;
DiCesare et al., 1994), and each of these tissues also expresses ADAMTS-7. ADAMTS-7 is also detectable in meniscus, skeletal muscle and fat (
Liu et al., 2006a). ADAMTS-12 can be detected in cartilage, synovium, tendon, skeletal muscle and fat, as evidenced by real-time PCR data (
Cal et al., 2001;
Liu et al., 2006b). If ADAMTS-7 and -12 can both interact with COMP, we would expect these molecules to be co-localized, not only in the same tissues, but also within the same sub-cellular location. Immunostaining analysis demonstrates that this is the case—ADAMTS-7 and -12 are co-localized with COMP both in the cytoplasm and on the surface of human chondrocytes (
Liu et al., 2006a,
b). These studies also suggest that COMP may mediate the interaction between ADAMTS-7 and -12 and the chondrocyte membrane.
In vivo immunohistochemistry assays performed on embryonic murine limbs demonstrate significant overlap between ADAMTS-7, -12, and COMP expression patterns.
Subsequent studies involving recombinant enzyme, conditioned medium, and purified protein, have demonstrated that both ADAMTS-7 and -12 can digest COMP
in vitro (
Liu et al., 2006a,
b). An analysis of COMP fragments taken from
in vitro assays suggests that ADAMTS-7 may cleave COMP at multiple sites (
Neidhart et al., 1997). Importantly, COMP fragments taken from the cartilage explants of osteoarthritis patients are of similar size to those found with
in vitro studies (110 kDa) (
Luan et al., 2008). This highlights the possible role that the digestion of COMP by ADAMTS-7 and -12 may play in degenerative joint disease.
Since inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-1β have been shown to induce the expression of ADAMTS-7 and -12, these cytokines would also be expected to induce COMP degradation by upregulating these enzymes. Indeed, abundant 110 kDa COMP fragments are seen in cartilage explants treated with both cytokines, and these fragments are completely eliminated in the presence of anti-ADAMTS-7 and ADAMTS-12 antibodies (
Luan et al., 2008). This provides strong evidence to suggest that ADAMTS-7 and -12 serve to mediate the link between inflammatory cytokines and ECM degradation. Experiments involving siRNA silencing of ADAMTS-7 and -12 in human chondrocytes confirms these results (
Luan et al., 2008). The next logical step would be to validate these findings
in vivo by generating ADAMTS-7 or-12-null mice in an arthritis model. Interestingly, findings demonstrating the role of ADAMTS-5 in aggrecan degradation using osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis mouse models are based on this type of approach (
Glasson et al., 2005).
Like ADAMTS-4 and -5, ADAMTS-7 and -12 are also affected by the action of α2M. Both ADAMTS-7 and -12 are able to cleave α2M in its bait region, and α2M is able to inhibit the COMP degrading activities of ADAMTS-7 and -12 (
Luan et al., 2008). The ability of α2M to interact with four ADAMTSs that have been implicated in arthritis, suggests that future study of this endogenous protease inhibitor may help us to better understand arthritis pathogenesis.
GEP
A recent study has found that COMP associates with granulin-epithelin precursor (GEP), a growth factor that is highly expressed in chondrocytes and is strongly upregulated in the synovium of both OA and RA patients (
Xu et al., 2007). GEP is an 80 kDa secreted glycoprotein that contains seven and a half repeats of a cysteine-rich motif (
Wright et al., 1989;
Anakwe and Gerton, 1990;
Zhou et al., 1993;
Ong and Bateman, 2003). It acts as an autocrine growth factor, and undergoes proteolytic processing to produce ~6 kDa repeating units known as granulins, which retain at least some of the biologic activity of GEP (
Davidson et al., 2004). These peptides are active in cell growth assays and may be mediators of inflammation (
Zanocco-Marani et al., 1999;
Lu and Serrero, 2000).
The finding that COMP associates with both ADAMTS-7 and GEP suggests that these three molecules may form a protein-protein interaction network, whereby co-regulation of all three molecules is intertwined. We performed yeast-2-hybrid and co-immunoprecipitation assays demonstrating that ADAMTS-7 does indeed associate with GEP and that the four C-terminal TS repeats of ADAMTS-7 are required for this interaction (
Bai et al., 2009).
GEP exhibits a potent anti-protease activity—it inhibits TNF-induced protease and GEP-derived granulin inhibits the protease thrombin (
Hong and Kang, 1999;
Zhu et al., 2002). Unpublished data from our lab demonstrate that GEP specifically inhibits COMP degradation by ADAMTS-7 and -12. When GEP and ADAMTS-7 are co-expressed in a COMP-stable cell line, ADAMTS-7-mediated COMP degradation is significantly inhibited (Guo et al., unpublished data). In addition, data from an
in vitro digestion assay show that GEP prevents ADAMTS-12 from degrading COMP (Guo et al., unpublished data). Further data show that ADAMTS-7 can also be categorized as a GEP convertase, since it is involved in the proteolytic processing of GEP with the liberation of small fragments (
Bai et al., 2009).
The available data suggest that GEP inhibits the action of ADAMTS-7 via two distinct mechanisms. First, GEP inhibits the induction of ADAMTS-7 by inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α. Second, it disrupts the association between ADAMTS-7 and COMP via a direct protein-to-protein interaction (
Liu, 2009). Thus, ADAMTS-7 and -12 metalloproteinases, COMP extracellular matrix protein, GEP growth factor, and TNF inflammatory cytokine all act in concert to form a key interaction and interplay network in the pathogenesis of arthritis (Fig. 2).
OTHER ADAMTSs
Like ADAMTS-4 and -5, ADAMTS-9 is also known to have aggrecan degrading activity and is highly activated by both TNF-α and IL-1β in both chondrosarcoma cells and human chondrocytes (
Demircan et al., 2005). Cloning of the ADAMTS-9 promoter reveals putative binding sites for Nuclear Factor of Activated T cells (NFAT), which is commonly found in ADAMTS-4 and -5 promoters (
Yaykasli et al., 2009). 11R-VIVIT, a peptide that inhibits NFAT activation, is able to block the induction of ADAMTS-9 by IL-1β. Since ADAMTS-4 and -5 promoters also contain NFAT binding sites, this finding may aid the development of aggrecanases inhibitors that specifically target NFAT activation.
Another recent study investigated the possible role of various ADAMTSs by analyzing SNPs in 18 ADAMTS genes (
Rodriguez-Lopez et al., 2009). ADAMTS-14 was specifically singled out, as a rare allele was overrepresented in women requiring joint replacement due to knee OA. ADAMTS-14 plays a role in procollagen I processing
in vitro, although its function
in vivo is still unknown (
Colige et al., 2002).
SUMMARY AND PERSPECTIVES
Exploring the role of the ADAMTSs, particularly ADAMTS-4, -5, -7, and -12, in arthritic diseases has been advanced significantly by recent discoveries (Fig. 2). Indeed, the finding that these molecules are able to interact with and modulate cartilage ECM components provides us with new potential to generate specific therapies. By targeting the ADAMTSs, these new therapies would address one of the fundamental processes behind arthritis pathogenesis, namely the destruction of cartilage ECM components. It is this destruction that underlies the loss of cartilage biology, integrity and ultimately functions. Thus, halting or even reversing this destruction could be one of the keys in achieving disease remission. This is the underlying principle behind the ongoing interest in both endogenous and exogenous ADAMTs inhibitors.
Although this review focuses on the role of ADAMTSs in the pathogenesis of arthritis, recent evidence has emerged to implicate these same molecules in a host of other biological and disease processes. Indeed, ADAMTS-4, -5, -7, and -12 could potentially play a key role in the pathogenesis of today’s most common and costly diseases, including arthritis, atherosclerosis and cancer, thus highlighting the importance of future study. Learning the full relationship between the ADAMTSs, their inhibitors, and their binding partners, holds the promise of helping us to better understand the pathogenesis of, as well as develop effective therapies for arthritis as well as many other diseases.
Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010