Mechanical Evaluation of Suture Docking Method Versus Novel Tensegrity Suture Screw in Treating Varus Posterolateral Surrogate and Cadaveric Elbow Instability

Marilyn Janice Oentaryo , Tsz Ying Abby Yeung , Christian Fang

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4) : 777 -790.

PDF (1845KB)
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4) :777 -790. DOI: 10.1111/os.70216
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Mechanical Evaluation of Suture Docking Method Versus Novel Tensegrity Suture Screw in Treating Varus Posterolateral Surrogate and Cadaveric Elbow Instability
Author information +
History +
PDF (1845KB)

Abstract

Introduction: Elbow instability often arises from collateral ligament (LUCL) complex failure, causing varus and posterolateral rotatory subluxations. Conventional docking repair requires technical expertise balancing slack and tension. Existing suture anchors lack adjustable tensioning and rely on bone tunnel length for mechanical performance. A novel tensegrity-based suture anchor system was developed to enhance implant-bone fixation and optimize suture tensioning for early stability.

Methodology: Static three-point bending tests were conducted using Sawbones (n = 20) and paired cadaveric elbows (n = 14) with either conventional suture docking (CON) or elbow tensegrity screw (TEN). Force-displacement relationships were plotted. Stiffness, maximum force, and displacement at peak force were measured and compared using nonparametric Mann–Whitney U tests in GraphPad Prism 10.5.0.

Results: In foam elbows, TEN demonstrated significantly higher stiffness (3.46 ± 1.44 N/mm) than CON (1.44 ± 1.17 N/mm, p < 0.01). Maximum forces were 132.60 ± 28.82 N for TEN versus 75.02 ± 20.28 N for CON (p < 0.01), while displacement at peak force was slightly lower in TEN (35.54 ± 5.80 mm) versus CON (39.03 ± 9.05 mm, p = 0.22). In cadaveric elbows, TEN also had greater stiffness (12.79 ± 9.73 N/mm) versus CON (3.53 ± 2.43 N/mm, p < 0.05). Maximum forces were significantly greater for TEN (199.93 ± 35.89 N) compared to CON (140.11 ± 37.23 N, p < 0.05), while displacements at peak force were lower in TEN (22.31 ± 10.06 mm) than CON (38.68 ± 8.64 mm, p < 0.05). All CON samples failed from irreversible yielding and suture stretching, whereas most TEN samples failed due to suture rupture, suggesting superior bone-implant and suture-implant interface resistance.

Conclusion: TEN devices significantly improved mechanical strength and pretensioning over conventional docking, enhancing early stability and reducing yield failure risk.

Keywords

docking / elbow instability / fracture / tensegrity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Marilyn Janice Oentaryo, Tsz Ying Abby Yeung, Christian Fang. Mechanical Evaluation of Suture Docking Method Versus Novel Tensegrity Suture Screw in Treating Varus Posterolateral Surrogate and Cadaveric Elbow Instability. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2026, 18 (4) : 777-790 DOI:10.1111/os.70216

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

C. M. Court-Brown and B. Caesar, “Epidemiology of Adult Fractures: A Review,” Injury 37 (2006): 691–697, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130.

[2]

A. Marinelli, E. Guerra, and R. Rotini, “Elbow Instability: Are We Able to Classify It? Review of the Literature and Proposal of an All-Inclusive Classification System,” Musculoskeletal Surgery 100 (2016): 61–71, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-016-0424-1.

[3]

A. De Crescenzo, R. Garofalo, L. A. Pederzini, and A. Celli, “The Internal Joint Stabilizer for Elbow Instability: Current Concepts,” Journal of ISAKOS 9, no. 3 (2024): 482–489, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2024.03.003.

[4]

L. E. Karbach and J. Elfar, “Elbow Instability: Anatomy, Biomechanics, Diagnostic Maneuvers, and Testing,” Journal of Hand Surgery 42 (2017): 118–126, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.11.025.

[5]

C. J. Fedorka and L. S. Oh, “Posterolateral Rotatory Instability of the Elbow,” Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 9 (2016): 240–246, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-016-9345-8.

[6]

A. Marinelli, B. R. Graves, G. I. Bain, and L. Pederzini, “Treatment of Elbow Instability: State of the Art,” Journal of ISAKOS 6 (2021): 102–115, https://doi.org/10.1136/jisakos-2019-000316.

[7]

K. J. Jones, C. C. Dodson, D. C. Osbahr, et al., “The Docking Technique for Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 21, no. 3 (2012): 389–395, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.04.033.

[8]

C. L. Camp, J. Sanchez-Sotelo, M. N. Shields, and S. W. O'Driscoll, “Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction for Posterolateral Rotatory Instability of the Elbow,” Arthroscopy Techniques 6, no. 4 (2017): e1101–e1105, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2017.03.029.

[9]

J. T. Rohrbough, D. W. Altchek, J. Hyman, R. J. Williams, and J. D. Botts, “Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow Using the Docking Technique*,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 30, no. 4 (2002): 541–548.

[10]

B. D. Crawford, R. G. Alrabaa, and K. H. Akizuki, “Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament (UCL) Repair Using Suture Augmentation, Anchors, and Bone Tunnels,” Arthroscopy Techniques 12, no. 10 (2023): e1715–e1719, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2023.05.022.

[11]

Y. Ozdag, J. L. Baylor, J. R. Nester, B. K. Foster, C. A. Daly, and L. C. Grandizio, “Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Suture-Tape Augmentation for Traumatic Elbow Instability,” Journal of Hand Surgery 48, no. 2 (2023): 117–125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.10.016.

[12]

A. Ellwein, L. Füßler, M. Ferle, T. Smith, H. Lill, and M. F. Pastor, “Suture Tape Augmentation of the Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Increases Load to Failure in Simulated Posterolateral Rotatory Instability,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 29, no. 1 (2021): 284–291, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05918-5.

[13]

E. S. Chang, C. C. Dodson, and M. G. Ciccotti, “Comparison of Surgical Techniques for Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Overhead Athletes,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 24 (2016): 135–149, https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00323.

[14]

C. C. Dodson, A. Thomas, J. S. Dines, S. J. Nho, R. J. Williams, and D. W. Altchek, “Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow in Throwing Athletes,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 34, no. 12 (2006): 1926–1932, https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506290988.

[15]

G. A. Paletta and R. W. Wright, “The Modified Docking Procedure for Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: 2-Year Follow-Up in Elite Throwers,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 34 (2006): 1594–1598, https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506289884.

[16]

J. L. Koh, M. F. Schafer, G. Keuter, and J. E. Hsu, “Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Elite Throwing Athletes,” Arthroscopy : The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery 22, no. 11 (2006): 1187–1191, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.024.

[17]

A. L. Bowers, J. S. Dines, D. M. Dines, and D. W. Altchek, “Elbow Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical Relevance and the Docking Technique,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 19 (2010): 110–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.01.005.

[18]

A. D. Armstrong, C. E. Dunning, L. M. Ferreira, K. J. Faber, J. A. Johnson, and G. J. W. King, “A Biomechanical Comparison of Four Reconstruction Techniques for the Medial Collateral Ligament-Deficient Elbow,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 14, no. 2 (2005): 207–215, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.06.006.

[19]

G. A. Paletta, S. J. Klepps, G. S. Difelice, et al., “Biomechanical Evaluation of 2 Techniques for Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 34, no. 10 (2006): 1599–1603, https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506289340.

[20]

T. R. McAdams, A. T. Lee, J. Centeno, N. J. Giori, and D. P. Lindsey, “Two Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Methods: The Docking Technique Versus Bioabsorbable Interference Screw Fixation-A Biomechanical Evaluation With Cyclic Loading,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 16, no. 2 (2007): 224–228, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.12.012.

[21]

M. G. Ciccotti, S. Siegler, J. A. Kuri, J. H. Thinnes, and D. J. Murphy, IV, “Comparison of the Biomechanical Profile of the Intact Ulnar Collateral Ligament With the Modified Jobe and the Docking Reconstructed Elbow: An In Vitro Study,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 37, no. 5 (2009): 974–981, https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508331136.

[22]

D. L. Bernholt, S. P. Lake, R. M. Castile, C. Papangelou, O. Hauck, and M. V. Smith, “Biomechanical Comparison of Docking Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With and Without an Internal Brace,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 28, no. 11 (2019): 2247–2252, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.061.

[23]

B. M. Bodendorfer, A. M. Looney, S. L. Lipkin, et al., “Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With the Docking Technique Versus Repair With Internal Bracing,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 46, no. 14 (2018): 3495–3501, https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518803771.

[24]

C. L. Camp, C. Bernard, B. Benavitz, J. Konicek, D. W. Altchek, and J. S. Dines, “Reconstruction of the Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Elbow: Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Anatomic Technique to the Docking Technique,” Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 7, no. 7 (2019): 2325967119857592, https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967119857592.

[25]

C. R. Calladine, “Buckminster Fuller's ‘Tensegrity’ Structures and Clerk Maxwell's Rules for the Construction of Stiff Frames,” International Journal of Solids and Structures 14, no. 2 (1977): 161–172, https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(78)90052-5.

[26]

J. Gardiner, “Cytoskeletal Tensegrity in Microgravity,” Life 11 (2021): 1091, https://doi.org/10.3390/life11101091.

[27]

E. Skelton Robert and M. C. de Oliveira, “Introduction and Motivation,” in Tensegrity Systems (Springer US, 2009), 1–44, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74242-7_1.

[28]

D. S. Shah, J. W. Booth, R. L. Baines, et al., “Tensegrity Robotics,” Soft Robotics 9 (2022): 639–656, https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2020.0170.

[29]

M. E. Taha, K. Schneider, E. C. Clarke, et al., “A Biomechanical Comparison of Different Suture Materials Used for Arthroscopic Shoulder Procedures,” Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery 36, no. 3 (2020): 708–713, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048.

[30]

D. E. Ingber, “Tensegrity I. Cell Structure and Hierarchical Systems Biology,” Journal of Cell Science 116, no. 7 (Apr. 2003): 1157–1173.

[31]

P. N. Williams, M. H. McGarry, H. Ihn, et al., “The Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel 3-Strand Docking Technique for Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in the Elbow,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 27, no. 9 (2018): 1672–1678, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.005.

[32]

Y. Itami, T. Mihata, M. H. McGarry, et al., “Biomechanical Assessment of Docking Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction After Failed Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Suture Augmentation,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 30, no. 7 (2021): 1477–1486, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.034.

[33]

J. L. Lynch, T. Maerz, M. D. Kurdziel, A. A. Davidson, K. C. Baker, and K. Anderson, “Biomechanical Evaluation of the TightRope Versus Traditional Docking Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Technique: Kinematic and Failure Testing,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 41, no. 5 (2013): 1165–1173, https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513482567.

[34]

T. Mihata, M. Akeda, M. Künzler, M. H. McGarry, and T. Q. Lee, “Biomechanical Analysis of Ulnar Nerve Gliding and Elongation: Implications for Nonsurgical Ulnar Nerve Release in Cubital Tunnel Syndrome,” Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 28, no. 2 (2025): 137–145, https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2024.00934.

[35]

F. Komatsu, R. Mori, and Y. Uchio, “Optimum Surgical Suture Material and Methods to Obtain High Tensile Strength at Knots: Problems of Conventional Knots and the Reinforcement Effect of Adhesive Agent,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science 11, no. 1 (2006): 70–74, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-005-0973-x.

[36]

W. P. Ensminger, T. McIff, B. Vopat, S. Mullen, and J. P. Schroeppel, “Mechanical Comparison of High-Strength Tape Suture Versus High-Strength Round Suture,” Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation 3, no. 5 (2021): e1525–e1534, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.07.014.

[37]

R. Zdero, P. Brzozowski, and E. H. Schemitsch, “Biomechanical Properties of Artificial Bones Made by Sawbones: A Review,” Medical Engineering & Physics 118 (2023): 104017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2023.104017.

[38]

T. N. Combs, B. K. Nelson, M. Jackucki, et al., “Testing of Novel Total Elbow Prostheses Using Active Motion Experimental Setup,” Journal of Hand Surgery 48, no. 3 (2023): 312.e1–312.e10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.10.020.

[39]

J.-T. Hausmann, “Sawbones in Biomechanical Settings—A Review,” Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care 14, no. 4 (2006): 259–264, https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-942,333.

[40]

J. D. Reed, S. J. Stanbury, R. M. Menorca, and J. C. Elfar, “The Emerging Utility of Composite Bone Models in Biomechanical Studies of the Hand and Upper Extremity,” Journal of Hand Surgery 38 (2013): 583–587, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.12.005.

[41]

M. P. Gardner, A. C. M. Chong, A. G. Pollock, and P. H. Wooley, “Mechanical Evaluation of Large-Size Fourth-Generation Composite Femur and Tibia Models,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering 38 (2010): 613–620, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9887-7.

[42]

J. T. Dunlap, A. C. M. Chong, G. L. Lucas, and F. W. Cooke, “Structural Properties of a Novel Design of Composite Analogue Humeri Models,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering 36, no. 11 (2008): 1922–1926, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-008-9568-y.

[43]

H. G. Choi, H. W. Jeong, S. B. Park, S. J. Shim, and Y. S. Lee, “Additional Tying on the Adjustable-Loop Device Improves the Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autograft,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 30, no. 11 (2022): 3673–3680, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06936-1.

[44]

P. Borbas, L. Fischer, L. Ernstbrunner, et al., “High-Strength Suture Tapes Are Biomechanically Stronger Than High-Strength Sutures Used in Rotator Cuff Repair,” Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation 3, no. 3 (2021): e873–e880, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.01.029.

[45]

C. Melbourne, J. L. Cook, G. J. Della Rocca, C. Loftis, J. Konicek, and M. J. Smith, “Biomechanical Assessment of Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair and Reconstruction With or Without Internal Brace Augmentation,” JSES International 4, no. 2 (2020): 224–230, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.01.011.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2026 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF (1845KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/