Primary Total Elbow Arthroplasty With the Coonrad–Morrey Prosthesis in a Chinese Cohort: A Follow-Up of 5–10 Years

Jianyu Zhang , Kehan Hua , Dan Xiao , Chen Chen , Maoqi Gong , Yejun Zha , Xieyuan Jiang

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4) : 685 -694.

PDF (1082KB)
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4) :685 -694. DOI: 10.1111/os.70276
CLINICAL ARTICLE
Primary Total Elbow Arthroplasty With the Coonrad–Morrey Prosthesis in a Chinese Cohort: A Follow-Up of 5–10 Years
Author information +
History +
PDF (1082KB)

Abstract

Objective: Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a commonly performed surgical technique for the management of elbow disorders. The Coonrad–Morrey (CM) prosthesis is the most commonly used prosthesis in TEA. The study from Chinese cohorts remains limited, particularly regarding differences between patients with and without RA. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the medium- to long-term clinical outcomes using the CM prosthesis in a Chinese cohort, and to compare clinical outcomes between patients with and without RA.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 74 patients (75 elbows) who underwent TEA using CM prostheses between March 2015 and February 2019. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 5 years (mean follow-up: 83.4 months) and were assessed for elbow range of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick-DASH) score, pain, complications, and revision surgeries. Kaplan–Meier survivorship analysis was conducted. The differences between patients with and without rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were compared in the subgroup analysis.

Results: At the final follow-up, the average flexion-extension ROM was 105.3° ± 33.6°. The mean MEPS was 85.5 ± 14.3, with a good-to-excellent rate of 81.3%. The mean Quick-DASH score was 30.8 ± 18.1. A total of 26 complications (26/75, 34.7%) were observed in 22 elbows (22/75, 29.3%). Nine elbows (9/75, 12.0%) underwent reoperation. The revision-free rates were 98.7% at 1 year, 94.7% at 2 years, and 90.7% at 5 years. There were no significant differences in elbow function or revision-free rate between patients with and without RA.

Conclusion: TEA using CM prosthesis in Chinese patients can achieve favorable functional outcomes regardless of RA status, with a high 5-year prosthesis survival rate. However, a larger sample size and a longer follow-up period are still required.

Keywords

5-year survival / Chinese population / complication / Coonrad–Morrey prosthesis / rheumatoid arthritis / total elbow arthroplasty

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jianyu Zhang, Kehan Hua, Dan Xiao, Chen Chen, Maoqi Gong, Yejun Zha, Xieyuan Jiang. Primary Total Elbow Arthroplasty With the Coonrad–Morrey Prosthesis in a Chinese Cohort: A Follow-Up of 5–10 Years. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2026, 18 (4) : 685-694 DOI:10.1111/os.70276

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

R. Barco, P. N. Streubel, B. F. Morrey, and J. Sanchez-Sotelo, “Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Distal Humeral Fractures: A Ten-Year-Minimum Follow-Up Study,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 99, no. 18 (2017): 1524–1531.

[2]

D. Zhang and N. Chen, “Total Elbow Arthroplasty,” Journal of Hand Surgery 44, no. 6 (2019): 487–495.

[3]

T. A. Chou, H. H. Ma, J. H. Wang, et al., “Total Elbow Arthroplasty in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Bone & Joint Journal 102-b, no. 8 (2020): 967–980.

[4]

B. S. Schoch, J. D. Werthel, J. Sánchez-Sotelo, et al., “Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Primary Osteoarthritis,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 26, no. 8 (2017): 1355–1359.

[5]

E. Kholinne, L. A. Altamimi, A. Aldayel, et al., “Primary Linked Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Acute Distal Humerus Fracture Management: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcome,” Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 12, no. 4 (2020): 503–513.

[6]

P. Y. Barthel, P. Mansat, F. Sirveaux, F. Dap, D. Molé, and G. Dautel, “Is Total Elbow Arthroplasty Indicated in the Treatment of Traumatic Sequelae? 19 Cases of Coonrad–Morrey Reviewed at a Mean Follow-Up of 5.2 Years,” Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research 100, no. 1 (2014): 113–118.

[7]

A. Celli and B. F. Morrey, “Total Elbow Arthroplasty in Patients Forty Years of Age or Less,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 91, no. 6 (2009): 1414–1418.

[8]

A. G. Aliyev, R. M. Tikhilov, I. I. Shubnyakov, et al., “Coonrad-Morrey Total Elbow Arthroplasty Implications in Young Patients With Post-Traumatic Sequelae,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 31, no. 9 (2022): 1874–1883.

[9]

D. R. Gill and B. F. Morrey, “The Coonrad-Morrey Total Elbow Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Rheumatoid Arthritis. A Ten to Fifteen-Year Follow-Up Study,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 80, no. 9 (1998): 1327–1335.

[10]

M. Morandi Guaitoli, A. Mazzotti, E. Artioli, A. Arceri, A. Ruffilli, and C. Faldini, “Indications and Outcomes of the Coonrad-Morrey Total Elbow Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 145, no. 1 (2024): 19.

[11]

B. F. Morrey and J. Sanchez-Sotelo, “Approaches for Elbow Arthroplasty: How to Handle the Triceps,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 20, no. 2 Suppl (2011): S90–S96.

[12]

Z. Xue, X. Huang, W. Guo, et al., “Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between the Olecranon Osteotomy Approach and the Bryan–Morrey Approach for Total Elbow Arthroplasty,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 32, no. 7 (2023): 1505–1513.

[13]

T. D. Pierce and J. H. Herndon, “The Triceps Preserving Approach to Total Elbow Arthroplasty,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 354 (1998): 144–152.

[14]

P. M. Prokopis and A. J. Weiland, “The Triceps-Preserving Approach for Semiconstrained Total Elbow Arthroplasty,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 17, no. 3 (2008): 454–458.

[15]

K. T. Na, S. W. Song, Y. M. Lee, and J.-H. Choi, “Modified Triceps Fascial Tongue Approach for Primary Total Elbow Arthroplasty,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 27, no. 5 (2018): 887–893.

[16]

R. P. Dachs, M. A. Fleming, D. A. Chivers, et al., “Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Outcomes After Triceps-Detaching and Triceps-Sparing Approaches,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 24, no. 3 (2015): 339–347.

[17]

D. Meijering, A. L. Boerboom, C. L. E. Gerritsma, et al., “Mid-Term Results of the Latitude Primary Total Elbow Arthroplasty,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 31, no. 2 (2022): 382–390.

[18]

N. Mühlenfeld, I. Marzi, and J. Frank, “Total Elbow Arthroplasty in Elderly Trauma Patients: Adding a New Perspective for Functional Evaluation,” European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 48, no. 5 (2022): 3941–3947.

[19]

D. W. Zeltser, H. A. Prentice, R. A. Navarro, R. Mirzayan, M. T. Dillon, and A. Foroohar, “Total Elbow Arthroplasty: A Descriptive Analysis of 170 Patients From a United States Integrated Health Care System,” Journal of Hand Surgery 46, no. 7 (2021): 552–559.

[20]

H. Barret, P. Laumonerie, S. Delclaux, M. Arboucalot, N. Bonnevialle, and P. Mansat, “Revision Total Elbow Arthroplasty With the Semiconstrained Coonrad/Morrey Prosthesis: Follow-Up to 21 Years,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 103, no. 7 (2021): 618–628.

[21]

M. Siala, P. Laumonerie, A. Hedjoudje, et al., “Outcomes of Semiconstrained Total Elbow Arthroplasty Performed for Arthritis in Patients Under 55 Years Old,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 29, no. 4 (2020): 859–866.

[22]

Q. Zhang, M. Xiang, J. S. Yang, et al., “Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Total Elbow Arthroplasty Using a Semi-Constrained Prosthesis With a Triceps-Preserving Approach Over a Minimum Follow-Up Period of 4 Years,” Orthopaedic Surgery 15, no. 8 (2023): 2091–2101.

[23]

L. Tarallo, A. Celli, M. Delvecchio, et al., “Long-Term Outcomes and Trends in Elbow Arthroplasty With Coonrad-Morrey Prosthesis: A Retrospective Study in Large Group of Patients,” International Orthopaedics 48, no. 10 (2024): 2689–2698.

[24]

N. Goyal, T. J. Luchetti, R. W. Wysocki, and M. S. Cohen, “Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Elbow Arthroplasty,” Journal of Hand Surgery 45, no. 10 (2020): 957–970.

[25]

M. J. Gutman, M. A. Stone, S. Namdari, and J. A. Abboud, “Treatment of Elbow Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 29, no. 2 (2020): 411–419.

[26]

N. Martinez-Catalan, N. T. V. Nguyen, M. E. Morrey, et al., “Two-Stage Reimplantation for Deep Infection After Total Elbow Arthroplasty,” Shoulder & Elbow 14, no. 6 (2022): 668–676.

[27]

W. B. J. Rudge, K. Eseonu, M. Brown, et al., “The Management of Infected Elbow Arthroplasty by Two-Stage Revision,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 27, no. 5 (2018): 879–886.

[28]

B. Zmistowski, A. Pourjafari, E. M. Padegimas, et al., “Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Elbow: 15-Year Experience at a Single Institution,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 27, no. 9 (2018): 1636–1641.

[29]

J. M. Kwak, K. H. Koh, and I. H. Jeon, “Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Revision Surgery,” Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 11, no. 4 (2019): 369–379.

[30]

A. Choo and M. L. Ramsey, “Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Current Options,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 21, no. 7 (2013): 427–437.

[31]

J. Sanchez-Sotelo and B. F. Morrey, “Total Elbow Arthroplasty,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 19, no. 2 (2011): 121–125.

[32]

C. P. Little, A. J. Graham, and A. J. Carr, “Total Elbow Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature in the English Language Until the End of 2003,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 87, no. 4 (2005): 437–444.

[33]

R. P. Dachs, B. C. Vrettos, D. A. Chivers, et al., “Outcomes After Ulnar Nerve In Situ Release During Total Elbow Arthroplasty,” Journal of Hand Surgery 40, no. 9 (2015): 1832–1837.

[34]

K. A. Hildebrand, S. D. Patterson, W. D. Regan, et al., “Functional Outcome of Semiconstrained Total Elbow Arthroplasty,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 82, no. 10 (2000): 1379–1386.

[35]

I. Voloshin, D. W. Schippert, S. Kakar, E. K. Kaye, and B. F. Morrey, “Complications of Total Elbow Replacement: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 20, no. 1 (2011): 158–168.

[36]

M. D. Mckee, D. M. Pugh, R. R. Richards, et al., “Effect of Humeral Condylar Resection on Strength and Functional Outcome After Semiconstrained Total Elbow Arthroplasty,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 85, no. 5 (2003): 802–807.

[37]

A. Celli, C. Paroni, P. Bonucci, and L. Celli, “Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Acute Distal Humeral Fractures With Humeral Condyle Resection or Retention: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study,” JSES International 5, no. 4 (2021): 797–803.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2026 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF (1082KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/