Robot-Assisted, Conventional Fluoroscopy (C-Arm), O-Arm Navigation, and Freehand Pedicle Screw Fixation in Thoracolumbar Spine Fracture Surgery: A Network Meta-Analysis

Yankun Zhu , Shuaiqi Zhu , Yanan Li , Kun Wang

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (12) : 3302 -3317.

PDF
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (12) :3302 -3317. DOI: 10.1111/os.70189
REVIEW ARTICLE
Robot-Assisted, Conventional Fluoroscopy (C-Arm), O-Arm Navigation, and Freehand Pedicle Screw Fixation in Thoracolumbar Spine Fracture Surgery: A Network Meta-Analysis
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Thoracolumbar fractures are a prevalent clinical disease, with several surgical techniques, including traditional freehand pedicle screw fixation (TFPSF), conventional fluoroscopy (C-arm) percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (CPPSF), O-arm-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OPPSF), and robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (RPPSF), being currently applied. However, a comprehensive comparison of their relative efficacy across multiple perioperative and functional outcomes is lacking, leading to uncertainty in optimal technique selection. This network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluates and compares the clinical efficacy of these four surgical techniques to identify the most effective intervention and guide clinical decision-making. Researchers independently searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science for studies published before September 20, 2024. Studies were selected based on stringent eligibility criteria. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed using RoB 2.0, while cohort studies were evaluated with the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). After data extraction, Bayesian network analysis was executed using R 4.2.2 and Stata 16.0. Nineteen studies were included, encompassing 1344 patients with thoracolumbar fractures. For screw accuracy, OPPSF ranked highest (SUCRA = 92.7%), significantly outperforming TFPSF (RR 1.12; 95% credible intervals [CrI] [1.04, 1.23]) and CPPSF (RR 1.12; 95% CrI [1.04, 1.22]), with RPPSF also surpassing both. OPPSF showed superior intraoperative blood loss reduction (SUCRA = 79.8%) while TFPSF had significantly more bleeding than others. For hospitalization, RPPSF ranked highest (SUCRA = 65.0%) but CPPSF significantly shortened stays versus TFPSF (MD −2.24; 95% CrI [−4.48, −0.03]). CPPSF also showed better pain control (SUCRA = 77.9%) with significantly lower VAS scores versus TFPSF (MD −1.02; 95% CrI [−1.71, −0.37]). RPPSF demonstrated the lowest complication risk (SUCRA = 94.9%), with both CPPSF and RPPSF showing significant reductions versus TFPSF. Additionally, although CPPSF ranked first in SUCRA for both operative time (SUCRA = 81.6%) and Cobb angle (SUCRA = 72.4%), the pairwise comparisons did not demonstrate statistical significance, necessitating cautious interpretation. In summary, OPPSF tends to demonstrate superior precision and blood loss control, CPPSF may optimize rehabilitation efficiency, while RPPSF appears to be the safest technique. Technique selection should balance clinical outcomes, economic feasibility, and patient-specific priorities.

Keywords

fluoroscopy / network meta-analysis / O-arm / pedicle screw fixation / robot / thoracolumbar spine fracture

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yankun Zhu, Shuaiqi Zhu, Yanan Li, Kun Wang. Robot-Assisted, Conventional Fluoroscopy (C-Arm), O-Arm Navigation, and Freehand Pedicle Screw Fixation in Thoracolumbar Spine Fracture Surgery: A Network Meta-Analysis. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2025, 17(12): 3302-3317 DOI:10.1111/os.70189

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Y. Lan, S. Chen, G. Lan, C. Li, and J. Wei, “Global, Regional, and National Burden of Fracture of Vertebral Column, 1990-2021: Analysis of Data From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021,” Frontiers in Public Health 13 (2025): 1573888.

[2]

P. Liu, Y. Yao, M. Y. Liu, et al., “Spinal Trauma in Mainland China From 2001 to 2007: An Epidemiological Study Based on a Nationwide Database,” Spine 37, no. 15 (2012): 1310–1315.

[3]

H. Wang, Y. Zhang, Q. Xiang, et al., “Epidemiology of Traumatic Spinal Fractures: Experience From Medical University-Affiliated Hospitals in Chongqing, China, 2001-2010,” Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine 17, no. 5 (2012): 459–468.

[4]

X. Wang, J. Du, C. Jiang, et al., “Epidemiological Characteristics of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injuries in a Multicenter Retrospective Study in Northwest China, 2017-2020,” Frontiers in Surgery 9 (2022): 994536.

[5]

S. F. Bigdon, Y. Saldarriaga, K. A. C. Oswald, et al., “Epidemiologic Analysis of 8000 Acute Vertebral Fractures: Evolution of Treatment and Complications at 10-Year Follow-Up,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 17, no. 1 (2022): 270.

[6]

M. O. Alawad, N. Alenezi, B. S. Alrashedan, et al., “Traumatic Spinal Injuries in Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Single-Centre Medical Record Review,” BMJ Open 10, no. 11 (2020): e039768.

[7]

K. B. Wood, W. Li, D. R. Lebl, and A. Ploumis, “Management of Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures,” Spine Journal 14, no. 1 (2014): 145–164.

[8]

Y. Gong, G. Fu, B. Li, Y. Li, and X. Yang, “Comparison of the Effects of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Pedicle Screws Osteosynthesis and Open Surgery on Repairing the Pain, Inflammation and Recovery of Thoracolumbar Vertebra Fracture,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 14, no. 5 (2017): 4091–4096.

[9]

C. Zhang and Y. Liu, “Combined Pedicle Screw Fixation at the Fracture Vertebrae Versus Conventional Method for Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Meta-Analysis,” International Journal of Surgery 53 (2018): 38–47.

[10]

L. Y. Dai, “Principles of Management of Thoracolumbar Fractures,” Orthopaedic Surgery 4, no. 2 (2012): 67–70.

[11]

M. Reinhold, C. Knop, R. Beisse, et al., “Operative Treatment of 733 Patients With Acute Thoracolumbar Spinal Injuries: Comprehensive Results From the Second, Prospective, Internet-Based Multicenter Study of the Spine Study Group of the German Association of Trauma Surgery,” European Spine Journal 19, no. 10 (2010): 1657–1676.

[12]

B. G. Kim, J. M. Dan, and D. E. Shin, “Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fracture,” Asian Spine Journal 9, no. 1 (2015): 133–146.

[13]

G. Rudol and N. W. Gummerson, “(ii) Thoracolumbar Spinal Fractures: Review of Anatomy, Biomechanics, Classification and Treatment,” Orthopaedics and Traumatology 28, no. 2 (2014): 70–78.

[14]

S. Rajasekaran, R. M. Kanna, and A. P. Shetty, “Management of Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: An Overview,” Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 49, no. 1 (2015): 72–82.

[15]

S. Sharif, Y. Shaikh, O. Yaman, and M. Zileli, “Surgical Techniques for Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations,” Neurospine 18, no. 4 (2021): 667–680.

[16]

C. Kapoen, Y. Liu, F. W. Bloemers, and J. Deunk, “Pedicle Screw Fixation of Thoracolumbar Fractures: Conventional Short Segment Versus Short Segment With Intermediate Screws at the Fracture Level-a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” European Spine Journal 29, no. 10 (2020): 2491–2504.

[17]

S. T. Skou, C. B. Juhl, K. B. Hare, L. S. Lohmander, and E. M. Roos, “Surgical or Non-Surgical Treatment of Traumatic Skeletal Fractures in Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Benefits and Harms,” Systematic Reviews 9, no. 1 (2020): 179.

[18]

P. Yang, K. Chen, K. Zhang, J. Sun, H. Yang, and H. Mao, “Percutaneous Short-Segment Pedicle Instrumentation Assisted With O-Arm Navigation in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures,” Journal of Orthopaedic Translation 21 (2020): 1–7.

[19]

W. Yuan, X. Liu, L. Cong, et al., “Robot-Assisted Versus Traditional Fluoroscopy-Assisted Posterior Fixation in Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures With Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Retrospective Study,” Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 38, no. 8 (2024): 929–934.

[20]

X. Q. Hu, H. G. Lu, X. Zhou, et al., “A Comparative Study of Robot-Assisted and Traditional Surgeries in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures Based on 1-Year Follow-Up Observation,” Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering 34, no. 4 (2023): 375–383.

[21]

P. Tu, C. C. Yan, J. X. Hao, S. Cao, and C. Jiang, “Effect of Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures and Its Impact on Quality of Life,” Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 38, no. 1 (2022): 100–105.

[22]

N. Bronsard, T. Boli, M. Challali, et al., “Comparison Between Percutaneous and Traditional Fixation of Lumbar Spine Fracture: Intraoperative Radiation Exposure Levels and Outcomes,” Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research 99, no. 2 (2013): 162–168.

[23]

R. L. Ge, P. Yang, X. Liu, et al., “Comparison of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement Under O-Arm Navigation With Traditional Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in Patients With Thoracolumbar Fractures Without Neurological Symptoms,” Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 100, no. 39 (2020): 3099–3103.

[24]

S. Lin, F. Wang, J. Hu, and L. Y. Tang, “Comparison of the Accuracy and Safety of TiRobot-Assisted and Fluoroscopy-Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures,” Orthopaedic Surgery 14, no. 11 (2022): 2955–2963.

[25]

B. Hutton, G. Salanti, D. M. Caldwell, et al., “The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-Analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations,” Annals of Internal Medicine 162, no. 11 (2015): 777–784.

[26]

S. D. Gertzbein and S. E. Robbins, “Accuracy of Pedicular Screw Placement In Vivo,” Spine 15, no. 1 (1990): 11–14.

[27]

G. A. Wells, B. Shea, and D. O'Connell, “The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses,” 2000.

[28]

J. A. Sterne, J. Savović, M. J. Page, et al., “RoB 2: A Revised Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Randomised Trials,” BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 366 (2019): l4898.

[29]

R. J. Zhang, L. P. Zhou, H. Q. Zhang, P. Ge, C. Y. Jia, and C. L. Shen, “Rates and Risk Factors of Intrapedicular Accuracy and Cranial Facet Joint Violation Among Robot-Assisted, Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous, and Freehand Techniques in Pedicle Screw Fixation of Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Comparative Cohort Study,” BMC Surgery 22, no. 1 (2022): 52.

[30]

I. Shah, K. Mehmood, D. K. Kabrah, and M. M. Halawani, “Is Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation Being Superior Than Open Pedicle Screw Fixation for the Management of Thoracolumbar Spine Fracture,” El Hospital 400, no. 63.39 (2022): 0.004.

[31]

M. G. A. Teli and A. C. Amato-Watkins, “Posterior Segmental Fixation for Thoraco-Lumbar and Lumbar Fractures: A Comparative Outcome Study Between Open and Percutaneous Techniques,” British Journal of Neurosurgery 38, no. 4 (2024): 838–843.

[32]

Y. Xu, Y. Sun, R. Shi, et al., “A Clinical Comparative Study on Percutaneous and Open Approaches for Screw Internal Fixation in Treating Thoracolumbar Fractures,” Orthopaedic Surgery 15, no. 10 (2023): 2532–2539.

[33]

Y. Liu, H. Zhang, S. Ao, L. Pei, and X. Zhou, “Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Screw Placement Versus Open Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures,” Acta Medica Mediterranea 39 (2023): 859.

[34]

M. Yang, Q. Zhao, D. Hao, Z. Chang, S. Liu, and X. Yin, “Comparison of Clinical Results Between Novel Percutaneous Pedicle Screw and Traditional Open Pedicle Screw Fixation for Thoracolumbar Fractures Without Neurological Deficit,” International Orthopaedics 43, no. 7 (2019): 1749–1754.

[35]

J. Ye, P. Jiang, H. Guan, et al., “Surgical Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fracture in Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Comparison of Percutaneous and Open Techniques,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 17, no. 1 (2022): 504.

[36]

S. Y. Du, J. Dai, Z. T. Zhou, et al., “Size Selection and Placement of Pedicle Screws Using Robot-Assisted Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Techniques for Thoracolumbar Fractures: Possible Implications for the Screw Loosening Rate,” BMC Surgery 22, no. 1 (2022): 365.

[37]

G. A. Katsevman, R. D. Spencer, S. D. Daffner, et al., “Robotic-Navigated Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement Has Less Facet Joint Violation Than Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Screws,” World Neurosurgery 151 (2021): e731–e737.

[38]

Y. Li, X. Wei, Y. Liang, and G. Song, “Robot-Assisted Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Pedicle Screw Fixation of Thoracolumbar Compression Fractures,” Medicine (Baltimore) 102, no. 48 (2023): e36430.

[39]

H. Liu, Y. Wang, B. Pi, Z. Qian, X. Zhu, and H. Yang, “Comparison of Intraoperative O-Arm-and Conventional Fluoroscopy (C-Arm)-assisted Insertion of Pedicle Screws in the Treatment of Fracture of Thoracic Vertebrae,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 25, no. 1 (2017): 2309499016684090.

[40]

J. Lu, W. Chen, H. Liu, H. Yang, and T. Liu, “Does Pedicle Screw Fixation Assisted by O-Arm Navigation Perform Better Than Fluoroscopy-Guided Technique in Thoracolumbar Fractures in Percutaneous Surgery?: A Retrospective Cohort Study,” Clin Spine Surgery 33, no. 6 (2020): 247–253.

[41]

X. Zhu, Y. Shao, Y. Lu, J. Sun, and J. Chen, “Comparison of Pedicle Screw Fixation by Four Different Posterior Approaches for the Treatment of Type A Thoracolumbar Fractures Without Neurologic Injury,” Frontiers in Surgery 9 (2022): 1036255.

[42]

W. Feng, W. Wang, S. Chen, K. Wu, and H. Wang, “O-Arm Navigation Versus C-Arm Guidance for Pedicle Screw Placement in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” International Orthopaedics 44, no. 5 (2020): 919–926.

[43]

J. Sun, D. Wu, Q. Wang, Y. Wei, and F. Yuan, “Pedicle Screw Insertion: Is O-Arm-Based Navigation Superior to the Conventional Freehand Technique? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” World Neurosurgery 144 (2020): e87–e99.

[44]

C. M. Li, S. J. Zhao, J. Z. Xu, Q. Li, R. F. Quan, and X. M. Deng, “Case Series: O-Arm Navigation Assisted by the Wiltse Approach Improves the Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in Ankylosing Spondylitis Combined With Thoracolumbar Fractures,” Medicine (Baltimore) 102, no. 52 (2023): e36807.

[45]

L. Yibin, G. Qingguo, C. Cheng, et al., “Current Status of Intraoperative O-Arm CT Navigation Technology in Orthopedics,” Journal of Neck and Low Back Pain 36, no. 5 (2015): 417–419.

[46]

Z. Chongjing, Z. Xu, L. De-jian, et al., “Accuracy and Safety of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Assisted by O-Arm-Based Navigation for Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture at Midline Thoracic Vertebra,” Fudan University Journal of Medical Sciences 49, no. 5 (2022): 739–746.

[47]

M. Reinhold, L. Audigé, K. J. Schnake, C. Bellabarba, L. Y. Dai, and F. C. Oner, “AO Spine Injury Classification System: A Revision Proposal for the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine,” European Spine Journal 22, no. 10 (2013): 2184–2201.

[48]

D. Taterra, B. Skinningsrud, P. A. Pękala, et al., “Artery of Adamkiewicz: A Meta-Analysis of Anatomical Characteristics,” Neuroradiology 61, no. 8 (2019): 869–880.

[49]

Y. Li and L. Zhang, “Application of the Concept of Accelerated Rehabilitation Surgery in Orthopedic Perioperative Period,” Chinese Journal of Convalescent Medicine 31, no. 9 (2022): 936–940.

[50]

H. Chen, J. Li, X. Wang, and Y. Fu, “Effects of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery on Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression of Retrospective Study,” Archives of Osteoporosis 18, no. 1 (2023): 46.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF

2

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/