Clinical Outcomes of N-HA/pa66 and Titanium Mesh in the Treatment of Lower Cervical Spine Fractures and Dislocations During an 8-Year Follow-Up Period

Abstract

Objective: Studies evaluating the long-term outcomes of the nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 cages (n-HA/PA66) in treating lower cervical spine fractures have not been reported. The objective is to compare the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of titanium mesh cage (TMC) and-HA/PA66 for anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) in the treatment of lower cervical spine fractures and dislocations.

Method: This retrospective analysis included 223 patients treated at our hospital between January 2010 and January 2016 who had undergone single-level anterior corpectomy for lower cervical spine fractures and dislocations (with a minimum follow-up of 8 years) using either a TMC (n = 130) or an n-HA/PA66 cage (n = 93). The radiographic parameters, including segmental alignment (SA), cage subsidence, plate-to-disc distance, cervical lordosis (CL), intervertebral height, and fusion status, along with clinical metrics such as Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and visual analog scale (VAS) assessments, were systematically analyzed at preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up intervals for the patients involved in the study. The Chi-Square (χ²) test for categorical variables and the Student's t-test for numerical data were used to assess differences between the two groups.

Result: The mean follow-up durations for the TMC group and n-HA/PA66 group were9.81 ± 2.21 and 9.43 ± 0.92 years, respectively. Moreover, final fusion rates were not significantly different between the n-HA/PA66 group and the TMC group (97.8% and 96.9%, respectively). The final cage subsidence was significantly lower in the n-HA/PA66 group (1.56 ± 0.88 mm, with 17.6% subsidence of > 3 mm) than in the TMC group (2.70 ± 2.02 mm, with 36.9% subsidence) (p < 0.01). Furthermore, CL, SA, plate-to-disc distance, JOA scores, and VAS scores were not significantly different between the two groups (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Within 8 years following single level ACCF surgery, the n-HA/PA66 cage may be better than TMC in anterior cervical construction for treating lower cervical fractures and dislocations.

Keywords

anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion / lower cervical spine fracture and dislocation / nano-hydroxyapatite/Polyamide66 cage / titanium mesh cage

References

[1] L. M. Ngo, T. Aizawa, T. Hoshikawa, et al., “Fracture and Contralateral Dislocation of the Twin Facet Joints of the Lower Cervical Spine,” European Spine Journal 21, no. 2 (2012): 282-288.

[2] A. F. Douglas and P. R. Cooper, “Cervical Corpectomy and Strut Grafting,” Neurosurgery 60, no. 1 S1 (2007): S137-S142.

[3] K. Yamauchi, K. Fushimi, K. Miyamoto, A. Hioki, K. Shimizu, and H. Akiyama, “Sagittal Alignment of a Strut Graft Affects Graft Subsidence and Clinical Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion,” Asian Spine Journal 11, no. 5 (2017): 739-747.

[4] C. N. Kang, J. L. Cho, S. P. Suh, Y. H. Choi, J. S. Kang, and Y. S. Kim, “Anterior Operation for Unstable Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Burst Fractures: Tricortical Autogenous Iliac Bone Versus Titanium Mesh Cage,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques 26, no. 7 (2013): E265-E271.

[5] P. C. McAfee, “Interbody Fusion Cages in Reconstructive Operations on the Spine,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 81, no. 6 (1999): 859-880.

[6] Q. Li, Q. Gao, L. Wang, L. Liu, H. Yang, and Y. Song, “Comparison of Long-Term Follow-Up of n-HA PA66 Cage and PEEK Cage of Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multi-Level Degenerative Lumbar Diseases: A Stepwise Propensity Score Matching Analysis,” Orthopaedic Surgery 16, no. 1 (2024): 17-28.

[7] K. D. Riew and J. M. Rhee, “The Use of Titanium Mesh Cages in the Cervical Spine,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 394 (2002): 47-54.

[8] M. Kanayama, T. Hashimoto, K. Shigenobu, F. Oha, T. Ishida, and S. Yamane, “Pitfalls of Anterior Cervical Fusion Using Titanium Mesh and Local Autograft,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques 16, no. 6 (2003): 513-518.

[9] D. T. Cawley, A. Alzakri, T. Fujishiro, et al., “Carbon-Fibre Cage Reconstruction in Anterior Cervical Corpectomy for Multilevel Cervical Spondylosis: Mid-Term Outcomes,” Journal of Spine Surgery 5, no. 2 (2019): 251-258.

[10] Z. Li, W. Wu, R. Chen, Y. Huang, X. Chen, and J. Lin, “Could Allograft Bones Combined With Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone Cages or Titanium Mesh Cages be an Alternative Grafting Method in the Management of Cervical Spinal Tuberculosis,” World Neurosurgery 128 (2019): e653-e659.

[11] H. Xu, W. Ke, D. Zhang, J. Miao, B. Wang, and C. Yang, “Biomechanical Effects of Different Prosthesis Types and Fixation Ranges in Multisegmental Total En Bloc Spondylectomy: A Finite Element Study,” Orthopaedic Surgery 16, no. 10 (2024): 2488-2498.

[12] W. Bonfield, M. D. Grynpas, A. E. Tully, J. Bowman, and J. Abram, “Hydroxyapatite Reinforced Polyethylene—A Mechanically Compatible Implant Material for Bone Replacement,” Biomaterials 2, no. 3 (1981): 185-186.

[13] Y. Zhang, X. Deng, D. Jiang, et al., “Long-Term Results of Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion With Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide 66 Strut for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy,” Scientific Reports 6 (2016): 26751.

[14] B. Hu, L. Wang, Y. Song, X. Yang, L. Liu, and C. Zhou, “Long-Term Outcomes of the Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide-66 Cage Versus the Titanium Mesh Cage for Anterior Reconstruction of Thoracic and Lumbar Corpectomy: A Retrospective Study With at Least 7 Years of Follow-Up,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 18, no. 1 (2023): 482.

[15] Z. Zeng, C. Zhu, Z. Deng, L. Liu, and Y. Song, “A Novel Nanohydroxyapatite/Polyamide-66 Cage for Reducing the Subsidence Rate After Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Comparative Study of 7-Year Follow-Up,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 18, no. 1 (2023): 54.

[16] X. Yang, Q. Chen, L. Liu, et al., “Comparison of Anterior Cervical Fusion by Titanium Mesh Cage Versus Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide Cage Following Single-Level Corpectomy,” International Orthopaedics 37, no. 12 (2013): 2421-2427.

[17] J. W. Brantigan and A. D. Steffee, “A Carbon Fiber Implant to Aid Interbody Lumbar Fusion. Two-Year Clinical Results in the First 26 Patients,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18, no. 14 (1993): 2106-2107, https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199310001-00030.

[18] W. Gao, B. Wang, D. Hao, et al., “Surgical Treatment of Lower Cervical Fracture-Dislocation With Spinal Cord Injuries by Anterior Approach: 5- to 15-Year Follow-Up,” World Neurosurgery 115 (2018): e137-e145.

[19] Y. Tang, H. Li, S. Zhang, et al., “Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion Combined With Lateral Mass Screw and With Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation Surgery Under O-Arm Navigation for Single-Stage Management of Severe Lower Cervical Fracture Dislocation,” Orthopaedic Surgery 15, no. 10 (2023): 2647-2655.

[20] C. Ren, R. Qin, P. Wang, and P. Wang, “Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Approaches for Treatment of Traumatic Cervical Dislocation Combined With Spinal Cord Injury: Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up,” Scientific Reports 10, no. 1 (2020): 10346.

[21] J. S. Silber, D. G. Anderson, S. D. Daffner, et al., “Donor Site Morbidity After Anterior Iliac Crest Bone Harvest for Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28, no. 2 (2003): 134-139.

[22] X. H. Li, Y. M. Song, and H. Duan, “Reconstruction of Segmental Stability of Goat Cervical Spine With Poly (D, L-Lactic Acid) Cage,” Orthopaedic Surgery 7, no. 3 (2015): 266-272.

[23] T. A. Zdeblick and T. B. Ducker, “The Use of Freeze-Dried Allograft Bone for Anterior Cervical Fusions,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16, no. 7 (1991): 726-729.

[24] Q. Li, B. Hu, U. Masood, et al., “A Comparison of Corpectomy ACDF Hybrid Procedures With Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide 66 Cage and Titanium Mesh Cage for Multi-Level Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Stepwise Propensity Score Matching Analysis,” Orthopaedic Surgery 15, no. 11 (2023): 2830-2838.

[25] X. Wang, Y. Li, J. Wei, and K. de Groot, “Development of Biomimetic Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Poly(Hexamethylene Adipamide) Composites,” Biomaterials 23, no. 24 (2002): 4787-4791.

[26] X. Yang, Y. M. Song, L. M. Liu, C. L. Lü, Q. Q. Kong, and C. Q. Tu, “Anterior Decompression and Fusion With n-HA/PA66 Cage for the Treatment of Lower Cervical Fracture and Dislocation,” Zhongguo Gu Shang 27, no. 2 (2014): 92-96.

[27] B. Hu, L. Wang, Y. Song, et al., “A Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Nanohydroxyapatite/Polyamide-66 Cage and Titanium Mesh Cage in Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion: A Clinical Follow-Up Study of Least 8 Years,” Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 176 (2019): 25-29.

[28] Y. Fengbin, M. Jinhao, L. Xinyuan, W. Xinwei, C. Yu, and C. Deyu, “Evaluation of a New Type of Titanium Mesh Cage Versus the Traditional Titanium Mesh Cage for Single-Level, Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion,” European Spine Journal 22, no. 12 (2013): 2891-2896.

[29] Y. Zhang, Z. Quan, Z. Zhao, et al., “Evaluation of Anterior Cervical Reconstruction With Titanium Mesh Cages Versus Nano-Hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 Cages After 1- or 2-Level Corpectomy for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of 117 Patients,” PLoS One 9, no. 5 (2014): e96265.

[30] D. Yan, Z. Wang, S. Deng, J. Li, and C. Soo, “Anterior Corpectomy and Reconstruction With Titanium Mesh Cage and Dynamic Cervical Plate for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy in Elderly Osteoporosis Patients,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 131, no. 10 (2011): 1369-1374.

[31] H. Nakase, Y. S. Park, H. Kimura, T. Sakaki, and T. Morimoto, “Complications and Long-Term Follow-Up Results in Titanium Mesh Cage Reconstruction After Cervical Corpectomy,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques 19, no. 5 (2006): 353-357.

[32] B. Hu, X. Yang, Y. Hu, et al., “The n-HA/PA66 Cage Versus the PEEK Cage in Anterior Cervical Fusion With Single-Level Discectomy During 7 Years of Follow-Up,” World Neurosurgery 123 (2019): e678-e684.

[33] J. B. Park, Y. S. Cho, and K. D. Riew, “Development of Adjacent-Level Ossification in Patients With an Anterior Cervical Plate,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 87, no. 3 (2005): 558-563.

[34] J. Goffin, J. van Loon, F. Van Calenbergh, and C. Plets, “Long-Term Results After Anterior Cervical Fusion and Osteosynthetic Stabilization for Fractures and/or Dislocations of the Cervical Spine,” Journal of Spinal Disorders 8, no. 6 (1995): 500-508, discussion 499.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.