Comparison of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Versus High Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Knee Osteoarthritis: An Updated Meta-Analysis of 56,000 Patients

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative joint disease primarily affecting hip and knee joints, with an estimated 300 million cases globally. This study is crucial as it provides an updated, comprehensive comparison of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for treating medial knee osteoarthritis, offering valuable insights into their relative effectiveness. The findings aim to inform clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes by identifying the superior treatment option. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar until August 1, 2024. Statistical analysis used Review Manager 5.4 with a random-effects model, risk ratio (RR), and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment, and funnel plots were used to analyze publication bias. GRADE assessment was done to gauge the certainty of the evidence. Thirty-nine studies, involving a total of 56,686 patients, were evaluated for comparison. UKA significantly reduced the complications (RR = 0.37; 95% CI: [0.25, 0.54]; p < 0.0001; I² = 30%), revision rates to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (RR = 0.64; 95% CI: [0.41, 0.99]; p = 0.05; I² = 72%) and postoperative pain (MD = −0.33; 95% CI: [−0.64, −0.03]; p = 0.03; I² = 89%) compared to HTO, while range of motion (ROM) (RR = −3.55; 95% CI: [−7.16, 0.52]; p = 0.09; I² = 98%) and walking speed (MD = 0.02; 95% CI: [−0.04, 0.07]; p = 0.56; I² = 0%) and surgical site infections(RR = 1.40; 95% CI: [0.30, 6.53]; p = 0.67; I² = 86%) were comparable. All the functional knee scores are comparable except the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, which is increased in UKA (MD = 2.63; 95% CI: [0.52, 4.74]; p = 0.01; I² = 76%). UKA is superior to HTO, offering lower revision rates, reduced postoperative pain, fewer complications, and better functional scores.

Keywords

high tibial osteotomy / meta-analysis / osteoarthritis / unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

References

[1] L. A. Salman, G. Ahmed, S. G. Dakin, B. Kendrick, and A. Price, “Osteoarthritis: A Narrative Review of Molecular Approaches to Disease Management,” Arthritis Research & Therapy 25, no. 1 (2023): 27.

[2] R. Giorgino, D. Albano, S. Fusco, G. M. Peretti, L. Mangiavini, and C. Messina, “Knee Osteoarthritis: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Mesenchymal Stem Cells: What Else Is New? An Update,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 7 (2023): 6405.

[3] L. Huang, Y. Xu, L. Wei, et al., “Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Is Superior to High Tibial Osteotomy for the Treatment of Medial Unicompartmental Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Medicine 101, no. 30 (2022): e29576.

[4] G. Spahn, G. O. Hofmann, L. V. von Engelhardt, M. Li, H. Neubauer, and H. M. Klinger, “The Impact of a High Tibial Valgus Osteotomy and Unicondylar Medial Arthroplasty on the Treatment for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-Analysis,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 21, no. 1 (2013): 96-112.

[5] T. Karasavvidis, N. P. Fackler, K. T. Callan, B. E. Lung, and D. Wang, “Comparison of Early Complication Rates After High Tibial Osteotomy Versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Knee Osteoarthritis,” Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 12, no. 1 (2024).

[6] A. C. Kanakamedala, E. T. Hurley, A. K. Manjunath, L. M. Jazrawi, M. J. Alaia, and E. J. Strauss, “High Tibial Osteotomies for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee,” JBJS Reviews 10, no. 1 (2022): e21.

[7] M. B. Santoso and L. Wu, “Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty, Is It Superior to High Tibial Osteotomy in Treating Unicompartmental Osteoarthritis? A Meta-Analysis and Systemic Review,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 12, no. 1 (2017): 50.

[8] M. Neubauer, E. M. Reinberger, D. Dammerer, et al., “Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Provides Superior Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Compared to High Tibial Osteotomy at a Follow-Up of 5-8 Years,” Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 16 (2023): 5387.

[9] M. J. Page, M. J. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt, et al., “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews,” BMJ 372 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.N71.

[10] J. P. T. Higgins, J. Thomas, J. Chandler, et al., “Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions,” Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2009): 1-694, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604.

[11] S. J. Teo, G. Purnomo, D. T. S. Koh, et al., “High Tibial Osteotomy Versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Advanced Medial Compartmental Knee Arthrosis: A Comparative Study With Propensity Score Matched Analysis,” Knee 49 (2024): 116-124, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38909589/.

[12] G. A. Wells, B. Shea, D. O'Connell, et al., “The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses,” 2014.

[13] GRADEpro [Internet]. [cited 2024 Aug 22], https://www.gradepro.org/.

[14] RevMan [Internet]. [cited 2024 Sep 3], https://revman.cochrane.org/myReviews.

[15] J. P. T. Higgins, S. G. Thompson, J. J. Deeks, and D. G. Altman, “Measuring Inconsistency in Meta-Analyses,” BMJ 327, no. 7414 (2003): 557-560, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12958120/.

[16] N. S. Broughton, J. H. Newman, and R. A. J. Baily, “Unicompartmental Replacement and High Tibial Osteotomy for Osteoarthritis of the Knee. A Comparative Study After 5-10 Years' Follow-Up,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 68, no. 3 (1986): 447-452, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3733813/.

[17] R. Jefferson, “Biomechanical Assessment of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty, Total Condylar Arthroplasty and Tibial Osteotom,” Biomechanics MWC 4 (1989): 232-242, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0268003389900089.

[18] Rehabilitation after high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental arthroplasty, A comparative study - PubMed [Internet] [cited 2024 Oct 3], https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2019043/.

[19] L. Weidenhielm, O. K. Svensson, L. Å. Broström, and U. Rudberg, “Change in Adduction Moment About the Knee After High Tibial Osteotomy and Prosthetic Replacement in Osteoarthrosis of the Knee,” Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 7, no. 2 (1992): 91-96, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23915685/.

[20] C. Stukenborg-Colsman, C. J. Wirth, D. Lazovic, and A. Wefer, “High Tibial Osteotomy Versus Unicompartmental Joint Replacement in Unicompartmental Knee Joint Osteoarthritis: 7-10-Year Follow-Up Prospective Randomised Study,” Knee 8, no. 3 (2001): 187-194, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11706726/.

[21] “Unicompartmental Arthroplasty and High Tibial Osteotomy for Osteoarthrosis of the Knee. A Comparative Study With a 12- To 17-Year Follow-Up Period - PubMed [Internet].” [cited 2024 Oct 3], https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8168290/.

[22] M. Börjesson, L. Weidenhielm, E. Mattsson, and E. Olsson, “Gait and Clinical Measurements in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis After Surgery: A Prospective 5-Year Follow-Up Study,” Knee 12, no. 2 (2005): 121-127, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15749447/.

[23] R. Takeuchi, Y. Umemoto, M. Aratake, et al., “A Mid Term Comparison of Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy vs Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis of the Knee,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 5, no. 1 (2010): 65, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20799991/.

[24] J. H. Yim, E. K. Song, H. Y. Seo, M. S. Kim, and J. K. Seon, “Comparison of High Tibial Osteotomy and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at a Minimum Follow-Up of 3 Years,” Journal of Arthroplasty 28, no. 2 (2013): 243-247, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22854345/.

[25] I. Tuncay, K. Bilsel, M. Elmadağ, Ö. F. Erkoçak, M. Aşçi, and C. Şen, “Evaluation of Mobile Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty, Opening Wedge, and Dome-Type High Tibial Osteotomies for Knee Arthritis,” Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 49, no. 3 (2015): 280-287, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26200407/.

[26] W. Petersen and S. Metzlaff, “Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) Versus Mobile Bearing Unicondylar Medial Joint Replacement: Five Years Results,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 136, no. 7 (2016): 983-989, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27154579/.

[27] Y. S. Jeon, C. H. Ahn, and M. K. Kim, “Comparison of HTO With Articular Cartilage Surgery and UKA in Unicompartmental OA,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong Kong) 25, no. 1 (2017): 1-7, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28176602/.

[28] A. J. Krych, P. Reardon, P. Sousa, A. Pareek, M. Stuart, and M. Pagnano, “Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Provides Higher Activity and Durability Than Valgus-Producing Proximal Tibial Osteotomy at 5 to 7 Years,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 99, no. 2 (2017): 113-122, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28099301/.

[29] R. Maxwell, A. Johnston, D. Lees, and C. Walker, “Knee OUTcome Study: A Comparison of the Patient Perceived Outcome Between High Tibial Osteotomy, Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty for Medial Compartment Osteoarthitis in Men Under Age 55,” Orthopedics & Sports Medicine 5, no. 5_suppl5 (2017): 2325967117S0016.

[30] Z. Shaofei, Z. Junliang, X. Zhongxin, H. Peng, and Z. Xing, “Comparative Analysis of the Medium-Term Effect of the Medial Unicompartmental Arthroplasty Through Medial Approach Next to Patellar and High Tibial Osteotomy on Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis of the Knee,” Biomedical Research 28, no. 7 (2017), https://www.alliedacademies.org/articles/comparative-analysis-of-the-mediumterm-effect-of-the-medial-unicompartmental-arthroplasty-through-medial-approach-next-to-patellar.html.

[31] W. J. Cho, J. M. Kim, W. K. Kim, D. E. Kim, N. K. Kim, and B. S. Il, “Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Old-Aged Patients Demonstrates Superior Short-Term Clinical Outcomes to Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in Middle-Aged Patients With Advanced Isolated Medial Osteoarthritis,” International Orthopaedics 42, no. 10 (2018): 2357-2363, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29569140/.

[32] S. M. Ryu, J. W. Park, H. D. Na, and O. J. Shon, “High Tibial Osteotomy Versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Medial Compartment Arthrosis With Kissing Lesions in Relatively Young Patients,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 30, no. 1 (2018): 17-22, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29298462/.

[33] I. J. Koh, M. S. Kim, S. Sohn, et al., “Predictive Factors for Satisfaction After Contemporary Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and High Tibial Osteotomy in Isolated Medial Femorotibial Osteoarthritis,” Orthopedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research 105, no. 1 (2019): 77-83, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30509622/.

[34] S. J. Song, D. K. Bae, K. I. Kim, and C. H. Park, “Long-Term Survival Is Similar Between Closed-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Similar Demographics,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 27, no. 4 (2019): 1310-1319, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30719541/.

[35] C. Jacquet, F. Gulagaci, A. Schmidt, et al., “Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Allows Better Outcomes Than Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Expecting to Return to Impact Sports,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 28, no. 12 (2020): 3849-3857, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32008058/.

[36] “Chen: Comparison of One-Year Follow-Up Effectiveness… - Google Scholar [Internet],” [cited 2024 Oct 3], https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?journal=Chin+J+Tissue+Eng+Res&title=Comparison+of+one-year+follow-up+effectiveness+between+high+tibial+osteotomy+and+unicompartmental+knee+arthroplasty+for+treating+medial+compartment+osteoarthritis+of+the+knee.&author=R+Chen&author=H+Ge&author=W+Chen&volume=23&publication_year=2020&pages=3143-7&.

[37] Y. Hou, S. Wang, and A. Wang, “Effect of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and High Tibial Osteotomy With Tomofix Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis,” Orthopedics & Sports Medicine 8, no. 9_suppl7 (2020): 2325967120S0054.

[38] Z. Ziqi, M. Yufeng, Z. Lei, W. Chunsheng, Y. Pei, and W. Kunzheng, “Therapeutic Effects Comparison and Revision Case Analysis of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in Treating Medial Knee Osteoarthritis in Patients Under 60 Years: A 2-6-Year Follow-Up Study,” Orthopedic Surgery 12, no. 6 (2020): 1635-1643, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32893481/.

[39] Q. H. Jin, W. G. Lee, E. K. Song, C. Jin, and J. K. Seon, “Comparison of Long-Term Survival Analysis Between Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty,” Journal of Arthroplasty 36, no. 5 (2021): 1562-1567.e1, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33261999/.

[40] “Lin: Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Superior… - Google Scholar [Internet],” [cited 2024 Oct 3], https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?journal=Chin+J+Tissue+Eng+Res&title=Unicompartmental+knee+arthroplasty+superior+to+open-wedge+high+tibial+osteotomy:+differences+of+mechanical+parameters+and+knee+function.&author=X+Lin&author=W+Liu&author=X+Xu&volume=25&publication_year=2021&pages=4793-8&.

[41] D. L. Rodkey, L. J. McMillan, S. E. Slaven, D. A. Treyster, J. F. Dickens, and J. P. Cody, “Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: More Conversions, Fewer Complications Than Proximal Tibial Osteotomy in a Young Population,” Journal of Arthroplasty 36, no. 12 (2021): 3878-3882, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34481695/.

[42] S. Watanabe, R. Akagi, T. Ninomiya, et al., “Comparison of Joint Awareness After Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and High Tibial Osteotomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 142, no. 6 (2022): 1133-1140, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34269892/.

[43] “Liu: Changes in Kinematic Parameters After Unicompartment… - Google Scholar [Internet],” [cited 2024 Oct 3], https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?journal=Chin+J+Tissue+Eng+Res&title=Changes+in+kinematic+parameters+after+unicompartmental+knee+arthroplasty+and+high+tibial+osteotomy.&author=S+Liu&author=G+Zhou&author=X+Chen&volume=26&publication_year=2021&pages=406-12&.

[44] D. Screpis, G. Piovan, M. Baldini, et al., “Higher Activity Level After Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Compared to Medial Unicompartimental Knee Arthroplasty in a Selected Cohort of Advanced Age: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis,” Knee 40 (2023): 183-191, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36470195/.

[45] S. Zehir and E. Şahin, “Comparison of Unilateral Knee Arthroplasty With High Tibial Osteotomy in Surgical Treatment of Medial Knee Osteoarthritis,” Archives of Iranian Medicine 25, no. 5 (2022): 324-328, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35943009/.

[46] H. Xu, H. Tu, T. Zhao, et al., “Age-Stratified Analysis of HTO and UKA Clinical Effects in Cross-Indicated Anterior Medial Osteoarthritis,” European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 34, no. 5 (2024): 2421-2427, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38627286/.

[47] S. H. Lee, H. R. Kim, E. K. Song, and J. K. Seon, “Risk of Revision and Adverse Outcomes Following Partial Knee Replacement and High Tibial Osteotomy for Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis: A Nationwide Cohort Study,” Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 55, no. 5 (2021): 1101-1110, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34824709/.

[48] A. L. Özgözen and M. B. Çınar, “Long-Term Outcomes of High Tibial Osteotomy vs. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study,” 2024, https://www.researchsquare.com.

[49] S. Okimura, T. Suzuki, T. Matsumura, et al., “Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Were Better Than Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in Early Elderly Patients With Severe Osteoarthritis,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 143, no. 10 (2023): 6339-6344, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37103607/.

[50] F. C. Gláucia, R. de Sousa Marcos, Tatiani, OF, and R. A. N. Ana, “The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomized Studies,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases (2013), https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:91080501.

[51] Z. W. Cao, X. J. Mai, J. wang, E. H. Feng, and Y. M. Huang, “Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs High Tibial Osteotomy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Arthroplasty 33, no. 3 (2018): 952-959, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29203354/.

[52] B. Zhang, H. Qian, H. Wu, and X. Yang, “Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Versus High Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 31, no. 1 (2023): 102255362311628.

[53] F. Dettoni, D. E. Bonasia, F. Castoldi, M. Bruzzone, D. Blonna, and R. Rossi, “High Tibial Osteotomy Versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Medial Compartment Arthrosis of the Knee: A Review of the Literature,” Iowa Orthopaedic Journal 30 (2010): 131-140.

[54] J. Li, Y. Zhang, Y. Chen, Y. Li, B. Dai, and P. Liu, “Effects of High Tibial Osteotomy Compared With Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty on the Surgical Site Wound Infection and Pain in Patients With Medial Knee Osteoarthritis,” International Wound Journal 21, no. 3 (2024): e14773.

[55] L. Liu, J. Li, Y. Wang, X. Li, P. Han, and X. Li, “Different Surgical Treatment Modalities for Single-Compartment Knee Osteoarthritis: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials,” 2023, https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2919857/v1.

[56] C. C. Wyles, J. S. Vargas-Hernandez, S. W. Carlson, B. C. Carlson, and R. J. Sierra, “Single-Dose Perioperative Antibiotics Do Not Increase the Risk of Surgical Site Infection in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty,” Journal of Arthroplasty 34, no. 7 (2019): S327-S330.

[57] J. Belsey, S. K. Yasen, S. Jobson, J. Faulkner, and A. J. Wilson, “Return to Physical Activity After High Tibial Osteotomy or Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Pooling Data Analysis,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 49, no. 5 (2021): 1372-1380.

[58] A. M. Morsy, E. G. Elbana, A. G. Mostafa, M. A. Edward, and M. A. Hafez, “Comparison of Functional Outcome of Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Using Computer-Assisted Patient-Specific Templating,” Advances in Orthopedics 2021 (2021): 1-8.

[59] I. Seth, G. Bulloch, N. Seth, et al., “High Tibial Osteotomy Versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 56, no. 6 (2022): 973-982.

[60] H. Ping, J. Wen, Y. Liu, et al., “Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Lower Pain Levels but Inferior Range of Motion, Compared With High Tibial Osteotomy: A Systematic Overview of Meta-Analyses,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 17, no. 1 (2022): 425.

[61] G. Hauer, P. Sadoghi, G. A. Bernhardt, et al., “Greater Activity, Better Range of Motion and Higher Quality of Life Following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Case-Control Study,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 140, no. 2 (2020): 231-237.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.