The Perioperative Resource Use and Effectiveness of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

Ziying Wu , Ning Wang , Jian Zhang , Cong Lu , Wenni Rong , Xiang Ding , Guanghua Lei

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (7) : 1965 -1975.

PDF
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (7) : 1965 -1975. DOI: 10.1111/os.70063
CLINICAL ARTICLE

The Perioperative Resource Use and Effectiveness of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective: Patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) is a common condition that significantly affects quality of life. With advancements in modern patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) prostheses, a growing number of surgeons are opting for PFA to treat isolated PFOA. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the perioperative resource use and therapeutic outcomes of PFA versus total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with isolated PFOA.

Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science until November 2024. The included studies provided direct comparisons of perioperative resource use (surgical time, blood loss, and length of stay) and postoperative outcomes (patient-reported outcome measures [PROMs], quality of life, and patient satisfaction) between modern PFA and TKA in patients with isolated PFOA. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was applied to randomized controlled trials, and the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for observational studies to evaluate methodological quality and risk of bias. Data was extracted from eligible studies and combined to calculate the mean difference (MD) or pooled relative risk with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: We included eight eligible studies with a mean follow-up duration of 2–10 years. Compared with TKA, modern PFA demonstrated significantly shorter surgical times (MD = −13.67 min; 95% CI: −20.47 to −6.86) and reduced perioperative blood loss. However, no significant difference was observed in hospital length of stay. Regarding PROMs, PFA showed superior functional outcomes on the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) within 2 years postoperatively (MD = −2.02; 95% CI: −3.77 to −0.26). No significant differences were found between PFA and TKA at 12-month follow-up for the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function score (MD = −5.68; 95% CI: −21.54 to 10.18) or total WOMAC score (MD = −6.65; 95% CI: −30.00 to 16.70). Similarly, at 24-month follow-up, no differences were observed in the University of California, Los Angeles activity score (MD = −0.02; 95% CI: −1.79 to 1.75) or final OKS (MD = −1.09; 95% CI: −6.31 to 4.14). Quality of life and patient satisfaction remained comparable between the two procedures throughout the first 2 years and final follow-up.

Conclusions: PFA demonstrates comparable efficacy to TKA in isolated PFOA, with superior early functional recovery within the first 2 years post-surgery, shorter surgical duration, and reduced blood loss. These findings suggest PFA may be a resource-efficient alternative for eligible patients.

Keywords

patellofemoral arthroplasty / patellofemoral osteoarthritis / total knee arthroplasty

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ziying Wu, Ning Wang, Jian Zhang, Cong Lu, Wenni Rong, Xiang Ding, Guanghua Lei. The Perioperative Resource Use and Effectiveness of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2025, 17(7): 1965-1975 DOI:10.1111/os.70063

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

GBD 2021 Osteoarthritis Collaborators, “Global, Regional, and National Burden of Osteoarthritis, 1990-2020 and Projections to 2050: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021,” Lancet Rheumatology 5, no. 9 (2023): e508-e522.

[2]

H. F. Hart, J. J. Stefanik, N. Wyndow, Z. Machotka, and K. M. Crossley, “The Prevalence of Radiographic and MRI-Defined Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis and Structural Pathology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” British Journal of Sports Medicine 51, no. 16 (2017): 1195-1208.

[3]

C. Arias and S. Lustig, “Physiopathology of Patello-Femoral Osteoarthritis: Current Concepts,” Journal of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine 9, no. 4 (2024): 806-813.

[4]

R. Duncan, G. Peat, E. Thomas, E. M. Hay, and P. Croft, “Incidence, Progression and Sequence of Development of Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis in a Symptomatic Population,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 70, no. 11 (2011): 1944-1948.

[5]

J. J. Stefanik, A. Guermazi, F. W. Roemer, et al., “Changes in Patellofemoral and Tibiofemoral Joint Cartilage Damage and Bone Marrow Lesions Over 7 Years: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 24, no. 7 (2016): 1160-1166.

[6]

V. Duong, W. M. Oo, C. Ding, A. G. Culvenor, and D. J. Hunter, “Evaluation and Treatment of Knee Pain: A Review,” JAMA 330, no. 16 (2023): 1568-1580.

[7]

H. E. Ennis, J. Phillips, J. M. Jennings, and D. A. Dennis, “Patellofemoral Arthroplasty,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 31, no. 19 (2023): 1009-1017.

[8]

Y. Li, J. Zhang, and W. Zhai, “Comparison of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty and Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Isolated Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis,” Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal 26, no. 8 (2022): 1552-1558.

[9]

J. R. Serino, M. T. Weintraub, R. R. Burnett, M. L. Angotti, P. M. Courtney, and V. C. Della, “Complications and Costs of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty,” Knee 41 (2023): 58-65.

[10]

M. J. Page, D. Moher, P. M. Bossuyt, et al., “PRISMA 2020 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated Guidance and Exemplars for Reporting Systematic Reviews,” British Medical Journal 372 (2021): n160.

[11]

J. Deeks, J. P. Higgins, and D. G. Altman, “Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses,” in Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0, ed., J. Higgins and S. Green (Cochrane Collaboration, 2011), 1-9.

[12]

J. P. T. Higgins, J. Savović, M. J. Page, R. G. Elbers, and J. A. C. Sterne, “Chapter 8: Assessing Risk of Bias in a Randomized Trial,” in Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 6.5, eds., J. P. T. Higgins, J. Thomas, J. Chandler, M. Cumpston, T. Li, M. J. Page, and V. A. Welch (Cochrane, 2024), https://cochrane.org/handbook.

[13]

G. Wells, B. Shea, D. O'Connell, et al., “The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses,”2009, http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.

[14]

L. Li, J. Shen, M. M. Bala, et al., “Incretin Treatment and Risk of Pancreatitis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised and Non-Randomised Studies,” British Medical Journal 348 (2014): g2366.

[15]

J. P. Higgins and S. G. Thompson, “Quantifying Heterogeneity in a Meta-Analysis,” Statistics in Medicine 21, no. 11 (2002): 1539-1558.

[16]

C. Fredborg, A. Odgaard, and J. Sørensen, “Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Is Cheaper and More Effective in the Short Term Than Total Knee Arthroplasty for Isolated Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Based on a Randomized Trial,” Bone and Joint Journal 102-B, no. 4 (2020): 449-457.

[17]

A. Odgaard, F. Madsen, P. W. Kristensen, A. Kappel, and J. Fabrin, “The Mark Coventry Award: Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Results in Better Range of Movement and Early Patient-Reported Outcomes Than TKA,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 476, no. 1 (2018): 87-100.

[18]

D. L. Dahm, W. Al-Rayashi, K. Dajani, J. P. Shah, B. A. Levy, and M. J. Stuart, “Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Isolated Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis,” American Journal of Orthopedics 39, no. 10 (2010): 487-491.

[19]

M. N. Joseph, J. Achten, N. R. Parsons, and M. L. Costa, “The PAT Randomized Clinical Trial,” Bone and Joint Journal 102-B, no. 3 (2020): 310-318, https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-0723.R1.

[20]

I. Kamikovski, J. Dobransky, and G. F. Dervin, “The Clinical Outcome of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty vs Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Younger Than 55 Years,” Journal of Arthroplasty 34, no. 12 (2019): 2914-2917.

[21]

N. D. Clement, T. A. Howard, R. J. Immelman, et al., “Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty for Patients With Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis: Equal Function and Satisfaction but Higher Revision Rate for Partial Arthroplasty at a Minimum Eight Years Follow-Up,” Bone and Joint Journal 101-B, no. 1 (2019): 41-46.

[22]

F. L. Perrone, S. Baron, E. M. Suero, et al., “Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Patients Undergoing Patellofemoral Arthroplasty and Total Knee Replacement: A Comparative Study,” Technology and Health Care 26, no. 3 (2018): 507-514.

[23]

H. Elbardesy, A. McLeod, R. Gul, and J. Harty, “Midterm Results of Modern Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty for Isolated Patellofemoral Arthritis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 142, no. 5 (2022): 851-859.

[24]

C. Li, Z. Li, L. Shi, F. Gao, and W. Sun, “The Short-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Second-Generation Patellofemoral Arthroplasty and Total Knee Arthroplasty on Isolated Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 16, no. 1 (2021): 358.

[25]

G. Peng, M. Liu, Z. Guan, et al., “Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty for Isolated Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 16, no. 1 (2021): 264.

[26]

Y. Ben-Shlomo, A. Blom, C. Boulton, et al., The National Joint Registry 18th Annual Report 2021 (National Joint Registry, 2021).

[27]

M. Vella-Baldacchino, D. Chughtai, J. Kow, et al., “Outcomes of Patellofemoral Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Revision Timelines and Complication Rates,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 20, no. 1 (2025): 289.

[28]

G. Duan, C. Liu, W. Lin, et al., “Different Factors Conduct Anterior Knee Pain Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Arthroplasty 33, no. 6 (2018): 1962-1971.

[29]

G. Duan, S. Cai, W. Lin, and Y. Pan, “Risk Factors for Patellar Clunk or Crepitation After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Knee Surgery 34, no. 10 (2021): 1098-1109.

[30]

G. Freystaetter, K. Fischer, E. J. Orav, et al., “Total Serum Testosterone and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Pain and Function Among Older Men and Women With Severe Knee Osteoarthritis,” Arthritis Care and Research 72, no. 11 (2020): 1511-1518.

[31]

A. Utrillas-Compaired, B. J. De la Torre-Escuredo, A. J. Tebar-Martinez, and B. A. Asunsolo-Del, “Does Preoperative Psychologic Distress Influence Pain, Function, and Quality of Life After TKA?,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 472, no. 8 (2014): 2457-2465.

[32]

A. Wilson, S. M. Ronnekleiv-Kelly, and T. M. Pawlik, “Regret in Surgical Decision Making: A Systematic Review of Patient and Physician Perspectives,” World Journal of Surgery 41, no. 6 (2017): 1454-1465.

[33]

C. Batailler, T. Libert, S. Oussedik, S. Zaffagnini, and S. Lustig, “Patello-Femoral Arthroplasty—Indications and Contraindications,” Journal of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine 9, no. 4 (2024): 822-828.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

27

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/