Quantitative MRI Signal Changes of the Spinal Cord as Predictors of Suboptimal Surgical Outcomes in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Xingsheng Zhang , Bingxuan Wu , Tianhua Rong , Bowei Xiao , Ping Li , Baoge Liu

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1) : 84 -92.

PDF
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1) :84 -92. DOI: 10.1111/os.70214
CLINICAL ARTICLE
Quantitative MRI Signal Changes of the Spinal Cord as Predictors of Suboptimal Surgical Outcomes in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective: There are limited data about the association between intramedullary increased signal intensity (ISI) on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and surgical outcome in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) after anterior decompressive surgery. This study aimed to explore factors contributing to unsatisfactory recovery following surgical treatment for DCM, with a particular focus on evaluating whether preoperative quantitative indicators of ISI on T2-weighted MRI could be used to forecast surgical outcomes.

Methods: In this retrospective analysis, 94 patients diagnosed with ISI and treated with anterior cervical decompression for DCM between January 2021 and June 2023 were reviewed. Based on a postoperative recovery rate cutoff of 50% at final follow-up, patients were categorized into optimal and suboptimal recovery groups. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to identify independent predictors of prognosis.

Results: Among the 94 patients, 39 (41.5%) had a suboptimal clinical outcome with a recovery rate below 50%. Multivariate analysis identified longer duration of symptoms, higher signal change ratio (SCR) on T2-weighted MRI, and the presence of snake-eye appearance (SEA) as significant predictors of poor recovery. The optimal SCR cutoff value for predicting a suboptimal outcome was 1.53, yielding a sensitivity of 64.1% and a specificity of 83.6%. While somatosensory and motor evoked potentials (SEP/MEP) were associated with baseline neurological function, they did not serve as standalone predictors of recovery.

Conclusions: Longer symptom duration, elevated SCR on T2-weighted MRI, and SEA features may be significant preoperative indicators of less favorable outcomes in DCM patients. Individuals exhibiting an SCR above 1.53 and SEA on imaging should be considered at increased risk for limited postoperative improvement. These insights highlight the potential benefit of earlier surgical intervention and underscore the need for prospective validation through multicenter studies.

Keywords

degenerative cervical myelopathy / magnetic resonance imaging / prognosis / quantitative analysis / signal intensity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xingsheng Zhang, Bingxuan Wu, Tianhua Rong, Bowei Xiao, Ping Li, Baoge Liu. Quantitative MRI Signal Changes of the Spinal Cord as Predictors of Suboptimal Surgical Outcomes in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2026, 18(1): 84-92 DOI:10.1111/os.70214

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

J. Park and G. W. Lee, “Choosing the Right Treatment for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy,” Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma 66 (2025): 103014.

[2]

H. Sweetman, M. Rahman, A. Vedantam, and K. Satkunendrarajah, “Subclinical Respiratory Dysfunction and Impaired Ventilatory Adaptation in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy,” Experimental Neurology 371 (2024): 114600.

[3]

O. Khan, J. H. Badhiwala, M. A. Akbar, and M. G. Fehlings, “Prediction of Worse Functional Status After Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Machine Learning Approach,” Neurosurgery 88 (2021): 584–591.

[4]

K. Tozawa, K. Nagata, N. Ohtomo, et al., “Effect of Early Postoperative Resolution of MRI Signal Intensity Changes on the Outcomes of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy,” Spine 48 (2023): 591–599.

[5]

A. R. Martin, L. Tetreault, A. Nouri, et al., “Imaging and Electrophysiology for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 9],” Global Spine Journal 12 (2022): 130S–146S.

[6]

M. Takahashi, Y. Sakamoto, M. Miyawaki, and H. Bussaka, “Increased MR Signal Intensity Secondary to Chronic Cervical Cord Compression,” Neuroradiology 29 (1987): 550–556.

[7]

Z. Xu, L. Xiao, C. Liu, Q. Zhao, Y. Zhang, and H. Xu, “Correlation Analysis of Surgical Efficacy and Risk Factors of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy With High Signal Intensity on MRI-T2WI,” Current Medical Imaging 19 (2023): 142–148.

[8]

L. Wei, Y. Wei, Y. Tian, P. Cao, and W. Yuan, “Does Three-Grade Classification of T2-Weighted Increased Signal Intensity Reflect the Severity of Myelopathy and Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Cervical Compressive Myelopathy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Neurosurgical Review 43 (2020): 967–976.

[9]

A. Shakya, A. Sharma, V. Singh, A. Jaiswal, N. Marathe, and V. Garje, “Preoperative T1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Changes Carry a Poor Postoperative Prognosis in Cervical Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of 182 Patients,” Surgical Neurology International 12 (2021): 629.

[10]

L. Wei, P. Cao, C. Xu, et al., “Comparison of the Prognostic Value of Different Quantitative Measurements of Increased Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted MRI in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy,” World Neurosurgery 118 (2018): e505–e512.

[11]

G. Scalia, R. Costanzo, L. Brunasso, et al., “Correlation Between “Snake-Eyes” Sign and Role of Surgery With a Focus on Postoperative Outcome: A Systematic Review,” Brain Sciences 13 (2023): 301.

[12]

R. Nardone, Y. Höller, F. Brigo, et al., “The Contribution of Neurophysiology in the Diagnosis and Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Review,” Spinal Cord 54 (2016): 756–766.

[13]

K. Yonenobu, K. Abumi, K. Nagata, E. Taketomi, and K. Ueyama, “Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scoring System for Evaluation of Cervical Compression Myelopathy,” Spine 26 (2001): 1890–1895.

[14]

K. Hirabayashi, J. Miyakawa, K. Satomi, T. Maruyama, and K. Wakano, “Operative Results and Postoperative Progression of Ossification Among Patients With Ossification of Cervical Posterior Longitudinal Ligament,” Spine 6 (1981): 354–364.

[15]

J. S. Torg, H. Pavlov, S. E. Genuario, et al., “Neurapraxia of the Cervical Spinal Cord With Transient Quadriplegia,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 68 (1986): 1354–1370.

[16]

A. Nouri, L. Tetreault, J. J. Zamorano, et al., “Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Surgical Outcome in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy,” Spine 40 (2015): 171–178.

[17]

B. Wu, B. Liu, D. Sang, W. Cui, and D. Wang, “The Association Between Cervical Focal Kyphosis and Myelopathy Severity in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Before Surgery,” European Spine Journal 30 (2021): 1501–1508.

[18]

C.-A. Mechas, M. Sarraj, and M. Helgeson, “Diagnosis and Management of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 33, no. 24 (2025): e1462–e1476.

[19]

M. D. Dijkman, M. W. T. van Bilsen, M. G. Fehlings, and R. H. M. A. Bartels, “Long-Term Functional Outcome of Surgical Treatment for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine 36 (2022): 830–840.

[20]

M. Kim, Y. Park, C. Kang, and S. H. Choi, “Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy and Radiculopathy: A Stepwise Approach and Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes: A Narrative Review of Recent Literature,” Asian Spine Journal 19 (2025): 121–132.

[21]

M. G. Fehlings, S. Barry, B. Kopjar, et al., “Anterior Versus Posterior Surgical Approaches to Treat Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Outcomes of the Prospective Multicenter AOSpine North America CSM Study in 264 Patients,” Spine 38 (2013): 2247–2252.

[22]

Z. Ghogawala, B. Martin, E. C. Benzel, et al., “Comparative Effectiveness of Ventral vs Dorsal Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy,” Neurosurgery 68 (2011): 622–631.

[23]

S. He, Z. Zhou, X. Shao, et al., “Comparing the Bridge-Type Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer (ROI-C ) Interbody Fusion Cage System and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) With Plating and Cage System in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy,” Orthopaedic Surgery 14 (2022): 1100–1108.

[24]

X. Zhang, B. Peng, Z. Ma, B. Wu, C. Liu, and Y. Li, “Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for the Treatment of Pincer Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study,” World Neurosurgery 191 (2024): e772–e778.

[25]

Z. Ma, Q. Ye, X. Ma, C. Chen, H. Feng, and Y. Zhang, “Correlation of Imaging Characteristics of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy and the Surgical Approach With Improvement for Postoperative Neck Pain and Neural Function: A Retrospective Cohort Study,” Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery 14 (2024): 3923–3938.

[26]

B. W. Su, V. Tadepalli, P. N. Kamalapathy, and A. Shimer, “Prognostic Factors Impacting Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy,” Clinical Spine Surgery 35 (2022): 418–421.

[27]

K. Yone, T. Sakou, M. Yanase, and K. Ljiri, “Preoperative and Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Image Evaluations of the Spinal Cord in Cervical Myelopathy,” Spine 17 (1992): S388–S392.

[28]

J. T. Zhang, F. T. Meng, S. Wang, L. F. Wang, and Y. Shen, “Predictors of Surgical Outcome in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Focusing on the Quantitative Signal Intensity,” European Spine Journal 24 (2015): 2941–2945.

[29]

B. Sun, A. Xu, C. Cui, et al., “Does Snake-Eye Appearance Affect the Clinical Outcome of ACDF in Treating Cervical Myelopathy,” European Spine Journal 34 (2025): 78–85.

[30]

H. Shen, L. Li, Z. Yang, and T. Hou, “Position of Increased Signal Intensity in the Spinal Cord on MR Images: Does It Predict the Outcome of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?,” Chinese Medical Journal 122 (2009): 1418–1422.

[31]

F. Vázquez-Sánchez, M. D. C. Lloria-Gil, A. I. Gómez-Menéndez, et al., “The Role of Magnetic Transcranial Stimulation in the Diagnosis and Post-Surgical Follow-Up of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20 (2023): 3690.

[32]

M. Zileli, S. A. Borkar, S. Sinha, et al., “Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Natural Course and the Value of Diagnostic Techniques –WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations,” Neurospine 16 (2019): 386–402.

[33]

N. Okais, R. Moussa, and P. Hage, “Value of Increased MRI Signal Intensity in Cervical Arthrosis in Myelopathies,” Neurochirurgie 43 (1997): 285–291.

[34]

A. Suri, R. P. S. Chabbra, V. S. Mehta, S. Gaikwad, and R. M. Pandey, “Effect of Intramedullary Signal Changes on the Surgical Outcome of Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy,” Spine Journal 3 (2003): 33–45.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF

9

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/