Impact of Sagittal Reference Lines on Predicting Distal Junctional Kyphosis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Po-Yao Wang , Chih-Wei Chen , Chuan-Ching Huang , Jui-Yo Hsu , Yuan-Fuu Lee , Yu-Cheng Yeh , Ming-Hsiao Hu , Po-Liang Lai , Shu-Hua Yang

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (11) : 3222 -3229.

PDF
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (11) :3222 -3229. DOI: 10.1111/os.70171
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Impact of Sagittal Reference Lines on Predicting Distal Junctional Kyphosis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective: Incorporating the sagittal stable vertebra (SSV) in posterior spinal fusion (PSF) may reduce postoperative distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), but its determination varies across reference methods and may be affected by patient posture. This study aims to investigate the SSV determined by different sagittal reference lines in predicting the risk of DJK after PSF in AIS patients.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated AIS patients with Lenke Type 1 or 2 curves treated with PSF between January 2009 and July 2017. The inclusion or exclusion of SSV in PSF based on SSV determined by different reference lines was assessed for its association with the postoperative DJK. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and odds ratio were calculated.

Results: One hundred twenty-two patients (mean age at surgery: 15.1 ± 3.2 years) were included with the incidence of postoperative DJK 6.6%. PSF with the exclusion of SSV, defined by the vertebral level at which 50% of the vertebral body was anterior to the posterior sacral vertical line (PSVL), the midline between PSVL and the C7 plumb line (PSVL-C7PL Midline), and the line connecting the center point of the C7 vertebral body and the posterior superior corner of the sacrum (C7PSL), was significantly associated with the occurrence of postoperative DJK. Among the evaluated reference lines, PSVL demonstrated numerically higher sensitivity, NPV, odds ratio, and area under the curve (AUC), although these differences in AUC did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions: Although there are concerns about whether standing posture affects the SSV determined by a specific reference line, this study demonstrates that PSVL might be an effective and convenient reference line for identifying SSV.

Keywords

adolescent idiopathic scoliosis / distal junctional kyphosis / lowest instrumented vertebra / posterior sacral vertical line / posterior spinal fusion / reference lines / sagittal stable vertebra

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Po-Yao Wang, Chih-Wei Chen, Chuan-Ching Huang, Jui-Yo Hsu, Yuan-Fuu Lee, Yu-Cheng Yeh, Ming-Hsiao Hu, Po-Liang Lai, Shu-Hua Yang. Impact of Sagittal Reference Lines on Predicting Distal Junctional Kyphosis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2025, 17(11): 3222-3229 DOI:10.1111/os.70171

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

R. Jia and Y. Long, “Risk Factors for Distal Junctional Kyphosis After Posterior Spinal Surgery in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Meta-Analysis,” Frontiers in Surgery 10 (2023): 1263655.

[2]

T. G. Lowe, L. Lenke, R. Betz, et al., “Distal Junctional Kyphosis of Adolescent Idiopathic Thoracic Curves Following Anterior or Posterior Instrumented Fusion: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Prevention,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31, no. 3 (2006): 299–302.

[3]

D. N. Segal, J. Ball, N. D. Fletcher, et al., “Risk Factors for the Development of DJK in AIS Patients Undergoing Posterior Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion,” Spine Deformity 10, no. 2 (2022): 377–385.

[4]

E. Ameri, H. Behtash, B. Mobini, H. Ghandhari, H. Vahid Tari, and M. Khakinahad, “The Prevalence of Distal Junctional Kyphosis Following Posterior Instrumentation and Arthrodesis for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis,” Acta Medica Iranica 49, no. 6 (2011): 357–363.

[5]

J. Yang, L. M. Andras, A. M. Broom, et al., “Preventing Distal Junctional Kyphosis by Applying the Stable Sagittal Vertebra Concept to Selective Throacic Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis,” Spine Deformity 6, no. 1 (2018): 38–42.

[6]

P. Y. Wang, C. W. Chen, Y. F. Lee, et al., “Distal Junctional Kyphosis After Posterior Spinal Fusion in Lenke 1 and 2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis-Exploring Detailed Features of the Sagittal Stable Vertebra Concept,” Global Spine Journal 13, no. 4 (2023): 1112–1119.

[7]

K. J. Cho, L. G. Lenke, K. H. Bridwell, M. Kamiya, and B. Sides, “Selection of the Optimal Distal Fusion Level in Posterior Instrumentation and Fusion for Thoracic Hyperkyphosis: The Sagittal Stable Vertebra Concept,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34, no. 8 (2009): 765–770.

[8]

A. A. Theologis, H. H. Wu, J. F. Oeding, and M. Diab, “Costs of Revision Operations for Distal Junctional Kyphosis Following Thoracic Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis,” European Spine Journal 33, no. 6 (2024): 2504–2511.

[9]

Y. Wang, E. S. Hansen, K. Hoy, et al., “Distal Adding-On Phenomenon in Lenke 1A Scoliosis: Risk Factor Identification and Treatment Strategy Comparison,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36, no. 14 (2011): 1113–1122.

[10]

E. R. DeLong, D. M. DeLong, and D. L. Clarke-Pearson, “Comparing the Areas Under Two or More Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves: A Nonparametric Approach,” Biometrics 44 (1988): 837–845.

[11]

L. G. Lenke, R. R. Betz, J. Harms, et al., “Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A New Classification to Determine Extent of Spinal Arthrodesis,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 83, no. 8 (2001): 1169–1181.

[12]

Y. Hori, A. Matsumura, T. Namikawa, et al., “Optimal Selection of Lower Instrumented Vertebra Can Minimize Distal Junctional Kyphosis After Posterior Spinal Fusion for Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2025). Epub ahead of print.

[13]

S. A. Shah, J. M. Henstenburg, P. O. Newton, and S. Parent, “Updated Criteria for Fusion Level Selection in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Including Use of Three-Dimensional Analysis,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 31, no. 6 (2023): e298–e307.

[14]

C. R. Fischer, “Optimal Lowest Instrumented Vertebra for Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis,” Spine Deformity 6, no. 3 (2018): 250–256.

[15]

S. I. Suk, S. M. Lee, E. R. Chung, J. H. Kim, W. J. Kim, and H. M. Sohn, “Determination of Distal Fusion Level With Segmental Pedicle Screw Fixation in Single Thoracic Idiopathic Scoliosis,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28, no. 5 (2003): 484–491.

[16]

J. Takahashi, P. O. Newton, V. L. Ugrinow, and T. P. Bastrom, “Selective Thoracic Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Factors Influencing the Selection of the Optimal Lowest Instrumented Vertebra,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36, no. 14 (2011): 1131–1141.

[17]

T. Banno, Y. Yamato, T. Hasegawa, et al., “Optimal Lowest Instrumented Vertebra Selection With Consideration of Coronal and Sagittal Planes to Prevent Distal Junctional Complications in Patients With Lenke Type 1A and 2A Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis,” Spine Deformity 11, no. 5 (2023): 1145–1156.

[18]

S. H. Seo, S. J. Hyun, J. K. Lee, et al., “Selection of Optimal Lower Instrumented Vertebra for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery,” Neurospine 20, no. 3 (2023): 799–807.

[19]

Y. Gong, L. Yuan, M. He, et al., “Comparison Between Stable Sagittal Vertebra and First Lordotic Vertebra Instrumentation for Prevention of Distal Junctional Kyphosis in Scheuermann Disease,” Clinical Spine Surgery 32, no. 8 (2019): 330–336.

[20]

K. Lundine, P. Turner, and M. Johnson, “Thoracic Hyperkyphosis: Assessment of the Distal Fusion Level,” Global Spine Journal 2, no. 2 (2012): 65–70.

[21]

D. N. Segal, K. J. Orland, E. Yoon, T. Bastrom, and N. D. Fletcher, “Fusions Ending Above the Sagittal Stable Vertebrae in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Does It Matter?,” Spine Deformity 8, no. 5 (2020): 983–989.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF

3

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/