Comparison of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Preoperative Planning Measurements for High Tibial Osteotomy

Haohao Bai , Yadi Sun , Jianxiong Ma , Ying Wang , Yan Wang , Bin Lu , Lei Sun , Hongzhen Jin , Xingwen Zhao , Xinlong Ma

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (11) : 3169 -3177.

PDF
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (11) :3169 -3177. DOI: 10.1111/os.70118
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Comparison of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Preoperative Planning Measurements for High Tibial Osteotomy
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a prevalent condition characterized by cartilage degeneration, tissue destruction, and bone hyperplasia, with pain being the primary symptom. High tibial osteotomy (HTO) has emerged as an effective treatment for symptomatic unicompartmental KOA, focusing on realigning force vectors to redistribute mechanical stress and alleviate pain. This study aims to address the question of whether two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning methods yield different correction angles and distraction distances in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). By comparing these methodologies, we seek to evaluate their impact on surgical outcomes and patient prognosis.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted involving patients diagnosed with unicompartmental medial knee osteoarthritis (KOA) who exhibited deviations in the mechanical axis of the lower limbs. These patients underwent OWHTO between January 2021 and August 2022. Both 3D and 2D preoperative planning procedures for OWHTO were employed, targeting an ideal alignment with the weight-bearing line (%WBL) set at 62.5%. The study quantitatively assessed the differences in correction angles and distraction distances associated with the two surgical planning methods using paired t-tests and non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

Results: The study comprised a total of 102 patients. It was observed that the mean correction angle in the 2D approach was significantly greater than that recorded in the 3D approach (p < 0.001), with an average difference of 1.49° ± 1.70°. The medial opening gap differences for OWHTO between the two approaches measured 2.1 ± 2.06 mm.

Conclusions: To summarize, the 2D preoperative planning method for OWHTO necessitates a larger correction angle and a wider medial opening gap relative to the 3D planning approach when aiming for the same WBL. Therefore, it is crucial for surgeons to take into account the variances between 2D and 3D planning and to evaluate potential correction errors during the surgical procedure while strategizing for OWHTO.

Keywords

high tibial osteotomy / knee osteoarthritis / preoperative planning

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Haohao Bai, Yadi Sun, Jianxiong Ma, Ying Wang, Yan Wang, Bin Lu, Lei Sun, Hongzhen Jin, Xingwen Zhao, Xinlong Ma. Comparison of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Preoperative Planning Measurements for High Tibial Osteotomy. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2025, 17(11): 3169-3177 DOI:10.1111/os.70118

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

A. Amendola and D. E. Bonasia, “Results of High Tibial Osteotomy: Review of the Literature,” International Orthopaedics 34, no. 2 (2010): 155–160.

[2]

J. D. Agneskirchner, C. Hurschler, C. D. Wrann, and P. Lobenhoffer, “The Effects of Valgus Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy on Articular Cartilage Pressure of the Knee: A Biomechanical Study,” Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery: Official Publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association 23, no. 8 (2007): 852–861.

[3]

G. A. Mchugh, M. Campbell, A. J. Silman, P. R. Kay, and K. A. Luker, “Patients Waiting for a Hip or Knee Joint Replacement: Is There Any Prioritization for Surgery?,” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (2008): 361–367.

[4]

B. Clemens, K. Armin, G. Felix, et al., “Knee Kinematics Are Variously Influenced by Different Correction Angles in High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO),” International Orthopaedics 47, no. 5 (2023): 1393.

[5]

D. T. Felson, “Osteoarthritis as a Disease of Mechanics,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 21, no. 1 (2013): 10–15.

[6]

O. L. Li, S. Pritchett, J. R. Giffin, and A. R. I. Spouge, “High Tibial Osteotomy: An Update for Radiologists,” AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 218, no. 4 (2022): 701–712.

[7]

P. Ruangsomboon, K. Chareancholvanich, T. Harnroongroj, and C. Pornrattanamaneewong, “Survivorship of Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in the Elderly: Two to Ten Years of Follow Up,” International Orthopaedics 41, no. 10 (2017): 2045–2052.

[8]

H. G. P. V. da Silva, A. R. Zorzi, H. P. V. Da Silva, and J. B. de Miranda, “Gait Analysis in Short-Term Follow-Up of Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy,” European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 28 (2017): 939–946.

[9]

Y. H. Kim, J. W. Park, J. S. Kim, and S. D. Park, “The Relationship Between the Survival of Total Knee Arthritis and Postoperative Coronary, Sagittal and Rotational Alignment of Knee Prosthesis,” International Orthopaedics 38 (2014): 379–385.

[10]

R. S. Laskin and B. Beksaç, “Computer-Assisted Navigation in TKA: Where We Are and Where We Are Going,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 452 (2006): 127–131.

[11]

D. M. Fang, M. A. Ritter, and K. E. Davis, “Coronal Alignment in Total Knee Arthritis: Just How Important Is It?,” Journal of Arthritis 24, no. 6 (2009): 39–43.

[12]

R. G. Marx, P. Grimm, K. A. Lillemoe, et al., “Reliability of Lower Extremity Alignment Measurement Using Radiographs and PACS,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 19 (2011): 1693–1698.

[13]

N. Kour, S. Gupta, and S. Arora, “A Survey of Knee Osteoarthritis Assessment Based on Gait,” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 28 (2021): 345–385.

[14]

P. Lobenhoffer, “Importance of Osteotomy Around to the Knee for Medial Gonarthritis: Indications, Technique and Results,” Der Orthopäde 43 (2014): 425–431.

[15]

S. Chaoouche, C. Jacquet, M. Fabre-Aubrespy, et al., “Patient-Specific Cutting Guides for Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: Safety and Accuracy Analysis of a Hundred Patients Continuous Cohort,” International Orthopaedics 43 (2019): 2757–2765.

[16]

D. E. Bonasia, F. Dettoni, G. Sito, et al., “Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Compartment Overload/Arthritis in the Varus Knee: Prognostic Factors,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 42, no. 3 (2014): 690–698.

[17]

J. H. Yim, J. K. Seon, and E. K. Song, “Posterior Tibial Slope in Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: 2-D Versus 3-D Navigation,” Orthopedics 35, no. 10 (2012): 60–63.

[18]

J. O. Smith, A. J. Wilson, and N. P. Thomas, “Osteotomy Around the Knee: Evolution, Principles and Results,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 21 (2013): 3–22.

[19]

S. Hodel, J. Hasler, T. A. Roth, et al., “Validation of a Three-Dimensional Weight-Bearing Measurement Protocol for Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy,” Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 5 (2024): 1280.

[20]

C. Gwinner, M. Fuchs, U. Sentuerk, et al., “Assessment of the Tibial Slope Is Highly Dependent on the Type and Accuracy of the Preceding Acquisition,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 139 (2019): 1691–1697.

[21]

M. G. Kyung, T. S. Bae, H. H. Baek, M. J. Chang, T. W. Kim, and S.-B. Kang, “Optimal Hinge Level in Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: Biomechanical Analysis Using Finite Element Method,” Clinical Biomechanics 107 (2023): 106027.

[22]

B. Bockmann, W. Nebelung, C. K. Boese, T. L. Schulte, and A. J. Venjakob, “Planning Results for High Tibial Osteotomies in Degenerative Varus Osteoarthritis Using Standing and Supine Whole Leg Radiographs,” Orthopaedic Surgery 13, no. 1 (2021): 77–82.

[23]

T. Matsushita, S. Watanabe, D. Araki, et al., “Differences in Preoperative Planning for High-Tibial Osteotomy Between the Standing and Supine Positions,” Knee Surgery and Related Research 33, no. 1 (2021): 8.

[24]

A. Williams, K. Walker, D. Hughes, A. M. C. Goodson, and S. F. Mustafa, “Accuracy and Cost Effectiveness of a Waferless Osteotomy Approach, Using Patient Specific Guides and Plates in Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review,” British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 60, no. 5 (2022): 537–546.

[25]

K. Tetsworth, S. Block, and V. Glatt, “Putting 3D Modelling and 3D Printing Into Practice: Virtual Surgery and Preoperative Planning to Reconstruct Complex Post-Traumatic Skeletal Deformities and Defects,” SICOT-J 3 (2017): 16.

[26]

K. Zheng, “The Effect of High Tibial Osteotomy Correction Angle on Cartilage and Meniscus Loading Using Finite Element Analysis” (Master's Thesis, University of Sydney, 2014).

[27]

S. Vasta, B. Zampogna, B. Uribe-Echevarria Marbach, Y. Gao, R. Papalia, and A. Amendola, “Correlation of Pre-Operative Planning to Surgical Correction of Opening Wedge HTO: A Radiographic Study Utilizing a Manual Measurement Method,” Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents 33, no. 2 Suppl. 1 (2019): 187–193.

[28]

Y. S. Lee, B. K. Lee, S. H. Lee, H. G. Park, D.-. S. Jun, and D. H. Moon, “Effect of Foot Rotation on the Mechanical Axis and Correlation Between Knee and Whole Leg Radiographs,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 21 (2013): 2542–2547.

[29]

T. W. Dugdale, F. R. Noyes, and D. Styer, “Preoperative Planning for High Tibial Osteotomy: The Effect of Lateral Tibiofemoral Separation and Tibiofemoral Length,” Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research 274 (1992): 248–264.

[30]

K. H. Shin, J. K. Jung, J. J. Nam, K. M. Jang, and S. B. Han, “Preoperative Supine Radiographs Are More Accurate Than Standing Radiographs for Preoperative Planning in Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy,” Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopy & Related Surgery 36, no. 6 (2020): 1655–1664.

[31]

G. G. Jones, M. Jaere, S. Clarke, and J. Cobb, “3D Printing and High Tibial Osteotomy,” EFORT Open Reviews 3, no. 5 (2018): 254–259.

[32]

A. Ariumi, T. Sato, K. Kobayashi, et al., “Three-Dimensional Lower Extremity Alignment in the Weight-Bearing Standing Position in Healthy Elderly Subjects,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science 15 (2010): 64–70.

[33]

O. J. F. Keenan, N. D. Clement, R. Nutton, and J. F. Keating, “Older Age and Female Gender Are Independent Predictors of Early Conversion to Total Knee Arthritis After High Tibial Osteotomy,” Knee 26, no. 1 (2019): 207–212.

[34]

S. Schröter, C. Ihle, D. W. Elson, S. Döbele, U. Stöckle, and A. Ateschrang, “Surgical Accuracy in High Tibial Osteotomy: Coronal Equivalence of Computer Navigation and Gap Measurement,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 24 (2016): 3410–3417.

[35]

Y. Fujisawa, K. Masuhara, and S. Shiomi, “The Effect of High Tibial Osteotomy on Osteoarthritis of the Knee. An Arthroscopic Study of 54 Knee Joints,” Orthopedic Clinics of North America 10, no. 3 (1979): 585–608.

[36]

J. L. B. Martay, A. J. R. Palmer, N. K. Bangerter, et al., “A Preliminary Modeling Investigation Into the Safe Correction Zone for High Tibial Osteotomy,” Knee 25, no. 2 (2018): 286–295.

[37]

J. M. Wright, H. C. Crockett, D. P. Slawski, M. W. Madsen, and R. E. Windsor, “High Tibial Osteotomy,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 13, no. 4 (2005): 279–289.

[38]

P. Schuster, M. Geßlein, M. Schlumberger, et al., “Ten-Year Results of Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy and Chondral Resurfacing in Severe Medial Osteoarthritis and Varus Malalignment,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 46, no. 6 (2018): 1362–1370.

[39]

J. M. Brinkman, P. Lobenhoffer, J. D. Agneskirchner, A. E. Staubli, A. B. Wymenga, and R. J. van Heerwaarden, “Osteotomies Around the Knee: Patient Selection, Stability of FIXATION and BONE Healing in High Tibial OSTEOT Omies,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British Volume) 90, no. 12 (2008): 1548–1557.

[40]

B. J. A. Lankester, H. L. Cottam, V. Pinskerova, J. D. J. Eldridge, and M. A. R. Freeman, “Variation in the Anatomy of the Tibial Plateau: A Possible Factor in the Development of Anteromedial Osteoarthritis of the Knee,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British Volume) 90, no. 3 (2008): 330–333.

[41]

M. He, X. Zhong, Z. Li, K. Shen, and W. Zeng, “Progress in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis With High Tibial Osteotomy: A Systematic Review,” Systematic Reviews 10, no. 1 (2021): 1–10.

[42]

M. Bonnin, La Subluxation Tibiale Antérieure En Appui Monopodal Dans Les Ruptures Du Ligament Croisé Antérieur: Étude Clinique Et Biomécanique (Lyon 1, 1990).

[43]

S. Kuriyama, N. Morimoto, T. Shimoto, et al., “Clinical Efficacy of Preoperative 3D Planning for Reducing Surgical Errors During Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research 37, no. 4 (2019): 898–907.

[44]

O. S. Lee, E. S. Lee, and Y. S. Lee, “Disparity Between Preoperative Target Correction Amount and Postoperative Correction Amount in Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy,” Knee Surgery & Related Research 31, no. 2 (2019): 126–131.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF

6

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/