Purpose: Bone void fillers are essential for successful outcomes in opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO), a procedure that corrects varus knee misalignment and alleviates medial compartment pain. However, the best filler for OWHTO is still uncertain. This study compared the clinical and radiographic results of using three-dimensional-printed (3DP) porous tantalum wedges versus allogeneic chip bone as fillers in OWHTO, aiming to provide a reference for clinical decision-making.
Methods: This exploratory-retrospective matched-cohort consecutively enrolled study included 20 patients (10 per group) who were treated between January 2020 and December 2022, with Group A (3DP porous tantalum) selected from a large trial and Group B (allogeneic chip bone) matched by age, gender, and varus severity. Inclusion criteria: young, active patients with tibial varus and complete follow-up; exclusions: knee infection, instability, contracture, dislocation, or pan-compartmental osteoarthritis. Postoperatively, early full-weight-bearing rehabilitation was applied, with follow-ups at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and annually. Primary outcome: bone healing (modified van Hemert score, standing radiographs). Secondary outcomes: hospital for special surgery knee score (HSS), visual analogue scale (VAS), time to full-weight-bearing walking, and radiographic parameters (joint line convergence angle [JLCA], femur-tibia angle [FTA], hip–knee–ankle angle [HKA], mechanical medial proximal tibial angle [mMPTA], mechanical axis deviation [MAD], weight-bearing line [WBL] ratio, posterior tibial slope [PTS]). Postoperative complications were recorded and compared between both groups. Statistical analyses used the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous data and the chi-square test for categorical data.
Results: Mean age was 48.7 ± 3.9 years, with a mean follow-up of 50.0 ± 7.0 months (range: 29.4–59.0). Group A had significantly higher bone healing scores at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months (3.0 ± 0.8 vs. 1.6 ± 1.0, 3.4 ± 0.5 vs. 2.0 ± 0.9, 4.3 ± 0.5 vs. 2.9 ± 0.9, respectively, all p < 0.01), with no difference at 1 year (4.8 ± 0.4 vs. 4.4 ± 0.5, p = 0.075). Time to full-weight-bearing walking was significantly shorter in Group A (18.7 ± 3.2 vs. 54.4 ± 15.3 days; p < 0.001). Both groups showed significant postoperative improvements in VAS, HSS scores, and radiographic parameters (MAD, WBL ratio, mMPTA, HKA; all p < 0.01 vs. preoperative values), with no intergroup differences in these metrics (preoperative or postoperative). Overall complication rates were similar (20% vs. 60%; p = 0.074), but Group A had a lower incidence of delayed union (0% vs. 40%; p = 0.011). The statistical power for 1-year bone union grades was 0.65 (G*Power, effect size = 0.883).
Conclusion: 3DP porous tantalum wedges in OWHTO accelerate bone healing (up to 6 months), reduce time to full-weight-bearing walking, and lower delayed union rates compared to allogeneic chip bone, thereby establishing them as a promising option for future surgical interventions. Further large-scale, long-term trials are needed to confirm these benefits.
| [1] |
R. Rossi, D. E. Bonasia, and A. Amendola, “The Role of High Tibial Osteotomy in the Varus Knee,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 19, no. 10 (2011): 590–599.
|
| [2] |
J. M. Wright, H. C. Crockett, D. P. Slawski, M. W. Madsen, and R. E. Windsor, “High Tibial Osteotomy,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 13, no. 4 (2005): 279–289.
|
| [3] |
M. C. Loia, S. Vanni, F. Rosso, et al., “High Tibial Osteotomy in Varus Knees: Indications and Limits,” Joints 4, no. 2 (2016): 98–110.
|
| [4] |
S. Akizuki, A. Shibakawa, T. Takizawa, et al., “The Long-Term Outcome of High Tibial Osteotomy: A Ten- to 20-Year Follow-Up,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 90, no. 5 (2008): 592–596.
|
| [5] |
J. R. Yoon, “Some Considerations in High Tibial Osteotomy,” Knee Surgery & Related Research 30, no. 4 (2018): 273–274.
|
| [6] |
B. Miltenberg, R. N. Puzzitiello, V. Ruelos, et al., “Incidence of Complications and Revision Surgery After High Tibial Osteotomy: A Systematic Review,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 52, no. 1 (2024): 258–268.
|
| [7] |
J. D. Harris, R. Mcneilan, R. A. Siston, et al., “Survival and Clinical Outcome of Isolated High Tibial Osteotomy and Combined Biological Knee Reconstruction,” Knee 20, no. 3 (2013): 154–161.
|
| [8] |
T. Woodacre, M. Ricketts, J. T. Evans, et al., “Complications Associated With Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy—A Review of the Literature and of 15 Years of Experience,” Knee 23, no. 2 (2016): 276–282.
|
| [9] |
O. Slevin, O. R. Ayeni, S. Hinterwimmer, T. Tischer, M. J. Feucht, and M. T. Hirschmann, “The Role of Bone Void Fillers in Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Systematic Review,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 24, no. 11 (2016): 3584–3598.
|
| [10] |
W. H. Jung, R. Takeuchi, D. H. Kim, and R. Nag, “Faster Union Rate and Better Clinical Outcomes Using Autologous Bone Graft After Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 28, no. 5 (2020): 1380–1387.
|
| [11] |
T. Resch, D. Szymski, F. Hartz, P. Zehnder, G. Römmermann, and P. Angele, “Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy With and Without Bone Void Filler: Allograft Leads to Faster Bone Union and Weight Bearing With Comparable Return to Work and Sports Rates,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 32, no. 7 (2024): 1785–1797.
|
| [12] |
R. Martin, T. B. Birmingham, K. Willits, R. Litchfield, M. E. Lebel, and J. R. Giffin, “Adverse Event Rates and Classifications in Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 42, no. 5 (2014): 1118–1126.
|
| [13] |
R. Siboni, P. Beaufils, P. Boisrenoult, C. Steltzlen, and N. Pujol, “Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Without Bone Grafting in Severe Varus Osteoarthritic Knee. Rate and Risk Factors of Non-Union in 41 Cases,” Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research 104, no. 4 (2018): 473–476.
|
| [14] |
F. R. Noyes, W. Mayfield, S. D. Barber-Westin, J. C. Albright, and T. P. Heckmann, “Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: An Operative Technique and Rehabilitation Program to Decrease Complications and Promote Early Union and Function,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 34, no. 8 (2006): 1262–1273.
|
| [15] |
C. G. Finkemeier, “Bone-Grafting and Bone-Graft Substitutes,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) 84, no. 3 (2002): 454–464.
|
| [16] |
M. A. Kuremsky, T. M. Schaller, C. C. Hall, B. A. Roehr, and J. L. Masonis, “Comparison of Autograft vs Allograft in Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy,” Journal of Arthroplasty 25, no. 6 (2010): 951–957.
|
| [17] |
G. Spahn, “Complications in High Tibial (Medial Opening Wedge) Osteotomy,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 124, no. 10 (2004): 649–653.
|
| [18] |
B. S. Miller, B. Downie, E. B. Mcdonough, et al., “Complications After Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy,” Arthroscopy 25, no. 6 (2009): 639–646.
|
| [19] |
N. J. Lash, J. A. Feller, L. M. Batty, J. Wasiak, and A. K. Richmond, “Bone Grafts and Bone Substitutes for Opening-Wedge Osteotomies of the Knee: A Systematic Review,” Arthroscopy 31, no. 4 (2015): 720–730.
|
| [20] |
T. Koshino, T. Murase, and T. Saito, “Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy With Use of Porous Hydroxyapatite to Treat Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis of the Knee,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) 85, no. 1 (2003): 78–85.
|
| [21] |
W. C. Choi, B. Kim, U. Kim, et al., “Gap Healing After Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Using Injectable Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong Kong) 25, no. 3 (2017): 613388230.
|
| [22] |
J. H. Han, H. J. Kim, J. G. Song, et al., “Is Bone Grafting Necessary in Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy? A Meta-Analysis of Radiological Outcomes,” Knee Surgery & Related Research 27, no. 4 (2015): 207–220.
|
| [23] |
C. Pornrattanamaneewong, S. Numkanisorn, K. Chareancholvanich, and T. Harnroongroj, “A Retrospective Analysis of Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Varus Osteoarthritic Knee,” Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 46, no. 4 (2012): 455–461.
|
| [24] |
W. L. Van Hemert, K. Willems, P. G. Anderson, R. J. van Heerwaarden, and A. B. Wymenga, “Tricalcium Phosphate Granules or Rigid Wedge Preforms in Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Radiological Study With a New Evaluation System,” Knee 11, no. 6 (2004): 451–456.
|
| [25] |
M. Ozalay, O. Sahin, S. Akpinar, G. Ozkoc, M. Cinar, and N. Cesur, “Remodeling Potentials of Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Granules in Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 129, no. 6 (2009): 747–752.
|
| [26] |
T. Tanaka, Y. Kumagae, M. Saito, et al., “Bone Formation and Resorption in Patients After Implantation of Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate Blocks With 60% and 75% Porosity in Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B, Applied Biomaterials 86, no. 2 (2008): 453–459.
|
| [27] |
F. Gouin, F. Yaouanc, D. Waast, B. Melchior, J. Delecrin, and N. Passuti, “Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomies: Calcium-Phosphate Ceramic Spacer Versus Autologous Bonegraft,” Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research 96, no. 6 (2010): 637–645.
|
| [28] |
Y. Guo, K. Xie, W. Jiang, et al., “In Vitro and In Vivo Study of 3D-Printed Porous Tantalum Scaffolds for Repairing Bone Defects,” ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering 5, no. 2 (2019): 1123–1133.
|
| [29] |
C. Yang, J. Li, C. Zhu, et al., “Advanced Antibacterial Activity of Biocompatible Tantalum Nanofilm via Enhanced Local Innate Immunity,” Acta Biomaterialia 89 (2019): 403–418.
|
| [30] |
J. Li, J. A. Jansen, X. F. Walboomers, and J. J. J. P. van den Beucken, “Mechanical Aspects of Dental Implants and Osseointegration: A Narrative Review,” Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 103 (2020): 103574.
|
| [31] |
G. A. Macheras, K. Kateros, S. D. Koutsostathis, G. Tsakotos, S. Galanakos, and S. A. Papadakis, “The Trabecular Metal Monoblock Acetabular Component in Patients With High Congenital Hip Dislocation: A Prospective Study,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 92, no. 5 (2010): 624–628.
|
| [32] |
J. Wegrzyn, K. R. Kaufman, A. D. Hanssen, and D. G. Lewallen, “Performance of Porous Tantalum vs. Titanium Cup in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Randomized Trial With Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up,” Journal of Arthroplasty 30, no. 6 (2015): 1008–1013.
|
| [33] |
M. Hosoki, K. Nishigawa, T. Tajima, M. Ueda, and Y. Matsuka, “Cross-Sectional Observational Study Exploring Clinical Risk of Titanium Allergy Caused by Dental Implants,” Journal of Prosthodontic Research 62, no. 4 (2018): 426–431.
|
| [34] |
M. Lu, S. Xu, Z. X. Lei, et al., “Application of a Novel Porous Tantalum Implant in Rabbit Anterior Lumbar Spine Fusion Model: In Vitro and In Vivo Experiments,” Chinese Medical Journal 132, no. 1 (2019): 51–62.
|
| [35] |
Q. Wang, H. Zhang, Q. Li, et al., “Biocompatibility and Osteogenic Properties of Porous Tantalum,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 9, no. 3 (2015): 780–786.
|
| [36] |
M. M. Bakri, S. H. Lee, and J. H. Lee, “Improvement of Biohistological Response of Facial Implant Materials by Tantalum Surface Treatment,” Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 41, no. 1 (2019): 52.
|
| [37] |
P. Duan and L. F. Bonewald, “The Role of the Wnt/beta-Catenin Signaling Pathway in Formation and Maintenance of Bone and Teeth,” International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 77, no. Pt A (2016): 23–29.
|
| [38] |
M. Wu, G. Chen, and Y. P. Li, “TGF-Beta and BMP Signaling in Osteoblast, Skeletal Development, and Bone Formation, Homeostasis and Disease,” Bone Research 4 (2016): 16009.
|
| [39] |
M. M. Lu, P. S. Wu, X. J. Guo, L. L. Yin, H. L. Cao, and D. Zou, “Osteoinductive Effects of Tantalum and Titanium on Bone Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Bone Formation in Ovariectomized Rats,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 22, no. 21 (2018): 7087–7104.
|
| [40] |
H. Yu, M. Xu, Q. Duan, et al., “3D-Printed Porous Tantalum Artificial Bone Scaffolds: Fabrication, Properties, and Applications,” Biomedical Materials 19, no. 4 (2024): 042002.
|
| [41] |
C. Zhang, H. Chen, H. Fan, et al., “Carpal Bone Replacement Using Personalized 3D Printed Tantalum Prosthesis,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 11 (2023): 1234052.
|
| [42] |
H. Liang, J. Tu, B. Wang, et al., “Innovative 3D-Printed Porous Tantalum Cage With Non-Window Design to Accelerate Spinal Fusion: A Proof-of-Concept Study,” Materials Today Bio 31 (2025): 101576.
|
| [43] |
L. Hua, P. Lei, and Y. Hu, “Knee Reconstruction Using 3D-Printed Porous Tantalum Augment in the Treatment of Charcot Joint,” Orthopaedic Surgery 14, no. 11 (2022): 3125–3128.
|
| [44] |
M. B. Coventry, “Upper Tibial Osteotomy,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 182 (1984): 46–52.
|
| [45] |
T. W. Dugdale, F. R. Noyes, and D. Styer, “Preoperative Planning for High Tibial Osteotomy. The Effect of Lateral Tibiofemoral Separation and Tibiofemoral Length,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 274 (1992): 248–264.
|
| [46] |
X. Wang, W. Liu, X. Yu, et al., “Advances in Surface Modification of Tantalum and Porous Tantalum for Rapid Osseointegration: A Thematic Review,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 10 (2022): 983695.
|
| [47] |
Y. S. Lee, M. C. Lee, S. G. Kang, A. Elazab, and W. S. Oh, “Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Using a Protective Cutting System: Technical Advancement for the Accuracy of the Osteotomy and Avoiding Intraoperative Complications,” Arthroscopy Techniques 5, no. 1 (2016): e7–e10.
|
| [48] |
Y. S. Lee and G. H. Moon, “Comparative Analysis of Osteotomy Accuracy Between the Conventional and Devised Technique Using a Protective Cutting System in Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science 20, no. 1 (2015): 129–136.
|
| [49] |
S. C. Kim, D. H. Kim, J. I. Lee, et al., “Comparative Analysis of Serial Union Patterns After Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy With and Without Bone-Void Fillers,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) 103, no. 19 (2021): 1788.
|
| [50] |
J. E. Kim, D. H. Kim, J. I. Lee, et al., “Difference of Preoperative Varus-Valgus Stress Radiograph Is Effective for the Correction Accuracy in the Preoperative Planning During Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 29, no. 4 (2021): 1035–1044.
|
| [51] |
O. S. Lee, E. S. Lee, and Y. S. Lee, “Disparity Between Preoperative Target Correction Amount and Postoperative Correction Amount in Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy,” Knee Surgery & Related Research 31, no. 2 (2019): 126–131.
|
| [52] |
W. H. Jung, C. W. Chun, J. H. Lee, J. H. Ha, J. H. Kim, and J. H. Jeong, “Comparative Study of Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Using 2 Different Implants,” Arthroscopy 29, no. 6 (2013): 1063–1071.
|
| [53] |
J. Onodera, E. Kondo, N. Omizu, D. Ueda, T. Yagi, and K. Yasuda, “Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate Shows Superior Absorption Rate and Osteoconductivity Compared to Hydroxyapatite in Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 22, no. 11 (2014): 2763–2770.
|
| [54] |
S. Maeda, D. Chiba, E. Sasaki, et al., “The Difficulty of Continuing Sports Activities After Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in Patient With Medial Knee Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Case Series at 2-Year-Minimum Follow-Up,” Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics 8, no. 1 (2021): 68.
|
| [55] |
S. Schroter, C. Ihle, D. W. Elson, et al., “Surgical Accuracy in High Tibial Osteotomy: Coronal Equivalence of Computer Navigation and Gap Measurement,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 24, no. 11 (2016): 3410–3417.
|
| [56] |
R. Takeuchi, H. Ishikawa, M. Aratake, et al., “Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy With Early Full Weight Bearing,” Arthroscopy 25, no. 1 (2009): 46–53.
|
| [57] |
P. Ou, C. Hao, J. Liu, et al., “Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Osseointegration of Nb-xTi-Zr Alloys for Use as Dental Implant Materials,” Biomedical Materials 16, no. 3 (2021): 035020.
|
| [58] |
D. Fraser, G. Mendonca, E. Sartori, P. Funkenbusch, C. Ercoli, and L. Meirelles, “Bone Response to Porous Tantalum Implants in a Gap-Healing Model,” Clinical Oral Implants Research 30, no. 2 (2019): 156–168.
|
| [59] |
J. W. Lee, H. B. Wen, P. Gubbi, et al., “New Bone Formation and Trabecular Bone Microarchitecture of Highly Porous Tantalum Compared to Titanium Implant Threads: A Pilot Canine Study,” Clinical Oral Implants Research 29, no. 2 (2018): 164–174.
|
| [60] |
D. Y. Lee, M. C. Lee, C. W. Ha, et al., “Comparable Bone Union Progression After Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Using Allogenous Bone Chip or Tri-Calcium Phosphate Granule: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 27, no. 9 (2019): 2945–2950.
|
| [61] |
P. Hernigou, L. C. Flouzat, J. Delambre, et al., “Full Weight Bearing and Dynamisation With Limmed(R) Locked Plate Fixation Accelerates Bone Regeneration in the Volume of Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy,” International Orthopaedics 39, no. 7 (2015): 1295–1300.
|
| [62] |
M. Asik, C. Sen, B. Kilic, S. B. Goksan, F. Ciftci, and O. F. Taser, “High Tibial Osteotomy With Puddu Plate for the Treatment of Varus Gonarthrosis,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 14, no. 10 (2006): 948–954.
|
| [63] |
J. S. An, N. Bouguennec, C. Batailler, et al., “Better Clinical Outcomes and Faster Weight Bearing After Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Using Allogeneic Than Synthetic Graft: A Secondary Analysis of a Francophone Arthroscopy Society Symposium,” Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research 109, no. 8S (2023): 103700.
|
| [64] |
M. D. Vanpelt, A. Athey, J. Yao, et al., “Is Routine Hardware Removal Following Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Tarsometatarsal Joint Fracture/Dislocation Necessary?,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery 58, no. 2 (2019): 226–230.
|
| [65] |
J. M. Galina, V. Sarwahi, A. M. Atlas, et al., “Are All Hardware Removals Equal?,” Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 30, no. 1 (2021): 20–23.
|
| [66] |
S. Bencharit, W. C. Byrd, S. Altarawneh, et al., “Development and Applications of Porous Tantalum Trabecular Metal-Enhanced Titanium Dental Implants,” Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 16, no. 6 (2014): 817–826.
|
| [67] |
J. D. Bobyn, G. J. Stackpool, S. A. Hacking, M. Tanzer, and J. J. Krygier, “Characteristics of Bone Ingrowth and Interface Mechanics of a New Porous Tantalum Biomaterial,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British Volume) 81, no. 5 (1999): 907–914.
|
| [68] |
V. Giordano, R. E. Pires, L. Faria, et al., “Doctor, When Should I Start Walking? Revisiting Postoperative Rehabilitation and Weight-Bearing Protocols in Operatively Treated Acetabular Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 12 (2024): 3570.
|
| [69] |
A. Bruggemann, H. Mallmin, M. Bengtsson, et al., “Safety of Use of Tantalum in Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 102, no. 5 (2020): 368–374.
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PDF
