Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Monosegmental Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for High-Grade Spondylolisthesis: A 3-Year Observational Study

Chao Liu , Ya Wang , Changqing Li , Piming Nie

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (8) : 1591 -1600.

PDF (1073KB)
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (8) :1591 -1600. DOI: 10.1111/os.70364
CLINICAL ARTICLE
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Monosegmental Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for High-Grade Spondylolisthesis: A 3-Year Observational Study
Author information +
History +
PDF (1073KB)

Abstract

Objective: High-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis remains surgically controversial, and evidence on minimally invasive, single-level reduction and fusion with mid-term follow-up remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for high-grade (Meyerding Grade III) spondylolisthesis.

Methods: This prospective observational case series included 14 consecutive patients with Meyerding Grade III isthmic spondylolisthesis treated at a single institution between 2014 and 2019. All patients underwent monosegmental MIS-TLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Outcome measures included VAS (back and leg pain), ODI, slip percentage, Dubousset lumbosacral angle, and other spinopelvic parameters. Pre- and postoperative comparisons were performed using paired t-tests (p < 0.05).

Results: Fourteen patients had a mean age of 54.9 years with a diagnosis of isthmic spondylolisthesis, Meyerding Grade III. The average estimated blood loss was 273.93 mL (range, 197–380 mL). The average operating time was 142.14 min (range, 125–165 min). The average follow-up duration was 43.5 months, with a range of 38–60 months. In most cases, radicular pain was significantly relieved postoperatively. The mean ODI scores decreased from preoperative 65.56% to postoperative 7.93%. All cases achieved near-anatomic reduction, and lumbosacral lordosis was significantly corrected. The average slip percentage improved from 64.36% (preop) to 5.88% (postop), and the average Dubousset-LSA increased from 81.96° (preop) to 105.93° (postop). The overall sagittal profile improved dramatically.

Conclusions: MIS-TLIF and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation may offer a safe and effective treatment option for high-grade spondylolisthesis, with satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes.

Keywords

high-grade spondylolisthesis / minimally invasive surgery / percutaneous pedicle screw / transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chao Liu, Ya Wang, Changqing Li, Piming Nie. Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Monosegmental Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for High-Grade Spondylolisthesis: A 3-Year Observational Study. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2026, 18 (8) : 1591-1600 DOI:10.1111/os.70364

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

R. W. Molinari, “Adult Isthmic Spondylolisthesis,” Current Opinion in Orthopaedics 13, no. 3 (2002): 178–183.

[2]

R. R. Gramse, M. Sinaki, and D. M. Ilstrup, “Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Rational Approach to Conservative Treatment,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings 55, no. 11 (1980): 681–686.

[3]

M. E. Steiner and L. J. Micheli, “Treatment of Symptomatic Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis With the Modified Boston Brace,” Spine 10, no. 10 (1985): 937–943.

[4]

C. P. Thirukumaran, B. Raudenbush, Y. Li, R. Molinari, P. Rubery, and A. Mesfin, “National Trends in the Surgical Management of Adult Lumbar Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: 1998 to 2011,” Spine 41, no. 6 (2016): 490–501.

[5]

T. Lamberg, V. Remes, I. Helenius, D. Schlenzka, S. Seitsalo, and M. Poussa, “Uninstrumented In Situ Fusion for High-Grade Childhood and Adolescent Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: Long-Term Outcome,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 89 (2007): 512–518.

[6]

P. G. Passias, C. E. Poorman, S. Yang, et al., “Surgical Treatment Strategies for High-Grade Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review,” International Journal of Spine Surgery 9 (2015): 50.

[7]

H. Mehdian and L. A. Nasto, “Single-Stage Posterior Reduction and Instrumented Fusion of High-Grade L5-S1 Spondylolisthesis,” European Spine Journal 26, no. 5 (2017): 557–559.

[8]

R. C. Sasso, K. D. Shively, and T. M. Reilly, “Transvertebral Transsacral Strut Grafting for High-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis L5-S1 With Fibular Allograft,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques 21, no. 5 (2008): 328–333.

[9]

J. D. Schwender, L. T. Holly, and D. P. Rouben, “Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF). Technical Feasibility and Initial Results,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques 18 (2005): S1-S6.

[10]

J. C. Fairbank and P. B. Pynsent, “The Oswestry Disability Index,” Spine 25 (2000): 2940–2952.

[11]

E. Bourassa-Moreau, J.-M. Mac-Thiong, and H. Labelle, “Redefining the Technique for the Radiologic Measurement of Slip in Spondylolisthesis,” Spine 35, no. 14 (2010): 1401–1405.

[12]

J. Legaye, G. Duval-Beaupère, J. Hecquet, and C. Marty, “Pelvic Incidence: A Fundamental Pelvic Parameter for Three-Dimensional Regulation of Spinal Sagittal Curves,” European Spine Journal 7 (1998): 99–103.

[13]

J. Dubousset, “Treatment of Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis in Children and Adolescents,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 337 (1997): 77–85.

[14]

D. S. Hanson, K. H. Bridwell, J. M. Rhee, and L. G. Lenke, “Correlation of Pelvic Incidence With Low- and High-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis,” Spine 27 (2002): 2026–2029.

[15]

E. E. Transfeldt and A. A. Mehbod, “Evidence-Based Medicine Analysis of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Treatment Including Reduction Versus Fusion In Situ for High-Grade Slips,” Spine 32, no. 19 (2007): S126-S129.

[16]

M. T. Hresko, H. Labelle, P. Roussouly, et al., “Classification of High Grade Spondylolisthesis Based on Pelvic Version and Spinal Balance: Possible Rationale for Reduction,” Spine 32, no. 20 (2007): 2208–2213.

[17]

H. Labelle, J. M. Mac-Thiong, and P. Roussouly, “Spino-Pelvic Sagittal Balance of Spondylolisthesis: A Review and Classification,” European Spine Journal 20, no. 5 (2011): 641–646.

[18]

A. Alzakri, H. Labelle, M. T. Hresko, et al., “Restoration of Normal Pelvic Balance From Surgical Reduction in High-Grade Spondylolisthesis,” European Spine Journal 28, no. 9 (2019): 2087–2094.

[19]

J. M. Mac-Thiong, M. T. Hresko, A. Alzakri, et al., “Criteria for Surgical Reduction in High-Grade Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis Based on Quality of Life Measures,” European Spine Journal 28 (2019): 2060–2069.

[20]

R. J. Hoel, R. M. Brenner, and D. W. Polly, Jr., “The Challenge of Creating Lordosis in High-Grade Dysplastic Spondylolisthesis,” Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 29 (2018): 375–387.

[21]

H. Labelle, P. Roussouly, E. Berthonnaud, et al., “Spondylolisthesis, Pelvic Incidence and Sagittal Spino-Pelvic Balance: A Correlation Study,” Spine 29, no. 18 (2004): 2049–2054.

[22]

F. Tanguay, H. Labelle, Z. Wang, J. Joncas, J. A. de Guise, and J. M. Mac-Thiong, “Clinical Significance of Lumbosacral Kyphosis in Adolescent Spondylolisthesis,” Spine 37, no. 4 (2012): 304–308.

[23]

X. Guo, W. Li, Z. Guo, et al., “The Relationship Between the Extent of Reduction and the Change of Spino-Pelvic Parameters in High Dysplastic Developmental Spondylolisthesis,” Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord 30, no. 8 (2020): 679–686.

[24]

M. Ruf, H. Koch, R. P. Melcher, and J. Harms, “Anatomic Reduction and Monosegmental Fusion in High-Grade Developmental Spondylolisthesis,” Spine 31, no. 3 (2006): 269–274.

[25]

N. A. Quraishi and Y. Rampersaud, “Minimal Access Bilateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for High-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis,” European Spine Journal 22 (2013): 1707–1713.

[26]

V. Deshpande, V. Rajakumar, A. Hari, et al., “Complete Anatomic Reduction and Monosegmental Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis of Grade II and Higher: Use of the Minimally Invasive “Rocking” Technique,” Neurosurgical Focus 43, no. 2 (2017): E12.

[27]

J. Wang, “Comparison of One-Level Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative and Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Grades 1 and 2,” European Spine Journal 19, no. 10 (2010): 1780–1784.

[28]

H. L. Shufflebarger and M. J. Geck, “High-Grade Isthmic Dysplastic Spondylolisthesis,” Spine 30, no. 6 Suppl (2005): S42–S48.

[29]

H. Koller, K. Mühlenkamp, W. Hitzl, et al., “Surgical Outcomes With Anatomic Reduction of High-Grade Spondylolisthesis Revisited: An Analysis of 101 Patients,” Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine 36 (2021): 215–225.

[30]

M. K. Kasliwal, J. S. Smith, C. I. Shaffrey, et al., “Short-Term Complications Associated With Surgery for High-Grade Spondylolisthesis in Adults and Pediatric Patients: A Report From the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Database,” Neurosurgery 71 (2012): 109–116.

[31]

A. M. Khalaf, V. Yedavalli, and T. F. Massoud, “Magnetic Resonance Imaging Anatomy and Morphometry of Lumbar Intervertebral Foramina to Guide Safe Transforaminal Subarachnoid Punctures,” Clinical Anatomy 33 (2020): 405–413.

[32]

C. Karampalis, M. Grevitt, M. Shafafy, and J. Webb, “High-Grade Spondylolisthesis: Gradual Reduction Using Magerl's External Fixator Followed by Circumferential Fusion Technique and Long-Term Results,” European Spine Journal 21, no. 2 (2012): 200–206.

[33]

G. Tender, D. Serban, C. Niki, et al., “L5 Spinal Nerve Function After L5-S1 High-Grade Spondylolisthesis Reduction: Two Case Reports,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences 375 (2017): 321–323.

Rights & permissions

2026 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF (1073KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉