Comparison of a New Minimally Invasive Reduction Technique Using Open Wiring in the Treatment of Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures

Teng Ma , Chaofeng Wang , Qiang Huang , Hua Lin , Qian Wang , Cheng Ren , Yibo Xu , Kun Zhang , Congming Zhang , Deyin Liu

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (7) : 1976 -1984.

PDF
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (7) : 1976 -1984. DOI: 10.1111/os.70065
CLINICAL ARTICLE

Comparison of a New Minimally Invasive Reduction Technique Using Open Wiring in the Treatment of Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective: Minimally invasive reduction and intramedullary nailing (IMN) are the most common strategies used to treat subtrochanteric femur fractures (SFF). We report a new minimally invasive surgical technique for the successful reduction of SFF and maintenance of fragmental position after longitudinal traction. This study compared the radiological and clinical effects of these two reduction techniques when using IMN to treat SFF.

Methods: All 43 patients who underwent SFF at our hospital were included in this retrospective study. Twenty-two patients were treated using the conservative method (CM) from March 2016 to January 2018. Between May 2019 and March 2022, 21 patients with SFF were treated using this new technique (NT). All the patients completed the entire follow-up period. Details of both groups were obtained and analyzed from electronic medical records. Postoperative complications, fracture reduction quality, and fracture healing times were recorded and compared.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences after comparing both groups in terms of patient demographics or the incidence of complications. The mean operating time was 68.2 min (range, 54–85 min) in the group NT, shorter than 78 min (range, 65–103 min) in the group CM (p = 0.005). Compared to 275.6 mL average blood loss using NT, that using CM was 329.5 mL (p = 0.021). Three patients (14.2%) experienced deep venous thrombosis of the affected lower limb; however, no other postoperative complications occurred in the NT group, similar to those in the CM group. Compared to the uninjured side, the average fracture displacement was corrected to 2.7 mm (range, 2–4 mm) in the anterior–posterior view, and the mean anterior angulation was restored to 2.0° (range, 0°–10°) in the lateral view in group NT. All fractures in the NT group achieved consolidation healing within a mean time of 4.7 months (range, 4–8 months). The lower-extremity functional scale (LEFS)score of all patients was 60.4 (range, 47–71) in the NT group at the last follow-up. Similar results were observed for fracture reduction quality, time to bone union, and the LEFS in the CM group.

Conclusions: The soft tissue rebalancing technique utilizes hemostatic forceps as a lever and soft tissue around the fracture end as fulcrums to successfully overcome deforming forces in the proximal femoral fragment. Compared to CM, it is a minimally invasive, time-saving method for closed reduction and maintenance of the fragment position before opening and reaming.

Keywords

minimally invasive / reduction / soft tissue rebalancing technique / subtrochanteric femur fractures

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Teng Ma, Chaofeng Wang, Qiang Huang, Hua Lin, Qian Wang, Cheng Ren, Yibo Xu, Kun Zhang, Congming Zhang, Deyin Liu. Comparison of a New Minimally Invasive Reduction Technique Using Open Wiring in the Treatment of Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2025, 17(7): 1976-1984 DOI:10.1111/os.70065

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

N. Maffulli and R. Aicale, “Proximal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly: A Few Things to Know, and Some to Forget,” Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) 58 (2022): 1314.

[2]

S. N. Sambandam, J. Chandrasekharan, V. Mounasamy, and C. Mauffrey, “Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Review of Fixation Methods,” European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology 26 (2016): 339-353.

[3]

P. N. Streubel, M. Moustoukas, and W. T. Obremskey, “Locked Plating Versus Cephalomedullary Nailing of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures,” European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 26 (2016): 385-390.

[4]

M. Saudan, A. Lübbeke, C. Sadowski, N. Riand, R. Stern, and P. Hoffmeyer, “Pertrochanteric Fractures: Is There an Advantage to an Intramedullary Nail?: A Randomized, Prospective Study of 206 Patients Comparing the Dynamic Hip Screw and Proximal Femoral Nail,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 16 (2002): 386-393.

[5]

Z. T. Kokkalis, A. F. Mavrogenis, D. I. Ntourantonis, et al., “Reduction Techniques for Difficult Subtrochanteric Fractures,” European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology 29 (2019): 197-204.

[6]

A. S. Rhorer, “Percutaneous/Minimally Invasive Techniques in Treatment of Femoral Shaft Fractures With an Intramedullary Nail,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 23 (2009): S2-S5.

[7]

A. Afsari, F. Liporace, E. Lindvall, A. Infante, H. C. Sagi, and G. J. Haidukewych, “Clamp-Assisted Reduction of High Subtrochanteric Fractures of the Femur: Surgical Technique,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 92, no. S1 Pt. 2 (2010): 217-225, https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00158.

[8]

W. Hoskins, R. Bingham, S. Joseph, et al., “Subtrochanteric Fracture: The Effect of Cerclage Wire on Fracture Reduction and Outcome,” Injury 46 (2015): 1992-1995.

[9]

S. M. Perren, A. Fernandez Dell'Oca, M. Lenz, and M. Windolf, “Cerclage, Evolution and Potential of a Cinderella Technology. An Overview With Reference to Periprosthetic Fractures,” Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca 78 (2011): 190-199.

[10]

J. Park and K. H. Yang, “Correction of Malalignment in Proximal Femoral Nailing—Reduction Technique of Displaced Proximal Fragment,” Injury 41 (2010): 634-638.

[11]

W. Shui, Y. Yang, X. Pi, et al., “A Novel Closed Reduction Technique for Treating Femoral Shaft Fractures With Intramedullary Nails, Haemostatic Forceps and the Lever Principle,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 22 (2021): 187.

[12]

S. Shukla, P. Johnston, M. A. Ahmad, H. Wynn-Jones, A. D. Patel, and N. P. Walton, “Outcome of Traumatic Subtrochanteric Femoral Fractures Fixed Using Cephalo-Medullary Nails,” Injury 38 (2007): 1286-1293.

[13]

K. H. Yang, Y. Won, D. H. Kang, J. C. Oh, and S. J. Kim, “Role of Appositional Screw Fixation in Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Distal Tibial Fracture,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 29 (2015): e331-e335.

[14]

J. M. Binkley, P. W. Stratford, S. A. Lott, and D. L. Riddle, “The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): Scale Development, Measurement Properties, and Clinical Application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network,” Physical Therapy 79 (1999): 371-383.

[15]

H. T. Liu, I. C. Wang, C. M. Yu, et al., “Closed Femoral Nailing in Lateral Decubitus Position Without a Fracture Table: A Preliminary Report of Fifteen Patients,” Chang Gung Medical Journal 28 (2005): 629-635.

[16]

J. Whalen, “The Anatomy and Functional Axes of the Femur,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 70 (1988): 151-152.

[17]

J. B. Carr, “The Anterior and Medial Reduction of Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Simple Method to Obtain a Stable Reduction,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 21 (2007): 485-489.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

18

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/