Ultra Short Osteotomy With Mortise-Tenon Diaphyseal Prosthesis Reconstruction for Forearm Metastases: A Retrospective Study

Yunxiu Chen , Tongfu Wang , Miaomiao Gao , Xiaoyi Wang , Chengke Li , Jingyu Zhang

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (6) : 1288 -1297.

PDF (732KB)
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (6) :1288 -1297. DOI: 10.1111/os.70321
OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE
Ultra Short Osteotomy With Mortise-Tenon Diaphyseal Prosthesis Reconstruction for Forearm Metastases: A Retrospective Study
Author information +
History +
PDF (732KB)

Abstract

Objective: Forearm diaphyseal metastases are rarely encountered and are predisposed to pathological fracture because torsional stress is repeatedly generated during pronation–supination. In addition, relatively long osteotomy is often required by conventional intercalary prostheses, and limited bone stock in the radius and ulna may be sacrificed. In this study, the feasibility and short- to mid-term outcomes of an intercalary mortise–tenon diaphyseal prosthesis designed to enable ultra-short osteotomy were evaluated in patients undergoing reconstruction after en bloc resection of forearm metastases.

Methods: Five consecutive patients with diaphyseal metastases of the forearm (radius, n = 3; ulna, n = 2) who were treated with en bloc resection and implantation of a custom mortise–tenon diaphyseal prosthesis between June 2019 and November 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Pain and limb function were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, respectively. Osteotomy length, perioperative findings, complications, local recurrence, implant-related events, and survival were recorded. Pre- and postoperative VAS and MSTS scores were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results: A mean follow-up of 40.2 months (range, 19–72) was achieved. A mean osteotomy length of 3.6 cm (range, 3.0–4.0) was recorded, and reconstruction was completed with limited bone resection. Pathological fractures were observed in three patients, whereas Mirel's scores of 10 were documented in the remaining two patients. At final follow-up, the mean VAS score was reduced to 0.4 (range, 0–1), and the mean MSTS score was increased to 26.2 (range, 25–27); statistical significance was reached for both comparisons. The 12- and 24-month survival rates were estimated at 100% and 80%, respectively. No local recurrence, implant failure, or major postoperative complications were observed during follow-up.

Conclusion: In this small retrospective case series, intercalary reconstruction using a mortise–tenon diaphyseal prosthesis after en bloc resection was shown to be feasible for forearm diaphyseal metastases, and substantial pain relief together with satisfactory functional recovery was achieved. Long-term durability and oncologic outcomes should be confirmed in larger studies.

Keywords

diaphyseal prosthesis / forearm / metastatic lesions / mortise-tenon / radius / ulna

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yunxiu Chen, Tongfu Wang, Miaomiao Gao, Xiaoyi Wang, Chengke Li, Jingyu Zhang. Ultra Short Osteotomy With Mortise-Tenon Diaphyseal Prosthesis Reconstruction for Forearm Metastases: A Retrospective Study. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2026, 18 (6) : 1288-1297 DOI:10.1111/os.70321

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Z. Y. Du, J. Zang, X. D. Tang, and W. Guo, “Experts' Agreement on Therapy for Bone Metastases,” Orthopedic Surgery 2 (2010): 241–253.

[2]

J. Fornetti, A. L. Welm, and S. A. Stewart, “Understanding the Bone in Cancer Metastasis,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 33 (2018): 2099–2113.

[3]

G. Guzik, “Oncological and Functional Results After Surgical Treatment of Bone Metastases at the Proximal Femur,” BMC Surgery 18 (2018): 5.

[4]

C. M. Kelly, R. M. Wilkins, J. J. Eckardt, and W. G. Ward, “Treatment of Metastatic Disease of the Tibia,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 415 (2003): S219–S229.

[5]

D. Stomeo, A. Tulli, A. Ziranu, C. Perisano, V. De Santis, and G. Maccauro, “Acrometastasis: A Literature Review,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 19 (2015): 2906–2915.

[6]

V. L. Seltzer and E. M. Beckman, “Pathologic Fracture of the Ulna Secondary to Metastatic Vulvar Carcinoma: Report of a Case,” Gynecologic Oncology 4 (1976): 232–237.

[7]

A. Nooh, K. Goulding, M. H. Isler, et al., “Early Improvement in Pain and Functional Outcome but Not Quality of Life After Surgery for Metastatic Long Bone Disease,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 476 (2018): 535–545.

[8]

B. J. J. Bindels, Q. Thio, K. A. Raskin, M. L. Ferrone, S. A. Lozano Calderón, and J. H. Schwab, “Thirty-Day Postoperative Complications After Surgery for Metastatic Long Bone Disease Are Associated With Higher Mortality at 1 Year,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 478 (2020): 306–318.

[9]

T. Raschka, S. Weiss, A. Reiter, et al., “Outcomes and Prognostic Factors After Surgery for Bone Metastases in the Extremities and Pelvis: A Retrospective Analysis of 140 Patients,” Journal of Bone Oncology 34 (2022): 100427.

[10]

H. C. Bauer, “Controversies in the Surgical Management of Skeletal Metastases,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 87 (2005): 608–617.

[11]

J. Bickels, S. Dadia, and Z. Lidar, “Surgical Management of Metastatic Bone Disease,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 91 (2009): 1503–1516.

[12]

M. Ratasvuori, R. Wedin, J. Keller, et al., “Insight Opinion to Surgically Treated Metastatic Bone Disease: Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Skeletal Metastasis Registry Report of 1195 Operated Skeletal Metastasis,” Surgical Oncology 22 (2013): 132–138.

[13]

W. S. Aljuhani, A. M. Alanazi, and A. O. Edrees, “Single Bone Forearm Reconstruction of Proximal Ulna Metastatic Lesion: A Case Report,” International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 106 (2023): 108259.

[14]

L. M. Zhao, D. M. Tian, Y. Wei, et al., “Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Intercalary Prosthesis for Humeral Diaphyseal Segmental Defect Reconstruction,” Orthopaedic Surgery 10 (2018): 23–31.

[15]

V. I. Sakellariou, A. F. Mavrogenis, G. C. Babis, P. N. Soucacos, E. A. Magnissalis, and P. J. Papagelopoulos, “Comparison of Four Reconstructive Methods for Diaphyseal Defects of the Humerus After Tumor Resection,” Journal of Applied Biomechanics 28 (2012): 568–578.

[16]

G. Rovere, C. Meschini, P. Piazza, et al., “Proximal Humerus Fractures Treatment in Adult Patients With Bone Metastasis,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 26 (2022): 100–105.

[17]

H. Mirels, “Metastatic Disease in Long Bones: A Proposed Scoring System for Diagnosing Impending Pathologic Fractures,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 415 (2003): S4–S13.

[18]

Y. T. Sung and J. S. Wu, “The Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP): A New Technique for Psychological Measurement,” Behavior Research Methods 50 (2018): 1694–1715.

[19]

K. Uehara, K. Ogura, T. Akiyama, et al., “Reliability and Validity of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scoring System for the Upper Extremity in Japanese Patients,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 475 (2017): 2253–2259.

[20]

L. Huang, W. Guo, R. Yang, X. Tang, and T. Yan, “Clinical Features and Surgical Strategies for Metastatic Tumors of the Distal Extremities,” Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint 3 (2014): 490–494.

[21]

Y. Tang, “Clinical Features and Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Tumors of the Radius and Ulna,” Journal of Practical Orthopaedics 24 (2018): 1119–1122.

[22]

K. Zheng, X. C. Yu, Y. C. Hu, et al., “Outcome of Segmental Prosthesis Reconstruction for Diaphyseal Bone Tumors: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study,” BMC Cancer 19 (2019): 638.

[23]

K. Hashimoto, S. Nishimura, T. Ito, R. Kakinoki, and K. Goto, “Efficacy of Surgical Intervention in Treating Pathological Fractures of the Upper Extremity: A Retrospective Case Series,” Cureus 16 (2024): e71273.

[24]

J. Sebghati and P. Tsagkozis, “Outcome of Surgical Treatment for Metastatic Bone Disease of the Forearm,” Cancer Reports 8 (2025): e70208.

[25]

A. Szendroi, E. Dinya, M. Kardos, et al., “Prognostic Factors and Survival of Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma Patients With Bone Metastases,” Pathology, Oncology, Research: POR 16 (2010): 29–38.

[26]

M. Ratasvuori, R. Wedin, B. H. Hansen, et al., “Prognostic Role of En-Bloc Resection and Late Onset of Bone Metastasis in Patients With Bone-Seeking Carcinomas of the Kidney, Breast, Lung, and Prostate: SSG Study on 672 Operated Skeletal Metastases,” Journal of Surgical Oncology 110 (2014): 360–365.

[27]

D. L. Muscolo, M. A. Ayerza, L. A. Aponte-Tinao, and M. Ranalletta, “Partial Epiphyseal Preservation and Intercalary Allograft Reconstruction in High-Grade Metaphyseal Osteosarcoma of the Knee,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 86 (2004): 2686–2693.

[28]

D. L. Muscolo, M. A. Ayerza, L. Aponte-Tinao, M. Ranalletta, and E. Abalo, “Intercalary Femur and Tibia Segmental Allografts Provide an Acceptable Alternative in Reconstructing Tumor Resections,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 426 (2004): 97–102.

[29]

R. W. Hsu, M. B. Wood, F. H. Sim, and E. Y. Chao, “Free Vascularised Fibular Grafting for Reconstruction After Tumour Resection,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 79 (1997): 36–42.

[30]

M. Ghert, N. Colterjohn, and M. Manfrini, “The Use of Free Vascularized Fibular Grafts in Skeletal Reconstruction for Bone Tumors in Children,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 15 (2007): 577–587.

[31]

E. Ortiz-Cruz, M. C. Gebhardt, L. C. Jennings, D. S. Springfield, and H. J. Mankin, “The Results of Transplantation of Intercalary Allografts After Resection of Tumors. A Long-Term Follow-Up Study,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 79 (1997): 97–106.

[32]

D. Donati, M. Di Liddo, M. Zavatta, et al., “Massive Bone Allograft Reconstruction in High-Grade Osteosarcoma,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 377 (2000): 186–194.

[33]

R. C. Thompson, A. Garg, D. R. Clohisy, and E. Y. Cheng, “Fractures in Large-Segment Allografts,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 370 (2000): 227–235.

[34]

H. J. Mankin, D. S. Springfield, M. C. Gebhardt, and W. W. Tomford, “Current Status of Allografting for Bone Tumors,” Orthopedics 15 (1992): 1147–1154.

[35]

F. J. Hornicek, W. Mnaymneh, R. D. Lackman, G. U. Exner, and T. I. Malinin, “Limb Salvage With Osteoarticular Allografts After Resection of Proximal Tibia Bone Tumors,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 352 (1998): 179–186.

[36]

K. N. Malizos, C. G. Zalavras, P. N. Soucacos, A. E. Beris, and J. R. Urbaniak, “Free Vascularized Fibular Grafts for Reconstruction of Skeletal Defects,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 12 (2004): 360–369.

[37]

C. Perisano, T. Greco, C. Fulchignoni, and G. Maccauro, “The IlluminOss System: A Solution in Elderly Patients With Upper Limbs Bone Metastases,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 26 (2022): 119–126.

[38]

F. Pu, Z. Zhang, B. Wang, J. Liu, and Z. Shao, “En Bloc Resection and Intercalary Prosthesis Implantation for the Treatment of Humeral Diaphyseal Bone Metastases,” International Orthopaedics 45 (2021): 281–288.

[39]

J. Zhao, X. C. Yu, M. Xu, et al., “Intercalary Prosthetic Reconstruction for Pathologic Diaphyseal Humeral Fractures due to Metastatic Tumors: Outcomes and Improvements,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 27 (2018): 2013–2020.

[40]

J. C. Henry, T. A. Damron, M. M. Weiner, M. E. Higgins, F. W. Werner, and F. H. Sim, “Biomechanical Analysis of Humeral Diaphyseal Segmental Defect Fixation,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 396 (2002): 231–239.

[41]

M. D. Sewell, S. A. Hanna, A. McGrath, et al., “Intercalary Diaphyseal Endoprosthetic Reconstruction for Malignant Tibial Bone Tumours,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 93 (2011): 1111–1117.

[42]

A. Abudu, S. R. Carter, and R. J. Grimer, “The Outcome and Functional Results of Diaphyseal Endoprostheses After Tumour Excision,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 78 (1996): 652–657.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2026 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF (732KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/