Objectives: Clavicle fracture fixation is frequently complicated by implant mismatch and mechanical failure due to the complex and highly variable S-shaped anatomy of the clavicle. Conventional morphometric classification systems rely on subjective assessments of curvature and fail to capture the continuous spectrum of clavicular shape variation, limiting their utility for personalized implant design and preoperative planning. Furthermore, large-scale statistical shape modeling studies focusing on Asian populations remain scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize clavicular morphology in an Asian cohort using statistical shape modeling (SSM), investigate sex- and side-related differences, and evaluate the validity of traditional morphological classification systems.
Methods: A retrospective study analyzed 288 clavicles reconstructed from CT scans of 144 adults (94 females, 50 males). Three-dimensional models were segmented in 3D Slicer, aligned, and processed using the Scalismo platform. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to establish the SSM and extract modes of variation (MoV). Morphometric parameters were calculated automatically. Independent t-tests assessed sex and side differences, and clustering analysis was conducted to compare data-driven groupings with traditional three-type classifications.
Results: The first six MoV explained 82.38% of total variance. PC01 (50.84%) reflected clavicular length and midshaft width; PC02–PC06 represented curvature and rotational variations. Significant sex differences were observed in PC01, PC02, and PC06 (p < 0.05), whereas no side differences were detected. Agglomerative clustering identified two morphological groups with poor concordance with traditional three-type classifications (Adjusted Rand Index≈0), indicating a continuous rather than discrete distribution of clavicular shapes.
Conclusion: Clavicular morphology exhibits sex-dependent but not side-dependent variability. Traditional categorical classifications inadequately capture anatomical diversity. Large-scale SSM provides objective morphometric evidence to guide personalized preoperative planning and improve implant design in clavicle fracture fixation.
| [1] |
P. C. Liu, S. H. Chien, J. C. Chen, C. H. Hsieh, P. H. Chou, and C. C. Lu, “Minimally Invasive Fixation of Displaced Midclavicular Fractures With Titanium Elastic Nails,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 24, no. 4 (2010): 217–223.
|
| [2] |
M. D. McKee, “Clavicle Fractures in 2010: Sling/Swathe or Open Reduction and Internal Fixation?,” Orthopedic Clinics of North America 41, no. 2 (2010): 225–231.
|
| [3] |
N. Hussain, C. Sermer, P. J. Prusick, L. Banfield, A. Atrey, and M. Bhandari, “Intramedullary Nailing Versus Plate Fixation for the Treatment Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Scientific Reports 6 (2016): 34912.
|
| [4] |
M. A. Meeuwis, A. F. Pull Ter Gunne, M. H. J. Verhofstad, and F. H. W. M. van der Heijden, “Construct Failure After Open Reduction and Plate Fixation of Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures,” Injury 48, no. 3 (2017): 715–719.
|
| [5] |
M. Fridberg, I. Ban, Z. Issa, M. Krasheninnikoff, and A. Troelsen, “Locking Plate Osteosynthesis of Clavicle Fractures: Complication and Reoperation Rates in One Hundred and Five Consecutive Cases,” International Orthopaedics 37, no. 4 (2013): 689–692.
|
| [6] |
Y. Zhu, J. Hu, T. Zhan, K. Zhu, and C. Zhang, “Refracture After Plate Removal of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures After Bone Union—Incidence, Risk Factors, Management and Outcomes,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 24, no. 1 (2023): 308.
|
| [7] |
A. Van Tongel, T. Huysmans, B. Amit, J. Sijbers, F. Vanglabbeek, and L. De Wilde, “Evaluation of Prominence of Straight Plates and Precontoured Clavicle Plates Using Automated Plate-To-Bone Alignment,” Acta Orthopaedica Belgica 80, no. 3 (2014): 301–308.
|
| [8] |
G. Fu, A. Berg, K. Das, J. Li, R. Li, and R. Wu, “A Statistical Model for Mapping Morphological Shape,” Theoretical Biology & Medical Modelling 7 (2010): 28.
|
| [9] |
S. Arbabi, P. Seevinck, H. Weinans, et al., “Statistical Shape Model of the Talus Bone Morphology: A Comparison Between Impinged and Nonimpinged Ankles,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research : Official Publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 41, no. 1 (2023): 183–195.
|
| [10] |
K. Iyer, A. Morris, B. Zenger, et al., “Statistical Shape Modeling of Multi-Organ Anatomies With Shared Boundaries,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 10 (2022): 1078800.
|
| [11] |
M. Ringnér, “What Is Principal Component Analysis?,” Nature Biotechnology 26, no. 3 (2008): 303–304.
|
| [12] |
Z. J. Daruwalla, P. Courtis, C. Fitzpatrick, D. Fitzpatrick, and H. Mullett, “An Application of Principal Component Analysis to the Clavicle and Clavicle Fixation Devices,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 5 (2010): 21.
|
| [13] |
N. Sarkalkan, H. Weinans, and A. A. Zadpoor, “Statistical Shape and Appearance Models of Bones,” Bone 60 (2014): 129–140.
|
| [14] |
M. Luthi, T. Gerig, C. Jud, and T. Vetter, “Gaussian Process Morphable Models,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 40, no. 8 (2018): 1860–1873.
|
| [15] |
R. H. Davies, C. J. Twining, T. F. Cootes, J. C. Waterton, and C. J. Taylor, “A Minimum Description Length Approach to Statistical Shape Modeling,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 21, no. 5 (2002): 525–537.
|
| [16] |
S. Vancleef, M. Herteleer, Y. Carette, et al., “Why Off-The-Shelf Clavicle Plates Rarely Fit: Anatomic Analysis of the Clavicle Through Statistical Shape Modeling,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 28, no. 4 (2019): 631–638.
|
| [17] |
D. A. Hart, “Regulation of Bone by Mechanical Loading, Sex Hormones, and Nerves: Integration of Such Regulatory Complexity and Implications for Bone Loss During Space Flight and Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis,” Biomolecules 13, no. 7 (2023): 1136.
|
| [18] |
M. A. Crane, K. M. Kato, B. A. Patel, and A. K. Huttenlocker, “Histovariability in Human Clavicular Cortical Bone Microstructure and Its Mechanical Implications,” Journal of Anatomy 235, no. 5 (2019): 873–882.
|
| [19] |
A. D. Fontana, H. A. Hoyen, M. Blauth, et al., “The Variance of Clavicular Surface Morphology Is Predictable: An Analysis of Dependent and Independent Metadata Variables,” JSES International 4, no. 3 (2020): 413–421.
|
| [20] |
K. C. Wong, “3D-Printed Patient-Specific Applications in Orthopedics,” Orthopedic Research and Reviews 8 (2016): 57–66.
|
| [21] |
A. Bachoura, A. S. Deane, J. N. Wise, and S. Kamineni, “Clavicle Morphometry Revisited: A 3-Dimensional Study With Relevance to Operative Fixation,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 22, no. 1 (2013): e15–e21.
|
| [22] |
J. C. S. Yang, K. J. Lin, H. W. Wei, C. L. Tsai, K. P. Lin, and P. Y. Lee, “Morphometric Analysis of the Clavicles in Chinese Population,” BioMed Research International 2017 (2017): 8149109.
|
| [23] |
Z. J. Daruwalla, P. Courtis, C. Fitzpatrick, D. Fitzpatrick, and H. Mullett, “Anatomic Variation of the Clavicle: A Novel Three-Dimensional Study,” Clinical Anatomy 23, no. 2 (2010): 199–209.
|
| [24] |
Y. C. Lu and C. D. Untaroiu, “Statistical Shape Analysis of Clavicular Cortical Bone With Applications to the Development of Mean and Boundary Shape Models,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 111, no. 3 (2013): 613–628.
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
2026 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PDF
(1005KB)
