Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Facet Joint Fusion Fixation Device With Conventional Pedicle Screw Fixation Device: A Finite Element Analysis

Abstract

Purpose: The biomechanics of a novel facet joint fusion device is unknown. The objective of this study is to analyze and compare the biomechanical properties of a novel facet joint fusion device integrated with oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) to those of a conventional pedicle screw fixation device, employing finite element analysis.

Methods: A comprehensive three-dimensional finite element model of the L3-S1 lumbar spine was developed and validated. Based on this model, three surgical groups were created: OLIF combined with the bilateral facet joint fusion fixation (BFJFF + OLIF), unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UPSF + OLIF), and bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPSF + OLIF), focusing on the L4-L5 level. A torque of 7.5 Nm was applied to simulate vertebral activities under six conditions: flexion, extension, lateral bending (left and right), and axial rotation (left and right). The maximum displacement at the L4-L5 segment was then calculated. The maximum stress values were recorded at the L4-L5 interbody fusion cage and the L3-L4 and L5-S1 segments.

Results: When compared to the other two models, the BFJFF + OLIF model exhibited the smallest maximum displacement value at the L4-L5 segment across all six working conditions. The BFJFF + OLIF model also demonstrated the lowest maximum stress value at the L4-L5 segment interbody fusion cage under flexion, as well as left and right lateral bending and axial rotation conditions when compared with the other models. However, under the extension condition at the L4-L5 interbody fusion cage, the BPSF + OLIF model showed the lowest maximum stress value. At the adjacent L3-L4 segments, the BFJFF + OLIF model registered the lowest maximum stress value during flexion and left lateral bending conditions. At L3-L4, under extension and right lateral bending conditions, the UPSF + OLIF model exhibited the lowest maximum stress value. Under left axial rotation at the L3-L4 segment, both the BFJFF + OLIF and UPSF+OLIF models demonstrated the smallest maximum stress values. Under right axial rotation at the L3-L4 segment, the BPSF + OLIF model recorded the smallest maximum stress value. Concurrently, at the L5-S1 segment, the BFJFF + OLIF model presented the lowest maximum stress value under conditions of flexion, as well as left and right lateral bending and axial rotation. In the L5-S1 segment during the extension condition, the UPSF+OLIF model exhibited the lowest maximum stress value.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the novel device, when combined with OLIF, achieves 360° lumbar fusion by fusing the lumbar facet joints, thereby enhancing spinal stability post-fusion. Concurrently, stress on adjacent segments was diminished. The findings suggest that this device may serve as a novel internal fixation method. It may provide a new option for the surgical treatment of patients with low back pain in the future.

Keywords

biomechanical study / facet joint / finite element analysis / lumbar spine / pedicle screw

References

[1] A. C. Gellhorn, J. N. Katz, and P. Suri, “Osteoarthritis of the Spine: The Facet Joints,” Nature Reviews Rheumatology 9, no. 4 (2013): 216-224.

[2] L. T and D. AM , “Spinal Osteoarthritis,” in StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing, 2023).

[3] B. Meng, J. Bunch, D. Burton, and J. Wang, “Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Recent Advances in Surgical Techniques and Bone Healing Strategies,” European Spine Journal 30, no. 1 (2021): 22-33.

[4] A. Y. Aleinik, S. G. Mlyavykh, and S. Qureshi, “Lumbar Spinal Fusion Using Lateral Oblique (Pre-Psoas) Approach (Review),” Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine 13, no. 5 (2021): 70-81.

[5] G. Fang, Y. Lin, J. Wu, et al., “Biomechanical Comparison of Stand-Alone and Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery—A Finite Element Analysis,” World Neurosurgery 141 (2020): e204-e212.

[6] X. Zhang, Y. Wang, W. Zhang, et al., “Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-Term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease,” Neurospine 20, no. 2 (2023): 536-549.

[7] L. Simon, F. Millot, X. Hoarau, R. Buttin, and R. Srour, “Comparison of the Biomechanical Effect of the FFX Device Compared With Other Lumbar Fusion Devices: A Finite Element Study,” International Journal of Spine Surgery 16, no. 5 (2022): 935-943.

[8] A. Welch-Phillips, D. Gibbons, D. P. Ahern, and J. S. Butler, “What Is Finite Element Analysis?,” Clinical Spine Surgery 33, no. 8 (2020): 323-324.

[9] Z. X. Liu, Z. W. Gao, C. Chen, et al., “Effects of Osteoporosis on the Biomechanics of Various Supplemental Fixations Co-Applied With Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF): A Finite Element Analysis,” BioMed Central Musculoskeletal Disorders 23, no. 1 (2022): 794.

[10] X. Y. Cai, H. M. Bian, C. Chen, X. L. Ma, and Q. Yang, “Biomechanical Study of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) Augmented With Different Types of Instrumentation: A Finite Element Analysis,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 17, no. 1 (2022): 269.

[11] X. Y. Cai, M. S. Sun, Y. P. Huang, et al., “Biomechanical Effect of L₄-L₅ Intervertebral Disc Degeneration on the Lower Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Study,” Orthopaedic Surgery 12, no. 3 (2020): 917-930.

[12] W. Fan and L. X. Guo, “Influence of Different Frequencies of Axial Cyclic Loading on Time-Domain Vibration Response of the Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Study,” Computers in Biology and Medicine 86 (2017): 75-81.

[13] H. W. Choi and Y. E. Kim, “Effect of Lumbar Fasciae on the Stability of the Lower Lumbar Spine,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 20, no. 13 (2017): 1431-1437.

[14] G. R. Srinivas, M. N. Kumar, and A. Deb, “Adjacent Disc Stress Following Floating Lumbar Spine Fusion: A Finite Element Study,” Asian Spine Journal 11, no. 4 (2017): 538-547.

[15] L. Kalichman, L. Li, D. H. Kim, et al., “Facet Joint Osteoarthritis and Low Back Pain in the Community-Based Population,” Spine 33, no. 23 (2008): 2560-2565.

[16] M. Dreischarf, T. Zander, A. Shirazi-Adl, et al., “Comparison of Eight Published Static Finite Element Models of the Intact Lumbar Spine: Predictive Power of Models Improves When Combined Together,” Journal of Biomechanics 47, no. 8 (2014): 1757-1766.

[17] A. Rohlmann, T. Zander, M. Rao, and G. Bergmann, “Realistic Loading Conditions for Upper Body Bending,” Journal of Biomechanics 42, no. 7 (2009): 884-890.

[18] M. Yang, G. Sun, S. Guo, et al., “The Biomechanical Study of Extraforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Three-Dimensional Finite-Element Analysis,” Journal of Healthcare Engineering 2017 (2017): 9365068.

[19] S. Vadapalli, K. Sairyo, V. K. Goel, et al., “Biomechanical Rationale for Using Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Spacers for Lumbar Interbody Fusion-A Finite Element Study,” Spine 31, no. 26 (2006): E992-E998.

[20] C. C. Pan, C. H. Lee, K. H. Chen, Y. C. Yen, and K. C. Su, “Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Unilateral, Bilateral, and Lateral Pedicle Screw Implantation in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Study,” Bioengineering (Basel) 10, no. 11 (2023): 1238.

[21] R. K. Eastlack, P. D. Nunley, K. A. Poelstra, et al., “Finite Element Analysis Comparing a PEEK Posterior Fixation Device Versus Pedicle Screws for Lumbar Fusion,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 18, no. 1 (2023): 855.

[22] M. Song, K. Sun, Z. Li, et al., “Stress Distribution of Different Lumbar Posterior Pedicle Screw Insertion Techniques: A Combination Study of Finite Element Analysis and Biomechanical Test,” Scientific Reports 11, no. 1 (2021): 12968.

[23] A. Goel, A. Shah, M. Jadhav, and S. Nama, “Distraction of Facets With Intraarticular Spacers as Treatment for Lumbar Canal Stenosis: Report on a Preliminary Experience With 21 Cases,” Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine 19, no. 6 (2013): 672-677.

[24] A. Goel, “Facet Distraction Spacers for Treatment of Degenerative Disease of the Spine: Rationale and an Alternative Hypothesis of Spinal Degeneration,” Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine 1, no. 2 (2010): 65-66.

[25] S. R. Satoskar, A. A. Goel, P. H. Mehta, and A. Goel, “Quantitative Morphometric Analysis of the Lumbar Vertebral Facets and Evaluation of Feasibility of Lumbar Spinal Nerve Root and Spinal Canal Decompression Using the Goel Intraarticular Facetal Spacer Distraction Technique: A Lumbar/Cervical Facet Comparison,” Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine 5, no. 4 (2014): 157-162.

[26] R. Srour, Y. Gdoura, M. Delaitre, et al., “Facet Arthrodesis With the FFX Device: One-Year Results From a Prospective Multicenter Study,” International Journal of Spine Surgery 14, no. 6 (2020): 996-1002.

[27] R. Srour, “Comparison of Operative Time and Blood Loss With the FFX® Device Versus Pedicle Screw Fixation During Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study,” Cureus 14, no. 3 (2022): e22931.

[28] F. Zairi, T. P. Sunna, H. J. Westwick, et al., “Mini-Open Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) Approach for Multi-Level Discectomy and Fusion Involving L5-S1: Preliminary Experience,” Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research 103, no. 2 (2017): 295-299.

[29] C. Silvestre, J. M. Mac-Thiong, R. Hilmi, and P. Roussouly, “Complications and Morbidities of Mini-Open Anterior Retroperitoneal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in 179 Patients,” Asian Spine Journal 6, no. 2 (2012): 89-97.

[30] H. M. Mayer, “A New Microsurgical Technique for Minimally Invasive Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion,” Spine 22, no. 6 (1997): 691-700.

[31] D. Sun, W. Liang, Y. Hai, P. Yin, B. Han, and J. Yang, “OLIF Versus ALIF: Which Is the Better Surgical Approach for Degenerative Lumbar Disease? A Systematic Review,” European Spine Journal 32, no. 2 (2023): 689-699.

[32] W. He, D. He, Y. Sun, et al., “Standalone Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion vs. Combined With Percutaneous Pedicle Screw in Spondylolisthesis,” BioMed Central Musculoskeletal Disorders 21, no. 1 (2020): 184.

[33] S. S. Virk, S. Niedermeier, E. Yu, and S. N. Khan, “Adjacent Segment Disease,” Orthopedics 37, no. 8 (2014): 547-555.

[34] K. Hashimoto, T. Aizawa, H. Kanno, and E. Itoi, “Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Fusion Spinal Surgery—A Systematic Review,” International Orthopaedics 43, no. 4 (2019): 987-993.

[35] T. Lund and T. R. Oxland, “Adjacent Level Disk Disease—Is It Really a Fusion Disease?,” Orthopedic Clinics of North America 42, no. 4 (2011): 529-viii.

[36] C. S. Lee, C. J. Hwang, S. W. Lee, et al., “Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar Fusion,” European Spine Journal 18, no. 11 (2009): 1637-1643.

[37] S. L. Weinhoffer, R. D. Guyer, M. Herbert, and S. L. Griffith, “Intradiscal Pressure Measurements Above an Instrumented Fusion. A Cadaveric Study,” Spine 20, no. 5 (1995): 526-531.

[38] B. W. Cunningham, Y. Kotani, P. S. McNulty, A. Cappuccino, and P. C. McAfee, “The Effect of Spinal Destabilization and Instrumentation on Lumbar Intradiscal Pressure: An In Vitro Biomechanical Analysis,” Spine 22, no. 22 (1997): 2655-2663.

[39] M. Rana, J. K. Biswas, S. Roy, et al., “Measurement of Strain in the Rod for Lumbar Pedicle Screw Fixation: An Experimental and Finite Element Study,” Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express 6, no. 6 (2020): 065035, https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/abc607.

[40] M. Rana, S. Roy, P. Biswas, S. K. Biswas, and J. K. Biswas, “Design and Development of a Novel Expanding Flexible Rod Device (FRD) for Stability in the Lumbar Spine: A Finite-Element Study,” International Journal of Artificial Organs 43, no. 12 (2020): 803-810.

[41] H. Kim, D. H. Lim, H. J. Oh, K. Y. Lee, and S. J. Lee, “Effects of Nonlinearity in the Materials Used for the Semi-Rigid Pedicle Screw Systems on Biomechanical Behaviors of the Lumbar Spine After Surgery,” Biomedical Materials 6, no. 5 (2011): 055005.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.