Background: Anteromedial cortex reduction and accurate placement of the cephalomedullary nail is the key point to confront implant failure of intertrochanteric fractures. Existing intramedullary nails cannot compensate for femoral neck-shaft offset (FNSO), potentially undermining surgical outcome. This study aimed to investigate the effect of FNSO on anteromedial cortex reduction and accurate placement of the cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric fractures.
Methods: This retrospective study included patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated with short intramedullary nails at our institution from January 2014 to December 2016, who were divided into acceptable and unacceptable groups according to the anteromedial cortex reduction quality. We measured the femoral neck-shaft offset (FNSO) and offset angle (FNSOA) on the uninjured femur CT. Postoperative CT of the fractured femur was used to measure the offset between the femoral neck axis and the cephalic nail axis (FNCO) and the corresponding angular offset (FNCOA). Cephalic nail insertion alignment was classified into three types (oblique-forward/rear, coincident, and oblique-backward/front) based on FNCO/FNCOA values. Group differences were analyzed, and logistic regression identified predictors of poor reduction.
Results: Fifty-seven patients (mean age 78.10 ± 13.47 years; 74% women) were included. The median FNSO and FNSOA of unaffected femurs were 4.31 (IQR 1.50) mm and 4.85° (IQR 2.01). 42.1% of cases had acceptable anteromedial reduction, while 57.9% were unacceptable. Cephalic nail insertion types were: 43.9% oblique-backward/front, 28.1% coincident, and 28.1% oblique-forward/rear. The unacceptable reduction group had significantly different FNCO (−2.32 vs. 2.14 mm) and FNCOA (−3.5° vs. 0°) compared to the acceptable group (both p < 0.001), despite similar fracture types and devices. Cephalic nail insertion type differed between groups (p < 0.001): oblique-backward/front and coincident insertions were more common in poor reductions. Logistic regression showed that oblique-backward/front insertion (OR = 51.33, 95% CI 7.60–346.85) and coincident insertion (OR = 9.00, 95% CI 1.52–53.40) were strong independent predictors of unacceptable reduction (both p < 0.001). Among insertion types, oblique-forward/rear had the lowest median FNCO (3.59 mm) and FNCOA (0.69°) and only 12.5% unacceptable reductions, versus coincident (0 mm, 0°, 56.3%) and oblique-backward/front (−3.06 mm, −5.84°, 88.0%) (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: It is difficult for existing intramedullary nails to achieve both the reduction of the anterior medial cortex and the accurate implantation of intramedullary nails due to the presence of FNSO. Optimizing intramedullary nailing design and surgical strategy according to FNSO may improve the treatment outcome of intertrochanteric fractures.
| [1] |
S. Zhou, J. Liu, P. Zhen, et al., “Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation Versus Cementless Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Unstable Femoral Intertrochanteric Fracture in the Elderly: A Retrospective Study,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 20 (2019): 500.
|
| [2] |
M. Chakhtoura, H. Dagher, S. Sharara, et al., “Systematic Review of Major Osteoporotic Fracture to Hip Fracture Incidence Rate Ratios Worldwide: Implications for Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX)-Derived Estimates,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 36 (2021): 1942–1956.
|
| [3] |
S. Nie, M. Li, H. Ji, et al., “Biomechanical Comparison of Medial Sustainable Nail and Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in the Treatment of an Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture,” Bone & Joint Research 9 (2020): 840–847.
|
| [4] |
W. Liu, D. Zhou, F. Liu, M. J. Weaver, and M. S. Vrahas, “Mechanical Complications of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures Treated With Trochanteric Femoral Nails,” Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 75 (2013): 304–310.
|
| [5] |
A. Sharma, A. Mahajan, and B. John, “A Comparison of the Clinico-Radiological Outcomes With Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) and Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) in Fixation of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 11 (2017): RC05–RC09.
|
| [6] |
G. J. Haidukewych, “Intertrochanteric Fractures: Ten Tips to Improve Results,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 91 (2009): 712–719.
|
| [7] |
W. M. Ricci, “Stability of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 37 (2023): S1–S4.
|
| [8] |
G. Xu, J. Li, C. Xu, et al., “Triangular Mechanical Structure of the Proximal Femur,” Orthopaedic Surgery 14 (2022): 3047–3060.
|
| [9] |
J. Y. Yoon, S. Park, T. Kim, and G. I. Im, “Cut-Out Risk Factor Analysis After Intramedullary Nailing for the Treatment of Extracapsular Fractures of the Proximal Femur: A Retrospective Study,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 23 (2022): 107.
|
| [10] |
J. Li, L. Zhang, H. Zhang, et al., “Effect of Reduction Quality on Post-Operative Outcomes in 31-A2 Intertrochanteric Fractures Following Intramedullary Fixation: A Retrospective Study Based on Computerised Tomography Findings,” International Orthopaedics 43 (2019): 1951–1959.
|
| [11] |
S. M. Chang, Y. Q. Zhang, S. C. Du, et al., “Anteromedial Cortical Support Reduction in Unstable Pertrochanteric Fractures: A Comparison of Intra-Operative Fluoroscopy and Post-Operative Three Dimensional Computerised Tomography Reconstruction,” International Orthopaedics 42 (2018): 183–189.
|
| [12] |
Y. Hu, H. Ying, D. Yu, et al., “Positive Correlation Between the Femur Neck Shaft and Anteversion Angles: A Retrospective Computed Tomography Analysis in Patients With Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip,” Journal of Arthroplasty 37 (2022): 538–543.
|
| [13] |
H. Song, S. M. Chang, S. J. Hu, and S. C. Du, “Low Filling Ratio of the Distal Nail Segment to the Medullary Canal Is a Risk Factor for Loss of Anteromedial Cortical Support: A Case Control Study,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 17 (2022): 27.
|
| [14] |
G. Caruso, M. Bonomo, G. Valpiani, et al., “A Six-Year Retrospective Analysis of Cut-Out Risk Predictors in Cephalomedullary Nailing for Pertrochanteric Fractures: Can the Tip-Apex Distance (TAD) Still Be Considered the Best Parameter,” Bone & Joint Research 6 (2017): 481–488.
|
| [15] |
A. J. Cornelissen, N. Ferreira, M. C. Burger, and J. D. Jordaan, “Proximal Femur Anatomy-Implant Geometry Discrepancies,” SICOT Journal 8 (2022): 5.
|
| [16] |
G. Xu, J. Li, H. Zhang, et al., “Gender and Age Differences in Anatomical Parameters of Proximal Femur in Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients With Femoral Intertrochanteric Fracture,” Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 22, no. 3 (2020): 224–231.
|
| [17] |
R. Y. Zhang, Y. P. Zhao, X. Y. Su, et al., “The Oval-Like Cross-Section of Femoral Neck Isthmus in Three-Dimensional Morphological Analysis,” Orthopaedic Surgery 13 (2021): 321–327.
|
| [18] |
G. Norman, S. Monteiro, and S. Salama, “Sample Size Calculations: Should the Emperor's Clothes Be Off the Peg or Made to Measure,” BMJ 345 (2012): e5278.
|
| [19] |
S. M. Chang, Y. Q. Zhang, Z. Ma, Q. Li, J. Dargel, and P. Eysel, “Fracture Reduction With Positive Medial Cortical Support: A Key Element in Stability Reconstruction for the Unstable Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 135 (2015): 811–818.
|
| [20] |
Q. Shao, Y. Zhang, G. X. Sun, et al., “Positive or Negative Anteromedial Cortical Support of Unstable Pertrochanteric Femoral Fractures: A Finite Element Analysis Study,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 138 (2021): 111473.
|
| [21] |
P. J. Jenkins, R. Ramaesh, P. Pankaj, et al., “A Micro-Architectural Evaluation of Osteoporotic Human Femoral Heads to Guide Implant Placement in Proximal Femoral Fractures,” Acta Orthopaedica 84 (2013): 453–459.
|
| [22] |
J. M. Goffin, P. Pankaj, and A. H. Simpson, “The Importance of Lag Screw Position for the Stabilization of Trochanteric Fractures With a Sliding Hip Screw: A Subject-Specific Finite Element Study,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research 31 (2013): 596–600.
|
| [23] |
X. Fan, Q. Zhu, P. Tu, L. Joskowicz, and X. Chen, “A Review of Advances in Image-Guided Orthopedic Surgery,” Physics in Medicine and Biology 68 (2023): 02TR01.
|
| [24] |
T. Matsubara, K. Soma, I. Yamada, et al., “Offset Nail Fixation for Intertrochanteric Fractures Improves Reduction and Lag Screw Position,” PLoS One 17 (2022): e0276903.
|
| [25] |
J. Li, L. Han, H. Zhang, et al., “Medial Sustainable Nail Versus Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in Treating AO/OTA 31-A2.3 Fractures: Finite Element Analysis and Biomechanical Evaluation,” Injury 50 (2019): 648–656.
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PDF
