Objective: Vertebroplasty with non-degradable polymethyl methacrylate bone cement is a common procedure in spine surgery. However, this bone cement reinforcement of the vertebral body could affect subsequent spinal surgeries, especially for pedicle screw insertion. This study proposes a novel method of inserting pedicle screws into bone cement-reinforced vertebral bodies through thermal softening via Kirschner wires (K-wires) drilling, and conducts preliminary in vitro experiments to assess its feasibility and safety.
Methods: This study includes bone cement block experiments and in vitro goat bone experiments. The bone cement block experiment utilized a CNC machine to drill into bone cement blocks with varying K-wire diameters, rotational speeds, and feed rates, followed by the insertion of pedicle screws. The highest temperature during the procedure and the pull-out strength of the pedicle screws were recorded for different groups. A two-way ANOVA was used for comparative analysis. The goat bone experiment consisted of an experimental group and a control group. The control group had screws inserted along the pedicle after drilling. In the experimental group, screws were inserted after softening the old bone cement within the vertebral body using a 3.5 mm K-wire for drilling. The highest temperature during the procedure was recorded for the experimental group, and pull-out tests were conducted on the screws of both groups after the procedure. The pull-out results from the goat bone experiment were analyzed using Student's t-test.
Results: Bone cement block experiment: Drilling with K-wires caused a significant temperature increase in the bone cement blocks, with temperature rises at 4 mm ranging from 28.1°C to 75.9°C. The maximum pull-out loads across all groups ranged from 2455.053 to 15201.94 N. In the goat bone experiment, the experimental group showed temperature increases of 8.38°C ± 3.07°C beneath the pedicle, 11.18°C ± 1.42°C in the spinal canal, and 8.26°C ± 3.46°C anterior to the vertebral body during drilling. The average maximum loads for the experimental and control groups were 910.5504 ± 221.6544 N and 294.229 ± 40.3475 N, respectively, indicating a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.0001).
Conclusion: The experimental results demonstrate that screws can be inserted into bone cement after thermal softening via K-wire drilling, achieving good pull-out resistance. In the goat bone experiment, the average temperature increase around the vertebral body was measured to be below 10°C, indicating a low risk of thermal damage to the surrounding tissues.
| [1] |
P. Galibert, H. Deramond, P. Rosat, et al., “Preliminary Note on the Treatment of Vertebral Angioma by Percutaneous Acrylic Vertebroplasty,” Neurochirurgie 33, no. 2 (1987): 166–168.
|
| [2] |
K. Y. Huang, J. J. Yan, and R. M. Lin, “Histopathologic Findings of Retrieved Specimens of Vertebroplasty With Polymethylmethacrylate Cement: Case Control Study,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30, no. 19 (2005): E585–E588.
|
| [3] |
S. Bohara, B. Thapa, P. Regmi, and S. K. Shilpakar, “An Unexpected Cause of Intractable Dysphagia After 20 Years Following Cervical Spine Instrumentation Using Bone Cement Alone: A Case Report,” Annals of Medicine and Surgery 86, no. 12 (2024): 7444–7448.
|
| [4] |
A. Sharma, P. R. Martin, and F. R. Rodriguez, “Lumbar Osteoporotic Fractures Develop in Segments With Less Degenerated Discs Which Then Become More Degenerated,” European Spine Journal 32, no. 4 (2023): 1437–1445.
|
| [5] |
K. N. Chou, B. J. Lin, Y. C. Wu, M.-Y. Liu, and D.-Y. Hueng, “Progressive Kyphosis After Vertebroplasty in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture,” Spine 39, no. 1 (2014): 68–73.
|
| [6] |
M. D. Burkhard, A. K. Calek, M. R. Fasser, et al., “Biomechanics After Spinal Decompression and Posterior Instrumentation,” European Spine Journal 32, no. 6 (2023): 1876–1886.
|
| [7] |
C. C. Wu, M. H. Lin, S. H. Yang, et al., “Surgical Removal of Extravasated Epidural and Neuroforaminal Polymethylmethacrylate After Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in the Thoracic Spine,” European Spine Journal 16, no. Suppl 3 (2007): 326–331.
|
| [8] |
S. C. Yang, W. J. Chen, S. W. Yu, Y.-K. Tu, Y.-H. Kao, and K.-C. Chung, “Revision Strategies for Complications and Failure of Vertebroplasties,” European Spine Journal 17, no. 7 (2008): 982–988.
|
| [9] |
X. Hu, W. Jiang, Y. Chen, Y. Wang, and W. Ma, “Revision Surgery After Cement Augmentation for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture,” Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research 107, no. 7 (2021): 102796.
|
| [10] |
A. Huang, S. Fang, L. Wang, et al., “Vertebral Collapse and Polymethylmethacrylate Breakage After Vertebroplasty: A Case Report,” Medicine (Baltimore) 98, no. 34 (2019): e16831.
|
| [11] |
K. Nakanishi, K. Uchino, S. Watanabe, N. Hayashi, H. Iba, and T. Hasegawa, “Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for re-Collapse of Vertebrae After Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation (PVA),” Spine Surgery & Related Research 5, no. 1 (2021): 28–33.
|
| [12] |
A. Yusufu, A. Abulaiti, A. Haibier, J. Ma, and Y. Ma, “Analysis of the Short-Term Effect of Three Different Level Pedicle Screws in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Type A Fractures,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 20, no. 1 (2025): 133.
|
| [13] |
W. Limthongkul, N. Wannaratsiri, C. Sukjamsri, et al., “Biomechanical Comparison Between Posterior Long-Segment Fixation, Short-Segment Fixation, and Short-Segment Fixation With Intermediate Screws for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture: A Finite Element Analysis,” International Journal of Spine Surgery 17, no. 3 (2023): 442–448.
|
| [14] |
J. H. Park, C. I. Ju, and S. W. Kim, “Posterior Screw Fixation in Previously Augmented Vertebrae With Bone Cement: Is It Inapplicable?,” Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 61, no. 1 (2018): 114–119.
|
| [15] |
W. N. Ayre, S. P. Denyer, and S. L. Evans, “Ageing and Moisture Uptake in Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Bone Cements,” Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 32, no. 100 (2014): 76–88.
|
| [16] |
M. Stańczyk and B. Van Rietbergen, “Thermal Analysis of Bone Cement Polymerisation at the Cement-Bone Interface,” Journal of Biomechanics 37, no. 12 (2004): 1803–1810.
|
| [17] |
M. Ghanem, A. Koenig, F. Dehn, C.-E. Heyde, and C. Josten, “Thermomechanical Method for Cement Extraction in Revision Arthroplasty,” European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 27, no. 8 (2017): 1125–1130.
|
| [18] |
C. Roitzsch, R. Apolle, C. Jan Baldus, et al., “Ultrasonic Bone Cement Removal Efficiency in Total Joint Arthroplasty Revision: A Computer Tomographic-Based Cadaver Study,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research 41, no. 6 (2023): 1365–1375.
|
| [19] |
R. Gardiner, W. J. Hozack, C. Nelson, et al., “Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Ultrasonically Driven Tools. A Clinical Evaluation,” Journal of Arthroplasty 8, no. 5 (1993): 517–521.
|
| [20] |
M. Haertlé, L. R. Tücking, A. Derksen, et al., “The Use of an Ultrasonic Cement Removal Device in Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty-A Matched Case–Control Study,” Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics 12, no. 2 (2025): e70171.
|
| [21] |
S. H. Goldberg, M. S. Cohen, M. Young, and B. Bradnock, “Thermal Tissue Damage Caused by Ultrasonic Cement Removal From the Humerus,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 87, no. 3 (2005): 583–591.
|
| [22] |
K. Birnbaum and N. Gutknecht, “Scanning Electron Microscopy Investigation of PMMA Removal by Laser Irradiation (Er:YAG) in Comparison With an Ultrasonic System and Curettage in Hip Joint Revision Arthroplasty,” Lasers in Medical Science 25, no. 4 (2010): 595–603.
|
| [23] |
A. R. Eriksson and T. Albrektsson, “Temperature Threshold Levels for Heat-Induced Bone Tissue Injury: A Vital-Microscopic Study in the Rabbit,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 50, no. 1 (1983): 101–107.
|
| [24] |
M. T. Hillery and I. Shuaib, “Temperature Effects in the Drilling of Human and Bovine Bone,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 92–93 (1999): 302–308.
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
2026 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.