Objective: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion technology may have a protective effect on the paravertebral and spinal ligaments during surgery, resulting in positive effects on bone mineral density (BMD). However, evidence is lacking on the change in vertebral bone density of patients. The changes in bone density in patients after lumbar fusion surgery are closely related to the occurrence of mechanical complications such as proximal border kyphosis, screw extraction, and adjacent vertebral fractures. Therefore, the aim is to investigate the changes in the volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) of the adjacent vertebral cancellous bone and endplate at the fusion level in patients undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF).
Methods: The medical records of patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent LLIF surgery in our hospital from March 2018 to October 2021 were retrospectively examined. The volumetric BMD of the cancellous bone and endplate adjacent to the lumbar fusion segment was measured before the operation and during postoperative follow-up. The measured volumetric BMD included the level of the upper/lower instrumented vertebra and the endplate (UIV + 1; LIV + 1; UIV + 1e; and LIV + 1e). Shapiro–Wilk test, one-way ANOVA, Mann–Whitney test, Fisher exact test, univariable, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were executed in this study.
Results: A total of 32 patients were included in the study, including 27 women and 5 men, with a mean age of 60.1 ± 7.1 years. The preoperative vBMD values in the UIV + 1, LIV + 1, UIV + 1e, and LIV + 1e groups were greater than those at the postoperative follow-up (131.9 ± 34.8 vs. 115.8 ± 30.8; 134.8 ± 37.0 vs. 117.2 ± 32.1, p < 0.001; 312.9 ± 79.3 vs. 287.7 ± 85.2, p = 0.007; 314.7 ± 71.4 vs. 296.1 ± 59.8, p = 0.042). The vBMD changes and rates of change in the cancellous and endplate regions were 16.1% ± 17.7% (11.4% ± 13.0%), 12.2% ± 12.1% (17.3% ± 17.5%), 11.4% ± 18.3% (−25.2% ± 49.2%), and 7.2% ± 18.5% (−18.6% ± 49.8%) in the UIV + 1, LIV + 1, UIV + 1e, and LIV + 1e groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the preoperative vBMD, postoperative vBMD, or percent vBMD change between UIV + 1 and LIV + 1. However, there was a significant difference in the endplate vBMD at follow-up (p = 0.035).
Conclusion: We evaluated the changes of vBMD of the cancellous bone and endplates adjacent to the vertebral body, cephalad or caudal to the fused level in LLIF patients through QCT, and can provide a new approach for reducing the occurrence of mechanically related complications after vertebral fusion surgery.
| [1] |
T. J. Aspray and T. R. Hill, “Osteoporosis and the Ageing Skeleton,” Sub-Cellular Biochemistry 91 (2019): 453–476.
|
| [2] |
E. Löfdahl, C. Söderlund, and G. Rådegran, “Bone Mineral Density and Osteoporosis in Heart Transplanted Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study at Skåne University Hospital in Lund 1988–2016,” Clinical Transplantation 33, no. 3 (2019): e13477.
|
| [3] |
C. A. Reitman, L. Nguyen, and G. R. Fogel, “Biomechanical Evaluation of Relationship of Screw Pullout Strength, Insertional Torque, and Bone Mineral Density in the Cervical Spine,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques 17, no. 4 (2004): 306–311.
|
| [4] |
Y. Liu, A. Dash, A. Krez, et al., “Low Volumetric Bone Density Is a Risk Factor for Early Complications After Spine Fusion Surgery,” Osteoporosis International : A Journal Established as Result of Cooperation Between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 31, no. 4 (2020): 647–654.
|
| [5] |
Y. C. Li, S. C. Yang, H. S. Chen, et al., “Impact of Lumbar Instrumented Circumferential Fusion on the Development of Adjacent Vertebral Compression Fracture,” Bone & Joint Journal 97b, no. 10 (2015): 1411–1416.
|
| [6] |
H. J. Lipscomb, S. A. Grubb, and R. V. Talmage, “Spinal Bone Density Following Spinal Fusion,” Spine 14, no. 4 (1989): 477–479.
|
| [7] |
Z. J. Liu, C. Zhang, C. Ma, et al., “Automatic Phantom-Less QCT System With High Precision of BMD Measurement for Osteoporosis Screening: Technique Optimisation and Clinical Validation,” Journal of Orthopaedic Translation 33 (2022): 24–30.
|
| [8] |
M. Di, Y. Weng, G. Wang, et al., “Cortical Endplate Bone Density Measured by Novel Phantomless Quantitative Computed Tomography May Predict Cage Subsidence More Conveniently and Accurately,” Orthopaedic Surgery 15, no. 12 (2023): 3126–3135.
|
| [9] |
X. Li, Y. Zhang, Y. Xie, R. Lu, H. Tao, and S. Chen, “Correlation Between Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and Paraspinal Muscle Fat Infiltration Based on QCT: A Cross-Sectional Study,” Calcified Tissue International 110, no. 6 (2022): 666–673.
|
| [10] |
A. Bazzocchi, F. Ponti, U. Albisinni, G. Battista, and G. Guglielmi, “DXA: Technical Aspects and Application,” European Journal of Radiology 85, no. 8 (2016): 1481–1492.
|
| [11] |
C. E. Guss, A. Mcallister, and C. M. Gordon, “DXA in Children and Adolescents,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry 24, no. 1 (2021): 28–35.
|
| [12] |
G. M. Bogdanffy, D. D. Ohnmeiss, and R. D. Guyer, “Early Changes in Bone Mineral Density Above a Combined Anteroposterior L4-S1 Lumbar Spinal Fusion. A Clinical Investigation,” Spine 20, no. 15 (1995): 1674–1678.
|
| [13] |
J. E. Adams, “Advances in Bone Imaging for Osteoporosis,” Nature Reviews Endocrinology 9, no. 1 (2013): 28–42.
|
| [14] |
J. Y. Chen, J. C. Yang, R. Y. Li, et al., “The Degree of Cervical Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Is Associated With Denser Bone Quality of the Cervical Sub-Endplate and Vertebral Body,” Orthopaedic Surgery 17, no. 2 (2025): 460–469.
|
| [15] |
S. C. Wagner, P. M. Formby, M. D. Helgeson, and D. G. Kang, “Diagnosing the Undiagnosed: Osteoporosis in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion,” Spine 41, no. 21 (2016): E1279–e83.
|
| [16] |
Ö. Demir, E. Öksüz, and F. E. Deniz, “Assessing the Effects of Lumbar Posterior Stabilization and Fusion to Vertebral Bone Density in Stabilized and Adjacent Segments by Using Hounsfield Unit,” Journal of Spine Surgery 3, no. 4 (2017): 548–553.
|
| [17] |
H. W. Garner, M. M. Paturzo, G. Gaudier, P. J. Pickhardt, and D. E. Wessell, “Variation in Attenuation in L1 Trabecular Bone at Different Tube Voltages: Caution Is Warranted When Screening for Osteoporosis With the Use of Opportunistic CT,” AJR American Journal of Roentgenology 208, no. 1 (2017): 165–170.
|
| [18] |
N. K. Knowles, J. M. Reeves, and L. M. Ferreira, “Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) Derived Bone Mineral Density (BMD) in Finite Element Studies: A Review of the Literature,” Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics 3, no. 1 (2016): 36.
|
| [19] |
A. Balci, O. Kalemci, F. G. Kaya, G. Akyoldas, K. Yucesoy, and D. Ozaksoy, “Early and Long-Term Changes in Adjacent Vertebral Body Bone Mineral Density Determined by Quantitative Computed Tomography After Posterolateral Fusion With Transpedicular Screw Fixation,” Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 145 (2016): 84–88.
|
| [20] |
I. Okano, C. Jones, S. N. Salzmann, et al., “Postoperative Decrease of Regional Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Measured by Quantitative Computed Tomography After Lumbar Fusion Surgery in Adjacent Vertebrae,” Osteoporosis International : A Journal Established as Result of Cooperation Between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 31, no. 6 (2020): 1163–1171.
|
| [21] |
R. Eastell, T. W. O'neill, L. C. Hofbauer, et al., “Postmenopausal Osteoporosis,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2 (2016): 16069.
|
| [22] |
B. J. Ko, S. K. Myung, K. H. Cho, et al., “Relationship Between Bariatric Surgery and Bone Mineral Density: A Meta-Analysis,” Obesity Surgery 26, no. 7 (2016): 1414–1421.
|
| [23] |
T. Rolvien and M. Amling, “Disuse Osteoporosis: Clinical and Mechanistic Insights,” Calcified Tissue International 110, no. 5 (2022): 592–604.
|
| [24] |
S. K. Papadopoulou, K. Papadimitriou, G. Voulgaridou, et al., “Exercise and Nutrition Impact on Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia-The Incidence of Osteosarcopenia: A Narrative Review,” Nutrients 13, no. 12 (2021): 4499.
|
| [25] |
D. C. Anthony and Y. Couch, “The Systemic Response to CNS Injury,” Experimental Neurology 258 (2014): 105–111.
|
| [26] |
P. C. Heinrich, I. Behrmann, S. Haan, et al., “Principles of Interleukin (IL)-6-Type Cytokine Signalling and Its Regulation,” Biochemical Journal 374, no. Pt 1 (2003): 1–20.
|
| [27] |
N. Weare-Regales, S. N. Hudey, and R. F. Lockey, “Practical Guidance for Prevention and Management of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis for the Allergist/Immunologist,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology in Practice 9, no. 5 (2021): 1841–1850.
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PDF
