Design and Validation of a Novel Orthopedic Device for Enhanced Fracture Stabilization and Reduction Efficiency: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Implications for Surgical Outcomes

Ahmad Hemmatyar , Davood Feizi , Reza Mosaed , Melina Pourkazemi , Salar Baghbani , Khatere Mokhtari , Pejman Molaei , Hamid Tanzadehpanah , Tohid Emami Meybodi

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4) : 801 -814.

PDF (2524KB)
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4) :801 -814. DOI: 10.1111/os.70248
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Design and Validation of a Novel Orthopedic Device for Enhanced Fracture Stabilization and Reduction Efficiency: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Implications for Surgical Outcomes
Author information +
History +
PDF (2524KB)

Abstract

Objective: Traumatic long bone fractures require precise reduction and stable fixation to achieve optimal outcomes during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Conventional bone-holding instruments are often associated with prolonged operative time, increased blood loss, reliance on surgical assistance, and higher complication rates. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a newly designed orthopedic repositioning device in reducing operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, and complications compared with conventional ORIF techniques.

Methods: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted between 2023 and 2024. Adult patients aged 18–65 years with diaphyseal fractures of the femur, humerus, or tibia who underwent ORIF were enrolled. Patients were randomized into two groups: an intervention group using the novel repositioning device and a control group undergoing conventional ORIF. All surgeries were performed by a single orthopedic surgeon. The device consists of dual bone holders with a lengthening/shortening mechanism that allows controlled traction, angular correction, and plate insertion without device removal. Primary outcome measures included duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS), transfusion requirement, and postoperative complications. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test or Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables, with significance set at p < 0.05.

Results: A total of 58 patients were included in the final analysis (29 per group), with a mean age of 29.9 years and a predominance of male patients (77.6%). Use of the repositioning device was associated with significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.05), shorter surgical duration (p < 0.05), and lower postoperative pain scores (p < 0.05) compared with the control group. The need for blood transfusion was significantly lower in the intervention group (p < 0.001). Postoperative complications occurred in 28.6% of patients in the control group but were not observed in the device group (p = 0.002). No significant difference in hospital length of stay was detected between groups (p = 0.284). Patients were followed for up to 3 months postoperatively.

Conclusion: The novel orthopedic repositioning device improves surgical efficiency and safety in ORIF of long bone fractures by reducing operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain, and complication rates, supporting its clinical value as an effective adjunct for fracture reduction and stabilization.

Keywords

fracture stabilization / intraoperative risk reduction / long bone fractures / open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) / orthopedic innovation / postoperative outcomes / surgical efficiency

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ahmad Hemmatyar, Davood Feizi, Reza Mosaed, Melina Pourkazemi, Salar Baghbani, Khatere Mokhtari, Pejman Molaei, Hamid Tanzadehpanah, Tohid Emami Meybodi. Design and Validation of a Novel Orthopedic Device for Enhanced Fracture Stabilization and Reduction Efficiency: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Implications for Surgical Outcomes. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2026, 18 (4) : 801-814 DOI:10.1111/os.70248

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

A. M. Rondanelli, M. A. Gómez-Sierra, A. A. Ossa, R. D. Hernández, and M. Torres, “Damage Control in Orthopaedical and Traumatology,” Colombia Médica 52, no. 2 (2021): 1–9.

[2]

V. C. Panagiotopoulou, E. Santolini, E. Jones, A. Jha, and P. V. Giannoudis, “Adhesives for Treatment of Bone Fractures: A Review of the State-Of-The Art,” Injury 53 (2022): S20–S25.

[3]

L. Rämö, S. Taimela, V. Lepola, A. Malmivaara, T. Lähdeoja, and M. Paavola, “Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Humeral Shaft Fractures Versus Conservative Treatment With a Functional Brace: A Study Protocol of a Randomised Controlled Trial Embedded in a Cohort,” BMJ Open 7, no. 7 (2017): e014076.

[4]

A. Greeven, S. Bezstarosti, P. Krijnen, and I. B. Schipper, “Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Percutaneous Transverse Kirschner Wire Fixation for Single, Closed Second to Fifth Metacarpal Shaft Fractures: A Systematic Review,” European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 42 (2016): 169–175.

[5]

D. P. Moss and N. C. Tejwani, “Biomechanics of External Fixation,” Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases 65, no. 4 (2007): 294–299.

[6]

B. S. Shulman and K. A. Egol, “Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Proximal humerus Fractures Indications, Techniques, and Pitfalls,” Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases 71, no. 2 SI (2013): S54.

[7]

E. A. Algadiem, A. A. Aleisa, H. I. Alsubaie, et al., “Blood Loss Estimation Using Gauze Visual Analogue,” Trauma Monthly 21, no. 2 (2016): e34131.

[8]

H. M. Fox, A. R. Thompson, O. F. Nazir, and A. J. Mirarchi, “Use of a Large Tenaculum Clamp as a Reduction Technique for Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures,” Journal of Hand Surgery 44, no. 5 (2019): 427.e1–427.e8.

[9]

H. Xu, W. Yin, P. Hsu, et al., “Improve the Efficiency of Surgery for Femoral Shaft Fractures With a Novel Instrument: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” PLoS One 11, no. 4 (2016): e0154332.

[10]

G. Lin, D. Yang, and W. Sui, “Clinical Effect of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Femoral Neck Fracture in Young Adults and Related Factors of Femoral Head Necrosis,” Journal of Environmental and Public Health 2022, no. 1 (2022): 2974830.

[11]

Z. Wu, B. du, Q. Wang, et al., “Minimally Invasive Clamp-Assisted Reduction and Long InterTAN Nail Fixation for Seinsheimer Type V Subtrochanteric Fractures: A Case Series Describing the Technique and Results,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 24, no. 1 (2023): 256.

[12]

M. Denisiuk and A. Afsari, “Femoral Shaft Fractures,” 2020.

[13]

W. Shui, Y. Yang, X. Pi, et al., “A Novel Closed Reduction Technique for Treating Femoral Shaft Fractures With Intramedullary Nails, Haemostatic Forceps and the Lever Principle,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 22 (2021): 1–9.

[14]

H. Liu, B. Yuan, T. Yu, et al., “Accurate Fixation of Complicated Comminuted Femur Fracture With Customized LCP Referencing a Life-Size 3D-Printed Model: A Case Report,” Annals of Translational Medicine 8, no. 7 (2020): 505.

[15]

Y.-Z. Zhang, “Minimally Invasive Reduction and Fixation in Orthopedic Trauma,” LWW 129 (2016): 2521–2523.

[16]

Y. Bai, X. Zhang, Y. Tian, D. Tian, and B. Zhang, “Incidence of Surgical-Site Infection Following Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of a Distal Femur Fracture: An Observational Case–Control Study,” Medicine 98, no. 7 (2019): e14547.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2026 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF (2524KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/