Establishment of Subtrochanteric Fracture in Pre-Clinical Animal Model

Abstract

Objective: About 7%–34% of the femur fracture contributes to subtrochanteric fracture, and only very little research is available about these fractures when compared to common hip fractures. Hence, the aim of this study was to develop a clinically relevant and reproducible open fracture model in rabbits at the subtrochanteric region to understand the fracture healing mechanism at this site and to explore treatment effects of biophysical intervention in future studies.

Methods: An open osteotomy was created in 32 adult New Zealand white rabbits at the subtrochanteric region, followed by customized titanium internal fixations. The internal fixator consists of a 3D printed titanium compression plate with cortical screws for locking. The fracture healing was monitored for 6 weeks, and the corresponding radiography, MicroCT, and histomorphometry analysis were performed at regular intervals.

Results: Four rabbits were excluded due to complications (4/32), including bone dislocation one week post-surgery (3/32). Fracture healing progression was observed in radiographic images. MicroCT analysis showed increased callus volume after 42 days. Histomorphometry revealed remodeled bone area with a higher number of osteocyte cells.

Conclusion: The rabbit fracture model of an open femoral osteotomy at the subtrochanteric region has been successfully established, with the facilitation of an internal fixator consisting of a 3D printed titanium compression plate with cortical screws for locking. Applications of this model are being investigated, including different biophysical stimulation methods for accelerating fracture healing.

Keywords

bone repair / fracture healing / osteotomy / rabbit model / subtrochanteric fracture

References

[1] T. A. Einhorn and L. C. Gerstenfeld, “Fracture Healing: Mechanisms and Interventions,” Nature Reviews Rheumatology 11, no. 1 (2015): 45-54.

[2] P. Palanisamy, M. Alam, S. Li, S. K. Chow, and Y. P. Zheng, “Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Stimulation for Bone Fractures Healing: A Review,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 41, no. 3 (2022): 547-563.

[3] S. Toosi, N. Behravan, and J. Behravan, “Nonunion Fractures, Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Bone Tissue Engineering,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 106, no. 9 (2018): 2552-2562.

[4] M. Parker and A. Johansen, “Hip Fracture,” BMJ 333, no. 7557 (2006): 27-30.

[5] K. E. LeBlanc, H. L. Muncie, and L. L. LeBlanc, “Hip Fracture: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Secondary Prevention,” American Family Physician 89, no. 12 (2014): 945-951.

[6] M. Soveid, A. R. Serati, and M. Masoompoor, “Incidence of Hip Fracture in Shiraz, Iran,” Osteoporosis International 16 (2005): 1412-1416.

[7] R. J. Weiss, S. M. Montgomery, Z. Al Dabbagh, and K.-Å. Jansson, “National Data of 6409 Swedish Inpatients With Femoral Shaft Fractures: Stable Incidence Between 1998 and 2004,” Injury 40, no. 3 (2009): 304-308.

[8] S. B. Joglekar, E. M. Lindvall, and A. Martirosian, “Contemporary Management of Subtrochanteric Fractures,” Orthopedic Clinics 46, no. 1 (2015): 21-35.

[9] I. Garrison, G. Domingue, and M. W. Honeycutt, “Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures: Current Review of Management,” EFORT Open Rev 6, no. 2 (2021): 145-151.

[10] K. Matre, L. I. Havelin, J.-E. Gjertsen, T. Vinje, B. Espehaug, and J. M. Fevang, “Sliding Hip Screw Versus IM Nail in Reverse Oblique Trochanteric and Subtrochanteric Fractures. A Study of 2716 Patients in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register,” Injury 44, no. 6 (2013): 735-742.

[11] J. O. Anglen, J. N. Weinstein, and Committee ABoOSR, “Nail or Plate Fixation of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: Changing Pattern of Practice: A Review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 90, no. 4 (2008): 700-707.

[12] E. H. Schemitsch, L. L. Nowak, A. P. Schulz, et al., “Intramedullary Nailing vs Sliding Hip Screw in Trochanteric Fracture Management: The INSITE Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA Network Open 6, no. 6 (2023): e2317164-e.

[13] E. Shane, D. Burr, P. R. Ebeling, et al., “Atypical Subtrochanteric and Diaphyseal Femoral Fractures: Report of a Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 25, no. 11 (2010): 2267-2294.

[14] H. Gao, J. Huang, Q. Wei, and C. He, “Advances in Animal Models for Studying Bone Fracture Healing,” Bioengineering 10, no. 2 (2023): 201.

[15] A. Bigham-Sadegh and A. Oryan, “Selection of Animal Models for Pre-Clinical Strategies in Evaluating the Fracture Healing, Bone Graft Substitutes and Bone Tissue Regeneration and Engineering,” Connective Tissue Research 56, no. 3 (2015): 175-194.

[16] I. Ohnishi, K. Oikawa, K. Tsuji, T. Ichikawa, and T. Kurokawa, “A Femoral Neck Fracture Model in Rabbits,” Journal of Biomechanics 36, no. 3 (2003): 431-442.

[17] T. Histing, P. Garcia, R. Matthys, et al., “An Internal Locking Plate to Study Intramembranous Bone Healing in a Mouse Femur Fracture Model,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research 28, no. 3 (2010): 397-402.

[18] R. M. Y. Wong, P. Y. Wong, C. Liu, et al., “3D Printing in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Scoping Review of Randomized Controlled Trials,” Bone & Joint Research 10, no. 12 (2021): 807-819.

[19] X.-H. Xie, X.-L. Wang, G. Zhang, et al., “Impaired Bone Healing in Rabbits With Steroid-Induced Osteonecrosis,” Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume 93, no. 4 (2011): 558-565.

[20] M. H. V. Choy, R. M. Y. Wong, M. C. Li, et al., “Can We Enhance Osteoporotic Metaphyseal Fracture Healing Through Enhancing Ultrastructural and Functional Changes of Osteocytes in Cortical Bone With Low-Magnitude High-Frequency Vibration?,” FASEB Journal 34, no. 3 (2020): 4234-4252.

[21] C. Sfeir, L. Ho, B. A. Doll, K. Azari, and J. O. Hollinger, “Fracture Repair,” In Bone Regeneration and Repair: Biology and Clinical Applications (Springer, 2005), 21-44.

[22] B. Beamer, C. Hettrich, and J. Lane, “Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor: An Essential Component of Angiogenesis and Fracture Healing,” HSS Journal 6, no. 1 (2010): 85-94.

[23] H. ElHawary, A. Baradaran, J. Abi-Rafeh, J. Vorstenbosch, L. Xu, and J. I. Efanov, “Bone Healing and Inflammation: Principles of Fracture and Repair,” in Semin Plast Surg, vol. 35 (Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 2021), 198-203.

[24] M. Klein, A. Stieger, D. Stenger, et al., “Comparison of Healing Process in Open Osteotomy Model and Open Fracture Model: Delayed Healing of Osteotomies After Intramedullary Screw Fixation,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research 33, no. 7 (2015): 971-978.

[25] C.-C. Hung, Y.-T. Li, Y.-C. Chou, et al., “Conventional Plate Fixation Method Versus Pre-Operative Virtual Simulation and Three-Dimensional Printing-Assisted Contoured Plate Fixation Method in the Treatment of Anterior Pelvic Ring Fracture,” International Orthopaedics 43 (2019): 425-431.

[26] J. Hayes and R. Richards, “The Use of Titanium and Stainless Steel in Fracture Fixation,” Expert Review of Medical Devices 7, no. 6 (2010): 843-853.

[27] W. Abd-Elaziem, M. A. Darwish, A. Hamada, and W. M. Daoush, “Titanium-Based Alloys and Composites for Orthopedic Implants Applications: A Comprehensive Review,” Materials & Design 241 (2024): 112850.

[28] R. Wong, U. Thormann, M. Choy, et al., “A Metaphyseal Fracture Rat Model for Mechanistic Studies of Osteoporotic Bone Healing,” European Cells & Materials 37 (2019): 420-430.

[29] B. B. Frade, L. D. da Cunha Muller, and D. C. Bonfim, “Establishing a Diaphyseal Femur Fracture Model in Mice,” Journal of Visualized Experiments 190 (2022): e64766.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.