Risk Factors of Aseptic Loosening After Total Hip Arthroplasty With Collum Femoris Preserving Stem: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study

Yongbo Ma , Yansong Liu , Zeming Liu , Jiangqi Chang , Mengnan Li , Tao Wu

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (8) : 2321 -2330.

PDF
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (8) : 2321 -2330. DOI: 10.1111/os.70099
CLINICAL ARTICLE

Risk Factors of Aseptic Loosening After Total Hip Arthroplasty With Collum Femoris Preserving Stem: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective: The Collum Femoris Preserving (CFP) stem offers biomechanical advantages in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, aseptic loosening remains the most common cause of failure and other severe complications, with specific risk factors associated with the CFP stem remaining inadequately defined. This study aims to investigate the possible factors associated with aseptic loosening.

Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent primary THA with the CFP stem from January 2004 to December 2009 in our institution. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether there was aseptic loosening. Demographic and imaging parameters were collected from medical records and the hospital's Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). Comparative analyses were conducted, and variables with significant differences were subjected to Cox regression to identify independent risk factors of aseptic loosening.

Results: A total of 469 hips were included, with 52 hips (11.1%) of aseptic loosening identified. Seven independent risk (protective) factors were found, including ceramic-on-polyethylene (COP) bearing surfaces (Hazard Ratio = 2.084, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.043–4.166, p = 0.038), history of steroid therapy (HR = 2.393, 95% CI: 1.056–5.425, p = 0.037), neck resorption ratio (NRR) (HR = 1.019, 95% CI: 1.005–1.033, p = 0.008), bone mineral density (BMD) (HR = 0.933, 95% CI: 0.891–0.976, p = 0.003), canal fill ratio (CFR) (HR = 0.951, 95% CI: 0.923–0.980, p = 0.001), cortical index (HR = 0.933, 95% CI: 0.891–0.976, p = 0.003), and varus/valgus angle between 3° and 6° (HR = 4.427, 95% CI: 2.303–8.509, p < 0.001), varus/valgus angles > 6° (HR = 8.854, 95% CI: 3.704–21.165, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study identifies key risk factors contributing to aseptic loosening, including COP bearing surfaces, steroid therapy history, excessive femoral neck resorption, and significant varus/valgus malalignment. Conversely, higher BMD, improved cortical index, and favorable CFR were protective against loosening. These findings underscore the need for careful preoperative assessment and precise intraoperative positioning to optimize long-term implant stability.

Keywords

aseptic loosening / Collum Femoris Preserving stem / risk factors / total hip arthroplasty

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yongbo Ma, Yansong Liu, Zeming Liu, Jiangqi Chang, Mengnan Li, Tao Wu. Risk Factors of Aseptic Loosening After Total Hip Arthroplasty With Collum Femoris Preserving Stem: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2025, 17(8): 2321-2330 DOI:10.1111/os.70099

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

C. D. Watts, M. P. Abdel, A. D. Hanssen, and M. W. Pagnano, “Anatomic Hip Center Decreases Aseptic Loosening Rates After Total Hip Arthroplasty With Cement in Patients With Crowe Type-II Dysplasia: A Concise Follow-Up Report at a Mean of Thirty-Six Years,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) 98, no. 11 (2016): 910-915, https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.00902.

[2]

J. D. Christiansen, A. Ejaz, P. T. Nielsen, and M. Laursen, “An Ultra-Short Femoral Neck-Preserving Hip Prosthesis: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study With Radiostereometric Analysis and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry in a Stepwise Introduction,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) 102, no. 2 (2020): 128-136, https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00104.

[3]

K. E. Mjaaland, S. Svenningsen, A. M. Fenstad, L. I. Havelin, O. Furnes, and L. Nordsletten, “Implant Survival After Minimally Invasive Anterior or Anterolateral vs. Conventional Posterior or Direct Lateral Approach: An Analysis of 21,860 Total Hip Arthroplasties From the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (2008 to 2013),” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) 99, no. 10 (2017): 840-847, https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00494.

[4]

C. Schnurr, B. Schellen, J. Dargel, J. Beckmann, P. Eysel, and R. Steffen, “Low Short-Stem Revision Rates: 1- to 11-Year Results From 1888 Total Hip Arthroplasties,” Journal of Arthroplasty 32, no. 2 (2016): 487-493, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.009.

[5]

T. Heinz, H. Vasilev, P. M. Anderson, et al., “The Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) as a Standard Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) in Coxa Profunda and Protrusio Acetabuli? A Radiographic Analysis of 188 Cases,” Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 12 (2023): 3941, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12123941.

[6]

F. Pipino, “The Bone-Prosthesis Interaction,” Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 1, no. 1 (2000): 3-9, https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00012193.

[7]

C. Anderl, M. Steinmair, and J. Hochreiter, “Bone Preservation in Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Journal of Arthroplasty 37, no. 6 (2022): 1118-1123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.077.

[8]

F. Pipino and L. Molfetta, “Femoral Neck Preservation in Total Hip Replacement,” Italian Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 19, no. 1 (1993): 5-12.

[9]

H. Wacha, G. Domsel, and E. Herrmann, “Long-Term Follow-Up of 1217 Consecutive Short-Stem Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): A Retrospective Single-Center Experience,” European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 44, no. 3 (2018): 457-469, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-017-0895-2.

[10]

L. W. A. H. Van Beers, E. Scheijbeler, J. Van Oldenrijk, et al., “Short Versus Conventional Straight Stem in Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty: Functional Outcomes up to 5 Years and Survival up to 12 Years: Secondary Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial,” Acta Orthopaedica 95 (2024): 99-107, https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.39964.

[11]

H. Feyen and A. J. Shimmin, “Is the Length of the Femoral Component Important in Primary Total Hip Replacement?,” Bone and Joint Journal 96-B, no. 4 (2014): 442-448, https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B4.33036.

[12]

F. Pipino, L. Molfetta, and M. Grandizio, “Preservation of the Femoral Neck in Hip Arthroplasty: Results of a 13- to 17-Year Follow-Up,” Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 1, no. 1 (2000): 31-39, https://doi.org/10.1007/s101950070026.

[13]

D. O. Kendoff, M. Citak, C. C. Egidy, P. F. O'Loughlin, and T. Gehrke, “Eleven-Year Results of the Anatomic Coated CFP Stem in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Journal of Arthroplasty 28, no. 6 (2013): 1047-1051, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.10.013.

[14]

P. Piakong, M. Pahl, G. Delgado, et al., “Twenty-Year Results of a Neck-Preserving Short-Stem Prosthesis in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 143, no. 6 (2022): 3481-3486, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04556-5.

[15]

I. S. Vanhegan, A. K. Malik, P. Jayakumar, S. Ul Islam, and F. S. Haddad, “A Financial Analysis of Revision Hip Arthroplasty: The Economic Burden in Relation to the National Tariff,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British Volume) 94, no. 5 (2012): 619-623, https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B5.27073.

[16]

N. Wagener, S. Hardt, M. Pumberger, and F. Schömig, “Comparative Analysis of Femoral Bone Loss: Uncemented vs. Cemented Aseptic Stem Loosening in First-Time Revision Surgery—A Retrospective Evaluation of 215 Patients,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 144, no. 8 (2024): 3427-3438, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05506-z.

[17]

S. K. Chandi, C. C. Neitzke, J. A. O'Donnell, et al., “Contemporary Outcomes of Proximal Femoral Replacement as a Salvage Treatment in Nononcologic Severe Bone Loss,” Journal of Arthroplasty (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.051.

[18]

H. Fahlbusch, M. Budin, A. Volk, et al., “Long-Term Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Minimum 21-Year Follow-Up,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 143, no. 11 (2023): 6609-6616, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04970-3.

[19]

C. Röder, S. Eggli, P. Münger, M. Melloh, and A. Busato, “Patient Characteristics Differently Affect Early Cup and Stem Loosening in THA: A Case-Control Study on 7,535 Patients,” International Orthopaedics 32, no. 1 (2007): 33-38, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0291-8.

[20]

J. J. Cherian, J. J. Jauregui, S. Banerjee, T. Pierce, and M. A. Mont, “What Host Factors Affect Aseptic Loosening After THA and TKA?,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 473, no. 8 (2015): 2700-2709, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4220-2.

[21]

M. Clauss, S. Gersbach, A. Butscher, and T. Ilchmann, “Risk Factors for Aseptic Loosening of Müller-Type Straight Stems: A Registry-Based Analysis of 828 Consecutive Cases With a Minimum Follow-Up of 16 Years,” Acta Orthopaedica 84, no. 4 (2013): 353-359, https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.810517.

[22]

Y. Abu-Amer, I. Darwech, and J. C. Clohisy, “Aseptic Loosening of Total Joint Replacements: Mechanisms Underlying Osteolysis and Potential Therapies,” Arthritis Research & Therapy 9, no. Suppl 1 (2007): S6, https://doi.org/10.1186/ar2170.

[23]

R. Pourzal, H. J. Lundberg, D. J. Hall, and J. J. Jacobs, “What Factors Drive Taper Corrosion?,” Journal of Arthroplasty 33, no. 9 (2018): 2707-2711, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.055.

[24]

R. Legenstein, W. Huber, A. Ungersboeck, and P. Boesch, “Long-Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcome of the PPF System in Ceramic-On-Polyethylene Hip Bearings,” Hip International 16, no. 2 (2006): 75-80, https://doi.org/10.5301/hip.2008.213.

[25]

F. Schmidutz, M. Beirer, P. Weber, F. Mazoochian, A. Fottner, and V. Jansson, “Biomechanical Reconstruction of the Hip: Comparison Between Modular Short-Stem Hip Arthroplasty and Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty,” International Orthopaedics 36, no. 7 (2012): 1341-1347, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1477-2.

[26]

M. Yao, Y. Wang, C. Wei, Y. Han, and H. Li, “Greater Increase in Femoral Offset With Use of Collum Femoris-Preserving Stem Than Tri-Lock Stem in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Journal of International Medical Research 48, no. 5 (2020): 300060520925999, https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060520925999.

[27]

D. P. Sakalkale, P. F. Sharkey, K. Eng, W. J. Hozack, and R. H. Rothman, “Effect of Femoral Component Offset on Polyethylene Wear in Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 388 (2001): 125-134, https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200107000-00019.

[28]

A. Nyström, D. Kiritopoulos, H. Mallmin, and S. Lazarinis, “Continuous Periprosthetic Bone Loss but Preserved Stability for a Collum Femoris-Preserving Stem: Follow-Up of a Prospective Cohort Study of 21 Patients With Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Radiostereometric Analysis With Minimum 8 Years of Follow-Up,” Acta Orthopaedica 93 (2022): 206-211, https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2021.1080.

[29]

A. Zeh, A. Weise, A. Vasarhelyi, A. G. Bach, and D. Wohlrab, “Medium-Term Results of the Mayo Short-Stem Hip Prosthesis After Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head,” Zeitschrift für Orthopädie Und Unfallchirurgie 149, no. 2 (2011): 200-205, https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1270710.

[30]

M. Formica, L. Cavagnaro, M. Basso, A. Zanirato, A. Palermo, and L. Felli, “What Is the Fate of the Neck After a Collum Femoris Preserving Prosthesis? A Nineteen Years Single Center Experience,” International Orthopaedics 41, no. 7 (2016): 1329-1335, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3350-9.

[31]

K. Kobayashi, K. Kidera, M. Itose, T. Motokawa, K. Chiba, and M. Osaki, “Higher Incidence of Aseptic Loosening Caused by a Lower Canal Filling Ratio With a Modified Modular Stem in Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 15, no. 1 (2020): 568, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-02101-x.

[32]

L. C. Warth, T. W. Grant, N. B. Naveen, E. R. Deckard, M. Ziemba-Davis, and R. M. Meneghini, “Inadequate Metadiaphyseal Fill of a Modern Taper-Wedge Stem Increases Subsidence and Risk of Aseptic Loosening: Technique and Distal Canal Fill Matter!,” Journal of Arthroplasty 35, no. 7 (2020): 1868-1876, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.024.

[33]

R. Coulomb, A. Laborde, V. Haignère, F. Bauzou, P. Marchand, and P. Kouyoumdjian, “Varus Stem Positioning Does Not Affect Long-Term Functional Outcome in Cementless Anatomical Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 143, no. 1 (2022): 511-518, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04320-1.

[34]

N. Reina, C. G. Salib, K. I. Perry, A. D. Hanssen, D. J. Berry, and M. P. Abdel, “Mild Coronal Stem Malalignment Does Not Negatively Impact Survivorship or Clinical Results in Uncemented Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties With Dual-Tapered Implants,” Journal of Arthroplasty 34, no. 6 (2019): 1127-1131, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.055.

[35]

A. Fottner, M. Woiczinski, M. Kistler, et al., “Varus Malalignment of Cementless Hip Stems Provides Sufficient Primary Stability but Highly Increases Distal Strain Distribution,” Clinical Biomechanics 58 (2018): 14-20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.07.006.

[36]

J. Zang, K. Uchiyama, M. Moriya, et al., “Long-Term Clinical and Radiographic Results of the Cementless Spotorno Stem in Japanese Patients: A More Than 15-Year Follow-Up,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 26, no. 1 (2018): 2309499017750310, https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017750310.

[37]

L. Munuera and E. Garcia-Cimbrelo, “The Femoral Component in Low-Friction Arthroplasty After Ten Years,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 279 (1992): 163-175.

[38]

T. Maeda, Y. Kuroda, T. Kamenaga, T. Matsumoto, R. Kuroda, and S. Hayashi, “Impact of Femoral Stem Alignment on Periprosthetic Bone Density in THA: A Study of the Avenir Complete Stem,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 145, no. 1 (2024): 74, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05617-7.

[39]

A. D'Ambrosio, F. Bonnomet, P. A. Debordes, et al., “No Differences in Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Standard Offset and High Offset Short Cementless Stems,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 144, no. 8 (2024): 3401-3411, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05431-1.

[40]

D. Dimitriou, T. Y. Tsai, and Y. M. Kwon, “The Effect of Femoral Neck Osteotomy on Femoral Component Position of a Primary Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty,” International Orthopaedics 39, no. 12 (2015): 2315-2321, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2739-1.

[41]

F. M. Phillips, L. A. Pottenger, H. A. Finn, and J. Vandermolen, “Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Steroid-Induced Avascular Necrosis of the Hip: A 62-Month Follow-Up Study,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 303 (1994): 147-154.

[42]

A. Ohlin and U. H. Lerner, “Bone-Resorbing Activity of Different Periprosthetic Tissues in Aseptic Loosening of Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Bone and Mineral 20, no. 1 (1993): 67-78, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-6009(08)80038-4.

[43]

B. Liu, W. Ma, H. Li, T. Wu, J. Huo, and Y. Han, “Incidence, Classification, and Risk Factors for Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Single Stem: A Retrospective Study,” Journal of Arthroplasty 34, no. 7 (2019): 1400-1411, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.031.

[44]

H. T. Aro, J. J. Alm, N. Moritz, T. J. Mäkinen, and P. Lankinen, “Low BMD Affects Initial Stability and Delays Stem Osseointegration in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Women: A 2-Year RSA Study of 39 Patients,” Acta Orthopaedica 83, no. 2 (2012): 107-114, https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.678798.

[45]

A. P. Sah, T. S. Thornhill, M. S. LeBoff, and J. Glowacki, “Correlation of Plain Radiographic Indices of the Hip With Quantitative Bone Mineral Density,” Osteoporosis International 18, no. 8 (2007): 1119-1126, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-007-0348-6.

[46]

L. D. Dorr, M. C. Faugere, A. M. Mackel, T. A. Gruen, B. Bognar, and H. H. Malluche, “Structural and Cellular Assessment of Bone Quality of Proximal Femur,” Bone 14, no. 3 (1993): 231-242, https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(93)90146-2.

[47]

P. Zhen, Y. Chang, H. Yue, et al., “Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Short Bone-Conserving Stem in Young Adult Osteoporotic Patients With Dorr Type C Femoral Bone,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 16, no. 1 (2021): 17, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01985-z.

[48]

M. A. Buttaro, P. A. Slullitel, J. I. Oñativia, et al., “4- to 8-Year Complication Analysis of 2 ‘Partial Collum’ Femoral Stems in Primary THA,” Hip International 31, no. 1 (2019): 75-82, https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700019879360.

[49]

Z. Liu, H. Hu, S. Liu, J. Huo, M. Li, and Y. Han, “Relationships Between the Femoral Neck-Preserving Ratio and Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Total-Hip Arthroplasty With a Collum Femoris-Preserving Stem,” Medicine 98, no. 35 (2019): e16926, https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016926.

[50]

D. Briem, M. Schneider, N. Bogner, et al., “Mid-Term Results of 155 Patients Treated With a Collum Femoris Preserving (CFP) Short Stem Prosthesis,” International Orthopaedics 35, no. 5 (2010): 655-660, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1020-x.

[51]

J. T. Evans, J. P. Evans, R. W. Walker, A. W. Blom, M. R. Whitehouse, and A. Sayers, “How Long Does a Hip Replacement Last? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case Series and National Registry Reports With More Than 15 Years of Follow-Up,” Lancet 393, no. 10172 (2019): 647-654, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31665-9.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

27

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/