Effects of Bracing Combined With Tele-Rehabilitation-Guided Family Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercises on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Tao Chen , Hao Zhou , Qizhu Chen , Linjie Chen , Zhiguang Zhang , Zhendi Shu , Songhe Jiang , Xiangyang Wang , Aimin Wu , Xiaoli Huang

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3) : 511 -522.

PDF (1438KB)
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3) :511 -522. DOI: 10.1111/os.70265
CLINICAL ARTICLE
Effects of Bracing Combined With Tele-Rehabilitation-Guided Family Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercises on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Author information +
History +
PDF (1438KB)

Abstract

Objective: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) necessitates multimodal management strategies integrating orthotic intervention and physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE). This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of brace therapy combined with tele-rehabilitation-guided PSSE versus brace treatment with self-guided home-based PSSE in mitigating spinal deformity progression.

Methods: A cohort of 67 treatment-naïve AIS patients from a tertiary scoliosis center (July 2021–July 2023) was stratified into two intervention groups: (1) tele-rehabilitation (real-time digitally supervised PSSE) and (2) autonomous practice (self-guided home PSSE). Longitudinal evaluations at baseline, 6, 12, and 24-month intervals included radiographic Cobb angle quantification, scoliometric angle of trunk rotation (ATR) assessment, and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) patient-reported outcomes. Treatment success was categorized as improvement (Cobb reduction ≥ 5°), stability (change < 5°), or progression (increase ≥ 5°). Data were analyzed using paired and independent t-tests, Mann–Whitney U test, and Pearson's χ2 test.

Results: At 24-month follow-up, the tele-rehabilitation group exhibited significantly higher Cobb angle improvement rates (70.6% vs. 57.6%, p < 0.05) and lower progression rates (2.9% vs. 6.1%) compared to the autonomous practice group. Axial rotation correction demonstrated superior outcomes in the supervised cohort (final ATR: 6.9° ± 1.9° vs. baseline, p < 0.01). All SRS-22 domains showed clinically meaningful improvements (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Tele-rehabilitation-guided PSSE combined with bracing demonstrates enhanced efficacy over self-guided protocols in achieving three-dimensional deformity correction, stabilizing curve progression, and optimizing patient-centered outcomes. Structured digital supervision emerges as a critical adjunct to orthotic management, advocating for technology-integrated conservative strategies in adolescent spinal deformity care.

Keywords

adolescent idiopathic scoliosis / angle of trunk rotation / Chêneau brace / Cobb angle / exercise / rehabilitation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tao Chen, Hao Zhou, Qizhu Chen, Linjie Chen, Zhiguang Zhang, Zhendi Shu, Songhe Jiang, Xiangyang Wang, Aimin Wu, Xiaoli Huang. Effects of Bracing Combined With Tele-Rehabilitation-Guided Family Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercises on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2026, 18 (3) : 511-522 DOI:10.1111/os.70265

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

S. Negrini, S. Donzelli, A. G. Aulisa, et al., “2016 SOSORT Guidelines: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis During Growth,” Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders 13 (2018): 3.

[2]

J. E. Lonstein and J. M. Carlson, “The Prediction of Curve Progression in Untreated Idiopathic Scoliosis During Growth,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 66 (1984): 1061–1071.

[3]

R. E. Hawary, D. Zaaroor-Regev, Y. Floman, B. S. Lonner, Y. I. Alkhalife, and R. R. Betz, “Brace Treatment in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Risk Factors for Failure-A Literature Review,” Spine Journal 19 (2019): 1917–1925.

[4]

Y. Yang, H. Zhang, X. Tian, S. Wang, Y. Chen, and J. Zhang, “Association Between Adverse Psychological Emotions and Postoperative Brace for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Prospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching,” Orthopaedic Surgery 16 (2024): 1920–1928.

[5]

M. Rigo and H. R. Weiss, “The Cheneau Concept of Bracing—Biomechanical Aspects,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 135 (2008): 303–319.

[6]

T. Kotwicki and J. Cheneau, “Biomechanical Action of a Corrective Brace on Thoracic Idiopathic Scoliosis: Cheneau 2000 Orthosis,” Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 3 (2008): 146–153.

[7]

M. Q. Fang, X. L. Huang, W. Wang, et al., “The Efficacy of Schroth Exercises Combined With the Cheneau Brace for the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Retrospective Controlled Study,” Disability and Rehabilitation 44 (2022): 5060–5068.

[8]

P. Nathan, S. M. Chou, and G. Liu, “A Review on Different Methods of Scoliosis Brace Fabrication,” Prosthetics and Orthotics International 47 (2023): 424–433.

[9]

Y. Fan, M. K. To, E. H. K. Yeung, et al., “Electromyographic Discrepancy in Paravertebral Muscle Activity Predicts Early Curve Progression of Untreated Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis,” Asian Spine Journal 17 (2023): 922–932.

[10]

Z. Zhang, L. Wang, J. C. Li, L. M. Liu, Y. M. Song, and X. Yang, “Characteristics of Sagittal Alignment in Patients With Severe and Rigid Scoliosis,” Orthopaedic Surgery 15 (2023): 1607–1616.

[11]

C. Wibmer, P. Trotsenko, M. M. Gilg, et al., “Observational Retrospective Study on Socio-Economic and Quality of Life Outcomes in 41 Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis 5 Years After Bracing Combined With Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercises (PSSE),” European Spine Journal 28 (2019): 611–618.

[12]

Y. Fan, M. K. To, G. M. Kuang, and J. P. Y. Cheung, “The Relationship Between Compliance of Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis Specific Exercises and Curve Regression With Mild to Moderate Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis,” Global Spine Journal 14 (2024): 447–457.

[13]

M. J. You, Z. Y. Lu, Q. Y. Xu, et al., “Effectiveness of Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercises on 3-Dimensional Spinal Deformities in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 105 (2024): 2375–2389.

[14]

K. Ma, C. Wang, Y. Huang, Y. Wang, D. Li, and G. He, “The Effects of Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercise on Idiopathic Scoliosis in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Physiotherapy 121 (2023): 46–57.

[15]

S. Schreiber, E. C. Parent, E. K. Moez, et al., “The Effect of Schroth Exercises Added to the Standard of Care on the Quality of Life and Muscle Endurance in Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis-An Assessor and Statistician Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial: ‘SOSORT 2015 Award Winner’,” Scoliosis 10 (2015): 24.

[16]

T. Kotwicki, J. Chowanska, E. Kinel, D. Czaprowski, M. Tomaszewski, and P. Janusz, “Optimal Management of Idiopathic Scoliosis in Adolescence,” Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics 4 (2013): 59–73.

[17]

J. Clin, C. E. Aubin, S. Parent, and H. Labelle, “Biomechanical Modeling of Brace Treatment of Scoliosis: Effects of Gravitational Loads,” Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 49 (2011): 743–753.

[18]

J. Bettany-Saltikov, E. Parent, M. Romano, M. Villagrasa, and S. Negrini, “Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercises for Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis,” European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 50 (2014): 111–121.

[19]

M. A. Asher, S. Min Lai, and D. C. Burton, “Further Development and Validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Outcomes Instrument,” Spine 25 (2000): 2381–2386.

[20]

W. P. Bunnell, “The Natural History of Idiopathic Scoliosis Before Skeletal Maturity,” Spine 11 (1986): 773–776.

[21]

S. L. Weinstein, L. A. Dolan, J. G. Wright, and M. B. Dobbs, “Effects of Bracing in Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis,” New England Journal of Medicine 369 (2013): 1512–1521.

[22]

T. N. Theologis, J. C. Fairbank, A. R. Turner-Smith, et al., “Early Detection of Progression in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis by Measurement of Changes in Back Shape With the Integrated Shape Imaging System Scanner,” Spine 22 (1997): 1223–1227.

[23]

J. O. Sanders, P. O. Newton, R. H. Browne, D. E. Katz, J. G. Birch, and J. A. Herring, “Bracing for Idiopathic Scoliosis: How Many Patients Require Treatment to Prevent One Surgery?,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 96 (2014): 649–653.

[24]

D. E. Katz, J. A. Herring, R. H. Browne, D. M. Kelly, and J. G. Birch, “Brace Wear Control of Curve Progression in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 92 (2010): 1343–1352.

[25]

R. M. Thompson, E. W. Hubbard, C. H. Jo, D. Virostek, and L. A. Karol, “Brace Success Is Related to Curve Type in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 99 (2017): 923–928.

[26]

T. Maruyama, T. B. Grivas, and A. Kaspiris, “Effectiveness and Outcomes of Brace Treatment: A Systematic Review,” Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 27 (2011): 26–42.

[27]

H. R. Weiss and D. Goodall, “Rate of Complications in Scoliosis Surgery - a Systematic Review of the Pub Med Literature,” Scoliosis 3 (2008): 9.

[28]

M. Rigo, G. Quera-Salva, M. Villagrasa, et al., “Scoliosis Intensive Out-Patient Rehabilitation Based on Schroth Method,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 135 (2008): 208–227.

[29]

T. Babaee, M. Kamyab, M. S. Ganjavian, N. Rouhani, A. Khorramrouz, and J. G. Jarvis, “Coronal Deformity Angular Ratio as a Predictive Factor for In-Brace Curve Correction and Long-Term Outcome of Brace Treatment in Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis,” Spine Deformity 10 (2022): 543–551.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2026 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF (1438KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/