Quantifying the Trajectory of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy in 3D Lumbar Models Based on Automated MR Image Segmentation—A Cross-Sectional Study

Zhihai Su , Yunfei Wang , Chengjie Huang , Qingqing He , Junjie Lu , Zheng Liu , Yiou Zhang , Qiaochu Zhao , YuChen Zhang , Jianan Cai , Shumao Pang , Zhen Yuan , Ziyang Chen , Tao Chen , Hai Lu

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (9) : 2689 -2698.

PDF
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (9) : 2689 -2698. DOI: 10.1111/os.70112
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Quantifying the Trajectory of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy in 3D Lumbar Models Based on Automated MR Image Segmentation—A Cross-Sectional Study

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective: Creating a 3D lumbar model and planning a personalized puncture trajectory has an advantage in establishing the working channel for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). However, existing 3D lumbar models, which seldom include lumbar nerves and dural sac reconstructions, primarily depend on CT images for preoperative trajectory planning. Therefore, our study aims to further investigate the relationship between different virtual working channels and the 3D lumbar model, which includes automated MR image segmentation of lumbar bone, nerves, and dural sac at the L4/L5 level.

Methods: Preoperative lumbar MR images of 50 patients with L4/L5 lumbar disc herniation were collected from a teaching hospital between March 2020 and July 2020. Automated MR image segmentation was initially used to create a 3D model of the lumbar spine, including the L4 vertebrae, L5 vertebrae, intervertebral disc, L4 nerves, dural sac, and skin. Thirty were then randomly chosen from the segmentation results to clarify the relationship between various virtual working channels and the lumbar 3D model. A bivariate Spearman's rank correlation analysis was used in this study.

Results: Preoperative MR images of 50 patients (34 males, mean age 45.6 ± 6 years) were used to train and validate the automated segmentation model, which had mean Dice scores of 0.906, 0.891, 0.896, 0.695, 0.892, and 0.892 for the L4 vertebrae, L5 vertebrae, intervertebral disc, L4 nerves, dural sac, and skin, respectively. With an increase in the coronal plane angle (CPA), there was a reduction in the intersection volume involving the L4 nerves and atypical structures. Conversely, the intersection volume encompassing the dural sac, L4 inferior articular process, and L5 superior articular process increased; the total intersection volume showed a fluctuating pattern: it initially decreased, followed by an increase, and then decreased once more. As the cross-section angle (CSA) increased, there was a rise in the intersection volume of both the L4 nerves and the dural sac; the intersection volume involving the L4 inferior articular process grew while that of the L5 superior articular process diminished; the overall intersection volume and the intersection volume of atypical structures initially decreased, followed by an increase.

Conclusion: In terms of regularity, the optimal angles for L4/L5 PELD are a CSA of 15° and a CPA of 15°–20°, minimizing harm to the vertebral bones, facet joint, spinal nerves, and dural sac. Additionally, our 3D preoperative planning method could enhance puncture trajectories for individual patients, potentially advancing surgical navigation, robots, and artificial intelligence in PELD procedures.

Keywords

3D lumbar model / artificial intelligence / automated magnetic resonancesegmentation / percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy / trajectory planning

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhihai Su, Yunfei Wang, Chengjie Huang, Qingqing He, Junjie Lu, Zheng Liu, Yiou Zhang, Qiaochu Zhao, YuChen Zhang, Jianan Cai, Shumao Pang, Zhen Yuan, Ziyang Chen, Tao Chen, Hai Lu. Quantifying the Trajectory of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy in 3D Lumbar Models Based on Automated MR Image Segmentation—A Cross-Sectional Study. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2025, 17(9): 2689-2698 DOI:10.1111/os.70112

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

N. N. Knezevic, K. D. Candido, J. W. S. Vlaeyen, J. Van Zundert, and S. P. Cohen, “Low Back Pain,” Lancet 398, no. 10294 (2021): 78-92.

[2]

T. Benzakour, V. Igoumenou, A. F. Mavrogenis, and A. Benzakour, “Current Concepts for Lumbar Disc Herniation,” International Orthopaedics 43, no. 4 (2019): 841-851.

[3]

P. Näther, J. F. Kersten, I. Kaden, K. Irga, and A. Nienhaus, “Distribution Patterns of Degeneration of the Lumbar Spine in a Cohort of 200 Patients With an Indication for Lumbar MRI,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 6 (2022): 3721.

[4]

T. Li, J. Zhang, Z. Ding, Q. Jiang, and Y. Ding, “Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Open Fenestration Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study With More Than 5 Years of Follow-Up,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 19, no. 1 (2024): 753.

[5]

M. Pan, Q. Li, S. Li, et al., “Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Indications and Complications,” Pain Physician 23, no. 1 (2020): 49-56.

[6]

Y. Ahn, “Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Technical Tips to Prevent Complications,” Expert Review of Medical Devices 9, no. 4 (2012): 361-366.

[7]

C. I. Ju and S. M. Lee, “Complications and Management of Endoscopic Spinal Surgery,” Neurospine 20, no. 1 (2023): 56-77.

[8]

X. Huang, B. Zhu, and X. Liu, “Quantitative 3D Trajectory Measurement for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy,” Pain Physician 21, no. 4 (2018): E355-e365.

[9]

Z. Hu, X. Li, J. Cui, et al., “Significance of Preoperative Planning Software for Puncture and Channel Establishment in Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar DISCECTOMY: A Study of 40 Cases,” International Journal of Surgery 41 (2017): 97-103.

[10]

Y. Jiang, R. Wang, and C. Chen, “Preoperative Simulation of the Trajectory for L5/S1 Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy: A Novel Approach for Decision-Making,” World Neurosurgery 145 (2021): 77-82.

[11]

Z. Zhu, E. Liu, Z. Su, et al., “Three-Dimensional Lumbosacral Reconstruction by an Artificial Intelligence-Based Automated MR Image Segmentation for Selecting the Approach of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy,” Pain Physician 27, no. 2 (2024): E245-E254.

[12]

T. Chen, Z.-H. Su, Z. Liu, et al., “Automated Magnetic Resonance Image Segmentation of Spinal Structures at the L4-5 Level With Deep Learning: 3D Reconstruction of Lumbar Intervertebral Foramen,” Orthopaedic Surgery 14, no. 9 (2022): 2256-2264.

[13]

Z. Su, Z. Liu, M. Wang, et al., “Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Kambin's Triangle Based on Automated Magnetic Resonance Image Segmentation,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research 40, no. 12 (2022): 2914-2923.

[14]

G. Mathew, R. Agha, J. Albrecht, et al., “STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort, Cross-Sectional and Case-Control Studies in Surgery,” International Journal of Surgery 96 (2021): 106165.

[15]

J. Sung, W. H. Jee, J. Y. Jung, et al., “Diagnosis of Nerve Root Compromise of the Lumbar Spine: Evaluation of the Performance of Three-Dimensional Isotropic T2-Weighted Turbo Spin-Echo SPACE Sequence at 3T,” Korean Journal of Radiology 18, no. 1 (2017): 249-259.

[16]

A. Sayah, A. K. Jay, J. S. Toaff, E. V. Makariou, and F. Berkowitz, “Effectiveness of a Rapid Lumbar Spine MRI Protocol Using 3D T2-Weighted SPACE Imaging Versus a Standard Protocol for Evaluation of Degenerative Changes of the Lumbar Spine,” American Journal of Roentgenology 207, no. 3 (2016): 614-620.

[17]

J. Kamogawa, O. Kato, T. Morizane, and T. Hato, “Virtual Pathology of Cervical Radiculopathy Based on 3D MR/CT Fusion Images: Impingement, Flattening or Twisted Condition of the Compressed Nerve Root in Three Cases,” Springerplus 4, no. 1 (2015): 123.

[18]

K. Yamada, K. Nagahama, Y. Abe, Y. Hyugaji, M. Takahata, and N. Iwasaki, “Morphological Analysis of Kambin's Triangle Using 3D CT/MRI Fusion Imaging of Lumbar Nerve Root Created Automatically With Artificial Intelligence,” European Spine Journal 30, no. 8 (2021): 2191-2199.

[19]

G. Fan, H. Liu, Z. Wu, et al., “Deep Learning-Based Automatic Segmentation of Lumbosacral Nerves on CT for Spinal Intervention: A Translational Study,” American Journal of Neuroradiology 40, no. 6 (2019): 1074-1081.

[20]

X. Chen, J. Cheng, X. Gu, Y. Sun, and C. Politis, “Development of Preoperative Planning Software for Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgery and the Guidance for Clinical Applications,” International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 11, no. 4 (2016): 613-620.

[21]

S. S. Eun, S. H. Lee, W. C. Liu, and H. Y. Erken, “A Novel Preoperative Trajectory Evaluation Method for L5-S1 Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy,” Spine Journal 18, no. 7 (2018): 1286-1291.

[22]

Y. Hurday, B. Xu, L. Guo, et al., “Radiographic Measurement for Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Approach (PELD),” European Spine Journal 26, no. 3 (2017): 635-645.

[23]

R. A. Deyo and S. K. Mirza, “Herniated Lumbar Intervertebral Disk,” New England Journal of Medicine 374, no. 18 (2016): 1763-1772.

[24]

K. C. Choi, J. H. Lee, J. S. Kim, et al., “Unsuccessful Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Single-Center Experience of 10,228 Cases,” Neurosurgery 76, no. 4 (2015): 372-380, discussion 380-371; quiz 381.

[25]

L. Zhao, S. Pang, Y. Chen, et al., “SpineRegNet: Spine Registration Network for Volumetric MR and CT Image by the Joint Estimation of an Affine-Elastic Deformation Field,” Medical Image Analysis 86 (2023): 102786.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

22

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/