To manage anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, both remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and standard ACLR without remnant preservation are applied. This study aims to systematically evaluate clinical outcomes of remnant-preserving versus standard ACLR techniques by analyzing randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were used to identify studies published from January 2000 to November 2024. Based on the PICOS framework, we systematically reviewed RCTs in which patients with ACL injuries compared ACLR with remnant preservation versus standard ACLR in terms of International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Lachman test, pivot shift test, KT1000/2000 arthrometer side-to-side difference (SSD), synovial coverage, proprioception evaluation, cyclops lesion, and range of motion (ROM). Data were pooled using the random-effects model or fixed-effects model, based on the heterogeneity. The quality of the included literature was assessed based on the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (ROB 2.0), and the GRADE criteria were applied to rate evidence quality for key outcomes. Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 15 were used for the statistical analyses. The relative risk (RR) was used for dichotomous data, and the mean difference (MD) was used for continuous variable data. Both types of indicators were expressed as 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was adopted to determine whether patients improved enough clinically to notice a difference. Subgroup analyses were conducted for outcomes failing to reach MCID thresholds in order to examine potential modifiers of different follow-up durations and remnant preservation techniques. A total of 10 studies were included in the qualitative review and meta-analysis. Although there were statistically significant differences between the remnant preservation group and the standard technique group in favor of the remnant preservation technique with respect to postoperative Lysholm score (MD 1.44; 95% CI, 0.60–2.29; I2 = 23%; p < 0.01) (GRADE: Moderate), SSD (MD −0.57; 95% CI, −0.98 to −0.15; I2 = 86%; p < 0.01) (GRADE: Low) and proprioception recovery (MD −0.57; 95% CI, −0.83 to −0.31; I2 = 0%; p < 0.01) (GRADE: Low), these observed differences are so small that they are unlikely to be clinically relevant. No differences were found in other clinical outcomes between the two groups. The follow-up duration and remnant preservation techniques were not identified as the key factors influencing the differences between remnant preservation ACLR and standard ACLR. No clinically meaningful benefit in postoperative knee stability or function; remnant preservation may be considered primarily when technical feasibility is high and remnant quality is optimal. This is achieved without increasing the risk of cyclops lesions and deficiency of ROM.
| [1] |
C. C. Kaeding, B. Léger-St-Jean, and R. A. Magnussen, “Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries,” Clinics in Sports Medicine 36, no. 1 (2017): 1–8.
|
| [2] |
L. Kohn, E. Rembeck, and A. Rauch, “Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in Adults: Diagnostics and Treatment,” Der Orthopäde 49, no. 11 (2020): 1013–1028.
|
| [3] |
I. S. Hong, L. A. Pierpoint, J. E. Hellwinkel, et al., “Clinical Outcomes After ACL Reconstruction in Soccer (Football, Futbol) Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Sports Health 15, no. 6 (2023): 788–804.
|
| [4] |
S. R. Filbay and H. Grindem, “Evidence-Based Recommendations for the Management of Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Rupture,” Best Practice & Research. Clinical Rheumatology 33, no. 1 (2019): 33–47.
|
| [5] |
B. T. Raines, E. Naclerio, and S. L. Sherman, “Management of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: What's in and What's out?,” Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 51, no. 5 (2017): 563–575.
|
| [6] |
J. Xu, Y. Jia, B. Zhang, X. Wang, and R. Sun, “Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes Between All-Inside and Standard Technique in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With 6-Strand Hamstring Tendon Autograft,” Orthopaedic Surgery 16, no. 5 (2024): 1034–1041.
|
| [7] |
M. Li, F. Meng, D. Long, et al., “Sagittal Inclination Angle of the Graft Affects Graft Maturity and Knee Stability After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction,” Orthopaedic Surgery 17, no. 2 (2025): 427–436.
|
| [8] |
M. S. Dhillon, K. Bali, and R. K. Vasistha, “Immunohistological Evaluation of Proprioceptive Potential of the Residual Stump of Injured Anterior Cruciate Ligaments (ACL),” International Orthopaedics 34, no. 5 (2010): 737–741.
|
| [9] |
T. Takahashi, E. Kondo, K. Yasuda, et al., “Effects of Remnant Tissue Preservation on the Tendon Graft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical and Histological Study,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 44, no. 7 (2016): 1708–1716.
|
| [10] |
T. Naraoka, Y. Kimura, E. Tsuda, Y. Yamamoto, and Y. Ishibashi, “Is Remnant Preservation Truly Beneficial to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Healing? Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluations of Remnant-Preserved Reconstruction,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 45, no. 5 (2017): 1049–1058.
|
| [11] |
H. O. Mayr, T. G. Weig, and W. Plitz, “Arthrofibrosis Following ACL Reconstruction—Reasons and Outcome,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 124, no. 8 (2004): 518–522.
|
| [12] |
M. P. Recht, D. W. Piraino, M. A. Cohen, R. D. Parker, and J. A. Bergfeld, “Localized Anterior Arthrofibrosis (Cyclops Lesion) After Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: MR Imaging Findings,” AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 165, no. 2 (1995): 383–385.
|
| [13] |
E. Kondo, K. Yasuda, J. Onodera, Y. Kawaguchi, and N. Kitamura, “Effects of Remnant Tissue Preservation on Clinical and Arthroscopic Results After Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 43, no. 8 (2015): 1882–1892.
|
| [14] |
M. A. El-Desouky, M. Ezzat, and B. H. Abdelrazek, “Clinical Outcomes in Stump-Preserving Versus Stump-Sacrificing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; a Randomized Controlled Study,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 23, no. 1 (2022): 703.
|
| [15] |
N. Erkurt, M. Yerli, A. Yuce, et al., “Proprioception Analysis of Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction,” European Research Journal 9 (2023): 1420–1428.
|
| [16] |
C. Su, S. D. Kuang, W. J. Liu, et al., “Clinical Outcome of Remnant-Preserving and I.D.E.A.L. Femoral Tunnel Technique for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction,” Orthopaedic Surgery 12, no. 6 (2020): 1693–1702.
|
| [17] |
P. J. McMahon, J. R. Dettling, L. A. Yocum, and R. E. Glousman, “The Cyclops Lesion: A Cause of Diminished Knee Extension After Rupture of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament,” Arthroscopy 15, no. 7 (1999): 757–761.
|
| [18] |
M. Tonin, V. Saciri, M. Veselko, and A. Rotter, “Progressive Loss of Knee Extension After Injury. Cyclops Syndrome due to a Lesion of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 29, no. 5 (2001): 545–549.
|
| [19] |
L. Hong, X. Li, H. Zhang, et al., “Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Remnant Preservation: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 40, no. 12 (2012): 2747–2755.
|
| [20] |
S. Y. Park, H. Oh, S. W. Park, J. H. Lee, S. H. Lee, and K. H. Yoon, “Clinical Outcomes of Remnant-Preserving Augmentation Versus Double-Bundle Reconstruction in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction,” Arthroscopy 28, no. 12 (2012): 1833–1841.
|
| [21] |
N. K. Paschos and S. M. Howell, “Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Principles of Treatment,” EFORT Open Reviews 1, no. 11 (2016): 398–408.
|
| [22] |
K. Tie, L. Chen, D. Hu, and H. Wang, “The Difference in Clinical Outcome of Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions With and Without Remnant Preservation: A Meta-Analysis,” Knee 23, no. 4 (2016): 566–574.
|
| [23] |
T. Ma, C. Zeng, J. Pan, C. Zhao, H. Fang, and D. Cai, “Remnant Preservation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Versus Standard Techniques: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials,” Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 57, no. 7–8 (2017): 1014–1022.
|
| [24] |
F. Allende, S. Allahabadi, D. Sachdev, et al., “Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Knee Stability in Remnant-Preserving ACL Reconstruction Versus Standard ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 52, no. 14 (2024): 3651–3661.
|
| [25] |
M. J. Page, J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt, et al., “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews,” International Journal of Surgery 88 (2021): 105906.
|
| [26] |
G. Guyatt, T. Agoritsas, R. Brignardello-Petersen, et al., “Core GRADE 1: Overview of the Core GRADE Approach,” BMJ 389 (2025): e081903.
|
| [27] |
T. Ogura, J. Ackermann, A. Barbieri Mestriner, G. Merkely, and A. H. Gomoll, “Minimal Clinically Important Differences and Substantial Clinical Benefit in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation,” Cartilage 11, no. 4 (2020): 412–422.
|
| [28] |
J. D. Harris, J. C. Brand, M. P. Cote, S. C. Faucett, and A. Dhawan, “Research Pearls: The Significance of Statistics and Perils of Pooling. Part 1: Clinical Versus Statistical Significance,” Arthroscopy 33, no. 6 (2017): 1102–1112.
|
| [29] |
H. Robert, S. Nouveau, S. Gageot, and B. Gagnière, “A New Knee Arthrometer, the GNRB: Experience in ACL Complete and Partial Tears,” Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research 95, no. 3 (2009): 171–176.
|
| [30] |
S. Gohil, P. O. Annear, and W. Breidahl, “Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Autologous Double Hamstrings: A Comparison of Standard Versus Minimal Debridement Techniques Using MRI to Assess Revascularisation. A Randomised Prospective Study With a One-Year Follow-Up,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 89, no. 9 (2007): 1165–1171.
|
| [31] |
B. Demirağ, C. Ermutlu, F. Aydemir, and K. Durak, “A Comparison of Clinical Outcome of Augmentation and Standard Reconstruction Techniques for Partial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears,” Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi 23, no. 3 (2012): 140–144.
|
| [32] |
N. Pujol, P. Colombet, J. F. Potel, et al., “Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Partial Tear: Selective Anteromedial Bundle Reconstruction Conserving the Posterolateral Remnant Versus Single-Bundle Anatomic ACL Reconstruction: Preliminary 1-Year Results of a Prospective Randomized Study,” Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research 98, no. 8 Suppl (2012): S171–S177.
|
| [33] |
Q. Zhang, S. Zhang, X. Cao, L. Liu, Y. Liu, and R. Li, “The Effect of Remnant Preservation on Tibial Tunnel Enlargement in ACL Reconstruction With Hamstring Autograft: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 22, no. 1 (2014): 166–173.
|
| [34] |
W. Lu, D. Wang, W. Zhu, et al., “Placement of Double Tunnels in ACL Reconstruction Using Bony Landmarks Versus Existing Footprint Remnant: A Prospective Clinical Study With 2-Year Follow-Up,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 43, no. 5 (2015): 1206–1214.
|
| [35] |
A. Andonovski, S. Topuzovska, M. Samardziski, Z. Bozinovski, B. Andonovska, and Z. Temelkovski, “The Influence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Remnant on Postoperative Clinical Results in Patients With Remnant Preserving Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction,” Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences 5, no. 5 (2017): 624–629.
|
| [36] |
J. H. Kim, E. Oh, Y. C. Yoon, D. K. Lee, S. S. Lee, and J. H. Wang, “Remnant-Tensioning Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Provides Comparable Stability to and Better Graft Vascularity Than Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Acute or Subacute Injury: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging,” Arthroscopy 37, no. 1 (2021): 209–221.
|
| [37] |
Z. Wang, H. B. Tao, Y. Wang, B. Liu, W. F. Han, and L. B. Xiang, “Clinical Application of Modified Crain Classification in the Design of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Remnant Preservation,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 23, no. 1 (2022): 1066.
|
| [38] |
B. I. Lee, S. W. Kwon, J. B. Kim, H. S. Choi, and K. D. Min, “Comparison of Clinical Results According to Amount of Preserved Remnant in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Quadrupled Hamstring Graft,” Arthroscopy 24, no. 5 (2008): 560–568.
|
| [39] |
M. J. Schutte, E. J. Dabezies, M. L. Zimny, and L. T. Happel, “Neural Anatomy of the Human Anterior Cruciate Ligament,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 69, no. 2 (1987): 243–247.
|
| [40] |
Y. W. An, Y. Kang, H. P. Jun, and E. Chang, “Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructed Patients Who Recovered Normal Postural Control Have Dissimilar Brain Activation Patterns Compared to Healthy Controls,” Biology 11, no. 1 (2022): 119.
|
| [41] |
H. Nakayama, S. Kambara, T. Iseki, R. Kanto, K. Kurosaka, and S. Yoshiya, “Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Remnant Preservation—Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcomes and Complications,” Knee 24, no. 5 (2017): 1039–1046.
|
| [42] |
T. Chen, P. Zhang, J. Chen, Y. Hua, and S. Chen, “Long-Term Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Either Synthetics With Remnant Preservation or Hamstring Autografts: A 10-Year Longitudinal Study,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 45, no. 12 (2017): 2739–2750.
|
| [43] |
L. Sun, B. Wu, M. Tian, B. Liu, and Y. Luo, “Comparison of Graft Healing in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without a Preserved Remnant in Rabbits,” Knee 20, no. 6 (2013): 537–544.
|
| [44] |
B. Wu, Z. Zhao, S. Li, and L. Sun, “Preservation of Remnant Attachment Improves Graft Healing in a Rabbit Model of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction,” Arthroscopy 29, no. 8 (2013): 1362–1371.
|
| [45] |
P. Delincé, P. Krallis, P. Y. Descamps, L. Fabeck, and D. Hardy, “Different Aspects of the Cyclops Lesion Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Multifactorial Etiopathogenesis,” Arthroscopy 14, no. 8 (1998): 869–876.
|
| [46] |
Y. K. Kim, J. H. Ahn, and J. D. Yoo, “A Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes and Second-Look Arthroscopic Findings Between Remnant-Preserving Tibialis Tendon Allograft and Hamstring Tendon Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Matched-Pair Design,” Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 9, no. 4 (2017): 424–431.
|
| [47] |
S. B. S. Kambhampati, S. Gollamudi, S. Shanmugasundaram, and V. V. S. Josyula, “Cyclops Lesions of the Knee: A Narrative Review of the Literature,” Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 8, no. 8 (2020): 2325967120945671.
|
| [48] |
Y. Tanabe, K. Yasuda, E. Kondo, and N. Kitamura, “Clinical Results of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Ligament Remnant Tissue Preservation: A Systematic Review,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology 4 (2016): 1–8.
|
| [49] |
S. Gohil, T. M. Falconer, W. Breidahl, and P. O. Annear, “Serial MRI and Clinical Assessment of Cyclops Lesions,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 22, no. 5 (2014): 1090–1096.
|
| [50] |
H. Xie, Z. Fu, M. Zhong, et al., “Effects of Remnant Preservation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Frontiers in Surgery 9 (2022): 952930.
|
| [51] |
D. Sabat, K. Kundu, S. Arora, and V. Kumar, “Tunnel Widening After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Randomized Computed Tomography—Based Study Comparing 2 Different Femoral Fixation Methods for Hamstring Graft,” Arthroscopy 27, no. 6 (2011): 776–783.
|
| [52] |
Y. Xu, Y. Ao, J. Wang, J. Yu, and G. Cui, “Relation of Tunnel Enlargement and Tunnel Placement After Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction,” Arthroscopy 27, no. 7 (2011): 923–932.
|
| [53] |
S. Koyama, K. Tensho, H. Shimodaira, et al., “A New Remnant Preservation Technique Reduces Bone Tunnel Enlargement After Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 30, no. 6 (2022): 2020–2028.
|
| [54] |
T. Masuda, E. Kondo, J. Onodera, et al., “Effects of Remnant Tissue Preservation on Tunnel Enlargement After Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Hamstring Tendon,” Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 6, no. 12 (2018): 2325967118811293.
|
| [55] |
F. Wan, T. Chen, Y. Ge, P. Zhang, and S. Chen, “Effect of Nearly Isometric ACL Reconstruction on Graft-Tunnel Motion: A Quantitative Clinical Study,” Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 7, no. 12 (2019): 2325967119890382.
|
| [56] |
P. Annear, E. Rohr, D. Hille, S. Gohil, and J. Ebert, “No Clinical Difference in 10-Year Outcomes Between Standard and Minimal Graft Debridement Techniques in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Autologous Hamstrings: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 27 (2018): 516–523.
|
| [57] |
S. P. Arnoczky, “Blood Supply to the Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Supporting Structures,” Orthopedic Clinics of North America 16, no. 1 (1985): 15–28.
|
| [58] |
S. N. Crawford, B. R. Waterman, and J. H. Lubowitz, “Long-Term Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction,” Arthroscopy 29, no. 9 (2013): 1566–1571.
|
| [59] |
L. Z. van Keulen, R. A. G. Hoogeslag, and R. W. Brouwer, “The Importance of Continuous Remnant Preservation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 30, no. 5 (2022): 1818–1827.
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PDF
